
Simmonds out and about and talking trash in recess week
As regular readers of Southern Say will know, this is a column which likes a cheap pun as much as the next hack.
Environment Minister Penny Simmonds making a keynote speech to the Waste Minimisation conference, as she did this week, certainly offers a multitude of possibilities for mischief.
However, this was a serious speech by the Invercargill National MP, one which set out much of what she has been doing in a portfolio in which the opposition likes to claim Ms Simmonds' performance has been of diminishing proportions to the needs of the great outdoors.
"Over the past year and a-half, I've been focused on delivering the government's priorities for waste, contaminated sites and broader environmental challenges," Ms Simmonds began encouragingly.
"We know the waste sector has long-standing issues, but these challenges come with opportunities to improve outcomes for both the natural world and our communities."
So far, so green. As, potentially, are changes to replace the Waste Minimisation Act and the Litter Act which the government has recently consulted on: the former law dates from 2008 and the latter from 1979, and the attitudes to and science concerning those issues are much changed and greatly advanced.
"The aim is to introduce the new legislation before the next general election," she said.
The government was also working on improving recycling, reducing plastics use and was awaiting a report on how to recycle materials which at present cannot be accepted by kerbside collection schemes.
Now, some might say "what a load of old rubbish" to that, but consider this. The WasteMINZ conference is a four-day affair with an associated trade expo event — "the flagship event for New Zealand's waste, resource recovery and contaminated land sectors" may sound unnecessarily grandiose, but WasteMINZ has got some game.
Here are some numbers to consider, from a report released the previous week into building industry waste from the year 2023.
This single source of industrial waste sent 5.25 million tonnes of debris to dumps — over two-thirds of all the waste those tips and landfills received — and of that, 18.5% was recycled.
Also, consider that just in Dunedin alone right now are being built a new hospital, regional council headquarters, ACC hub and a radiology service building, and that in the city's hinterland, consent is being sought for mines and transport hubs.
Those will generate many thousand of those annual millions of tonnes of debris — much of the recent waste being courtesy of the hospital project and the associated demolition of the former Cadbury factory. That all has to go somewhere, and few would want to see it in rivers, oceans or dumped on wasteland.
That is the way we used to do things, as Ms Simmonds knows well given that the Contaminated Sites and Vulnerable Landfills Fund is $20 million of remediation money under her purview.
Locally, that fund has put cash into clearing up the Little Tahiti Landfill in Milford Sound, the Ocean Beach Landfill near Bluff and funded planning work ahead of a much-needed purge of the old Kettle Park Landfill in Dunedin.
Ms Simmonds told the conference that more help was at hand. Nearly 80% of waste was soil or rubble, and a lot of that was either clean or so slightly contaminated that it could be rinsed and reused rather than dumped.
"This contributes to landfill overuse, emissions and high project costs. For these reasons, I am pleased to confirm today that I support the WasteMINZ proposal to fund a national soils management framework," Ms Simmonds told a no-doubt pleased audience.
"Ministry for the Environment officials will be working with WasteMINZ to develop a phased approach for addressing these issues. Details are still to be finalised and the sector will be kept updated."
So far, so sensible, as was news that the government had established an emergency waste fund. When a disaster such as an earthquake, cyclone or flood strikes, an enormous amount of waste is generated which, by and large, councils have to clean up — often without extra funding.
Ms Simmonds touted a standing fund and a simple application process, hopefully avoiding the lengthy delays faced by Christchurch in clearing quake debris or Hawke's Bay in disposing of silt from the cyclonic floods.
However, it was not all clean and pristine in Ms Simmonds' wasteful world: she had to skip around the government removing the 2025 deadline to phase out all PVC and polystyrene food and drink packaging — a decision taken to give the industry more time to adopt alternatives.
Ms Simmonds also promised to continue to "reduce waste and support recycling innovation" — which sounds good, but which avoids highlighting that the government actually reduced the amount of funds allocated to be spent out of the Waste Management Levy in the May Budget.
If you are the opposition, this is trashing the environment to pay for tax cuts; if you are the government, the $30m left after the fund is reduced by 49% will "improve the value of that spending."
Time will tell if less really is more. The youth of today
The triennial Youth Parliament takes place on July 1 and 2, although the associated programme of supporting events is already in full swing.
Every three years, MPs pick a teenager from their electorate or region to be their Youth MP: that young person then gets two days in Wellington taking part in debates, committee hearings and being grilled by a youth press gallery.
Having worked in the actual press gallery during a previous Youth Parliament, it's a fun and inspiring event for all concerned.
