BBC bias claims reignite as majority of panellists back Labour
The BBC hosted a 'Glasgow Special' episode of the show on Wednesday night, featuring the SNP's Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken, Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells, artist David Eustace as well as both Scottish Labour MSP Paul Sweeney and Labour peer Willie Haughey.
We previously reported on SNP and Scottish Greens anger over the inclusion of two Scottish Labour politicians, especially given it came ahead of yesterday's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election – which Labour's Davy Russell ended up winning in a shock result, beating the SNP by just over 600 votes.
READ MORE: Good News Scotland: Plenty of Scottish heroics in May, both home and abroad
The Scottish Greens have also since sent a formal complaint to the BBC saying they should have been represented considering their high support in Glasgow.
But now, The National can reveal that Eustace also appears to be a Scottish Labour supporter, meaning three of the five panellists on the BBC show backed the party.
The photographer and former chancellor of Edinburgh Napier University attended Scottish Labour's Winter Gala last year, according to his LinkedIn.
In response to Anas Sarwar's post thanking those who attended, Eustace responded 'great night in many ways' – both by resharing the Scottish Labour leader's post and in a separate comment in response.
(Image: LinkedIn)
He has also interacted with Sarwar several further times in the past few months on the social media platform, including praising the Scottish Labour leader's Sunday Times article calling for Donald Trump's Scottish ties to be used to Scotland's advantage.
(Image: LinkedIn)
In a post announcing Ian Murray as Scottish Secretary after last year's General Election, Eustace also signalled his support, commenting: 'I doubt few work harder. Much respect and time for this man.'
The connection has sparked a further BBC impartiality row, with an SNP source telling The National that the panel makeup was 'ludicrous' and calling for action to be taken.
"It's ludicrous that the BBC would include three Labour supporting panellists,' they said.
'The BBC must make clear what steps it will take to rectify this."
The Greens have also again hit out at the BBC, with Glasgow councillor Anthony Carroll telling The National that the BBC must review its procedures.
'To have two Labour representatives on a supposedly politically representative panel is one thing, but to also have another who is certainly at least supportive of Anas Sarwar and his vision narrows the spectrum of voices speaking about Glasgow, to the city's detriment," he said.
"With parties like Reform being the darling of many partisan media outlets, its incumbent our public broadcaster to give fair hearings of parties who do well in elections, yet don't have half of Fleet Street on speed-dial.
"The BBC must review their balancing procedures for shows like Debate Night to make sure the people whose futures they seek to debate see the people they vote for represented on those panels.'
He added: "It's sad that audiences – on the eve of the Hamilton by-election – couldn't hear Green ideas on tackling the housing emergency through rent controls, banning winter evictions, or ramping up more social and affordable homes being built. Or our plans to get investment back for our communities who've been left behind by too many soft touch approaches by successive Governments on the rich, leading to growing wealth inequality in Scotland."
The BBC and Eustace have been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: Exclusion isn't the only response to difficult pupils
A reader has a suggestion for the First Minister when it comes to dealing with difficult pupils Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Apparently First Minister John Swinney warns that 'Excluding disruptive pupils risks pushing them into organised crime' (19 June). That may be so, but there are other alternatives for those young people who, for whatever reason, find mainstream education challenging. For example, he could look at the opportunities provided by the Spartans Community Foundation in Pilton and their Alternative School for secondary school students, extending now to P6/P7 pupils. Fiona Garwood, Edinburgh John Swinney wants every Scottish pupil to have a good educational experience (Picture: Andrew Milligan - Pool/Getty Images) Deadly games Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad US President Donald Trump is taking a fortnight to consider whether to join Israel in attacking Iran. Good. It means internal advisers have got to him, perhaps even the Europeans, Canadians and UK. Such a move would be an act of folly. Remember the run-up to the Iraq war. Labour in power, Tony Blair gives early notice of his support for the 'special relationship'. They produce a 'dodgy dossier' speaking of 'weapons of mass destruction' which probably didn't exist. Blair struts around beside George Bush, looking macho. There is a 'victory', but long-term chaos descends on Iraq, certainly no democracy. Iran is much bigger than Iraq, and there will be greater chaos. Israel is the immediate major aggressor, and is a client state of the US, which is totally complicit. Meanwhile, Israel has reduced Gaza to ruins, and is starving its population, what remains of it, to death. At the same time, it is a land-grab, with more Israel settlers being facilitated. Crawford Mackie, Edinburgh Ban US bombs Earlier this week, Donald Trump demonstrated his grasp of diplomacy by making an offensive early exit from the G7 meeting in Calgary, presumably rushing home to plan a joint war with Israel against Iran. