logo
Relatives of El Chapo enter U.S. as part of ‘negotiation,' Mexico's security secretary says

Relatives of El Chapo enter U.S. as part of ‘negotiation,' Mexico's security secretary says

CTV News13-05-2025

Cartel boss Joaquin Guzman is escorted by Mexican security forces at a Navy hangar in Mexico City, Mexico, in January 2016. (Susana Gonzalez/Bloomberg/Getty Images/File via CNN Newsource)
Several family members of Mexican drug trafficker Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán have entered the United States as part of negotiations in a case against one of his sons, Mexico's Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch told the Mexican network Radio Fórmula on Tuesday.
El Chapo's son Ovidio Guzmán López is facing drug trafficking charges in the US over his alleged role in the Sinaloa Cartel, which his father co-founded. Ovidio was extradited to the U.S. in September 2023, several months after Mexican authorities arrested him in a large-scale operation that resulted in at least 29 deaths.
Days after his extradition, he pleaded not guilty to the drug trafficking charges in a U.S. court. But last week, he reached an agreement to change his plea, according to a court document reviewed by CNN. The document did not specify details of the agreement.
'It's clear that with his family going to the United States, it's connected to this negotiation or plea deal opportunity provided by the (U.S.) Department of Justice itself,' García Harfuch told Radio Fórmula.
Several Mexican media outlets reported Tuesday that 17 of Ovidio's relatives had crossed the border into the United States. CNN has requested more information from the Mexican Ministry of Security and Citizen Protection, as well as the US Department of Justice.
García Harfuch added that the relatives who left the country were not wanted by Mexican authorities.
'Los Chapitos'
Ovidio is one of four sons of El Chapo who have been charged in the US with various crimes over their alleged roles in the Sinaloa Cartel.
Collectively known as 'Los Chapitos,' the brothers are thought to have been brought into the cartel as teenagers to learn the ins and outs of the organization, according to the think tank InSight Crime. Their roles became more prominent around the mid-2010s, roughly when their father was captured and extradited to the United States.
Another son of El Chapo, Joaquín Guzmán López, is also in U.S. custody. He was arrested in July 2024 when he flew into the United States on a private plane from Mexico alongside Ismael 'El Mayo' Zambada, a co-founder of the cartel who the brothers had been at odds with.
Joaquín had allegedly organized his arrest and that of El Mayo by luring him on the flight to examine a piece of land he thought was in Mexico, an official familiar with the operation had told CNN at the time. Instead, the plane landed in El Paso, Texas, where federal agents arrested them.
Mexico Secretary of Security Rosa Icela Rodriguez said in August that Joaquín had reached an agreement with his brother Ovidio 'so that they would go to the United States to surrender.'
However, an attorney for Ovidio told CNN that Rodriguez's claim was 'a complete and utter fabrication.' An attorney for El Mayo said he 'neither surrendered nor negotiated any terms with the US government' and described the flight to the US as a violent kidnapping.
Two other sons of El Chapo, Ivan Archivaldo and Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, are still at large. The US has accused them of leading large-scale drug trafficking operations for the cartel and has issued US$10 million bounties for information leading to each of their arrests.
Mexican forces had previously arrested Ovidio in a 2019 operation that ended in failure. Shortly after he was detained in October of that year, the cartel quickly mobilized dozens of gunmen to battle Mexican authorities and try to free him.
Ovidio was eventually released on the orders of then-President Andrés Manuel López Obrador to stop the violence. He then went into hiding until his second arrest and eventual extradition in 2023.
This is a developing story and will be updated.
Verónica Calderón and Michael Rios, CNN

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police seize cocaine, methamphetamine, a rifle and crossbow in South Dundas Township
Police seize cocaine, methamphetamine, a rifle and crossbow in South Dundas Township

CTV News

time29 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Police seize cocaine, methamphetamine, a rifle and crossbow in South Dundas Township

Ontario Provincial Police say officers seized cocaine, methamphetamine and weapons from a residence and property on Hanesville Road in South Dundas Township. (Ontario Provincial Police/release) Two people are facing charges after police seized 2.5-grams of suspected cocaine, over 50 codeine tablets and weapons in South Dundas Township. The Ontario Provincial Police launched an investigation in March into drug trafficking in the area. Police say officers executed a search warrant at a residence and a property on Hanesville Road on Thursday. 'Officers seized nearly 2.5-grams of suspected cocaine, more than nine grams of suspected crystal methamphetamine, more than 100 suspected methamphetamine (speed) tablets and over 50 codeine tablets,' the OPP said. 'Officers also seized a 22-calibre rifle, various types of ammunition, a crossbow and arrows, as well as items typically associated with drug trafficking.' A 37-year-old man is facing two counts of possession of a firearm or ammunition contrary to a prohibition order, and one count each of possession of a Schedule 1 substance for the purpose of trafficking and obstructing a peace officer. A 60-year-old man is charged with possession of a Schedule 1 substance for the purpose of trafficking and obstructing a peace officer. Police say the investigation continues, and additional arrests are anticipated.

