High Court upholds acquittal of Chinese company accused of bribing ex-LTA deputy group director
The High Court has upheld the acquittal of a Chinese company that was charged with bribery after two of its employees gave loans totalling $220,000 to a Land Transport Authority (LTA) deputy group director.
In a written judgment on May 29, the court said there was insufficient evidence to show that the company's top management was aware of or somehow complicit in the illegal acts.
The Singapore branch of China Railway Tunnel Group was first acquitted of three corruption charges by a district judge in March 2024 on grounds that the two employees' acts could not be attributed to the company.
Xi Zhengbing, who was the general manager and head representative of the branch, and Zhou Zhenghe, who was a deputy general manager, gave the loans to Henry Foo Yung Thye between January 2018 and August 2019.
The district judge said Xi did not have a sufficiently high level in the chain of command. The Singapore branch is only one of the sub-departments within the company's overseas department, which is in turn only one department in the company's corporate structure.
The prosecution appealed to the High Court against the acquittal.
On May 29, the appeal was dismissed by a panel comprising Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon, Justice Tay Yong Kwang and Justice Andrew Phang.
The court also noted that Xi and Zhou had resorted to defrauding the company with false invoices to obtain the $200,000 that was given to Foo as loans in 2018.
Zhou then had to borrow $20,000 to provide the subsequent loan.
"All these showed clearly that the respondent was never involved in its employees' illegal activities and neither did it give its tacit approval (nor) pretend to be ignorant of what the Singapore branch's employees were doing," said the court.
In September 2021, Foo, then 47, was sentenced to 5½ years' jail for taking about $1.24 million in bribes in the form of loans from contractors and sub-contractors.
Foo, who resigned from LTA in September 2019, was also ordered to pay a penalty of about $1.16 million, equivalent to the amount he had not returned.
Xi and Zhou were arrested in September 2019 by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau.
After being released on bail, they absconded to China, where they were arrested and subsequently convicted by a Guangzhou court.
Xi was sentenced to a five-year jail term and a fine of 300,000 yuan (S$57,400). Zhou was sentenced to two years' jail and a fine of 100,000 yuan.
China Railway Tunnel Group has 24 branches, eight of which are overseas.
The Singapore branch was a sub-contractor for two different projects on the Thomson-East Coast Line (TEL), and was awarded the main contract for a project on the Circle Line.
At the time of the offences, Foo was involved in the project management of the main contractors in respect of TEL projects.
Between 2016 and 2019, he reached out to the company's employees, including Xi, to ask for loans.
No loan was given as a result of Foo's first request.
Subsequently, Xi agreed to give him a loan upon his second request in the hope that Foo would refer more job opportunities to the company.
Zhou then arranged for false invoices to be issued to the company and prepared supporting documents with forged signatures.
These documents were presented to the company's finance department, which disbursed the payment.
After receiving the money, Xi and Zhou passed $200,000 to Foo.
In 2019, Foo made a third request.
Xi agreed to give him another loan, in the hope that Foo would expedite the company's payment claims and help the company to win the tender for another project.
On Xi's instructions, Zhou borrowed $20,000 from a friend and passed the money to Foo.
The prosecution alleged that in 2016, Mr Liu Chenyu, who was based in China, was told of the discussions to pay Foo a bribe and approved his request for a loan.
Mr Liu was then the deputy general manager of the company's overseas department, which was in charge of all the overseas branches.
The prosecution presented text messages, including one from another employee of the Singapore branch telling Foo that Mr Liu was grateful for his support.
But the High Court panel said the prosecution had not presented the necessary evidence to prove that Mr Liu was involved.
The messages did not prove that Foo's request for a loan was actually conveyed to Mr Liu, said the judges.
