Gold and oil surge after US bombing of Iran, as funds seek haven amid higher energy costs
The prices of gold and oil increased as the world waited for Iran's response after the US joined the Israeli assault on the Islamic Republic over the weekend, risking a wider war that could push up energy prices.
Advertisement
The precious metal climbed as much as 0.8 per cent, before paring most of that gain, after the US struck Iran's three main nuclear sites. That spurred a flight to havens like the dollar and gold on Monday.
Oil prices jumped sharply on fears that Tehran could attack Middle Eastern energy infrastructure or threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. West Texas Intermediate, the US oil benchmark, rose about 2.5 per cent after surging as much as 4.6 per cent in opening trade. The US dollar climbed against the euro and most major peers, while US equity futures declined.
'The key theme will be volatility - the moves might not stick if, for example, [US President Donald] Trump decides the strikes are done,' said Nick Twidale, chief analyst at AT Global Markets. 'Trump has the bigger stick compared with Tehran, and as such his next move, be it a further escalation or heading back to the negotiating table, will matter more for markets.'
The dealing room of Hana Bank in Seoul on June 23, 2025. Photo: EPA-EFE
The escalation of hostilities has given fresh impetus to a rally that is pushed gold up almost 30 per cent so far this year. While the chances of an expanding conflict are supporting haven assets, a sustained rise in energy prices would spur inflation and make interest rate cuts less likely, a negative for bullion that doesn't offer any interest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Beijing tells China ships in Strait of Hormuz to phone home, flags ‘shipping safety'
Check in once a day so we know you're OK – that is the message China has sent to all domestic shipping vessels traversing the Strait of Hormuz, as Iran mulls closure of the key oil trade route following air strikes by the United States at the weekend. Effective immediately, all shipping companies and ship-management firms must submit daily reports with specific details from vessels transiting not only the Hormuz – a critically important shipping chokepoint – but also the Gulf of Oman and the Persian Gulf, which the strait connects. Monday's notice, posted online by the China Shipowners' Association (CSA), which operates under the Ministry of Transport, requires companies to report the vessel names, unique IMO numbers, type, flags, capacities, departure and destination ports, planned voyage times, crew sizes and daily movements through that region. And not just current or future ships – the CSA is also requiring that data be provided on past vessels that transited the region, since the beginning of last year. 'The ongoing tensions in the Red Sea have had widespread and profound impacts on shipping safety in surrounding waters,' the association said, noting that information collected in these key regions is crucial to ensuring national interests. 02:37 Iran threatens to shut Strait of Hormuz after US bombs key nuclear sites Iran threatens to shut Strait of Hormuz after US bombs key nuclear sites
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Can China build on eased trade tensions with US amid Trump's many distractions?
While the US-China talks in London earlier this month suggested Beijing had the negotiating edge over Washington's other major trading partners, observers warn that China may need to temper expectations of a restoration of senior-level exchanges. Advertisement US President Donald Trump's competing priorities – both domestically and internationally – could distract his administration from the pressing need to establish a lasting agreement on US-China trade relations, they said. But while the Trump administration remains in the early stages of formulating its China policy, Beijing should advance a leader-driven process to stabilise bilateral ties, laying the groundwork for a trade agreement ahead of a potential summit. Sourabh Gupta, a senior policy specialist with the Institute for China-America Studies in Washington, said the framework reached in London was 'a genuine de-escalation of trade tensions'. 'At least, that's how the two sides envision it,' he said, noting that the framework essentially marked a return to last month's Geneva agreement, with both parties having 'a vested interest in getting to 'yes' on a trade deal'. Advertisement According to Gupta, the outcome of the talks – alongside the first call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump since the latter started his second term – has placed China as a 'front-runner' in Washington's negotiations with major trading partners. While the London framework represents a temporary truce rather than a comprehensive deal, no other US trading partner has secured a comparable agreement, despite parallel negotiations with the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Canada, India and others.
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Have Trump's Iran strikes given China a strategic advantage?
The US' direct engagement in the Israel-Iran conflict over the weekend could intensify its drive to secure critical resources – particularly rare earth minerals – a development that could strengthen China's position in its ongoing geopolitical and economic rivalry with Washington, analysts said. A potential escalatory spiral in the Middle East could push forward trade negotiations between the world's two largest economies, said Xu Weijun, an assistant research fellow at South China University of Technology's Institute of Public Policy. 'An intensifying situation would force the US to allocate more strategic resources there, leaving fewer resources available for competition with China in the Indo-Pacific, thereby easing pressure,' he said. 'On the other hand, one key focus of trade talks is rare earths, which are critical to modern technology and defence industries – and arguably a strategic vulnerability for the United States. As tensions escalate in the Middle East, Washington's urgency to secure these resources is likely to grow, giving Beijing more leverage at the negotiating table.' US President Donald Trump said on Saturday that the United States had conducted a 'very successful attack' on three nuclear sites in Iran. Tehran has pledged retaliation, and threatened to close the vital Strait of Hormuz. The strike has fuelled fears among various countries that tensions in the region will further intensify, and deepened Washington's military entanglements abroad at a time when its trade relationship with China remains stalled. China and the US remain locked in a tense stalemate over tariffs and other trade issues, with the most recent talks in London yielding little tangible progress.
