Closed Kazakhstan test site misrepresented as 'Pakistan nuclear facility'
gear emerging from hillside tunnels have been shared in posts that falsely claim they show US officials inspecting Pakistan's Kirana Hills -- a vast rocky mountain range that The photos in fact show visitors to the now-closed Semipalatinsk nuclear test site in Kazakhstan.
"Members of the US Department of Energy were seen near Pakistan's Kirana Hills which were hit by India on May 9," reads the caption of images shared in May 13, 2025, alongside the hashtag "NuclearLeak".
The post's three images show people wearing face masks and protective gear emerging from tunnels that have been cut into the side of a hill and a structure built into the landscape.
They were shared after India and Pakistan agreed a ceasefire on May 10, bringing to a halt four days of deadly jet fighter, missile, drone and artillery attacks between the nuclear-armed neighbours (archived link).
The fighting was touched off by an attack on April 22 in the Indian-administered side of Kashmir that killed 26 tourists, mostly Hindu men, which Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denies any involvement and has called for an independent probe.
also speculated about whether the location had been targeted.
Image
Screenshot of the false X post, captured on June 10, 2025
Similar posts were shared elsewhere on
But India has denied that Pakistan's nuclear facilities were targeted during the countries' most recent conflict, with Air Marshal A.K. Bharti telling reporters they "have not hit Kirana Hills" (archived link).
Islamabad's foreign office separately dismissed media reports alleging Pakistani nuclear facilities were compromised during the conflict, leading to radiation leaks (archived link).
And, responding to a query from the Indian Express, the International Atomic Energy Agency refuted reports of a radiation leak from any nuclear facility in Pakistan (archived link).
Closed Kazakhstan test site
Reverse image searches on Google found the three images used in the false posts were in fact taken at the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site, where 456 nuclear tests were conducted over 42 years until Kazakhstan shut down the facility on August 29, 1991 (archived link).
The photo of people wearing face masks emerging from a tunnel was taken from an August 2012 blog titled, "Visit to the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site" (archived link).
According to the blog poster's biography, they work as a nuclear engineer and use the platform to share their nuclear-themed travel experiences.
Image
Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared image (left) and the photo posted in the August 2012 blog (right).
The image of people in protective gear walking out of a tunnel can be found in a press release issued by the Kazakhstan government in 2021 for a photo exhibition dedicated to the 30th anniversary of the closure of the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site (archived link).
Image
Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared image (left) and the photo used in the Kazakhstan government press release (right)
The final image of a structure built into the landscape was sourced from an ABC news article titled, "The Polygon: Former Soviet Union nuclear test site on Kazakh Steppe now open for tours" (archived link).
The image is captioned, "An underground bunker used to monitor Soviet era nuclear tests".
Image
Screenshot comparison of the falsely shared image (left) and the ABC news photo (right)
AFP has debunked other false claims related to the recent conflict between India and Pakistan here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Iran's Arak heavy water reactor damaged in Israeli strike, IAEA says
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said on Friday that an Israeli air strike at the Arak heavy water reactor in Iran also damaged key buildings there, "including the distillation unit." In a post on X, the IAEA said it had information that the reactor that had been hit was under construction and non-operational, and so contained no nuclear material. The agency said that at present it has no information to confirm where exactly the complex had been hit. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi is scheduled to address the UN Security Council later on Friday to update them on the situation regarding Iranian nuclear sites. Iran's nuclear programme sits at the heart of the current conflict with Israel, currently in its eighth day, with Israeli officials pledging to destroy what they see as an existential threat to their country. Iran was previously subject to an international nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which saw the country receive sanctions relief in exchange for strict limits on its nuclear activities. During his first term in office, President Donald Trump withdrew the US from the pact in 2018, slamming it as "the worst deal ever negotiated" and slapping new sanctions on Iran. Since then, the other signatories to the deal have scrambled to keep Iran in compliance, but Tehran considers the deal void and has continued with uranium enrichment, which at current levels sits at 60%. That's still technically below the weapons-grade levels of 90%, but still far above the 3.67% permitted under the JCPOA. Iran maintains that its nuclear programme is peaceful and purely for civilian purposes and that the reactor at Arak will only be used for research and development, medical and industrial isotope production. Israel, on the other hand, says Tehran is working towards the construction of a nuclear weapon, which could be used against Israel. Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron said European diplomats will make a "comprehensive, diplomatic and technical offer of negotiation" to Iran in Geneva on Friday as a key response to the "threat" represented by Iran's nuclear programme. 'No one can seriously believe that this threat can be met with (Israel's) current operations alone," Macron said. "Why? Because there are some plants that are highly protected and because today, no one knows exactly where the uranium is enriched to 60%. So we need to regain control on (Iran's nuclear) program through technical expertise and negotiation," he added. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot will coordinate with UK and German counterparts - known collectively as the E3 countries - in Geneva before they meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. "It's absolutely essential to prioritise a return to substantial negotiations, including nuclear negotiations to move towards zero (uranium) enrichment, ballistic negotiations to limit Iran's activities and capabilities and the financing of all terrorist groups and destabilisation of the region that Iran has been carrying out for several years," Macron insisted. Macron also reiterated his call for Israel's strikes on energy and civilian infrastructures and civilian populations in Iran to be stopped. "There's no justification for that," he said.
