logo
Klarna CEO wants to turn the platform into a 'super app' with help from AI

Klarna CEO wants to turn the platform into a 'super app' with help from AI

CNBC3 days ago

Key Points
Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski wants to make the platform more of an all-encompassing financial "super app" that's personalized and can offer non-financial services.
"With AI, you can abstract and adopt the experience much more to the specific user you're dealing with," Siemiatkowski told CNBC in an interview this week.
On Wednesday, Klarna is set to announce the launch of mobile phone plans in the U.S. via a partnership with telecom services startup Gigs.
Klarna's CEO is so bullish about artificial intelligence that he sees it changing the way the fintech's 100 million users bank every day.
On Wednesday, Klarna — a pioneer of the popular "buy now, pay later" (BNPL) payment method — is announcing the launch of mobile phone plans in the U.S. via a partnership with telecom services startup Gigs. The move follows in the footsteps of rival fintechs Revolut and N26, which have launched similar offerings. Klarna's plans come with unlimited data, calls and texts and will cost $40 a month.
The new telco offering aligns with CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski's vision to make Klarna more of an all-encompassing personalized financial "super app" that can offer services outside the realms of traditional finance.
It isn't the company's first attempt. Previously, Klarna tried to make itself more akin to a "super app" — similar to Ant Group's Alipay and Tencent's WeChat Pay — offering additional services through multiple different buttons. This ended up being "confusing for the customer," however, Siemiatkowski told CNBC in an interview.
But the Klarna boss stressed the part AI can play as looks to diversify its services and become known for more than its BNPL offering.
"I think in this new AI world, there's a better opportunity to serve customers with different services and then adopt the kind of level of articulation and visualization of those services than there was historically," Siemiatkowski said.
"With AI, you can abstract and adopt the experience much more to the specific user you're dealing with," he added.
Super apps are popular in China and in other parts of Asia. They're meant to serve as a one-stop shop for all your mobile needs — for example, having taxi-hailing and food ordering in the same place as payment and messaging services.
However, while super apps have flourished in Asia, adoption in Western markets has nonetheless been slower due to a number of reasons.
'Tremendous opportunity'
Siemiatkowski says he's spending a lot of his time focusing on AI.
"There's a tremendous opportunity for that — but it's just getting it to work," he said. "Everyone who has used it knows it can spit out some exciting stuff but then you need to make sure that it works every time."
Going forward, Klarna's chief sees the platform becoming more of a "digital financial assistant" for users' every-day banking needs.
"If we have some information that suggests that you are overpaying for your carrier subscription or your data or whatever," Siemiatkowski says, Klarna will aim to use AI to "offer you both a suggestion of a better price model, but also with a click, implement that and make it a reality."
Acknowledging issues with Klarna's previous attempt to become a super app, Siemiatkowski says the technology just wasn't "mature" enough at the time.
"Ultimately, the north star for all financial products — especially the fintech companies — is to try and be the financial advisor in your pocket," Simon Taylor, Sardine.ai, told CNBC. "That private banker like experience but provided by a brand becomes the super-aggregator of your financial life, and that's what 'owning the customer' looks like in the age of AI."
Taylor added that, while many firms are still figuring out how to use AI, "you've got companies like Klarna building in public and trying to grab market share for a future that might not yet be built."
Klarna reported a $99 million loss for the quarter that ended in March, citing one-off costs relating to depreciation, share-based payments and restructuring.
Perception problem
Still, Klarna has a perception problem to overcome. In the U.S., the firm has become synonymous with the "buy now, pay later" (BNPL) payment method, which allows consumers to pay off orders over monthly installments — typically interest-free.
By contrast, European consumers recognize they can use Klarna to store their deposits and pay for things in one go as well as via a credit plan, according to Siemiatkowski.
He also expressed frustration with "the kind of memes that we get in in the U.S. when it's like, 'Oh, Klarna launched with DoorDash... it is a sign of the macroeconomic environment," referring to a tie-up the company announced with food delivery app DoorDash earlier this year that was met with backlash online.
Siemiakowski said this kind of reaction wouldn't happen in the German or Nordic markets, where Klarna operates more like online payment system PayPal.
He sees a future where Klarna works as a more all-encompassing financial ecosystem with add-on services such as features for investments in stocks and cryptocurrencies — which, he adds, is "not that far off."
"Offering people the ability to invest in both stock and crypto is is what's becoming a kind of more standard part of a neobank offering," he said, while stressing he doesn't want to compete with popular U.S. stock trading app Robinhood.
When will Klarna IPO?
Klarna paused plans to go public in April, after U.S. President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries.
Siemiatkowski said that Klarna has already achieved what it set out to do in order to be ready for that milestone — namely, building up a brand in the U.S.
"The U.S. is now our largest market by number of users. It's a profitable market for us," he said. "Those things have been accomplished."
Whether the company does or doesn't go public, the business strategy for Klarna remains the same.
"That is just a healthy way to drive liquidity for our shareholders, as well as give the company more ways to fund itself, if it would like to do so, and ... to show that this is a an established company," Siemiatkowski said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Easy returns cause big trouble for Amazon sellers, but return rates show signs of slowing
Easy returns cause big trouble for Amazon sellers, but return rates show signs of slowing

