Almost 10,000 gender certificates granted amid rise in Gen Z applications
Some 1,169 GRCs were issued in the year to March 2025, more than three times the number in 2019/20, when it stood at just 364.
It is also the highest annual total since 2005/06, which was the first full year that the scheme – which allows a person's acquired gender to be recognised legally in the country – was in operation.
The surge is likely to reflect recent changes in the certification process, including a big cut in fees, combined with more applications from young people.
Nearly a quarter (24%) of certificates granted in the latest year were for people born since 2000 – loosely known as Generation Z – and 68% were for those born since 1990, up from 4% and 41% respectively in 2019/20.
The analysis has been compiled by the PA news agency using data published by the Ministry of Justice, which shows a total of 9,633 GRCs had been granted in the UK up to March 2025.
The findings come after the Supreme Court's ruling in April on the definition of sex, which followed a dispute centred on whether someone with a GRC recognising their gender as female should be treated as a woman under the UK 2010 Equality Act.
In a long-awaited judgment, the court confirmed the terms woman and sex in the 2010 Equality Act 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
This means transgender women with a GRC can be excluded from single-sex spaces if 'proportionate'.
In the wake of the ruling the boss of Britain's equalities regulator suggested that while it does not mean GRCs are 'worthless', their 'efficacy' could be re-examined.
Baroness Kishwer Falkner, chairwoman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) told BBC Radio 4's Today programme in the days after the ruling: 'I think the next stage of litigation may well be tests as to the efficacy of the GRC, and or other areas.'
Asked about whether she thinks GRCs are now 'worthless', she replied: 'We don't believe they are. We think they're quite important.'
Government advice on how to apply for a GRC states that the Supreme Court ruling does not affect the application process, but advises people to contact the EHRC if they have questions.
The Gender Recognition Act came into effect on April 4 2005, giving adults the right legally to change the gender that was recorded on their birth certificate.
This is done by applying for a GRC, a document that shows a person has satisfied the criteria for changing their legal gender.
Applications are made to the Gender Recognition Panel, a body of legal and medical experts, who issue a certificate only if the application meets the necessary criteria.
GRC applications hit a record 1,517 in 2024/25, up from 1,397 the previous year and 443 in 2019/20.
The application fee for a certificate was cut in May 2021 from £140 to £5, while there was a switch to online applications in July 2022.
A GRC is granted if the applicant has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria; has lived in the acquired gender for at least two years, and intends to live in that gender for the rest of their life.
PA analysis shows the age of those receiving GRCs has changed considerably over the past decade.
Some 63% of certificates issued in 2014/15 went to people born before 1980 – but by 2024/25 this had dropped sharply to just 17%.
By contrast, people born from 1980 onwards accounted for 83% of certificates in the most recent year, up from 37% a decade earlier.
More recently, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of certificates going to people born since 2000, up from 4% in 2019/20 to 24% in 2024/25.
The age group currently responsible for the biggest proportion is people born in the 1990s, who accounted for 45% of the total in the year to March 2025.
The balance in applications between males and females has also changed over time.
In 2005/06, the first full year that certificates were available, more than three-quarters (77%) were granted to people whose sex at birth was male, with just under a quarter (23%) going to those who were female.
By 2015/16 the gap between these percentages had narrowed at 67% and 33%, and in 2023/24 the figures were almost equal, at 52% for males and 48% for females.
In the most recent year of 2024/25, the gap widened slightly with 55% of certificates granted to people whose sex at birth was male and 45% for those who were female.
Nearly one in 10 people receiving certificates in the year to March 2025 were part of a married couple – a proportion that has been relatively stable since the law was changed in 2014 to allow some applicants to remain married while obtaining gender recognition.