Lawyer Paul Loy of WongPartnership, who acts for the company, said his client will continue to respect the laws of countries in which it operates.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
27 minutes ago
- Business Times
Asean walks trade war tightrope
WITH its pauses and U-turns, Donald Trump's tariff agenda continues to defy firm forecasts. Still, it remains worthwhile to explore how the US president's trade wars have impacted South-east Asian economies and could continue to do so going forward. South-east Asian economies are strategically important to both China and the United States as trading partners, geographical interests and military bases, particularly for the US. Yet, for the past decade, the region has repeatedly found itself caught in the middle as these two global powers compete for economic supremacy. With a population of over 690 million – or around 8 per cent of the world's population – Asean accounts for over 3.5 per cent of global gross domestic product and 7.4 per cent of global exports, demonstrating the bloc's increasing importance to the world's economic activity. Asean is China's largest trading partner, while ranking as the US' fourth-largest trading partner, after Mexico, Canada and China. First Trump term: Unintended beneficiaries During Trump's first presidency, tariffs of 10-50 per cent were imposed on various categories of Chinese products, primarily aimed at addressing concerns over intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers, and the substantial trade deficit with China. While tariffs were subsequently halved on the premise that China would import an additional US$200 billion from the US, only around US$30 billion in additional US goods were actually imported to China between 2020 and 2024. The tariff on Chinese imports created an unexpected opportunity for Asean and Mexico through supply chain realignment. Vietnam and Mexico emerged as particular beneficiaries. Vietnam's exports to the US surged from just US$49 billion in 2018 to US$137 billion in 2024, while Mexico's exports rose from US$344 billion to US$506 billion over the same period. The rapid increase can be attributed to the relocation of Chinese manufacturing facilities and rerouting of goods, reflected in the parallel rise in goods imports from China to both Asean countries and Mexico, predominantly in partially finished or finished goods. China's supply chain realignment strategy proved remarkably successful. Mexico is now the largest exporter to the US, replacing China in 2023, while the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) now ranks as the fourth-largest exporter to the US after Mexico, China and Canada. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up Strategic positioning and political complexity This shift was hardly surprising, as Asean has long been strategically important to China from multiple angles: as manufacturing bases, investment destinations and for political influence. The region's significant overseas Chinese population and close proximity to China have helped Asean countries grow closer to the country over the years. Since 2018, the bloc has become a critical hub for Chinese companies seeking to mitigate tariff exposure from the US-China trade war. Chinese firms have rerouted exports through Asean or established factories in countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand and Malaysia to bypass tariffs, making the definition of 'origin of goods' and 'value-adding' increasingly opaque. Deja vu: The second Trump term Fast-forward to 2025, and investors face a deja vu moment as Trump's second presidential term took off with the strongest push yet for broad-based tariffs, maintaining significant focus on China. This reflects growing concerns about America's enormous total trade deficits with the world, which have grown to just shy of US$1 trillion. The US now understands the implications of imposing tariffs on China alone – the supply chain realignment has rendered previous tariffs ineffective in reducing the trade deficit. Asean economies once again find themselves caught in the crossfire between the world's two largest powers. This time, however, the implications are far more significant. The realignment of China's manufacturing supply chains has created jobs and entire industries over the past five years. Another shift could unwind parts of this manufacturing ecosystem and threaten people's livelihoods. The geopolitical balancing act There is also a broader geopolitical challenge. With escalating US-China tensions, Asean faces increasing pressure to align with one side or the other. Thailand and the Philippines, as examples, are notably taking a more muted stance towards geopolitical alignments. This balancing act is particularly delicate – both countries host existing US airbases while also relying heavily on China for investments, tourism and manufacturing. Given China's strong dominance as a trade partner and investor in the region, plus with the US serving as both a major export destination and source of political influence for many Asean economies, this equilibrium requires careful navigation. Asean must continue to strengthen intra-regional ties and leverage trade deals such as the RCEP and CPTPP to insulate itself from global volatility. The path forward for Asean economies must be both strategic and deliberate to safeguard the region's long-term interests. The group should focus on maintaining a delicate balance between the two global superpowers by adopting a neutral stance, while simultaneously strengthening