Natural England accused of favouring rewilding over saving farmland
Natural England has been accused of favouring rewilding over saving farmland.
The row centres on rules stipulating that when new homes are built in certain parts of the country, developers must offset any extra water pollution created.
Natural England advises councils on how to do this and runs its own schemes.
Most solutions involve taking nearby farmland out of food production and rewilding the land.
However, a company has developed an alternative method which can save farmland.
The company, Biocore Agri, claims that the scheme has been effectively blocked by Natural England, which is run by rewilding campaigner Tony Juniper and has been accused of having an 'anti-farming culture' over its push for reducing livestock and rewilding.
The row comes amid concern over a Government net zero push that could mean a tenth of all farmland is taken out of food production.
Mark Spencer, the former Conservative farming minister, said Natural England lacked accountability for its decision-making and called for the body to be scrapped.
'Natural England has become one of those monsters that is now uncontrollable,' he said. 'And I don't know how you escape from that, because the second you try and touch it as a politician, you're accused of being sort of anti-environmental or destroying wildlife.
'But they seem to be sucking all the common sense out of some of these decision-making moments.'
'Nutrient neutrality' rules
He added: 'They are ideologically wedded to this concept of conservation and removing food production and farmers from the countryside and rewilding.'
Local authorities consult Natural England on which schemes they should approve to provide offset credits to developers when approving new homes in their area.
The rules are known as 'nutrient neutrality' rules and were introduced by the EU.
Biocore Agri manufactures an organic alternative to chemical fertiliser and says this can satisfy the rules.
The company says its scheme provides a cheaper alternative to Natural England's nutrient neutrality schemes while avoiding farmland being taken out of food production.
Natural England's approach to reducing nutrient pollution focuses on turning farmland into woodland or wetland in the long term or ending agricultural activity in the short term.
A calculation from the Housebuilders Federation has estimated that more than 12,000 hectares of farmland could need to be taken out of production to offset some 140,000 homes planned in areas with nutrient neutrality rules.
That equates to around 126,000 sheep or enough wheat for nearly 35 million boxes of Weetabix.
However, Biocore Agri says that its scheme has been effectively blocked by Natural England after it secured interest from Somerset Council.
Conflicts of interest
Somerset farmer and developer Angus Macdonald had hoped to use the Biocore Agri product to switch away from chemical fertiliser on his farmland as a 'win-win-win' solution for homes he plans to build on his land
'I wanted to carry on food production and be able to reduce the phosphate that's going into our water systems, and to be able to build the houses,' he said.
Biocore Agri was initially told by Natural England in May 2024 that the watchdog had no objection in principle to the use of the company's approach and methodology to be used for nutrient neutrality projects.
The decision followed a months-long technical review, with input from relevant Natural England scientists, according to correspondence seen by The Telegraph.
However, objections were later raised by Natural England over the methodology following a later assessment from a local advisor after an approach from BioCore Agri at the request of Somerset Council.
The council were interested in using the scheme for projects including the land on Mr Macdonald's farm.
Mr Macdonald has now been forced to take fields that produce around 360 tonnes of wheat per year out of production to build 37 homes.
Biocore Agri founder Henri Willmott has made a complaint to the Competition and Markets Authority, asking it to investigate whether there are conflicts of interest in Natural England's decision-making.
Natural England does not have an official role in deciding which schemes get the green light, but local authorities rely on its advice to make their decisions on which offset methods should be used.
The quango is also an effective provider of credits through its nutrient mitigation scheme, launched in 2022 with £30m of taxpayer money to create new wetlands.
'We should be encouraging innovation'
Land equivalent to 442 football pitches on six farms in the Tees and Poole Harbour has been acquired to be converted into wetland and woodland habitats since the scheme was launched.
This includes what NE has called 'low-grade farmland' bought up by the Durham Wildlife Trust that is now part of a rewilding project.
In total, land on six farms has been taken out of production so far for Natural England's nutrient neutrality scheme, according to a Freedom of Information request seen by the Telegraph.
Biocore Agri's case for a CMA investigation has been backed by Labour MP, Lorraine Beavers, in whose Blackpool North and Fleetwood constituency Biocore Agri is based.
'The issue clearly appears to be one for the Competition & Markets Authority, who I have written to urging them to open a case urgently,' she said. 'The Government's mission for growth and our ambition to build 1.5 million homes means we should be encouraging innovation, not stifling it.'
Adam Robbins, an environmental consultant who assessed Biocore Agri's methodology, said there was a risk that nutrient neutrality and a similar biodiversity net gain scheme would lead to a drop in food production.
'You'll end up with a situation where you can build a house, but then you've got to sacrifice your food for the biodiversity gain and nutrient balancing,' Mr Robbins said.
'We were trying to find solutions where you could continue producing food, and achieve that nutrient and biodiversity balance, which is why Biocore, we thought, was a great option.'
'Different levels of risk'
Sources within the farming and land use industry told The Telegraph there is a perception that Natural England is reluctant to trust farmers to switch their fertilising methods to ensure pollution is reduced.
