Goh Jin Hian judgment clarifies scope of directors' duties, notes observers as ruling says directors should be a ‘sentinel', not a ‘sleuth'

Goh Jin Hian judgment clarifies scope of directors' duties, notes observers as ruling says directors should be a 'sentinel', not a 'sleuth'
Source: Business Times
Article Date: 17 Jun 2025
Author: Ranamita Chakraborty
Observers say judgment offers practical guidance by narrowing the scope of when a director should be held liable for inaction.
Former Inter-Pacific Petroleum (IPP) non-executive director Goh Jin Hian's recent win in his appeal in the Appellate Division of the High Court has given 'welcome relief' to other company directors with its clarification of the scope of directors' duties.
The Appellate Division in a judgment on Jun 5 overturned a previous ruling requiring Goh to pay damages of US$156 million to the insolvent marine fuel supplier after IPP's liquidators had accused him of 'sleepwalking through his time as a director'.
'Welcome relief'
Adrian Chan, first vice-chair at the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID) and head of corporate at Lee & Lee, said the successful appeal was a 'welcome relief' as it clarifies the boundaries of a director's responsibilities and what qualifies as actionable 'red flags'.
The judgment, he added, offers practical guidance by narrowing the scope of when a director should be held liable for inaction.
Had the lower court's judgment stood, Chan believes directors could face liability even when unaware of fraud committed by peers or when financial reports show no warning signs.
Kelvin Law, associate professor of accounting at Nanyang Technological University's Nanyang Business School, said that the case demonstrated that correlation does not equal causation – a mere link is insufficient.
He said: 'This case is a powerful reminder that a link isn't enough as a plaintiff must prove that the director's specific failure was the direct cause of the financial loss. To obtain damages, (the) plaintiff has to show that there's a causal relationship between negligence and damage.'
Boey Swee Siang, partner at law firm RPC, pointed out that while Goh's failure to be aware of the cargo trading business constituted a breach of his duty of care, the court clarified that the 'red flags' identified by the company's liquidators were insufficient to trigger an inquiry into its financials.
In Goh's case, he was only required to satisfy himself within reasonable limits regarding the company's financial position.
'The non-executive director is not required to make exhaustive inquiries into individual transactions or events, so long as these transactions or events were not, on their face, of such a nature as would raise immediate concerns,' added Boey.
Yee Chia Hsing, an independent director at several Singapore Exchange-listed companies, agreed with the judgment, saying directors cannot be expected to be better than auditors and there is a right to presume no fraud unless clear warning signs exist.
'If (there is a) need to presume fraud, a lot of resources and effort would be wasted across the entire system as directors would need to be commissioning forensic investigations from auditors on a regular basis specifically to detect fraud,' he told BT.
The court ruled that although Goh breached his duty of care by failing to stay informed about IPP's cargo trading operations, this breach was not due to ignoring red flags within the company.
'Get their hands dirty'
Still, SID's Chan emphasised that directors, including non-executive ones, have a duty to guide and monitor management, going beyond mere compliance.
He said: 'They have to ask tough questions, roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty. Rather than playing the role of a mere sentinel, sleuth, investigator or watchdog... a director should more appropriately look upon himself or herself as an active steward – sometimes being called upon to play all these roles and more, as the circumstances and director duties demand it.'
The judgment's reference to '(a) director may be a sentinel, but he is not a forensics investigator or a sleuth' resonated with Chan, who stressed that directors cannot simply stand watch passively.
'There really is no such thing as a 'sleeping director' as a director's duty to act in the best interest of the company is an active one that doesn't ever go to sleep,' he added.
RPC's Boey believes this decision serves as a reminder to independent directors of listed companies that 'they do owe a duty of care to their companies, but also sets the standard of care to a reasonable one'.
Directors and officers liability insurance
Beyond training, Nanyang Business School's Prof Law highlighted the importance of having directors and officers liability insurance.
'It provides the financial resources to defend themselves – which, as this case shows, can be a long and expensive process even if they are ultimately successful,' he added.
Chan also advised directors to read 'the fine print, exclusions, coverage, territory, and ensure that the scope and size of the sum assured is appropriate for the size of the business'.
He pointed to several high-profile cases involving non-executive directors under investigation or charged for failing to disclose material, price-sensitive information – including Hyflux, Eagle Hospitality Trust, Raffles Education and Cordlife.
'The outcomes of these cases will bring further clarity to the role of directors on listed boards, and will help shape corporate governance in Singapore,' he added.
Source: The Business Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction.
Print