Of the 1,169 certificates granted in 2024/25, 109 (9%) were for married applicants with the vast majority – 1,033 (88%) – for people who were single, while 27 were recorded as 'other/unknown'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Western Telegraph
More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats
According to Home Office figures, 437 people made the crossing on Friday June 20 in seven boats, bringing the total for the year so far to 17,817. This compares to 12,313 by the same date in 2024 and 10,518 in 2023 while 11,690 had made the crossing by June 20 in 2022. Border Force vessels arrive and leave as groups of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover on June 20 (Gareth Fuller/PA) The latest arrivals come after Sir Keir Starmer said the situation was 'deteriorating' and threatened a visa crackdown. The Prime Minister signalled that countries which did not do enough to tackle the irregular migration crisis, for example by taking back failed asylum seekers, could face repercussions in the numbers of visas issued to their citizens. Sir Keir's message came as French police were seen to employ more robust tactics on the beaches this week including using teargas. But they were also seen to stand by and watch once migrants had entered the water to board a dinghy in the hope of crossing the English Channel.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
More than 400 migrants arrive in the UK crossing the Channel in small boats
This compares to 12,313 by the same date in 2024 and 10,518 in 2023 while 11,690 had made the crossing by June 20 in 2022. Border Force vessels arrive and leave as groups of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover on June 20 (Gareth Fuller/PA) The latest arrivals come after Sir Keir Starmer said the situation was 'deteriorating' and threatened a visa crackdown. The Prime Minister signalled that countries which did not do enough to tackle the irregular migration crisis, for example by taking back failed asylum seekers, could face repercussions in the numbers of visas issued to their citizens. Sir Keir's message came as French police were seen to employ more robust tactics on the beaches this week including using teargas. But they were also seen to stand by and watch once migrants had entered the water to board a dinghy in the hope of crossing the English Channel.
Wales Online
3 hours ago
- Wales Online
Dame Esther Rantzen urges Lords not to block assisted dying legislation
Dame Esther Rantzen urges Lords not to block assisted dying legislation The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes, but opponents have vowed to continue their resistance in the unelected chamber (Image: PA Archive/PA Images ) Dame Esther Rantzen has called on the House of Lords not to impede the progress of pivotal legislation in relation to assisted dying. The Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill passed the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday, yet it faces staunch opposition in the Lords, where critics are ready to propose amendments that would introduce additional restrictions and safeguards. Welsh Paralympian Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson has said that she hopes there will be some amendments when it comes to the Lords to "make it stronger". Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Dame Esther remarked: "I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. "Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose." She continued, highlighting the role of the Lords: "So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through." Dame Esther, who celebrates her 85th birthday on Sunday and is living with terminal cancer, conceded that the bill is unlikely to be enacted in time for her own benefit, suggesting she may have to travel to Zurich's Dignitas clinic instead. Article continues below Baroness Grey-Thompson told BBC Breakfast about the upcoming debate in the Lords: "We're getting ready for it to come to the Lord's and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger. "We've been told it's the strongest Bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not very high bar for other legislation. "So I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in." Conservative Lord and disability rights advocate, Lord Shinkwin voiced his opinions on the close margin in the Commons and emphasised the importance of scrutiny by the House of Lords. He expressed to Today: "I think the House of Lords has a duty to expose and to subject this Bill to forensic scrutiny" and noted that "I don't think it's a question of blocking it so much as performing our duty as a revising chamber". Lord Shinkwin further commented: "The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people." Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who guided the Bill through the Commons, shared with the PA news agency her hopes that the Lords would not obstruct the legislation, which risks running out of time if delayed in the upper chamber. She remarked: "I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue." A faction of 27 Labour MPs who opposed the proposed law stated: "We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care. "As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill." On the other hand, one of the staunchest critics of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described the current period as "these are apocalyptic times". The East Wiltshire MP, whose stance diverges from his mother's, Great British Bake Off judge Dame Prue Leith—who backs the legalisation—took to Twitter on Friday evening. In his dispatch, he labelled proponents of assisted dying as "militant anti-Christians" and criticised them for their lack of engagement with "engage with the detail of the Bill". Article continues below