Local authorities have the final say in deciding whether or not to use a particular approach but rely on expertise from Natural England.
This influential role is acknowledged by Natural England in internal correspondence seen by the Telegraph from one of the body's advisers.
'LPAs [local planning authorities] will have different levels of risk but their acceptance of the scheme and its enforceability will inevitably be led by our response,' it reads.
'If we say fine they may well rely on that approval, if we ask how the LPA intend to monitor and enforce they may not.'
Natural England told The Telegraph that its advice does not constitute approval of any nutrient neutrality scheme and that it was happy to continue engaging with Biocore Agri on its methodology, and did not consider that its advice had been inconsistent.
Mike Burke, Natural England director, sustainable development, said: 'We are working across government and businesses like Biocore Agri to help restore nature and sustain food production while tackling the housing crisis.
'Nutrient mitigation schemes are a successful example of that - enabling much-needed homes to be built and tackling harmful pollution in our rivers.'
'Our role in this planning process is advisory, and decisions on accepting mitigation measures are made by Local Planning Authorities.
'Natural England has provided advice on many mitigation measures, this is always based on scientific evidence and how effective it will be in reducing nutrient pollution.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Middle East situation ‘perilous', says Lammy amid calls for more talks
David Lammy flew from Washington to Geneva on Friday to meet Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi alongside his French and German counterparts as the UK continued to press for a diplomatic solution to the Middle East crisis. The talks followed US President Donald Trump's announcement that he would delay a decision on joining Israeli strikes against Iran for up to two weeks. Speaking after the meeting, Mr Lammy told reporters: 'It is still clear to me, as President Trump indicated yesterday, that there is a window of within two weeks where we can see a diplomatic solution.' Urging Iran to 'take that off ramp' and talk to the Americans, he said: 'We have a window of time. This is perilous and deadly serious.' He added that the US and Europe were pushing for Iran to agree to zero enrichment of uranium as a 'starting point' for negotiations. But Mr Araghchi said Iran would not negotiate with the US as long as Israel continued to carry out airstrikes against the country, and insisted his country's nuclear programme was entirely peaceful. Both sides continued to exchange fire on Friday, with Iranian missiles targeting the city of Haifa while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tel Aviv's military operation would continue 'for as long as it takes'. Meanwhile, the UK Government has announced it will use charter flights to evacuate Britons stranded in Israel once the country's airspace reopens. Mr Lammy said work is under way to provide the flights 'based on levels of demand' from UK citizens who want to leave the region. The move follows criticism of the Foreign Office's initial response, which saw family members of embassy staff evacuated while UK citizens were not advised to leave and told to follow local guidance. The Government said the move to withdraw temporarily family members had been a 'precautionary measure'. On Friday, the Foreign Office announced that UK staff had also been evacuated from Iran, with the embassy continuing to operate remotely. But the Government continues to advise British nationals in the region to follow local advice, rather than urging them to leave.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
Ms Leadbeater's Bill passed what could be its final Commons hurdle by 23 votes, down from the majority of 55 it secured when MPs first voted on it in November. The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday. But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'. A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. 'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.' But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber. She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.' Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'. In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'. He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.' Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation. But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Middle East situation ‘perilous', says Lammy amid calls for more talks
David Lammy flew from Washington to Geneva on Friday to meet Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi alongside his French and German counterparts as the UK continued to press for a diplomatic solution to the Middle East crisis. The talks followed US President Donald Trump's announcement that he would delay a decision on joining Israeli strikes against Iran for up to two weeks. Speaking after the meeting, Mr Lammy told reporters: 'It is still clear to me, as President Trump indicated yesterday, that there is a window of within two weeks where we can see a diplomatic solution.' Urging Iran to 'take that off ramp' and talk to the Americans, he said: 'We have a window of time. This is perilous and deadly serious.' He added that the US and Europe were pushing for Iran to agree to zero enrichment of uranium as a 'starting point' for negotiations. But Mr Araghchi said Iran would not negotiate with the US as long as Israel continued to carry out airstrikes against the country, and insisted his country's nuclear programme was entirely peaceful. Both sides continued to exchange fire on Friday, with Iranian missiles targeting the city of Haifa while Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Tel Aviv's military operation would continue 'for as long as it takes'. Meanwhile, the UK Government has announced it will use charter flights to evacuate Britons stranded in Israel once the country's airspace reopens. Mr Lammy said work is under way to provide the flights 'based on levels of demand' from UK citizens who want to leave the region. The move follows criticism of the Foreign Office's initial response, which saw family members of embassy staff evacuated while UK citizens were not advised to leave and told to follow local guidance. The Government said the move to withdraw temporarily family members had been a 'precautionary measure'. On Friday, the Foreign Office announced that UK staff had also been evacuated from Iran, with the embassy continuing to operate remotely. But the Government continues to advise British nationals in the region to follow local advice, rather than urging them to leave.