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Will Britain, in an echo of their actions in joining with the USA to wreck Iraq, now join with the US to wreck Iran? It would seem that this is the intention of our Prime Minister, not wishing to cross his big orange buddy. I sense that the great majority of Scots are not up for waging a new war in the Middle East, just as we do not support Israel in their obliteration of the Palestinians, but what can we do? Well, we might take journalist Neal Ascherson's advice, and act as if we are already an independent nation. The USAF regularly use Prestwick to refuel their flights to the Middle east. Might bunker buster bombs be part of the payload of USAF aircraft refuelling at Prestwick? The airport is owned by us, the Scottish people. Our Scottish Government should veto any USAF flights resupplying Israel's military, and should certainly veto any transit of bunker busters ultimately intended for Iran. This would very much displease Keir Starmer, but would be recognised by right-minded people, nationally and internationally, as a correct and moral action. Ken Gow, Bridge of Canny, Banchory What the X? So the SNP's Communication's Officer, David Mitchell, asks on X, 'why exactly is Scotland is paying for [HS2] when it doesn't even stop in Scotland?' And yet, the SNP government has stated that it has not contributed any funds to HS2. Indeed, Scotland will receive proportionate Barnett consequentials funding based on that (albeit flawed) investment. So it seems to me that part of Mitchell's role is to miscommunicate in an attempt to provoke groundless outrage amongst dyed-in-the-wool separatists. Martin Redfern, Melrose, Roxburghshire Planning language Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Words fail me too (Letters, 19 June). The Government has taken its eye off the ball. There is a much more important language than Gaelic or Scots that must be made official so they can pursue their dream of covering Scotland with wind farms – planning language. I doubt SNP MSPs had any idea how, for example, the word 'localised' would be used when they passed National Planning Framework 4, based on the manifesto of the Scottish Greens, voted for by 8 per cent of the electorate. The Government voted for the two National Parks and National Scenic areas to be protected from wind farms but 'Where impacts are localised and/or appropriate design mitigation has been applied, they will generally be considered to be acceptable.' It seems 'localised' in the dictionary means 'restrict or assign to a particular place'. Developer language 'for planning purposes' means you can insist the effect of 18, 180m high turbines along the Moorfoot Scarp in view of Midlothian, parts of East Lothian and South Edinburgh, including the castle, are localised. It is said significant effects of Torfichen wind farm would reach to Gorebridge 5.6km away, about three and a half miles! Locally three wind farms have already been refused on wider landscape grounds. Surely the opposite of localised is 'widespread', as used by Nature Scot in their representation 'widespread visibility of the turbines from many areas of East Lothian and Midlothian... and would result in adverse cumulative landscape and visual impacts'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Why should a minority party decide the shape of Scotland to come? Why no strategic plan instead of landowners deciding where wind farms should go? Now the pact has ceased, and the New National Park has been scrapped, this has to be looked at again. All governments make mistakes but, as we have seen lately, it is how and if they rectify them by which they are judged by the electorate. Celia Hobbs, Penicuik, Midlothian Green dreams Scotsman writer Paul Wilson will certainly not feature on the Green brigade's Christmas Card list ("Mighty growth from Scotland's Acorn could prove elusive', Perspective, 19 June). He strips away the green film to reveal hard, indisputable facts not the green fiction politicians and those of a green persuasion would have us believe. Soaring electricity costs are costing jobs and are not being replaced by the green jobs so beloved and promised by clueless politicians and their followers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad So where is the cheap electricity we were promised? In the last year wind and solar could only provide 35.8 per cent of our electricity while gas was 29.9, nuclear 14, Drax using trees to produce electricity was 7.3, and imports from Europe totalling 11.5 per cent kept the lights on. The Scottish Government, keen to 'lead the world', said they