Israel's attacks on Iran hint at a bigger goal: Regime change
Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran. The attack aimed to disrupt Iran's nuclear program. Israel targeted nuclear facilities, missile factories, and military figures. Benjamin Netanyahu appealed to the Iranian people. He hinted at regime change. Experts are skeptical about Israel's ability to eliminate Iran's nuclear program alone. The US administration has not indicated it seeks regime change.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
ENDING NUCLEAR PROGRAMME BEYOND REACH, FOR NOW
Israel's surprise attack on Iran had an obvious goal of sharply disrupting Tehran's nuclear programme and lengthening the time it would need to develop an atomic weapon.But the scale of the attacks, Israel's choice of targets, and its politicians' own words suggest another, longer-term objective: toppling the regime itself.The strikes early on Friday hit not just Iran's nuclear facilities and missile factories but also key figures in the country's military chain of command and its nuclear scientists, blows that appear aimed at diminishing Iran's credibility both at home and among its allies in the region - factors that could destabilize the Iranian leadership, experts said."One assumes that one of the reasons that Israel is doing that is that they're hoping to see regime change ," said Michael Singh of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and a former senior official under President George W. Bush."It would like to see the people of Iran rise up," he said, adding that the limited civilian casualties in the initial round of attacks also spoke to a broader aim.In a video address shortly after Israeli fighter jets began striking Iranian nuclear facilities and air defence systems, Israel's prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu , appealed to the Iranian people directly.Israel's actions against Iran's ally Hezbollah had led to a new government in Lebanon and the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, he said.The Iranian people had an opportunity too: "I believe that the day of your liberation is near. And when that happens, the great friendship between our two ancient peoples will flourish once again," said Netanyahu.But despite the damage inflicted by the unprecedented Israeli attack, decades of enmity toward Israel - not only among Iran's rulers but its majority-Shi'ite population - raises questions about the prospect for fomenting enough public support to oust an entrenched theocratic leadership in Tehran backed by loyal security forces.Singh cautioned that no one knows what conditions would be required for an opposition to coalesce in Iran.Friday's assault was the first phase of what Israel said would be a prolonged operation. Experts said they expected Israel would continue to go after key Iranian nuclear infrastructure to delay Tehran's march to a nuclear bomb - even if Israel on its own does not have the capability to eliminate Iran's nuclear program.Iran says its nuclear programme is for civilian purposes only. The U.N. nuclear watchdog concluded this week that it was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty.Israel's first salvoes targeted senior figures in Iran's military and scientific establishment, took out much of the country's air defence system and destroyed the above-ground enrichment plant at Iran's nuclear site."As a democratic country, the State of Israel believes that it is up to the people of a country to shape their national politics, and choose their government," the Israeli embassy in Washington told Reuters. "The future of Iran can only be determined by the Iranian people."Netanyahu has called for a change in Iran's government, including in September.U.S. President Donald Trump's administration, while acquiescing to Israel's strikes and helping its close ally fend off Iran's retaliatory missile barrage, has given no indication that it seeks regime change in Tehran.The White House and Iran's mission to the United Nations in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter.Israel has much further to go if it is to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, and military analysts have always said it might be impossible to totally disable the well-fortified sites dotted around Iran.The Israeli government has also cautioned that Iran's nuclear programme could not be entirely destroyed by means of a military campaign."There's no way to destroy a nuclear programme by military means," Israel's National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi told Israel's Channel 13 TV. The military campaign could, however, create conditions for a deal with the United States that would thwart the nuclear programme.Analysts also remain sceptical that Israel will have the munitions needed to obliterate Iran's nuclear project on its own."Israel probably cannot take out completely the nuclear project on its own without the American participation," Sima Shine, a former chief Mossad analyst and now a researcher at Israel's Institute for National Security Studies, told reporters on Friday.While setting back Tehran's nuclear programme would have value for Israel, the hope for regime change could explain why Israel went after so many senior military figures, potentially throwing the Iranian security establishment into confusion and chaos."These people were very vital, very knowledgeable, many years in their jobs, and they were a very important component of the stability of the regime, specifically the security stability of the regime," said Shine."In the ideal world, Israel would prefer to see a change of regime, no question about that," she said.But such a change would come with risk, said Jonathan Panikoff, a former U.S. deputy national intelligence officer for the Middle East who is now at the Atlantic Council.If Israel succeeds in removing Iran's leadership, there is no guarantee the successor that emerges would not be even more hardline in pursuit of conflict with Israel."For years, many in Israel have insisted that regime change in Iran would prompt a new and better day - that nothing could be worse than the current theocratic regime," Panikoff said. "But history tells us it can always be worse."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran's IRGC Claims 17th Drone & Missile Attack On Israel Targeted IDF Sites, Command Centres
/ Jun 20, 2025, 11:29PM IST Iran on Friday unleashed the 17th wave of ballistic missile strikes into Israel, pounding cities including Tel Aviv, Haifa and Beersheba. Sirens were sounded across Israel, forcing people to take refuge in shelters. The Iranian military said the 17th wave focused on hitting Israel's military industries and command centers.
India.com
38 minutes ago
- India.com
Hypersonic speeds, advanced techniques and...: How Iran destroyed Israel's famed air defenses Arrow, David's Sling and Iron Dome?
