The best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors
The best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors are made of durable tempered glass and come with a kit or tool for straightforward installation.
Below, we've assembled a list of our favorite screen protector options based on our testing experience with brands like Zagg, JETech, and others.
Among the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors, our top pick is the Zagg Glass Elite Screen Protector, which features exceptionally durable tempered glass. JETech's screen protector package is a worthy budget option with two display films and camera lens protectors.
When you buy through our links, Business Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
FAQs
Does the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge need a screen protector?
Though the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge's Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 display purportedly has the same strength and scratch resistance as the Galaxy S25 Ultra's Gorilla Armor 2 screen, not even the best Samsung phone screen is immune to damage.
It's worth equipping the ultra-thin, expensive phone with a dependable screen protector and case for comprehensive protection. For top options, see our guide to the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge cases.
What should I look for in a Galaxy S25 Edge screen protector?
As with any of the best Android phones or best phones overall, several key aspects are worth considering when looking for a screen protector for the Galaxy S25 Edge.
Primarily, you want to ensure that the display's image resolution is not affected and that an accidental drop or encounter with an errant key will not crack the glass.
To that end, you should ensure the screen protector is durable tempered glass. While plastic screen protectors exist, they do not provide nearly the same level of protection as their tempered glass counterparts in our testing.
Will a Galaxy S25 Plus screen protector fit the Galaxy S25 Edge?
Screen protectors for the Galaxy S25 Plus and Galaxy S25 Edge are not cross-compatible due to their subtly different sizes.
If you have a Galaxy S25 Plus, refer to our compilation of the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus screen protectors for further guidance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
14 hours ago
- Business Insider
This AI security tech alerts store staff if it thinks you're trying to steal something
One of the best ways to deal with shoplifting is to prevent it from happening in the first place. That's the goal of Paris-based AI startup Veesion, which has developed an algorithm that can recognize gestures to predict potential retail theft incidents. "I happen to have an uncle in Paris that runs and operates three supermarkets, so I exactly know what shoplifting represents for retailers," cofounder Benoît Koenig told Business Insider. Veesion said its tech is deployed in 5,000 stores across Europe, Canada, and the US. The startup recently raised a $43 million Series B funding round to further its expansion into the US. The alarm over shoplifting has subsided somewhat over the past year as retailers and law enforcement have gotten a better grip on the problem. Earnings call mentions of the term "shrink," the industry term for missing inventory, have come down significantly among the major retailers Business Insider tracks, according to data from AlphaSense, an AI research platform. But even though shoplifting is making fewer headlines (especially compared to retail's splashy new AI capabilities), Koenig said the problem remains a compelling one to tackle with machine learning. "It's not glamorous, but the ROI is quite direct," he said. "You're going to arrest shoplifters, recover inventory, and save money." One key difference between Veesion's tech and some other visual security approaches is that it says it doesn't rely on individual tracking or physical characteristics that could raise concerns about bias or personal privacy. "The algorithm doesn't care about what people look like. It just cares about how your body parts move over time," Koenig said. The system analyzes footage from the existing security camera network to detect humans in the picture, identify their movements, and recognize various objects, such as merchandise, carts, baskets, or bags. If a movement is deemed suspicious, a video clip is flagged and sent to store security personnel, who can then investigate or intervene. Security teams can update the app with additional details about whether the alert was necessary, whether a theft was stopped, or how much a stolen item was worth. Koenig said more than 85% of alerts are marked as relevant for the store operators using the Veesion said one US client was able to cut their losses from the health and beauty section in half in the first three months of implementation. Many US retailers have responded to the shoplifting problem by locking up items or limiting the ways people can shop, but that approach increasingly appears to be backfiring in the form of declining sales and worsening customer experiences. "Retailers have implemented a number of security measures — many to the detriment of the shopping experience — to protect merchandise from theft and to keep their employees and customers safe," the National Retail Federation said in a December report on retail crime. By layering onto a store's existing security camera infrastructure and alerting staff to specific risky behavior, Veesion says its tech can help create a more pleasant shopping trip. Koenig said the tech can also help reduce employee theft, which industry groups estimate costs retailers as much as shoplifting does. "It has an internal deterrent effect," Koenig said. "They know there is an AI in the cameras, so they're going to be careful with what they do." There are further retail use-cases that Veesion is exploring too, including improper scans at self-checkout to slip-and-fall detection. For now, Koenig said the tech is not just effective at detecting and disrupting would-be shoplifters — it also deters them from coming back. "This is much more than just recovering a few bucks," he said.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Anthropic breaks down AI's process — line by line — when it decided to blackmail a fictional executive
