‘I came here for protection': John Magnier complains about ‘unfair' treatment in court
Billionaire businessman John Magnier has accused a barrister representing the Barne Estate owners of 'slaughtering' him and trying to take away his good name.
The bloodstock magnate addressed Martin Hayden on the third day of the hearing of his case alleging the property owners reneged on a deal, sealed with a handshake, to sell the 751-acre estate to him for €15 million.
Mr Magnier, his son John Paul Magnier and his daughter Katherine Wachman are suing Barne Estate owner Richard Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey), the holding company of the estate shares, over the purported sale they say occurred on August 22nd, 2023, at Mr Magnier's home in Coolmore.
They claim the Thomson-Moores backtracked on the agreement and accepted an offer from American-based businessman Maurice Regan for €22.25 million.
READ MORE
In the Commercial Court in Dublin on Thursday, Mr Magnier told Mr Hayden, senior counsel for the Thomson-Moores, he feels he was treated 'unfairly' in the witness box on Wednesday.
'I got a lot of praise at the start. You ended up taking my good name. I can't do business without my good name,' he said.
'They (the Thomson-Moores) wouldn't have done a deal with me without my good name. I came here for protection and not to be slaughtered'.
Mr Magnier said he is not a 'legal person' and left that to others. Every day he received an update on his bloodstock business, which covers 6,000 mares a year. He also gets a daily update on his businesses in the UK, which employ 18,000 people.
Mr Magnier went on to accuse Mr Hayden of repeatedly asking him the same questions. He is not a 'Pontius Pilate' washing his hands of the deal he had made with the Thomson-Moores. 'If I say something to you, it's the truth'.
Mr Justice Max Barrett interjected to say Mr Hayden is doing his job and, in the judge's opinion, 'had not strayed at all yesterday'.
Mr Hayden also said he is doing his job to the best of his ability and there are always two sides to every story.
The judge said Mr Magnier and Mr Hayden are 'decent and honorable gentlemen, let's leave it at that'.
In his evidence, Mr Magnier said only Mr Stokes had mentioned on the night of August 22nd, 2023, that the sale needed the approval of the trustees based in Jersey.
According to Mr Magnier, Mr Stokes said they needed to phone the trustees and Mr Thomson-Moore's sister Alex about the deal.
They adjourned to another room and, when they returned and shook hands, Mr Magnier believed the outside parties had given their approval.
Mr Magnier's case alleges Mr Thomson-Moore 'had the authority or expressly represented that he had the authority' when he agreed to sell the farm, Mr Hayden said.
Mr Magnier responded: 'I didn't say he had authority on the night. I assumed he had authority. It was his farm as far as he was concerned.'
Mr Hayden said all property deals are subject to contract, and Mr Magnier was not going to send €15 million via Revolut to the Thomson-Moores without paperwork.
Mr Hayden suggested Mr Magnier had entered into an exclusivity agreement with the Thomson-Moores for the land because he knew he did not have a binding legal contract for it.
Mr Magnier rejected this suggestion, saying he only entered into an exclusivity agreement because Mr Regan was attempting to interfere in the sales process.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
UN committee calls for greater Traveller representation in Irish politics
Low levels of political representation among Traveller and Roma women in Ireland have been criticised during a Government delegation's appearance before a United Nations committee. Ireland was examined on Friday by a UN committee on women's rights with regard to its compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Ireland last faced questioning by the Geneva-based CEDAW committee in 2017. The delegation also heard calls for guarantees to protect the human rights of sex workers, an assessment of the number of victims of child trafficking, and for complete restorative justice in relation to the mother and baby home redress scheme. The marginalisation of migrant, Traveller and Roma women dominated concerns voiced by the CEDAW committee, which consists of 23 human rights experts, with employment levels and political representation among topics raised. The implementation of education strategies addressing sexism and gender stereotyping was also discussed by the delegation. READ MORE Committee vice-chairperson Marianne Mikko said that Ireland had 'not produced meaningful representation' of minority women in politics. Ms Mikko highlighted Government failure 'to adopt legislative quotas which accelerate the participation of minority women in political and public life', as called on by the last committee in 2017. ' One Traveller woman in the senate is good but not sufficient,' she said. Speaking as a representative of the Department of Children, Disability and Equality , Lisa Hughes outlined some initiatives the State has taken to increase the inclusion of Traveller and Roma women in public life. Ms Hughes said: 'A specific action to promote the participation of Traveller and Roma women in political and community participation is included in the National Traveller and Roma Inclusion Strategy, published last year.' She added that a policy paper was discussed at the steering committee of the strategy when it met on May 21st last year 'to look at the Roma capacity to engage with policymaking'. In her opening statement, committee rapporteur Jelena Pia-Comella said the committee 'remains concerned at the lack of rights based investigations and reparations to the survivors of abuse' in mother and baby homes, Magdalene laundries, schools, residential institutions and survivors of the practice of symphysiotomy . Responding to concerns raised surrounding the scope of the mother and baby redress scheme, Carol Baxter, assistant secretary justice from the Department of Children, Disability and Equality said that payments given to date 'range in nature from €11,000-100,000, so they very much reflect the fact that people who were in Magdalene institutions often had very difficult experiences there'. Ms Baxter confirmed that the scheme is available to people living abroad 'and has always been', when asked. 'The State has been very conscious of the need for a proactive approach to make sure that the broadest number of women qualify,' said Ms Baxter, adding that it had commissioned senior counsel Mary O'Toole to look at cases where there was a dispute over the length of stay in the institutions. The committee were told that Ms O'Toole reviewed 231 cases and 'already has recommended additional payments', and in a majority of cases payments have been made. Her report has been finalised and will be published very shortly, Ms Baxter said.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