CNBC

time2 hours ago

  • CNBC

Easy returns cause big trouble for Amazon sellers, but return rates show signs of slowing

Returns on Amazon are free and easy for shoppers, but they're risky and expensive for the small businesses that sell a majority of the goods on the world's biggest e-commerce site. Returns have driven some sellers to exit the popular Fulfillment by Amazon program, while others told CNBC they'd like to leave the platform altogether. At the heart of the problem is a big rise in returns fraud, which has led to customers mistakenly receiving used products when they ordered something new. In two particularly egregious examples involving baby products described to CNBC, Amazon sent customers used diapers and a chiller with someone else's rotten breastmilk inside. "I really don't think that consumers understand how many small businesses are on Amazon and how their return habits affect small businesses and families like mine," said Rachelle Baron, owner of Beau and Belle Littles, which sells reusable swim diapers on Amazon. Baron said her business tanked after a return incident with Amazon. The e-commerce platform shipped soiled swim diapers to customers after the used baby products had been returned to Amazon, Baron said. "There was actually two diapers that were sent out that were poopy," she said. In 2024, nearly 14% of all U.S. retail returns were fraudulent, up from 5% in 2018, according to a report by the National Retail Federation. In total, the report found that returns cost retailers $890 billion in 2024. Amazon started charging sellers in its fulfillment program (FBA) a new fee in June 2024 for items that exceed certain return rate thresholds. Sellers who sign up for FBA rely on Amazon for logistics, including shipping, packing and returns. In September, a couple months after the fee went into effect, e-commerce group Helium 10 saw return rates for U.S. Amazon sellers drop nearly 5%. "It's forcing the seller to have higher quality listings and higher quality products," said Helium 10 General Manager Zoe Lu. Amazon has also started adding a warning label to some "frequently returned items," which could be contributing to the dip. However, the new fee may also be leading to rising prices. One survey by e-commerce analysis company SmartScout found that 65% of sellers said they raised prices in 2024 directly because of Amazon fee changes. Other sellers told CNBC returns fraud is the reason they've raised prices. In total, CNBC talked to seven Amazon sellers to find out how they're handling the rising cost of returns. "We're running at about just over 1% net profit on Amazon, totally due to fraud and return abuse," said Lorie Corlett, who sells Sterling Spectrum protective cases for hot wheels. She said her return rate is 4% on Amazon and only 1% on other marketplaces like Walmart. "It's really Amazon that's accountable at the end of the day. People would stop doing it if Amazon held them accountable." Amazon told CNBC it has no tolerance for fraudulent returns and that it takes action against some scammers. Those measures include denying refunds and requiring customer identity verification. Mike Jelliff sells professional music gear through his GeekStands brand on Amazon and eight other marketplaces. He said his return rate on Amazon is three times higher than the average he sees elsewhere. "On eBay, we're allowed to block specific customers out," Jelliff said. "But on Amazon, that customer is still allowed to repurchase from us." Jelliff showed CNBC the system of about 40 cameras he's installed in his Tyler, Texas, warehouse to track every outgoing item, incoming return and unboxing. He uses the images when filing appeals with Amazon, including when customers request refunds claiming they never receive an item. He keeps a blacklist of repeat offenders who commit this kind of fraud and those who return used and damaged items, which become a total loss for him. Amazon has made some improvements to its returns process, said Jelliff, who doesn't rely on FBA. This includes Amazon allowing small businesses to make multiple appeals when fighting a fraudulent return. Amazon has also let Jelliff opt-out of automatic return labels for items above $100 starting in 2023, and his return rate has been dropping since. Figuring out which returns are fraudulent and which are ready for re-sale is labor-intensive and item specific, experts said. That creates plenty of room for error. "Because it's such a large operation, things are missed," said Lu of Helium 