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Times

an hour ago

• Business Times

Four candidates assessed for Fu Yu's board, with no findings against suitability

[SINGAPORE] Four proposed directors for Fu Yu Corporation have been assessed by an independent party, with no findings made against their suitability for the role, said the company on Friday (Jun 20) evening. Fu Yu currently only has one director – chief executive David Seow – after all three of its independent directors resigned on Jun 15. The company has since appointed Asian Corporate Advisors (ACA) to assess four candidates proposed as independent directors: Gilbert L Rodrigues, Ralf Pilarczyk, Yang Zhenrong and Haytham Al Essa. In its bourse filing, Fu Yu said that 'nothing has come to (ACA's) attention that the proposed new independent directors may not be deemed suitable', and that its board 'sees no reason to disagree'. 'To the best of the current board's knowledge, the proposed new (directors) are not involved in matters relating to FYSCS,' the company added, in reference to its unit Fu Yu Supply Chain Solutions, which has been under investigation. The update comes ahead of Fu Yu's annual general meeting (AGM) on Jun 27. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up In an earlier filing on Friday, the company addressed questions from the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, as well as shareholders. Fu Yu said that its 'day-to-day operations and decision-making processes remain unaffected' by the resignation of all its previous independent directors – Royston Tan, Christopher Huang and Daniel Poh. It also addressed queries on its ongoing investigations into FYSCS – relating to Fu Yu's acquisition of the unit, purported misuse of the FYSCS' resources and a pre-paid commission. 'Currently, no fraud (in the legal sense) has been uncovered,' said Fu Yu, adding that there was no potential liability arising from the transactions in question, 'as well as FYSCS in general'. Asked by Sias if it would release findings by Rajah & Tann and PwC Risk Services ahead of the AGM, Fu Yu said that it would first conduct a 'full Maxwellisation process' relating to the people mentioned in the report, which could take between four to six weeks. Maxwellisation is a legal procedure in which those subject to potential criticism are given an opportunity to respond. 'The company (will) seek legal advice and will deliberate on its next steps after considering the information obtained through the Maxwellisation process, and will update shareholders thereafter,' said Fu Yu. In June last year, FYSCS also received a letter of demand for US$925,773.57 in compensation from another company, Evertree Hongkong. On Jun 5 this year, an arbitral tribunal ruled in favour of Evertree, with Fu Yu required to pay S$1.67 million. Asked about the matter, Fu Yu said that FYSCS had fulfilled its payment obligations on Jun 9 and is solvent. Fu Yu ended Friday at S$0.09, down 4.3 per cent.

