Ryan Reynolds' next movie suffers major blow amid Blake Lively legal drama with Justin Baldoni
Ryan Reynolds ' upcoming movie has been delayed by a staggering seven months - amid his wife Blake Lively's legal drama with Justin Baldoni.
Animal Friends, an R-rated combination of live-action and animation starring Reynolds, was previously slated for release this autumn on October 10, 2025.
Now, however, the Warner Bros Pictures and Legendary Entertainment production has been postponed and will bow next year on May 1, 2026, according to Deadline.
The date change went public this Tuesday, but no reason was officially announced for the substantial alteration in scheduling.
May 1, 2026 was supposed to be the release date of the upcoming Marvel film Avengers: Doomsday, but that picture has now been bumped to December 18, 2026, potentially leaving an opening for Animal Friends at the start of May.
Reynolds is at the top of a glittering cast including Aubrey Plaza, Jason Momoa, Addison Rae, Vince Vaughn, Eric André, Dan Levy and Rob Delaney.
October 10, 2025 - the previously listed release date for Animal Friends - was already a chockablock weekend, including the debuts of Jennifer Lopez' Kiss Of The Spider Woman, Channing Tatum's Roofman and the sci-fi-tentpole Tron: Ares.
The news comes after Lively sensationally dropped her claim that Baldoni intentionally caused her emotional distress, after his legal team demanded to see medical proof.
A new court filing, exclusively obtained by DailyMail.com, shows the embattled actress has also withdrawn a second claim of negligent infliction of emotional distress and try to avoid having to share her health records with the 41-year-old's legal team.
But there was a sting in the tale for Baldoni – who now has two fewer claims to defend himself from – after the actress demanded to drop the claims without prejudice, meaning they could be refiled.
The attempt has prompted a new round of legal letters, with Baldoni's team angrily insisting the mom-of-four is trying 'to have it both ways' and demanding that she comply with their 'reasonable' request to see her medical documents.
An insider told DailyMail.com that Lively's lawyers had hoped to quietly ditch the emotional distress elements of the lawsuit to dodge having her records scrutinized.
Lively had claimed that the emotional distress allegedly inflicted on her by Baldoni had 'severely impacted her physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing' – all of which could show up in her health records if true.
Lively's team has responded to DailyMail.com's request for comment: 'Once again this is a routine part of the litigation process that is being used as a press stunt. We are doing what trial lawyers do: preparing our case for trial by streamlining and focusing it; they are doing what they do: desperately seeking another tired round of tabloid coverage.
'Ms. Lively continues to allege emotional distress, as part of numerous other claims in her lawsuit, such as sexual harassment and retaliation, and massive additional compensatory damages on all of her claims.'
Although the actress has now dropped the emotional distress claims, Baldoni will still have to defend himself over her other claims which include sexual harassment and the orchestration of a smear campaign against her.
The 41-year-old is also pursuing a $400m countersuit of his own that also claims defamation and accuses the glamorous blonde of damaging his reputation and career.
The withdrawal is the latest twist in a tsunami of legal developments that in recent weeks has seen the warring pair battle it out over his attempt to subpoena her one-time bestie, Taylor Swift.
Swift, 36, was dragged into the saga in January due to a now-notorious claim by Baldoni that Lively referred to the megastar and husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, as 'my dragons' and threatened to unleash them upon him if he refused to go along with her changes to a scene.
According to a legal letter sent along with the subpoena, Lively allegedly threatened to leak a decade's worth of text messages if Swift failed to issue a statement in support of her.
Lively's team quickly hit back and denied the claims, and also demanded the subpoena be withdrawn – a request later granted by Judge Lewis Liman.
Subpoenas against Lively and Reynolds were upheld and the actress is facing a deposition, although that too is the subject of wrangling due to her reluctance to be grilled by Baldoni's lawyers.