would achieve net zero by 2045. Yes and pigs can fly. China has set its net zero target as 2060 and India 2070. Both huge maybes. As Paul Wilson says, the green jobs bonanza that politicians promised for decades has failed to materialise and the UK is shedding jobs by the thousands. At least the Scottish people can show their anger in May 2026 and throw out the green charlatan MSPs and their hoards of mega-expensive climate advisors. Clark Cross, Linlithgow, West Lothian Minimum brains It appears the SNP administration is still keen on introducing a minimum income guarantee payment of £11,500 to every Scot, whatever their status. This would cost £8 billion-plus. Maybe the nationalists think it a vote-winner. This in spite of every country that has ever tried to implement anything similar finding it to be unworkable and financially disastrous. An 'expert' group was commissioned by SNP ministers in 2021 to work it all out. That alone should send shivers down the Scottish spine. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Be afraid, be very afraid. This could make the ferry fiasco look like a drop in the ocean. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh The Never-Never Like Nessie, growth remains elusive for this government. The Bank of England has just prioritised control of inflation over any immediate interest rate reduction which could have stimulated growth. But worry not! Grand plans are in hand. Following on the heels of last week's Spending Review setting out the UK Government's priorities for the next four years or so, a £725 billion, ten-year infrastructure investment plan for the UK has just been announced. Moreover, the Government's much awaited Industrial Strategy is imminent. The devil is always in the detail of big plans and aspirations. Often overlooked, the devil here may lie in the detail of the approval process for capital projects in the public sector. The appraisal techniques that are used are set out in the Treasury's Green Book – the UK's Bible of 'best practice'. (Scotland has its own version which largely follows this.) The Chancellor announced that the Green Book is about to be revised and updated, making capital project approvals quicker and easier, so the taxpayer gets a bigger bang for their buck, especially for projects (eg new homes) in areas of deprivation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, it is unclear how this will work in practice. One concern relates to the level of analytical rigour required, which may prove over-challenging for parts of the public sector. If that's true, then, somewhat perversely, Green Book 'enhancements' could have the effect of slowing down approval rates, with knock-on effects for the speed at which any related growth impacts are realised. 'Never Never Land' is the fictional domain where children never grow up, or some other imaginary ideal. There is a fear here that despite good intentions, when facing increasingly fierce and uncertain macro-economic headwinds, and the micro-challenge of delivering growth-inducing capital projects on the ground, that the plans and aspirations of this government run the risk of being equally fanciful. Ewen Peters, Newton Mearns Write to The Scotsman
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Isn't it time the SNP got on with the issues that really matter?
The SNP administration needs to start dealing with the issues that actually make this country of ours function on a daily basis. The time for navel-gazing about issues that are of little consequence to the vast majority of our citizens is not now. Too often our FM tries to smoke-screen his way out of the glare of public scrutiny by virtue-signalling one peripheral issue after another, meanwhile 'Rome burns' metaphorically. Our omnipresent challenges continue to grow and become more acute. I don't need to list these, as anyone who reads these columns and is au fait with current news will easily be able to pen their own list. I suggest that we should be more engaged with the issues that affect the quality of life for the nation, rather than wasting time in anguishing about, for example, who uses which toilet. Leave that to the law makers. Colin Allison, Blairgowrie. We need to talk about pensions In February to April 2025, the employment rate for people aged 16-64 in the UK was 75.1%. The projected percentage of the population of working age in 2050 is 60.5%. Based on today's employability figures that would mean in just over 20 years only 45% of the country in work paying the vast majority of income tax for the welfare benefits of the day. The amount of pensioners to working-age people is projected to be 393/1000 by 2070. That means there will be fewer than three people in work for every pensioner. It was 4:1 in 1970 and 5:1 when the state pension was introduced. Successive governments have ignored the incoming time bomb of a population that is getting older with fewer working-age people to sustain it. Read more letters Previous governments have tinkered with schemes such as NEST (National Employment Savings Trust) and auto enrolment but the reality is that this provides a pensioner a fraction of what post-war generations