10. "I think they're probably missed on the margins, but these stories are very impactful because it is such a reckoning for the brand." Ceres Chill founder Lisa Myers, who once relied on Amazon to handle returns for her business as part of FBA, has one of these stories. In 2023, Amazon sent one of Ceres Chill's products to a customer with someone else's rotten breastmilk inside, said Myers, adding that the customer wrote a review saying, "she will never forget that smell." "To have something, and I don't mean to be dramatic, but dangerous, somebody else's bodily fluids in your kitchen rotting in something that you had intended to use for your child is unacceptable," Myers said. "That's the moment I broke down crying and just sat down and thought, I have no idea how this could have happened." Myers said she left FBA after the incident, leaving behind benefits like having her products labeled with Amazon's Prime badge. "It hurts our business to not participate in Fulfilled by Amazon," Myers said. "It's just we're not willing to, we will never put profit over the safety and, frankly, mental health of our customers." Instead, Myers outsources all her returns to baby resell specialist Goodbuy Gear, which is on track to re-sell 200,000 returned baby products this year. Kristin Langenfeld started GoodBuy Gear when she was a new mom struggling to find a good quality, used jogging stroller. "We've spent the last nine years building out a database that has all of the products and the variations, the common issues, the recalls," Langenfeld said. "For some of these, there's 40 points that we inspect on the item itself, and it's really complicated." Langenfeld showed CNBC the process at her warehouse in Malvern, Pennsylvania, where each item is inspected for about 15 minutes and is typically handled by at least four employees. The resource intensive process is paying off. She says 33 new sellers signed up in 2024, three times more than the previous year. And with business growing 50% year-over-year, she's upgrading to a bigger warehouse in Columbus, Ohio. She was inspired to handle returns after visiting a major retailer's returns warehouse five years ago. "Taped on the floor were signs that said 'incinerate,' 'destroy,'" she said. Returns generated an estimated 29 million metric tons of carbon emissions in 2024, and 9.8 billion pounds of returns ended up in landfills, according to reverse logistics software provider Optoro. Amazon has faced criticism for destroying millions of pounds of unused products. In 2022, Amazon told CNBC it was "working towards a goal of zero product disposal," but wouldn't give a timeline for that ambition. Three years later, that goal is still in the works, with Amazon telling CNBC in a statement, "The vast majority of returns are resold as new or used, returned to selling partners, liquidated, or donated." In 2020, Amazon added two new options for sellers to re-home returns. "Grade and Resell" allows all U.S. FBA sellers to have Amazon rate the return and mark it as "used" before re-selling it. FBA Liquidation allows sellers to recoup some losses by offloading palettes of goods for re-sale on the secondary market through liquidation partners like Liquidity Services. There's also an FBA Donations program that's been around since 2019, allowing sellers to automatically offer eligible overstock and returns to charity groups through the non-profit Good360. Amazon told CNBC these seller programs give a second life to more than 300 million items a year. For shoppers wanting to keep returns from incineration or landfills, Amazon also has options. Amazon Resale has used and open-box goods, Amazon Renewed sells refurbished items and Amazon Outlet sells overstock. Daily deal site Woot!, bought by Amazon for $110 million in 2010, also sells scratched and dented items. Customers can also trade in certain electronics, like Amazon devices, phones and tablets, for Amazon gift cards or send them to the company's certified recycler. "I hope the change that we're able to make as a country is that we stop making crap," Langenfeld said. "We should make high quality products that are meant for resale."

Iran hasn't yet made the Strait of Hormuz central in its fight with Israel. Here's how that could change.
Iran hasn't yet made the Strait of Hormuz central in its fight with Israel. Here's how that could change.

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Iran hasn't yet made the Strait of Hormuz central in its fight with Israel. Here's how that could change.