The dropping of the emotional distress claims is yet another legal setback for the 37-year-old actress, who has been the subject of a deluge of negative headlines for months and has seen her friendship with Swift publicly deteriorate.
On top of that, some of her allegations have begun to look increasingly dubious including the claim that Baldoni had nuzzled her neck and told her 'you smell so good' during a dancing scene.
Although Lively claimed it had been filmed with microphones off, DailyMail.com obtained raw footage that showed the sound was on and that the conversation had instead been about the scent of Lively's fake tan.
She has also faced scrutiny over some of her team's legal maneuvers, among them a shell lawsuit filed in October that was used as the basis to subpoena publicist Stephanie Jones for a phone used by her former employee Jennifer Abel.
The messages on the phone between Abel and crisis PR Melissa Nathan were later used as the basis for Lively's claims of a smear campaign, although Baldoni's team hit back saying the texts were selectively edited and released the conversations in full.
Jones had hotly denied handing over the texts as a favor, arguing in court papers that she turned the device over only after receiving a subpoena last October.
But that led to the existence of a 'sham' lawsuit being revealed – a now-dropped case filed by Lively's company Vanzan against anonymous Does 1-10.
The revelation prompted a furious response from Baldoni's lawyer Bryan Freedman who described the Vanzan suit as a 'sham'.
'Ms. Lively's and Mr. Reynolds' company Vanzan had nothing to do with this case and they knew it,' Freedman said in a statement.
'This sham lawsuit was designed to obtain subpoena power without oversight or scrutiny, and in doing so denied my clients the ability to contest the propriety, nature, and scope of the subpoena.
'There is nothing normal about this. Officers of the court have a duty of candor to the court and an obligation not to file fictitious lawsuits that have no basis in fact or law.
'This was done in bad faith and constitutes a flagrant abuse of process.'
DailyMail.com has also revealed that Baldoni has added a powerful female litigator to his legal counsel who could make a 'meaningful difference' to his acrimonious battle with Lively, according to insiders – and she has an unlikely connection to Taylor Swift.
Ellyn S. Garofalo, who previously worked with Venable LLP – the law firm used by Swift – has joined Baldoni's side as part of the Wayfarer legal team in a move that has prompted fans to question the singer's involvement in the ongoing war.
The pop superstar, 35, was dragged into the feud between Lively, 37, and her It Ends With Us costar and director Baldoni, 41, in early May when she was officially subpoenaed as a witness.
A legal letter filed last month by his lawyers alleged that Lively had attempted to 'coerce' Swift to issue a public statement in support of her and urged her to delete text messages between them.
Lively's lawyers later filed a motion asking the court to strike the accusations from its docket as 'baseless, unnecessary, improper and abusive,' and Lively's motion to dismiss Baldoni's letter was granted.
But Baldoni's team withdrew the subpoena in late May after Venable LLP objected that it amounted to an 'unwarranted fishing expedition.' It was branded 'tabloid clickbait' by Swift's representative.
Garofalo, who worked at Venable LLP from 2018 until 2021, reportedly joined Baldoni's team 'after Venable was able to get the Taylor subpoena tossed.'
'For Ellyn to join the counsel is huge,' an insider exclusively told the Daily Mail.
According to her biography, Garofalo is a seasoned trial attorney with over three decades of courtroom experience.
Her focus is on 'civil, criminal, and regulatory matters, including SEC enforcement actions,' and she has previously worked on high-profile cases involving Anna Nicole Smith and Alyssa Milano.
'Baldoni's team is thrilled because of her track record in the courtroom,' the insider said of the Pepperdine Law School grad.
'She not only brings exceptional legal expertise but also fulfils their desire to include a prominent female litigator.'
News of her involvement comes days after an unnamed insider in Swift's inner circle allegedly provided documented evidence to Baldoni's lead attorney Bryan Freedman detailing how Lively's attorneys had 'threatened to leak' the actress's private exchanges with Swift, in a failed attempt to coerce the singer into publicly siding with her against Baldoni. The Daily Mail exclusively revealed that the 'leaker' was none other than Scott Swift - the singer's 73-year-old father.