have enjoyed in the form of good occupational pensions and the current state pension. I am currently projected to get my state pension when I am 68. I have no doubt that this number will increase but governments kicking the issue into the long grass will only result in more pain passed on to the next generation who will see the sharpest decline of pensioner living standards in history. That is the most distressing part of Labour's welfare reforms – which are targeting some of the most vulnerable – as there is the need for a national conversation on what the Cura Annonae should look like in the years to come and importantly how it will be paid for. Christopher McEleny, Gourock. Death with dignity The headlines in newspapers, TV and radio will be the vote on the assisted dying bill in England and Wales ("MPs vote to pass assisted dying bill at Westminster", heraldscotland, June 20). For those Scots with short memories, similar legislation passed its first reading in Scotland last month. Opponents are now questioning the lack of palliative care available for patients with terminal illnesses. Only about 25 per cent funding comes from the Government, the rest from charitable donations. My wife, former BBC Radio Scotland host Annie Webster, died in February and was a staunch supporter of assisted dying. She was in agony for much of the last six months of her life. But she was fortunate to get a place at the Beatson Cancer Centre in Glasgow for two weeks which she loved. The most important thing for her was to be pain-free. The care and laughter and craic from the doctors, nurses, orderlies and volunteers was unbelievable. Eventually she was in the Marie Curie Hospice (the place she insisted she wanted to die) and I was able to stay with her for her last eight nights. I will be eternally grateful, and she would be too. Yes of course this support should be available to all and funded by the Government. But if it's not and someone gets to the stage they've simply had enough we have to let them die with dignity. Andy Stenton, Glasgow. Tourist tax will sink Glasgow Fifty years ago the film Jaws put Amity Island tourist resort in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. No one wanted to visit. Now we find Glasgow City Council adopting a "head in the ocean" stance with its introduction of a tourist tax ("Glasgow 'tourist tax' approved as visitors face £4.83 tariff per night from 2027", The Herald, June 20). Glasgow right now looks near derelict, particularly the city centre. The council has chased commerce and leisure away with high costs and a very car-unfriendly approach. Taxes only force folk to go elsewhere, just like the shark. Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow. UK's record is shameful Doug Maughan (Letters, June 20) refers to the UK's role in the overthrow of the democratically-elected Iranian government in 1953. To go back much further, during the First World War the French and British divided the map of the Middle East into states that cut through ethnic and religious communities and at about the same time the UK infamously promised Palestine to both the Jews and the Arabs. What is more, some 75 years ago Britain secretly supplied 20 tons of heavy water to Israel which enabled it to make nuclear weapons. Now such weapons are in the hands of Benjamin Netanyahu. And then the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the USA, backed up by our then Prime Minister, was justified by the fabricated insistence that Saddam Hussein was in possession of 'weapons of mass destruction'. What a sad story of greed, cruelty and deceit and I have not dwelt upon the terrible suffering, for the past 77 years, of the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israelis, Israel being seen, ironically, as an outpost of western 'civilisation'. Of our history in the Middle East we should be profoundly ashamed, our contribution to the never-ending suffering of the Palestinians and the Iranians displaying little in the way of caring for the consequences. I say, on behalf of the Iranian population, 'Thank you Britain for so many years of suffering. It ought to have been so different. We ought to be being remembered for so very many contributions to the civilised world in the fields of art, architecture, poetry, science and technology, medicine, philosophy and engineering and not the rule of the Ayatollahs which you and the US imposed upon us'. John Milne, Uddingston. The test of Trump's character Ever since the convicted felon DJ Trump was elected 47th President of the United States of America, the daily routine for many includes an anxious search for his latest outrageous acts and utterances to discover 'What Donald Did Next' . Sophie Robinson's article ("Starmer urges Trump to step back from military strikes in Iran", The Herald, June 20) reports attempts by Keir Starmer to rein in the President's aggressive tendencies. It seems likely that Mr Trump fears being thought weak were he not to send in the bombers, and the impact of others, including our Prime Minister, to alter that view is likely to be minimal. DJ Trump is arguably the most powerful man in the world and his ability to shock