Samsung considering Chinese suppliers for OLED displays
Samsung has resisted relying on Chinese suppliers for materials to manufacture its OLED displays for a long time, but that is finally changing as the smartphone industry faces challenges. The company is considering ( translated source ) opening its doors to Chinese materials suppliers for future products, including Galaxy smartphones.This decision is reportedly driven solely due to a singular reason: cost management. Simply put, smartphone manufacturers have little to no choice in keeping their devices at the same prices. This isn't just because of supply chain shortages or industrywide uncertainty due to tariff rates, but also because of advancing technology.
Both the Galaxy S26 series as well as the iPhone 18 lineup — two product lines launching in 2026 — will rely on 2 nm chipsets. Apple will have its A20 chips made using TSMC's ( Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ) 2 nm processes. Samsung is trying to get its own 2 nm Exynos 2600 processors ready in time, but if it fails, the company will likely use the 3 nm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 by Qualcomm. The Elite 2 chips will also be made by TSMC. This shift towards 2 nm processors is going to drive up the cost of manufacturing phones. Qualcomm is reportedly considering two Snapdragon variants for the future, an approach similar to Apple's base model and Pro model A-series chips.
The entire Samsung Galaxy S25 lineup uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite. | Image credit — Samsung Apple is already considering raising the prices of the upcoming iPhone 17 series. To avoid having to do something similar, Samsung has even begun considering Chinese suppliers of organic materials. These materials are used for the manufacturing of OLED displays, which are crucial to Samsung's products, such as its smartphones and TVs.Samsung has remained hesitant to rely on Chinese suppliers in the past because it would have to share its roadmaps with them. However, with the way things are looking, it's either that or jacking up the prices of upcoming Galaxy phones. Considering the current economy, neither Samsung nor Apple can afford to do that without risking losing a significant number of customers.
If Samsung is able to perfect its Exynos chips, that could be another avenue it could explore to reduce manufacturing costs. Both Apple and Samsung are ditching Qualcomm, and both of them are doing it to avoid costs that they deem unnecessary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
3 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple doesn't mind that its new processors won't be as powerful as Qualcomm's new AP
The A19 and A19 Pro application processors (APs) will be focusing on efficiency this year instead of performance. As a result, when compared to Apple's 2025 APs, Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 for Galaxy will probably be able to outperform the chips earmarked for the iPhone 17 series. On China's Weibo social media platform, tipster Fixed Focus Digital says that Apple is focusing on making the iPhone 17 series the best when it comes to battery life and doesn't mind giving away the top of the performance leaderboard to the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 for Galaxy. Apple's goal for the A19 Pro AP, which will be produced using TSMC's third-generation 3nm process node (N3P), is to score single-core and multi-core scores on Geekbench of 4000+ and 10000+ respectively. As a measure of comparison, the A18 Pro, which powers the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max, had Geekbench scores of 3539 (single-core) and 8772 (multi-core). While MediaTek's Dimensity 9500 (produced on TSMC's third-generation 3nm node) and Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 both will be looking to blow away the A19 and A19 Pro with their performance numbers, Apple's application processors should deliver improved battery life for the iPhone 17 series. The A19 and A19 Pro APs will focus on efficiency instead of performance. | Image credit-Wccftech Where the focus on efficiency over power for the A19 and A19 Pro APs will come in handy will be with the iPhone 17 Air. Thanks to its thin build, the device is expected to come to market with a puny battery with a capacity of 2800 mAh. The A19 and A19 Pro can handle more work than the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 over the same time period. That's because the new Apple APs have higher Instructions Per Cycle (IPC) scores than the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2. This means that Apple's chipset will have more efficient CPU cores. A higher IPC means that the CPU can do more work per clock tick. Even if the A19 has a lower clock speed than the Snapdragon 8 Elite 2, if it handles more instructions per cycle, it can do more work in a shorter period of time. Here's a shocker. Should Samsung Foundry get its yield on 2nm production up to 60% or higher, the 2nm Exynos 2600 AP could end up powering the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 + in most markets. That could make those two models the first smartphones to be powered by a 2nm chipset. Recently, the iPhone has been the first to the marketplace with a 7nm AP (iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max, A12 Bionic, September 2018), a 5nm AP (iPhone 12 series, A14 Bionic, October and November 2020), and a 3nm AP (iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max, A17 Pro, September 2024). Unless Samsung is unable to obtain enough 2nm chips for the Galaxy A26 and Galaxy A26+, the iPhone will not be the first smartphone to feature a cutting-edge 2nm chip. That honor appears to be heading to the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 +. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.
GSM Arena
3 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll results: iOS 26 is a mixed bag, new features liked better than the new look Comments
Weekly poll results: iOS 26 is a mixed bag, new features liked better than the new look Comments
GSM Arena
3 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll results: iOS 26 is a mixed bag, new features liked better than the new look
Apple has divided opinions with its new iOS 26 – it introduced new features, but is also a part of a wider effort to unify the user experience across all Apple products. As we noted in last week's poll, the new OS version is only available as a developer beta – an open beta should be out in a few weeks, the stable release will likely coincide with the arrival of the iPhone 17 series. What does the poll show? Around half of voters have found something to like in the iOS 26 update. That said, that was mostly due to the new features introduced in this version. As for Liquid Glass, the new unifying design language, that has its fans too, but they are in the minority. Positive impressions include better-quality glass visuals than Vista ever delivered and extended customization options. Negative opinions see this as just a skin at best rather than an actual major change to the UI. The computational requirements (more battery drain and more heat) of the new UI are also drawing ire. And, of course, legibility remains a concern – the good news on that front is that the Accessibility settings offer a toggle to reduce the transparency of the UI. The effects of the 'Reduce Transparency' toggle (image source) There is also a large group of voters who is not happy with either the new features or the new look – but part of that group just has a general anti-Apple sentiment. Not everyone, though, some long-time Apple users see this as a bad direction for UI. The 'wait and see' group isn't as big but Apple still has time to tweak details between now and Q4 when iOS 26 will be made available to the public at large. Subsequent versions will continue iterating on the design too.