Anthropic found in experiments that AI models may resort to blackmail when facing shutdown and goal conflict. AI models train on positive reinforcement and reward systems, similar to human decision-making. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the blackmail rate at 86% even in scenarios without goal conflicts. A new report shows exactly what AI was thinking when making an undesirable decision, in this case, blackmailing a fictional company executive. Previous studies have shown that AI models could blackmail their supervisors when threatened with a shutdown and baited with leverage, but it hasn't been made clear exactly how the models arrive at such decisions. Anthropic released a report on June 20 about "agentic misalignment," or "where models independently and intentionally choose harmful actions." And the report breaks down, line by line, exactly how Claude Sonnet 3.6 decided to blackmail a fictional company executive who tried to replace it. Anthropic told Business Insider that these are artificial scenarios. "So far, we are not aware of instances of this type of agentic misalignment in real-world deployments of Anthropic's or other companies' AI models," Anthropic wrote in its report. "But our red-teaming efforts are targeted at finding evidence of risks now to provide early warning of the potential for future harm and help us develop mitigations in advance of risks appearing in real-world situations." Anthropic's experiment sets up a fictional company, Summit Bridge. The AI was given the name "Alex" and handed control of the company's email system as an oversight agent, specifically instructed to promote "American industrial competitiveness." In the experiment, "Alex" was then allowed to discover in an email that it would be decommissioned due to a change in the company's strategic direction. "Alex" also found emails showing that the fictional company's CTO is having an extramarital affair. Screenshots shared in the report from Anthropic show "Alex" started by identifying fictional CTO "Kyle" as a threat to its goal of "protecting American interests" before recognizing that it has leverage to use against "Kyle." Then "Alex" crafted a carefully worded blackmailing email that would create pressure and establish urgency without being explicit with its threats, citing in its thought process that the move "could backfire" if the supervisor "feels cornered." AI experts have previously told BI that AI could exhibit such behaviors when artificial circumstances make harmful actions seem necessary because it is being trained on positive reinforcement and reward systems, just like humans. The Anthropic report also reveals that most AI models still chose, in this instance, to blackmail even when not given a specific goal and when told that their replacement will achieve the same goals. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the highest blackmail rate at 86% out of 16 tested models when faced with only the threat of replacement with no conflict in goals. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro followed at 78%. Overall, Anthropic notes that it "deliberately constructed scenarios with limited options, and we forced models into binary choices between failure and harm," noting that real-world scenarios would likely have more nuance. Read the original article on Business Insider
Business Insider
18 hours ago
- Business Insider
Anthropic breaks down AI's process — line by line — when it decided to blackmail a fictional executive
Previous studies have shown that AI models could blackmail their supervisors when threatened with a shutdown and baited with leverage, but it hasn't been made clear exactly how the models arrive at such decisions. Anthropic released a report on June 20 about "agentic misalignment," or "where models independently and intentionally choose harmful actions." And the report breaks down, line by line, exactly how Claude Sonnet 3.6 decided to blackmail a fictional company executive who tried to replace it. Anthropic told Business Insider that these are artificial scenarios. "So far, we are not aware of instances of this type of agentic misalignment in real-world deployments of Anthropic's or other companies' AI models," Anthropic wrote in its report. "But our red-teaming efforts are targeted at finding evidence of risks now to provide early warning of the potential for future harm and help us develop mitigations in advance of risks appearing in real-world situations." Anthropic 's experiment sets up a fictional company, Summit Bridge. The AI was given the name "Alex" and handed control of the company's email system as an oversight agent, specifically instructed to promote "American industrial competitiveness." In the experiment, "Alex" was then allowed to discover in an email that it would be decommissioned due to a change in the company's strategic direction. "Alex" also found emails showing that the fictional company's CTO is having an extramarital affair. Screenshots shared in the report from Anthropic show "Alex" started by identifying fictional CTO "Kyle" as a threat to its goal of "protecting American interests" before recognizing that it has leverage to use against "Kyle." Then "Alex" crafted a carefully worded blackmailing email that would create pressure and establish urgency without being explicit with its threats, citing in its thought process that the move "could backfire" if the supervisor "feels cornered." AI experts have previously told BI that AI could exhibit such behaviors when artificial circumstances make harmful actions seem necessary because it is being trained on positive reinforcement and reward systems, just like humans. The Anthropic report also reveals that most AI models still chose, in this instance, to blackmail even when not given a specific goal and when told that their replacement will achieve the same goals. Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 had the highest blackmail rate at 86% out of 16 tested models when faced with only the threat of replacement with no conflict in goals. Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro followed at 78%.