and harm millions shows no signs of slackening. It is disquieting to acknowledge that, in light of his advanced age and previous pattern of behaviour, flaws in his personality and the quality of his decision-making are unlikely to improve. We would do well to reflect on the saying attributed to Abraham Lincoln, the 16th President of the US. 'Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power". Bob Scott, Drymen. Will the tourist tax drive people away from Glasgow? (Image: Newsquest) Celebrate the greats of our history The recent outpouring of heartfelt admiration for Walter Scott in these pages has been nothing other than a delight. These letters and Rosemary Goring's article ("He is Scotland's greatest novelist but no-one reads him now. Why?", heraldscotland, May 24) read as a celebration of the rich and varied voices that compose Scotland's literary heritage. They stand in sharp contrast to the narrow-minded silencing of diverse voices at the Edinburgh Book Festival. I was reflecting on this situation the other evening, walking from Queen Street Station to Central, when the two statues that I passed, Sir Walter Scott and the Duke of Wellington, reminded me that next week marks the 210th anniversary of the victory over Napoleon. Having liberated Portugal and Spain, whose independence today seems entirely natural but was in fact paid for with the blood of British soldiers, Wellington's victory secured almost 100 years of European peace. Liberty was indeed in every blow. As the British ambassador in Paris, Wellington zealously attempted to persuade the French authorities to abandon their policy of colonial slavery, and later, as Prime Minister, he again marshalled his forces to secure the passing of the Catholic Relief Bill. He was, as his biographer Richard Holmes concludes, a great man built on a grand scale. There is no present-day British public figure that comes even close to his greatness. Reading Scott's three works, based on his almost immediate pilgrimage to the battlefield, is time well spent. He was a war poet with all the connotations that that phrase evokes for war's victors and victims alike. Scott's Dance of Death poem with its mystical lines are my personal favourites: …there are sounds in Allan's ear, Patrole nor sentinel may hear, And sights before his eye aghast Invisible to them have pass'd. Audible and visible only to an old soldier and perhaps the poet himself. But when, on Saturday June 24,1815, news reached Edinburgh of Wellington's victory, everybody heard. Scott tells us that every church bell in the capital rang for the whole of Saturday. Perhaps those in the proximity of the Scott Monument might close their eyes and hear those victory bells echo down through the centuries. In light of Mark Smith's recent article ("No more Edinburgh Book Festival for me – where did it go wrong?", The Herald, June 14), perhaps it is time to consider an alternative Edinburgh literary festival. This alt-festival would not only celebrate what is great in our history, but would recognise the role that all Scotland's businesses play in making a literary society possible. Such a festival would always be open to debate the legacy of great men like Scott and Wellington. Graeme Arnott, Stewarton. Water Scott's immortality To those errant schoolboys, like David Hay's brother (Letters, June 19), please note that you too were an easy target of fun for the great writer Sir Walter Scott himself. Here he describes a teacher looking forward to the close of day but who has toiled with "controlling petulance, exciting indifference to action, striving to enlighten stupidity, and labouring to soften obstinacy; and whose very powers of intellect have been confounded by hearing the same dull lesson repeated a hundred times by rote, and only varied by the various blunders of the reciters". Those are from the opening lines of Old Mortality, a cracking tale about the rise and fall of Covenanters. It had me from page 1. Peter G Farrell, Glasgow.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotland's future is uncertain. But then so is the here and now
At the same time, many in the mischievous media exaggerate the transient. Who is up, who is down? What is new, what is demanding attention? Always eager to hasten to the next caravanserai. This week, by contrast, there was a glance towards the longer term. Where are we going with our NHS, our services, our fiscal structure? What, an Edinburgh conference asked, will Scotland look like in 2050? Now, even adopting such a perspective may be viewed as courageous, given the perils currently confronting our planet. As Israel and Iran trade missiles, as President Trump ponders, it may seem rash to contemplate anything other than our collective survival. However, we cannot live that way. We cannot flee for the sanctuary of a dark corner whenever Donald J. Trump turns into King Lear: confused and uncertain yet insisting that he is the terror of the earth. And so it is entirely right to cast an eye ahead. However it may appear at first glance that there is a faintly futile tinge to the entire endeavour. Consider. In 1920, did the ravaged continent of Europe discern that, by 