internal resilience through enhanced intra-regional trade and improved competitiveness in manufacturing, trade and foreign direct investments. To prepare for potential geopolitical decoupling, Asean should diversify its network of economic partners and deepen institutional integration, drawing lessons from the European Union to strengthen its collective influence on the global stage. For businesses and investors, this evolving landscape presents dual-edged prospects: risks of supply chain disruptions, but also significant opportunities to position Asean as a key hub in future global trade and supply chain. Implications for bond investors While the temporary pause in new trade tariffs has brought some relief to bond investors, we view Trump 2.0 as bringing unprecedented growth risks for Asean. We expect a further economic decoupling between China and the US, which will negatively impact global growth as trade declines. In the near term, this uncertainty warrants further rate cuts from Asean central banks as inflation stabilises, growth slows and unemployment inches higher. Local currency bonds should therefore remain well-supported. We also expect to see some net international investment position flows from US assets returning to Asia, lending further support to local currency asset prices and Asian currencies. However, we remain mindful of the longer-term effects on potential economic growth from supply chain realignment and global slowdown, which can have lasting impacts on Asean economies. The writer is portfolio manager, Asia Fixed Income, at M&G Investments

Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
China is winning over Central Asia – but its growing influence could fuel a backlash
Chinese President Xi Jinping and five Central Asian leaders signed a treaty of 'permanent good neighbourliness' and friendly cooperation at this week's China-Central Asia Summit in Astana, Kazakhstan. PHOTO: EPA-EFE – While some Western countries have viewed Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) as threats to their domestic industries and put up tariffs on these Chinese exports, Central Asia has welcomed them. Brands from Zeekr and Chery ply the streets of Dushanbe, the capital of Tajikistan, where all taxis must be electric by September 2025. Kazakhstan saw a 36-fold rise in the sale of Chinese EVs in 2024, from 2023. BYD's first plant in Central Asia, in Uzbekistan, began production in January 2024. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
8 hours ago
- Business Times
Despite 1880's closure, private members' club 67 Pall Mall is expanding
[SINGAPORE] Private members' club 1880 may have suddenly closed and gone into liquidation this week, but that is no dampener for another player here. 67 Pall Mall, which started operating in Singapore from 2022, has just signed a lease to expand to Shanghai – its first Chinese outpost. The private members' club with a focus on fine wine will open next year at 7 Donghu Road, in Shanghai's historic Xuhui district. It will occupy the 100-year-old French Renaissance-style Grand Mansion – or da gongguan – built by British businessman Raymond Joseph. Grant Ashton, who founded 67 Pall Mall in London in 2015, said that opening a club in Shanghai allows it to connect with the wine community in China, which 'has long been one of the most dynamic and rapidly growing wine markets in the world'. On entering the country despite its economic woes, Ashton said the club's business model offering access to 'one of the largest lists of wines in the region at reasonable prices' has withstood economic ebbs and flows, including extended closures during the pandemic. 'Our proposition is new to the market in Shanghai and China – one that represents unprecedented value and access to fine wines.' He is not concerned about the sudden collapse of 1880 either. The club had also abruptly closed its Hong Kong branch on May 30. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself. Sign Up Sign Up 'Our membership model has served us well for 10 years,' he told The Business Times. 'We are a very different club with a singular focus, and everything about 67 Pall Mall revolves around the appreciation of wine.' In Singapore, the club occupies 15,000 square feet (sq ft) across the 27th and 28th floors of Shaw Centre in Scotts Road. The space used to be the penthouse dwelling of the late movie magnate Runme Shaw, where he threw extravagant soirees and wined and dined luminaries and celebrities. The club here is 67 Pall Mall's third, after London and Verbier in Switzerland. It had previously announced upcoming club openings in Melbourne, Australia, as well as in France's Bordeaux and Beaune. Members have access to its clubs around the world. Entrance to the Grand Mansion. PHOTO: 67 PALL MALL As for the Shanghai club, it will comprise around 14,300 sq ft and carry a wine list of 5,000 by the bottle and 1,000 by the glass from 40 countries. The mansion's grandeur will be showcased and it will include spaces such as a Grand Salon, a sunroom overlooking the gardens, a whisky bar and multiple private rooms. The Grand Mansion is a former diplomatic landmark that has housed various bureaus and served as the residence of some of China's prominent magnates, including industrialist and banker Sheng Zhushu. It has also hosted several high-profile events, including negotiations between former US president Richard Nixon and former Chinese premier Zhou Enlai, as well as the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in China in 2001 attended by then US president George W Bush.