Israel's air defenses have significantly weakened since June 13. (File) Iran-Israel war: Iranian missiles have repeatedly penetrated Israel's multi-layered air defense systems– including the Iron Dome– causing widespread devastation across the Jewish state as the Iran-Israel war entered its eighth day on Friday. But how did Iran manage to breach the famed Israeli air defenses, which includes some of the world's most advanced and sophisticated anti-missile systems like Arrow 1, 2 and 3, the David's Sling, and of course the Iron Dome short-range interceptor? According to defense experts, Iran's elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) used a combination of methods to enable Iranian missiles to penetrate Israeli air defense systems. Saturation attacks to overwhelm Israeli air defenses When Iran launches a barrage of missiles at Israel, they are accompanied by swarms of low-cost attack drones like Shahed 136, which air primarily aimed to saturate or overwhelm the air defense as it has to engage numerous targets at once. Additionally, Iran does not fire all its aerial projectiles in one go, instead they are launched in waves, making the interception even more difficult for Israeli air defenses. This strategy allows a few advanced missiles to breach the defenses and strike their targets. Israel uses the Iron Dome for short-range interception, David's Sling for medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles, and the Arrow 2 and 3 to intercept more advanced aerial threats such as long-range hypersonic ballistic missiles. However, the country is running out of interceptors due to the sheer volume of projectiles launched by Iran, and may soon have to choose which threat to intercept and which to let through, according to reports. Variety of Iran's aerial projectiles Iranian attacks usually consist a mix of drone swarms flying slower and at lower altitudes, and the much faster ballistic missiles that have a higher flying trajectory, making it difficult for air defense systems to intercept a multitude of targets that have varying flight characteristics and attack trajectories. Additionally, some of Iran's missiles, such as the Haj Qassem and the Sejjil, are capable of reaching hypersonic speeds of above Mach 5, and follow a high-flight trajectory before rapid reentry into the atmosphere, leaving little for Israeli air defenses to engage and intercept the threat. Iran also launched its Fattah-1 hypersonic missile at Israel which reportedly travels at Mach 15 speeds, making it almost impossible for any air defense system to intercept. Maneuvering techniques and spoofing According to reports, Iran has also employed advanced spoofing methods and guidance techniques to guide their missiles, which allegedly Israeli air defenses, causing them to target each other's interceptor missiles instead of the incoming threat. While the IRGC has not disclosed the details of this purported 'spoofing' technique, experts believe that the Iranians have likely found a way to exploit the target acquisition and engagement logic of Israel's interceptors. Additionally, reports suggest that some advanced Iranian missiles employ employ maneuverable re-entry vehicles (MaRV) or release decoys, which makes tracking their trajectories almost impossible, and further complicates interception. Interceptions cost Israel $285 million per night As per defense experts, Israel is forced to spend around $285 million (approximately 1 billion shekels) to stop Iranian missile and drone attacks each night, with a single Arrow 3 interceptor missile costing a whopping $3 million. Israel will likely run out of interceptor missiles with less than two weeks time and will not be able to stop Iranian aerial threats if immediate military resupplies are not received from the United States (US), they say. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, Israel is running out of interceptors to intercept short-range missiles, and at the current rate, its ability to intercept and neutralize short-range ballistic missiles (SRMs) could last for around 10-12 days at best. Citing US officials, the report said that Israel may soon have to choose which missile to intercept and which one to let through if Iran continues its ballistic missile attack at the current pace. As per the report, Iran has fired more than 400 ballistic missiles towards Israel since June 13 after Israel sparked the ongoing Iran-Israel war when it conducted deadly airstrikes deep inside the Islamic Republic under Operation Rising Lion.
India.com
38 minutes ago
- India.com
If World War 3 breaks out, missiles will fall on these countries first due to..., safest countries will be...
If World War 3 breaks out, missiles will fall on these countries first due to…, safest countries will be … Currently, the world is going through a very tense phase, with the recent deadly conflict between Iran and Israel, which, if it further escalates, has the tendency to shake the entire global system. Both countries are openly threatening each other, and neither of them is ready to step back. Amid all this, people have started talking about the possibility of World War III. Israel has recently carried out several airstrikes on Iran and has made it clear that military action will continue until all the nuclear bases of Iran are destroyed. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that his government is not ready to back down. Meanwhile, Iran has also threatened to retaliate, which has made the situation seem to be getting worse. Meanwhile, the United States is openly supporting Israel. But if America decides to join the conflict supporting Tel Aviv, then this war will not be limited to any regional boundary. This is the reason why the fear of World War III is deepening across the world. Russia's Warning – The Third World War has started Russian Army's top general, Alaudinov, has said that the conflict between Israel and Iran can now be the beginning of the Third World War. He has alerted the army and given a message to 10 lakh soldiers to be ready for war. Notably, the statement has come at a time when there are already tensions between Russia and Western countries, due to the ongoing Ukraine war. China, on the other hand, is also keeping a close eye on the regional crisis. According to experts, if the situation escalates further and is not controlled, then China and North Korea can also jump in support of Russia and Iran. Where Can World War III Break Out? Looking at the current circumstances, it is believed that if World War III happens, it can start from Western Asia. America, Israel. European countries will be on one side, while Russia, China, North Korea and some Arab countries will be on the other side. According to experts, the war can start with an attack on strategic and nuclear bases. Iran and Israel will be at the center of this conflict. But soon US, Russia, and China may also join it. NATO can also join America's sidke in this conflict. These Countries Will Be Attacked First Countries like Israel, Iran, Ukraine, South Korea, Japan and Taiwan can be targeted due to their geographical location, military role and political alliances. These Countries Will Be The Safest? Amidst every war, some countries are considered relatively safe due to their neutrality and peaceful policies. As per experts, if World War III happens, then countries like Switzerland, New Zealand, Canada, Iceland, Sweden, Finland and Bhutan can remain safe.