'Garofalo was compelled to join the case after reviewing its circumstances, feeling strongly that an injustice was unfolding and that her participation could make a meaningful difference,' our source said.
The legal dispute began when Lively sued Baldoni for sexual harassment. Baldoni has countersued for defamation. Both parties have denied all the allegations against them. Their trial is scheduled for March 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Review Geek
20 minutes ago
- The Review Geek
Smoke Episodes 1-2 Preview: Release Date, Time & Where To Watch
Smoke Smoke is a gritty crime drama set in the rain-soaked forests of the Pacific Northwest. Taron Egerton plays Dave Gudsen, an arson investigator with a haunted past and a flair for storytelling. He's working on a novel, but it's the fires that won't leave him alone. Alongside him though is Michelle Calderone (Jurnee Smollett) who plays a sharp, no-nonsense detective and ex-Marine who doesn't tolerate ego or excuses. Together, they're pulled into a string of escalating fires that point to not just one—but two serial arsonists. As the pair dig deeper, personal baggage starts to surface. If you've been following this one, you may be curious to find out when the next episode is releasing. Well, wonder no more! Here is everything you need to know about Smoke Episodes 1-2, including its release date, time and where you can watch this. Where Can I Watch Smoke? Smoke is available to stream on AppleTV+. This is an exclusive original series, meaning this is the only place you're going to be able to watch this show. However, now that Apple is available as an extension on Amazon Prime Video, you can also get a subscription to AppleTV+ that way too! Smoke Episodes 1-2 Release Date Smoke episodes 1 and 2 will release together on Friday 27th June at approximately 12am (ET/PT) / 5am (GMT). Of course, it's really dependent on how quickly Apple upload new episodes. Expect this to be pretty close to the release time though. Smoke Episodes 1-2 are also available with subtitles from release, with the chapters scheduled to clock in at around 45 minutes long. How Many Episodes Will Smoke Have? Season 1 of Smoke is scheduled for 9 episodes, so we've got 7 more episodes to go after this one. Expect the story to continue developing, with plenty of drama still to come! Is There A Trailer For Smoke? There is indeed! You can find a trailer for Smoke Season 1 below: What do you hope to see as the series progresses? What's been your favorite moment of Smoke so far? Let us know in the comments below!
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal judge blocks Trump effort to keep Harvard from hosting foreign students
A federal judge on Friday granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration's efforts to keep Harvard University from hosting international students. The order from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs preserves the ability of Harvard to host foreign students while the case is decided. It marks another victory for the Ivy League school as it challenges multiple government sanctions amid a battle with the White House. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Mahmoud Khalil to be released from ICE custody
A pro-Palestinian Columbia university graduate is to be released from immigration custody. Mahmoud Khalil, 30, was detained by Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) and faces deportation from the US over allegations that he 'led activities aligned with Hamas'. The green card holder, who is married to an American, is a prominent figure in the pro-Palestinian movement which has seen scores of protests across America against the Israel-Gaza conflict. Donald Trump has called the protests antisemitic and vowed to deport foreign students who took part. Mr Khalil was the first to be arrested under the policy. On Friday Michael Farbiarz, a New Jersey district judge, ordered the Department for Homeland Security (DHS) to release him from custody at a jail for immigrants in rural Louisiana. Judge Farbiarz said the government had made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk or a danger to public. 'There is at least something to the underlying claim that there is an effort to use the immigration charge here to punish the petitioner,' the judge said, adding that punishing someone over a civil immigration matter is unconstitutional. Earlier this month, the same judge ruled that the government was violating Mr Khalil's free speech rights by detaining him under a law granting the US secretary of state power to seek deportation of non-citizens whose presence in the country was deemed adverse to US foreigneleas policy interests, although he was not red at the time.