NCAD could not ‘wipe slate clean' after student with Down syndrome failed exam, WRC hears
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has heard a third-level institution made 'every effort' to support a young artist with Down syndrome pursuing a degree – but that it could not 'wipe the slate clean' after she failed a crucial first-year module. The director of the National College of Art and Design (NCAD) gave evidence on Thursday that in the wake of a 'heated' meeting with the student's parents, the woman's mother, a journalist, told her 'they would make sure that my reputation was damaged'. Ellie Dunne (25) – who is said by her legal team to be the first student with Down syndrome to enrol on a degree programme at NCAD on Thomas Street in Dublin 8 – is pursuing a complaint under the Equal Status Act 2000 against the college. Her case is the college failed to provide her with reasonable accommodation during her first semester after starting in September 2023 and that disability discrimination continued when the college required her to re-sit a failed first-year module. The college's lawyers have denied discrimination 'in the strongest possible terms'. READ MORE At an earlier WRC hearing on Wednesday , the college's head of academic affairs, Dr Siún Hanrahan, said some 32 per cent of the college's approximately 1,400 students had self-declared additional needs of some description. She said the college offers a range of supports to these students. Some were 'tailored' packages on foot of a needs assessment while 'less tailored' support was available more broadly to those who had simply self-declared additional needs. Dr Hanrahan said there was a 'significant difference' between the requirements of the level-five art course completed by Ms Dunne at Stillorgan College of Further Education and the level-eight bachelor's degree at NCAD. Ms Dunne had access to assistive technology and an educational support worker who was available for two days a week, the tribunal heard. After Ms Dunne failed a module, the college made the support worker available for five days. . The witness said Ms Dunne's parents, Katy McGuinness and Feidhlim Dunne, took it as 'a very offensive thing that Ms Dunne had not successfully achieved the learning outcomes of the module'. Ellie Dunne, centre, with her parents Katy McGuinness and Felim Dunne at the WRC in Dublin. Photograph: Stephen Bourke '[Their] view was that the slate should be wiped clean,' she said. 'Under the [academic] regulations, that's just not possible.' . The tribunal heard the college proposed to allow Ms Dunne re-sit the assessment with access to workshops and without academic penalty, and to have it considered by an exam board the following autumn. Barrister Rosemary Mallon, for the respondent, instructed by Paul McDonald of AJP McDonald Solicitors, pointed out she asked Ms Dunne in cross-examination last year whether she 'knew about that offer'. Ms Mallon said Ms Dunne had indicated she did not know about it and would have liked to have availed of it. 'If Ellie didn't know, it was because she was not told by her parents?' Ms Mallon asked Dr Hanrahan. 'Yes,' Dr Hanrahan said. At a January 2024 meeting 'any suggestion of a repeat was met with a lot of opposition,' the college's director, Prof Sarah Glennie said, but mediation was agreed to by the family. Prof Glennie said that during a phone call two days later Ms McGuinness said 'they would make sure that my reputation was damaged' and that 'they would bury me in the process'. 'That was directly said, that they would 'bury you' in the process?' adjudicator Breiffni O'Neill asked. Prof Glennie confirmed this. In cross examination, counsel for the complainant Aisling Mulligan, appearing instructed by KOD Lyons, put it to the witness that Ms McGuinness had 'disputed' telling Prof Glennie she 'would be buried'. Prof Glennie said: 'That is my recollection.' When the disputed remark was first raised last year by Ms Mallon, Ms McGuinness said it was 'a phrase not familiar to me'. The case has been adjourned to October.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Former Ires activist Vision to lose one board nominee as it cuts stake below 3%
Ires Reit shareholder Vision Capital, which secured board seats for two nominees last year to resolve a standoff with the company, is on track to see one of those representatives step down after it reduced its holding in the business below 3 per cent. Toronto-based Vision, led by Jeff Olin, started a year-long campaign in April 2023 for a sale or break-up of Ireland's largest private apartments owner . It reached a truce 14 months ago that resulted in two candidates it put forward joining the Dublin-listed company's board. Vision owned about 5 per cent of the stock at the time. The two directors were one-time chief operating officer of Canada's CIBC Bank Richard Nesbitt and Amy Freedman, an investment banker turned corporate consultant. They were part of a unanimous board conclusion last August, following a strategic review, that a sale or break-up of the company would not be in investors' best interests. Vision subsequently cut its stake in Ires, which is led by chief executive Eddie Byrne . Last September, its shareholding fell below 4 per cent and it reduced its holding further on Tuesday to 2.96 per cent, according to stock exchange filings. READ MORE The standstill agreement between Ires and Vision last year provides that Ms Freedman would step down from the board if the investment firm's stake were to fall below 3 per cent. Shares in Ires, which has 3,734 residential units in Dublin, have rebounded almost 16 per cent so far this year to €1.05, driven by falling European Central Bank (ECB) interest rates which have boosted investor appetite for property stocks. Still, the stock has pulled back by about 5 per cent from highs reached earlier this month as investors digest the Government's planned reform of rent controls . A planned new nationwide control system – set to fully kick in from March 2026 – would see rent increases for tenancies capped in most cases by inflation or a maximum cap of 2 per cent. However, landlords would be able to reset rents at the going market rate when a tenant leaves. Smaller landlords with three or fewer units will have to offer rolling six-year tenancies, while large ones will not be able to evict a tenant who has complied with their obligations except in very limited circumstances. Rent control for new apartments constructed following enactment of the legislation would be linked to inflation without the 2 per cent cap. This, the Government said, should 'provide certainty, clarity and encourage investment'.