Investigator and jurors speak out about Karen Read murder trial in aftermath of not guilty verdict
Investigator and jurors speak out about Karen Read murder trial in aftermath of not guilty verdict

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Investigator and jurors speak out about Karen Read murder trial in aftermath of not guilty verdict

Karen Read weeps as the final verdict of not guilty of second-degree murder is read in Norfolk Superior Court, Wednesday, June 18, 2025, in Dedham, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) Two jurors and the lead investigator in murder trial of Karen Read have come forward to comment about the case since a jury returned a not guilty verdict earlier this week. Read, 45, was charged with second-degree murder by authorities who said she intentionally hit Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her car after a night of drinking in the suburbs. The high-profile case culminated in a not guilty verdict on murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene charges Wednesday. The jury found Read guilty of operating a vehicle while under the influence. The trial has centred in part on lead investigator Michael Proctor, who defense attorneys described as biased against Read from the beginning. The State Police Trial Board found Proctor guilty of sending crude and defamatory text messages about Read while leading the investigation into her. He was fired and has drawn ire from Read supporters who believe he played a key role in a cover-up to frame her. Proctor told NBC's 'Dateline' that the idea he is corrupt and framed Read is a 'ridiculous' accusation. He specifically said an accusation that he cracked Read's taillight to make it look like she backed into O'Keefe is 'absolutely not' true. 'I laugh because it's such a ridiculous accusation,' Proctor told the program. 'There's not one piece of evidence or fact to support that because it did not happen.' The judge in the case announced via court papers Wednesday that the jurors' names would be sealed from public view due to safety concerns. But one of the jurors, who identified himself only as 'Jason' in an interview with TMZ, said he did not believe Read collided with O'Keefe. He also said he did not think investigators planted taillight pieces at the scene to frame Read. 'I don't really know if there was a cover-up or not. I know that's the big conspiracy about it but I don't really know. All I know is there was a lot of holes in their investigation,' the juror said. Another juror, Paula Prado, told local news stations her mind changed about the case over the course of the last three weeks. At first, she thought Read was guilty of manslaughter, but her opinion changed as the case progressed. 'As the weeks passed by, I just realized there was too many holes that we couldn't fill. And there's nothing that put her at the scene in our opinion, despite just dropping John O'Keefe off,' Prado told media. Massachusetts State Police said in a statement that it extends its 'sincerest condolences to the loved ones of Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe.' The statement said the the events of the last three years have 'challenged' the department to reviews it actions and improve accountability and oversight. 'Under my direction as colonel, the state police has, and will continue to, improve in these regards. Our focus remains on delivering excellent police services that reflect the value of professionalism and maintain public trust,' Colonel Geoffrey Noble said in the statement. The jurors, state police and Proctor are not the first to speak out about the verdict. Some of the key witnesses in the trial released a joint statement Wednesday in which they called the not guilty ruling a 'devastating miscarriage of justice.' The joint statement was issued by several people including Brian Albert, who owned the home where the party took place, and Jennifer McCabe, Albert's sister-in-law, who was with Read and O'Keefe on the night of O'Keefe's death. Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey said only: 'The jury has spoken.' Patrick Whittle, The Associated Press

Ex-NFL player sues Chiefs for wrongful termination, racial discrimination
Ex-NFL player sues Chiefs for wrongful termination, racial discrimination

National Post

timean hour ago

  • National Post

Ex-NFL player sues Chiefs for wrongful termination, racial discrimination

A former NFL defensive back is suing the Kansas City Chiefs for wrongful termination from his job as director of player engagement after accusing the franchise of discriminating against him because he is Black. Article content Ramzee Robinson, who spent nine years with the Chiefs, filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on Sunday. Article content Article content In the lawsuit, Robinson claims that he was called into a meeting in February and accused of attacking a female co-worker, and that Chiefs refused to show him security video of the encounter. Robinson ultimately was fired from his position, which involved locker room management, mentorship and other responsibilities within the team. Article content Article content The lawsuit claims that Robinson was paid a salary of $125,000 US by the Chiefs, but that his research found other NFL teams paid comparable positions an average salary of $171,932, not including other benefits. It also claims that 'the Chiefs paid African-American business employees less than their white counterparts.' Article content Chiefs spokesman Brad Gee told The Associated Press on Wednesday that while he could not comment on pending legal matters, 'to be clear, the Chiefs do not tolerate discrimination of any kind.' Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store