The South's Youth MPs are: Angus Noone (Mark Patterson); Ankita Pilo (Joseph Mooney); Enya O'Donnell (Miles Anderson); Hunter McKay Fairfax Heath (Todd Stephenson); James Watson (Scott Willis); Jomana Mohartram (Francisco Hernandez); Nargis Girhotra (Penny Simmonds); Phoebe Ashdown (Rachel Brooking); Zenah Taha (Ingrid Leary).
mike.houlahan@odt.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RNZ News
3 days ago
- RNZ News
Ministers quizzed over bottom trawling, freshwater, axing Predator Free 2050
Environment Minister Penny Simmonds has defended deep cuts to environment funding at a sometimes scrappy scrutiny hearing, which also saw opposition MPs challenging the government over weakening freshwater rules, bottom trawling near Auckland, and axing funding for Predator Free 2050. Green MP Lan Pham asked Simmonds what risks she saw from about $650 million in cuts to funding for the Ministry for the Environment across the previous two Budgets. "When you compare that to an annual budget of $528m in total, you san see that it's significant," Pham said. "Minister, you've been overseeing those cuts and some of the most damaging legislative changes we've seen in decades." Simmonds said budgets for the ministry were decreasing anyway under previous government. "We are doing things like using the much greater waste levy to go across a range of environmental issues," she said. "It's about getting value for money." "This country could not afford to keep spending the way it had been," Simmonds said. Labour MP Rachel Brooking said none of the government's strategic priorities for reforming environment laws talked about improving the environment and asked if a better environment was Simmonds' goal. "Your strategic priority document talks about improving the RMA (Resource Management Act) to be more efficient and effective but... there is nothing here about improving the environment." Brooking said waste management policies had been weakened. "You're consulting on removing the national bottom lines for freshwater," Brooking said. "These are all things that seem to go in the opposite direction from improving the environment." Simmonds said she did want a better environment but was focused on action. "The question highlights very clearly the difference between ideological statements and commentary and getting things done, and that's what this government is about, getting things done, getting product stewardship schemes in place, getting waste funding used to improve the environment," she said. The government reallocated much of the money from waste levies from purely funding waste-cutting schemes towards paying for broader environmental work in the Budget. "You're quite right, we haven't indulged in ideological rhetoric of the previous government but we are getting on with doing the things [that will help]." Simmonds was asked by Pham for the evidence behind her statements that the balance had swung too far in favour of the environment. "We are managing risk, risk if there is not economic growth, risk if there is not sufficient housing... there is risk of not having development and there is risk of any development that we do on the environment," Simmonds said. In a scrappy exchange over conservation, Minister Tama Potaka was asked about the decision to axe funding for Predator Free 2050 as well as changes to the protection of the Hauraki Gulf from bottom trawling. Green MP Celia Wade Brown said axing funding for Predator Free would only shift the work to an "overstretched" Department of Conservation and asked how volunteers were expected to keep investing their time in culling pests when the government was pulling funding out of conservation. Labour's Priyanca Radhakrishan asked Potaka how he squared the decision to disestablish funding for the Predator Free 2050 company with his statements a few months earlier about its crucial role in eradicating pests. Potaka said the Department of Conservation had had to go through a process of cost savings just as "nearly all portfolios have had to give up something". "One of those choices was to remove the funding for Predator Free 2050 Limited and disestablish that company." He said there had been some duplication between the company and the department, and "a lot of the mahi" could be undertaken by the department. "I think it is important to delineate between opinions and facts," Potaka said. "There is a strong opinion that we are not committed to Predator Free 2050 (the goal) and that is entirely inaccurate, we are consulting right now on a predator free strategy and... we have allocated a significant amount of money." He said 14 jobs would be lost from the closure of the company but some might be redeployed. Potaka accused Brooking of being "out of control" during a heated conversation about wildfire protection rules sparked by a herd of Wapiti deer, a type of elk, which the government recently decided to protect in Fiordland National park. Brooking asked Potaka if Wapiti ate the undergrowth of native forests in National Parks. "Yes, they do eat undergrowth but they also contribute significantly to tourism and getting the economy moving again and we're really thrilled to have partnered with the [Fiordland] Wapiti Foundation... and others," Potaka said. Potaka said he was carrying out conservation reforms because of some "archaic arrangements". Brooking asked, "Is the New Zealand Conservation Authority an archaic arrangement?" and noted it was included in the proposed reforms. "I've never said that, and you imputing that I did I think is out of control," Potaka said. Brooking could be heard saying "settle" during Potaka's answer. Potaka also defended changes to bottom trawling in the Hauraki Gulf under questioning from Green co-leader Marama Davidson, which became another heated discussion. Davidson asked if the minister had sought advice from officials "about the impact of continuing to allow for disruptive trawling and how that will impact on his purview of protection of ecosystems and indigenous species, and what further extra cost or work it might take to fix up that destruction?". "I'm not aware of any extensive advice that has been proffered to me on trawl corridors in the Hauraki Gulf but what I am aware of is extensive advice that's very celebratory of our tripling of the protection [area] in the Hauraki Gulf, which we are going to follow through," Potaka said. On freshwater, Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard said he knew of a vegetable grower producing a quarter of the country's leafy greens who was operating illegally because the council couldn't give him a consent. He defended the proposal to get rid of national bottom lines for water quality. "I'm aware of catchments where water is coming out of nature at quality worse than bottom lines." "We can't just live with no jobs, no economy in an idyllic little paradise." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Scoop