1945, they would have endured a second, bloody conflict? They did not. More prosaically, in 1980, did we know that the passing of a further quarter century would lead to a transformation in Information Technology and the creation of a Scottish Parliament? We did not. Yet contemplate a little more deeply. Were not the roots of the Second World War seeded in the aftermath of the First World War? The constraints and financial reparations understandably imposed upon Germany – but resented by their emerging, deadly leader? Read more Brian Taylor Do the Scottish Conservatives have any reason to exist? This is a set-back and an opportunity for the SNP - which one will they embrace? Brian Taylor: The fundamental battle which unites Donald Trump and Nigel Farage And the more modern period? Were there not early prequels for the 21st century information revolution? Further, here in Scotland, was not the cause of Scottish self-government measurably advanced in the wake of the election of Margaret Thatcher in 1979? In short, when we purport to look into the future, we are in reality studying present-day conditions. We are examining how reform might generate a steady transformation which would emerge over that longer period. It is a way of urging impatient voters and the mischievous media to cut a little slack for our elected tribunes. It is about the future, yes, but viewed through the prism of the present. In the context of reform, there was much talk this week about reviving thoughts advanced by the commission on public services, ably chaired by the late and decidedly great Campbell Christie. I recall Campbell for his intellect, his humour, his baffling devotion to Falkirk FC, his fierce competitiveness at golf – and his determination to work with all and sundry to make Scotland a better place. In 2011, his commission urged Scotland to embrace 'empowerment, integration, efficiency and prevention' in transforming the public sector. This week, Ivan McKee, Scotland's Public Finance Minister, set out a programme of reforms and savings – with an explicit nod to those earlier endeavours by the Christie team. Mr McKee is a key figure in the Scottish Government, returning to office alongside his close ally, Kate Forbes. Both advocate a focus upon efficiency – and, perhaps above all, economic growth. In doing so, they are most certainly aligned with the instincts and aims of the First Minister. Now John Swinney displayed another intuitive tendency in his forward-looking remarks this week. His solution to the entrenched problems confronting Scotland? It lay, you will be astonished to learn, with independence. So shifting attention back to independence, rather than the day-to-day concerns of the voters? Was this a U-turn? Not really, no. Indeed, I suspect too much can be made of this apparent change. Firstly, Mr Swinney is a believer, a fervent Nationalist. He yearns for independence. Secondly, he leads a party which contains many whose fervour is undimmed by minor matters such as convincing others. Thirdly, there is an SNP National Council this weekend. Enough, Brian. Away with cynicism. I believe John Swinney is simply sustaining his dual strategy. He feels a little more liberated to advance the option of independence – while simultaneously concentrating for the most part on the anxieties of the people, such as the cost of living and the health service. John Swinney (Image: PA) In short, his attention is drawn by the here and now, even as he offers a potential vision of the future. His opponents are similarly grounded. Labour's Anas Sarwar, for example, glanced forward and concluded that the SNP were only offering 'managed decline.' Still, futurology can be a source of innocent merriment. What might we favour? Ivan McKee is surely right to suggest public services which prioritise customers rather than producers, which share information and thus resources. But how about the health service? The current system is simply unsustainable, unaffordable. Do you see that nurse gesturing to you? That health worker is not waving but drowning. We have to cut waste – but also overall demand. Perhaps, as the Health Secretary Neil Gray suggested, that can be done in part by an emphasis on prevention. However, that will undoubtedly take time – which ministers facing elections do not have. Politically, Mr Swinney's focus will be upon ensuring that the stats are going in the right direction. Education? Our economy, our society, both need the acquisition of useful skills. I recall my school textbook entitled 'Physics is Fun!' This proved to be a brazen lie. However, physics is vital, along with tricky stuff like maths, literature and French irregular verbs. Our universities are struggling financially. But, as they reform, they must maintain the objective of excellence. If they are truly to be world-class, as Scotland advertises, then they must aspire to the very highest standards. And the economy itself? We need growth and prosperity. We need an environmental drive, including renewables, which does not shut down our industry and agriculture. The future? Simple really. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre – and Dundee United FC