Straits Times

3 hours ago

• Straits Times

Iran rules out nuclear talks under fire, sources say Qatar met energy majors

Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS DUBAI/JERUSALEM - Iran said on June 20 it would not discuss the future of its nuclear programme while under attack by Israel, as Europe tried to coax Tehran back into negotiations and the US considers whether to get involved in the conflict. A week into its campaign, Israel said it had struck dozens of military targets overnight, including missile production sites, a research body involved in nuclear weapons development in Tehran and military facilities in western and central Iran. Iran launched a new barrage of missiles at Israel early on June 20, striking near residential apartments, office buildings and industrial facilities in the southern city of Beersheba. After air raid warnings later that day, Israeli media said initial reports pointed to missile impacts in Tel Aviv, the Negev and Haifa. World oil markets are on high alert for any strikes that hit energy facilities in Iran or elsewhere in the Gulf which affect supplies. Qatar held crisis talks this week with energy majors after Israeli strikes on Iran's huge gas field, which it shares with Qatar, an industry source and a diplomat in the region told Reuters. Doha was asking firms to raise US, UK and European governments' awareness of increasing risks to global gas supply, they said. QatarEnergy did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The White House said on June 19 that President Donald Trump would decide on US involvement in the conflict in the next two weeks, citing the possibility of negotiations involving Iran in the near future. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said there was no room for negotiations with the US 'until Israeli aggression stops'. But he was due to meet European foreign ministers in Geneva for talks at which Europe hopes to establish a path back to diplomacy over Iran's nuclear programme. Two diplomats said before the meeting with France, Britain, Germany and the European Union's foreign policy chief that Mr Araqchi would be told the US is still open to direct talks. Expectations for a breakthrough are low, diplomats say. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran was ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment and that the European's role was now more prominent because Iran is unwilling to engage with the US while under fire from Israel. But any proposal for zero enrichment - not being able to enrich uranium at all - will be rejected 'especially now under Israel's strikes', the official said. Israel began attacking Iran on June 13, saying its longtime enemy was on the verge of developing nuclear weapons. Iran, which says its nuclear programme is only for peaceful purposes, retaliated with missile and drone strikes on Israel. Israel is widely assumed to possess nuclear weapons. It neither confirms nor denies this. Israeli air attacks have killed 639 people in Iran, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, a US-based human rights organisation that tracks Iran. The dead include the military's top echelon and nuclear scientists. In Israel, 24 civilians have been killed in Iranian missile attacks, according to authorities. Both sides say they are attacking military and defence-related targets. An Iranian news website said a drone had struck an apartment in a residential building in central Tehran on June 20, but did not give details. Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear installations so far pose only limited risks of contamination, experts say. But they warn that any attack on the nuclear power station at Bushehr could cause a nuclear disaster. Israel says it is determined to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities but that it wants to avoid any nuclear disaster in a region that is inhabited by tens of millions of people and produces much of the world's oil. The meeting in Geneva was due to start on the afternoon of June 20. The Swiss city is where an initial accord was struck in 2013 to curb Iran's nuclear programme in return for sanctions being lifted. A comprehensive deal followed in 2015. Mr Trump pulled the US out of the agreement in 2018. A new series of talks between Iran and the US collapsed when Israel started attacking Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic capabilities on June 12. Mr Trump has alternated between threatening Tehran and urging it to resume nuclear talks. His special envoy to the region, Steve Witkoff, has spoken to Mr Araqchi several times since last week, sources say. Western and regional officials say Israel is trying to shatter the government of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Katz said he had instructed the military to intensify attacks on 'symbols of the regime' in the Iranian capital Tehran, aiming to destabilise it. Iran has arrested an 'agent' of Israel's foreign spy agency Mossad who was sending information on Iranian air defence installations to Israel using WhatsApp messaging, Iran's state broadcaster said. Iranian opposition groups think their time may be near, but activists involved in previous protests say they are unwilling to unleash mass unrest with their nation under attack, and Iranian authorities have cracked down hard on dissent. Iranian state media reported rallies in several cities, describing them as rallies of 'rage and victory,' and 'solidarity and resistance.' REUTERS Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.

Business Times

4 hours ago

• Business Times

China's Baidu eyes robotaxi expansion to Singapore and Malaysia

[BEIJING] Baidu is planning to launch its Apollo Go robotaxi service in Singapore and Malaysia as early as this year, according to a person familiar with the matter, as the company continues to expand its global footprint. Apollo Go is in discussions with potential partners to explore the right business models for the two markets, said the person, who asked not to be identified discussing private matters. Baidu chief executive officer Robin Li has previously said the company was seeking partners such as mobility service providers, local taxi companies and third-party fleet operators for an asset-light approach. The development comes as Tesla prepares to launch its Cybercab robotaxi network within days, with Elon Musk staking the electric carmaker's future growth on autonomous driving technology. At the same time, Chinese robotaxi companies including Apollo Go, and US-listed Weride and Pony AI are expanding into international markets such as the Middle East, Europe and South-east Asia. Baidu didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Dow Jones Newswires reported the plans earlier. Apollo Go is fast scaling up. It has deployed than 1,000 self-driving vehicles worldwide, most of which are in China. It reached 11 million rides by the first quarter of this year, surpassing Alphabet's autonomous driving unit Waymo's 10 million paid rides as of May 23. The Baidu unit is also exploring entering Europe and Turkey, and was in talks with Swiss Post unit PostAuto to roll out a robotaxi service in Switzerland. BLOOMBERG