5 days ago
- Scoop
Supported Learners Carry The Burden Of Minister's Delusion
Minister of Vocational Education Penny Simmonds told the Education and Workforce Select Committee yesterday that she thinks most polytechnics are overstaffed, describing what she considers high staffing levels as 'abysmal'. Te Hautū Kahurangi | Tertiary Education Union is pointing to cuts currently proposed to educational opportunities for supported learners as a prime example of the human cost of her delusion. Weltec and Whitieria are proposing to disestablish both of their existing Level 1 Certificates in Skills for Living; and Skills for Learning and Working for Supported Learners. Along with the four full time equivalent staff members, the greater Wellington region will lose the only programmes of this kind for learners with disabilities if the proposal goes ahead. Kaiwhakahaere | Organiser Drew Mayhem says 'there is considerable demand for both these programmes within the community. Student numbers have not decreased. These cuts are purely due to the government's inability and unwillingness to provide a level of baseline funding that will avoid further contraction of the sector before it is in a permanent death spiral.' Te Pou Ahurei | National Secretary Sandra Grey says 'the Minister uses an 18:1 student/staff ratio as a blunt instrument to measure viability but this misses the point of why we need polytechnics. If 12 disabled young people want to gain work skills in Porirua, why wouldn't we fund that? By her reckoning those 12 young people miss out on the future they deserve and 12 businesses miss out on great workers.' 'Furthermore, the Minister's Education and Training (Vocational Education and Training System) Amendment Bill, if passed, will only further destabilise the provision of vocational education, as the bill provides no clarity on what the future of the sector looks like beyond closures and possible privatisation. New Zealanders deserve better. They were promised regional autonomy but instead are having our tertiary providers hollowed out from within.' To have your say on the Bill, click here for the TEU's submission guide, and here to make your submission by midnight tonight.


Otago Daily Times
5 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Census scrapped, replaced by 'administrative data'
By Kate Newtown of RNZ New Zealanders have filled out their last traditional Census form, with the five-yearly count scrapped from 2030. Statistics Minister Shane Reti announced today that the Census - which has existed in a similar format for more than 70 years - will be replaced with a combination of administrative data from other government agencies and smaller annual surveys that a sample of the population will complete. There will be no 2028 Census. The change follows a major review carried out last year, after the 2023 Census. Reti said the traditional Census was "no longer financially viable". "Despite the unsustainable and escalating costs, successive censuses have been beset with issues or failed to meet expectations," he said. An attempt to shift the Census online in 2018 was a failure, with much lower than normal completion rates that affected Māori particularly badly. The fallout prompted the chief statistician to resign, and the 2023 Census was shifted back to a paper form. However, completion rates were still lower than previous years, with only 88 percent of the population filling out and returning the 2023 form. The Census does more than just provide interesting insights into how New Zealand is changing - it serves some crucial democratic functions. It helps to determine how and where government funding is spent for basic services and infrastructure like hospitals and schools, now and in the future . The population count also determines how many electorates there are, and where their boundaries should be drawn. The Census is also the only nation-wide survey of housing conditions - collecting information on the size of each dwelling, the number of people living there, and which basic services like internet are available. Reti said not only would the new approach save time and money, it would also provide "more timely insights" into New Zealand's population. The most recent Census cost $325 million, and the data analysis involved meant the first results were not released until mid-2024. "By leveraging data already collected by government agencies, we can produce key census statistics every year, better informing decisions that affect people's lives," Reti said. A Census has been held in New Zealand every five years since 1851, with only a few exceptions - most recently following the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. This will be the biggest change to how the Census is conducted since 1951, when the same Census form was filled out by Māori and European New Zealanders for the first time. Administrative data would form the "backbone" of the new system, with surveys helping to fill in data gaps, especially for smaller populations. The administrative data used would include information from tax records, education enrolments, health data, student loans and allowances and ACC injury claims. Some statisticians and demographers have warned that any move away from a traditional Census that attempts to count and survey the entire population will need to be done carefully and transparently. Last year, a group of senior researchers at the Public Health Communications Centre - many of whom rely on Census data for their work - said there was a role for administrative data. However, it had been shown to "not be up to the task in many areas, such as understanding households or people's health and well-being, compared with survey data", they wrote.