Iranian threats to block energy shipments through the Straight of Hormuz and the fate of the nation's own oil and natural gas production efforts have been anxiously watched since the beginning of its conflict with Israel. So far, both fronts have been on the sidelines, with observers closely monitoring what changing war dynamics could signal about the ultimate economic consequences of this conflict. Oil futures have risen over 10% since the fighting started; the sense among analysts is that price pressures could ease if the war remains contained. But things could quickly go sideways — for oil markets and the global economy — if the coming weeks bring concrete signs of escalation around the Strait of Hormuz. "Should this key economic chokepoint be closed, that kind of disruption would send the price of oil toward $100 per barrel, or even above that," wrote Joe Brusuelas, the chief economist for RSM US, in a Friday note. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase have echoed these worries, calling a blocking of the Strait the "worst-case scenario" and suggesting the result could be to push inflation in the US to 5%. That's because this narrow waterway is where about 20% of the world's oil and seaborne natural gas shipments pass between oil-producing Gulf states — not just Iran, but Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and others — and the rest of the world. Iran has only made noise so far about closing the Strait, but at least one Iranian leader has reportedly said the US military getting involved could increase the odds. Ali Yazdikhah, an Iranian lawmaker, was quoted by the country's semi-official Mehr news agency as saying, "If the United States officially and operationally enters the war ... it is the legitimate right of Iran in view of pressuring the US and Western countries to disrupt their oil trade's ease of transit." Meanwhile, President Trump offered a move toward diplomacy in recent days, saying he will decide in the next two weeks about US action but also pushing back on notions he's taking threats of force off the table. As he told reporters recently, "I may do it, I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm going to do." Noam Raydan, who studies energy and maritime risks at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, notes that plenty of Iranian oil moves through the Hormuz passageway, so "there's no reason for Tehran at the moment to block the Strait unless it really wants to shoot itself in the foot." How that changes, she notes, is if Iran's oil infrastructure is severely damaged. "Iran will shut the Strait once it cannot export — this is my simple answer," Raydan said. But that scenario is a long way off for now, with Israel apparently focusing most of its attacks away from fossil fuel facilities. Indeed, oil disruptions in Iran have been minimal despite fears that followed one Israeli strike on an oil refinery in Tehran. This has left the world, including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, in a sort of wait-and-see mode. "We're watching like everybody else is," the central banker told reporters this past week, though Powell suggested an easing of economic pressure is likely unless tensions in the region spike to levels not seen in nearly 50 years. What also could emerge to rattle markets — though perhaps less dramatically — are other measures Iran has at its disposal. These range from terrorist attacks to the seizing of some commercial ships. Experts note that Iran has a variety of other means to disrupt the world economy if its military situation gets more desperate. Suzanne Maloney, the director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution, noted in a recent analysis that Iran could run out of existing countermeasures soon and that a further escalation may include things like small-scale terrorist attacks and cyberattacks in addition to threats to the Strait of Hormuz. But, she noted, these are options that "all entail risky tradeoffs, especially the prospect of precipitating US military intervention, which Tehran would prefer to avoid." The Washington Institute's Raydan offered another possible disruption to watch, noting that "Iran is known for seizing commercial ships in the region in retaliation to US actions ... so I'd say ship seizures are something to watch, and Iran has experience in that." Possible attacks on shipping were also brought up in a recent Capital Economics analysis that laid out the effects of four potential scenarios in the weeks ahead, ranging from a short conflict to regime change. Perhaps the most economic uncertainty could come with a scenario of "long-lasting conflict with no off-ramp," which, the group noted, could include regular attacks in the months ahead on shipping and energy transit from both Iran and its proxies. That's a scenario, they wrote, that "might result in a long-lasting higher oil price in the range of $130-$150 [per barrel], lift inflation in advanced economies by 2-2.5%-pts by end-2025 and would be a major risk-off event in markets." But the bottom line, the economists added, is that "we may not know the endgame for some time." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices

After Zuckerberg spent billions on an AI 'dream team,' he has to deliver for Meta shareholders
After Zuckerberg spent billions on an AI 'dream team,' he has to deliver for Meta shareholders

CNBC

time6 hours ago

  • CNBC

After Zuckerberg spent billions on an AI 'dream team,' he has to deliver for Meta shareholders