France 24
13 hours ago
- France 24
Japan-US-Philippines hold coast guard drills with eye on China
It is the second time the countries' coast guards have held training drills together, following their first joint maritime exercise in the Philippines in 2023. Friday's simulation of a collision, fire and person overboard, which AFP reporters will observe, cap a week of exercises off Japan's southwest coast that began Monday. Dozens of personnel are taking part in the drills that officials say are not targeted at any one nation -- while using language often employed by Washington and its allies to indirectly refer to China. Hiroaki Odachi, the regional head of Japan's coast guard, said the exercises aimed to contribute "to the realisation of a free and open" Asia-Pacific region. Tensions between China and other claimants to parts of the East and South China Seas have driven Japan to deepen ties with the Philippines and the United States in recent years. In 2024, the three countries issued a joint statement that included stronger language towards Beijing. "We express our serious concerns about the People's Republic of China's (PRC) dangerous and aggressive behavior in the South China Sea," it said, describing "dangerous and coercive use of Coast Guard and maritime militia vessels". They also expressed "strong opposition to any attempts by the PRC to unilaterally change the status quo by force or coercion in the East China Sea". 'Volatile flashpoint' China and the Philippines have engaged in months of confrontations in the contested South China Sea, which Beijing claims almost entirely, despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis. Chinese and Japanese patrol vessels in the East China Sea also routinely stage face-offs around disputed islands. Friday marks the 214th straight day that Chinese vessels have been spotted sailing near the Tokyo-administered disputed islets known as the Diaoyu in China and Senkaku in Japan, according to the Japan Coast Guard. The current record is 215 straight days in 2023-24. "Such persistent intrusion raises a risk of accidental collision or confrontation in the East China Sea," Daisuke Kawai, director of the University of Tokyo's economic security and policy innovation programme, told AFP. Meanwhile "the South China Sea is now regarded as one of the world's most volatile flashpoints, I would say, where any accident at sea could escalate into the border crisis." "A trilateral coast guard framework bolsters maritime domain awareness and law enforcement capacity, making it harder for any one nation, China, to pick off a smaller player in isolation," Kawai said. The three countries have also carried out joint military exercises to bolster regional cooperation. Last week Tokyo and Beijing traded barbs over close encounters between their military planes over the Pacific high seas. Japan says recent Chinese military activities in the Pacific -- where Beijing's two operating aircraft carriers were sighted simultaneously for the first time -- reveal its intent to improve operational capacity in remote areas.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
What is Iran's Fordow nuclear site and why is it so critical?