When Mark Zuckerberg feels the heat, he opens his wallet. The 41-year-old Facebook founder and Meta CEO is on a spending spree like never before in an effort to position his company at the forefront of the artificial intelligence boom and make up for recent costly mistakes in a market that's rapidly revolutionizing the business world. Following last week's stunning $14.3 billion investment in Scale AI, which brought with it Meta's hiring of the startup's founder, Alexandr Wang, and a small group of his top staffers, Meta now plans to hire former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman and his business partner, Daniel Gross, who had been CEO of $32 billion AI startup Safe Superintelligence, CNBC reported this week. Meta previously tried to buy Safe Superintelligence, which was launched a year ago by OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever, sources told CNBC. According to other sources, Meta had previously been in talks to buy Perplexity AI, which was valued at $14 billion in a funding round in May. The people who spoke to CNBC about the various dealmaking pursuits asked not to be named due to confidentiality. Zuckerberg told investors at the top of the most recent earnings call in April, "The major theme right now, of course, is how AI is transforming everything we do." At the same time, Meta upped its capital expenditures range for the year to between $64 billion and $72 billion from between $60 billion and $65 billion to reflect more data center investments in AI and potentially higher hardware costs. What Zuckerberg didn't say then is that he was about to start shelling out mounds of cash to revamp his AI organization. "Mark Zuckerberg is in founder mode and he's not going to be stopped," said Gil Luria, an analyst at D.A. Davidson, in an interview on Friday with CNBC's "Money Movers." Luria has a buy rating on the stock, but said that to win in AI, Meta needs to be successful with the next round, with the dream team that they're building." At Meta, AI is being embedded across the company, from its core online advertising unit and Instagram algorithms to its effort to build the metaverse. Better AI models and technology enhance the company's existing business, both by improving ad targeting and by bringing down costs. However, the building of fundamental models used by the vast community of developers — where the company competes with Google, OpenAI, Anthropic and others — is where Meta is viewed by many as a laggard. Meta's unique open-source approach is built around the Llama family of models. Its most recent update in April, the Llama 4 AI models, was not well received by developers. At the time, Meta only released two smaller versions of Llama 4 and said it would eventually release a bigger and more powerful "Behemoth" model. "On the heels of a successful rollout of Llama 3 a year ago, Llama 4 that came out this year was an absolute failure, almost by his admission," Luria said, referring to Zuckerberg. "Meta can't afford to fail in having the leading AI model. So they're out in the marketplace desperately trying to replace their AI team right now." Meta didn't respond to a request for comment for this story. Bringing on Scale AI's Wang was Zuckerberg's most headline-grabbing move yet. While Meta is gaining a 49% stake in the startup, Zuckerberg's real prize in the deal was hiring Wang, a dropout from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who started his company at age 19. Zuckerberg then turned his attention to Github's Friedman and Gross, who have been investing together at their venture firm NFDG. They will work on products under Wang, one source familiar with the matter told CNBC on Thursday. Meta, meanwhile, will get a stake in NFDG, according to multiple sources. A Meta spokesperson didn't comment on the planned hires and said the company "will share more about our superintelligence effort and the great people joining this team in the coming weeks." Not all of Zuckerberg's recruits are costing billions of dollars. Some are in the tens or hundreds of millions. That's according to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Altman said on the latest episode of the "Uncapped" podcast, which his brother hosts, that Meta has tried to lure OpenAI employees by offering signing bonuses as high as $100 million, with even larger annual compensation packages. "I've heard that Meta thinks of us as their biggest competitor," Altman said on the podcast. "Their current AI efforts have not worked as well as they have hoped and I respect being aggressive and continuing to try new things." Meta technology chief Andrew Bosworth told CNBC's "Closing Bell Overtime" on Friday that Altman is countering the offers. "The market is setting a rate here for a level of talent which is really incredible and kind of unprecedented in my 20-year career as a technology executive," said Bosworth, who joined Meta in 2006. Wall Street is mostly giving Zuckerberg the benefit of the doubt, for now. Meta shares were flat this week after slipping about 2% last week. Shares are still up 17% for the year, outpacing the Nasdaq and all the company's megacap peers. Analysts at Argus maintained their buy recommendation on the stock this week and lifted their price target to $790 a share from $725 a share. The stock closed on Friday at $682.35. "The company's ability to capitalize on GenAI advances in advertising targeting is a particularly relevant opportunity to drive advertising spending, which is the company's lifeblood," the Argus analysts wrote. D.A. Davidson's Luria said that Zuckerberg has put more pressure on himself to turn Meta into a long-term AI leader, but said he won't bet against him. Luria said: "The last time Mr. Zuckerberg felt like he was under the gun," he snapped up Instagram for $1 billion, a deal that set the stage for Facebook to become a dominant player in mobile. That was in 2012, just as Facebook was about to hit the public market. Luria also highlighted Zuckerberg's controversial $19 billion purchase of WhatsApp two years later. He sees the Meta CEO making an equally bold wager in AI. "He's going to rebuild the team and they're going to come back," Luria said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store