Fordow appears to be one of the primary targets of recent Israeli strikes on Iran – but what makes this nuclear facility so central to Israel's strategic concerns? On Saturday, Iranian state media reported explosions near the Fordow site. However, these reports remain unconfirmed, and no damage has been officially reported so far. Earlier in the week, US President Donald Trump stated that he had not yet decided whether to launch an attack on the underground facility, although military plans for such an operation were already in place. 'We have the capability to do it, but that doesn't mean we will,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I haven't made a decision,' he added. Fordow is Iran's second-largest nuclear facility after Natanz. Located near the holy city of Qom – around 95 kilometres south-west of Tehran – the site operates under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Constructed in secret from 2006, the existence of Fordow was only revealed in 2009, once it had become operational. Western powers, including the United States, strongly criticised Iran for failing to disclose the site during its construction. Fordow was specifically designed to endure air attacks. Buried roughly 80 metres underground beneath layers of soil and rock, it is considered resistant to conventional bunker-busting bombs. Given Israel's view of Iran's nuclear programme as an existential threat, facilities like Fordow and Natanz are considered top targets. Previously, the Fordow site served as a base for Iran's Revolutionary Guards and was protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems. However, these defences may have been neutralised in recent Israeli airstrikes. Experts believe that only the United States possesses bombs powerful enough to destroy Fordow's underground chambers – specifically, the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator, a 13,000-kilogram bunker-buster. The Israeli Defence Forces, meanwhile, are thought to possess GBU-28 bombs, which can penetrate up to six metres underground. Nonetheless, military analysts note that cyber warfare could be an alternative method for disabling the site. In 2010, the Stuxnet virus – allegedly developed in a joint US-Israeli operation – successfully destroyed thousands of Iranian centrifuges. Fordow was originally constructed for uranium enrichment. At its peak, the site is believed to have hosted 16 cascades and around 3,000 centrifuges. Iran initially enriched uranium to a 5% level but increased this to over 20% by 2011. Under the 2015 nuclear deal with major Western powers, Iran agreed to cease uranium enrichment at Fordow. But in 2019, President Hassan Rouhani reversed this commitment, announcing that uranium gas would once again be injected into centrifuges at the site – effectively reactivating it as a nuclear facility. The IAEA continues to monitor Iran's nuclear activities through surveillance systems and periodic inspections. During an unannounced inspection in January 2023 by the IAEA, sets of centrifuges at Fordow had been installed enabling the enrichment of uranium to 60% purity, contravening Tehran's safeguards agreement with the UN agency. 'Iran implemented a significant change to the declared design information for the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) without informing the agency in advance. This was contrary to Iran's obligations under its safeguards agreement,' IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said. Officials in Tehran have consistently claimed that the enriched uranium is intended for peaceful, primarily medical purposes. According to the IAEA, Fordow remains the primary site for Iran's uranium enriched to roughly 60 per cent—well above levels considered peaceful and edging closer to weapons-grade (90 per cent). The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Rwanda are set to sign a US-brokered peace deal in Washington next week, which aims to end the fighting in eastern DRC. A provisional agreement, announced by the two countries and the US State Department, covers issues including disarmament, the integration of non-state armed groups and the return of refugees and internally displaced people in eastern DRC. The deal is expected to be signed on 27 June. Eastern DRC has been plagued by conflict for decades, with armed groups competing for access to natural resources, including tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium. Congo has accused its neighbour Rwanda of backing one of the largest groups in the region, the M23 rebels. UN experts say the rebels are supported by about 4,000 troops from Rwanda, an accusation that Kigali has denied. The conflict escalated in January, when the M23 rebels advanced and seized the strategic DRC city of Goma, followed by the town of Bukavu in February. The draft agreement includes "provisions on respect for territorial integrity and a prohibition of hostilities; disengagement, disarmament, and conditional integration of non-state armed groups". It also includes a commitment to respecting territorial integrity and the conditional integration of non-state armed groups. The Trump administration has spoken of unlocking Western investment in eastern DRC, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has previously described the possibility of peace as a "win-win for everyone involved". Congo and Rwanda are not formally at war and in the past had held peace talks that have largely stalled, including some hosted by Qatar. Angola stepped down in March from its role as a mediator after several attempts to resolve the fighting in eastern DRC. M23 is one of about 100 armed factions vying for control in the region. But unlike the others, it is mainly made up of ethnic Tutsis who failed to integrate into the DRC's army. The group says it is defending ethnic Tutsis and Congolese of Rwandan origin from discrimination, although critics say their Rwanda-backed campaign is a pretext for economic and political influence over eastern DRC. Rwanda's longtime President Paul Kagame accuses Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi of overlooking the concerns of the ethnic Tutsis and ignoring previous peace agreements. Earlier this week, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk said that the M23 rebels, DRC military and allied armed groups had all carried out human rights abuses, some of which could amount to war crimes.
