Federation calls for immediate reconstitution of State-Level Backward Classes Commission in Puducherry
The Federation for People's Rights has urged the Puducherry government to immediately reconstitute the State-Level Commission for Backward Classes (SLBC), which has been non-functional for the past seven years.
In a statement, G. Sugumaran, secretary of FPR, said the SLBC, a permanent body constituted in conformity with the Constitution of India and established in Puducherry in 1998, has played a critical role in the implementation of reservation policies by the government.
The SLBC is normally reconstituted once in three years. The Commission has been reconstituted six times and the life of the sixth reconstituted Commission ended in May, 2018. However, the SLBC has become non-functional in the last seven years, the federation said.
As a consequence of the dysfunctional state of the SLBC, complaints and representations submitted by the public to the Commission remain unattended in the absence of a regular Chairman and a body. Though the files relating to the reconstitution of the body had been forwarded by the authorities concerned to the Chief Minister's office, they have been gathering dust, Mr. Sugumaran said.
Though repeated representations have been made by political parties and various other organisations to reconstitute the Commission, no action has been taken so far, he said.
Mr. Sugumaran said the caste census cannot be conducted till the SLBC is reconstituted. Under these circumstances, the government should immediately reconstitute the SLBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Congress's criticism of EC does disrespect to its layered processes
I have worked with the Election Commission. That's why I couldn't help but feel anguished by the Leader of the Opposition's article in this newspaper ('Match fixing in Maharashtra', IE, June 7). The charges levelled against the Commission in the article are inaccurate. Elections are a political fight. They are about getting the people's support. However, it seems to have become fashionable to blame the system when political parties are rejected by the people. It's another matter that the parties from the Opposition have been elected to office in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Bengal, Jharkhand and Karnataka. In Karnataka and Himachal, the BJP was ousted from office. If the LoP's accusations are correct, then Congress shouldn't have come to power in these two states. I have more than 36 years of experience with the civil services and have worked with Congress, BSP, SP and BJP governments at both the state level and the Centre. As a district election officer, I have officiated at least 10 elections. I have also been an election observer in at least five parliamentary constituencies. Nowhere was the role of the Commission doubted. Now to the charges against the Commission. One, the electoral rolls are updated in a routine manner at the district level. The process involves scrutiny at the booth level and by the tehsildar, sub-divisional officer, the supervisory officer at the district level and the district election office or the district magistrate. Every update is put up at the polling booth, the district office and the state office. Sufficient opportunity is given to all political parties to file objections. These objections are heard, and if necessary, corrections are made before the updated rolls are sent to a state's chief election officer. They are then finalised. The LoP's charge that the rolls were manipulated shows either a disconnect with his party workers at the district level or an absence of responsible cadres from his party at the grassroots level. Two, the chief election commissioner was earlier appointed by the Centre. One of them, in fact, became a minister after retirement in a government headed by the LoP's party. Now the same party is challenging the process of appointment of the CEC, when today, there is a process laid down for the appointment of this official. The charge is ridiculous. Three, the voting percentage given during the poll is an estimate. It takes time to arrive at the actual figure since queues at some of the polling stations, at the time of the polls closing, are long. The actual data comes in only when polling officials return to the collection points and submit the actual account with the total votes polled and the voter turnout. In several remote parts of the country, including in Maharashtra (especially the state's Naxal-prone regions), the polling parties return to the headquarters very late at night or even the next morning. Hence, the final voter turnout is put out only when every polling station gets its written and signed account. There will always be a divergence between the estimated and actual polling percentages. The entire process of accounting for votes involves so many layers of administration that it is impossible to manipulate the figures. Also, nothing stops the candidate from challenging the whole process. The Congress party and its advisors have lost touch with the system and with the public at large. They have lost the connection with their cadres at the grassroots level as well. They should not forget that the Election Commission of India is often asked by foreign governments to share its experiences in conducting free and fair elections. In fact, from my experience, I can say that irregularities used to take place when there was a system of paper ballots and when there were no EVMs. I remember a private company once telling me that it could manipulate the EVM. I asked them to give me a demonstration since that would have proved educational for me as well. But they couldn't manipulate the machine. I would urge the LoP to rethink. His criticism of Operation Sindoor indicates that he has lost touch with the country's reality. The LoP's criticism of the Election Commission is totally out of place. The writer is Chairman, Prasar Bharati
Mint
12 hours ago
- Mint
Bihar Assembly Elections: ECI mulls intensive house-to-house verification, here's why
Ahead of the Bihar Assembly Polls, the Election Commission of India (ECI) is mulling an intensive house-to-house verification during the upcoming electoral roll revision, reported PTI quoting ECI sources. According to the report, the ECI is planning the verification to make the Electoral Rolls completely robust and free of any kind of errors. This is not the first time when ECI has done rigorous revision of the electoral rolls. The last such exercise was undertaken in the year 2004, ECI sources said. Earlier, various civil society organisations, political parties and agencies have raised their concerns regarding the inclusion or deletion of names of the electors in the Electoral Rolls. The Election Commission of India has repeatedly emphasised that it is committed to ensuring that only genuine and eligible citizens are enrolled in the electoral rolls. Regular exercise of revision of the Electoral Rolls is undertaken annually throughout the country by the ECI and also before the holding of Elections/Bye-polls by the ECI. Constitutional and legal frameworks are also quite clear and robust in this regard. The provisions regarding eligibility to be registered as a voter and disqualifications for registration in an electoral roll are clearly laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution of India and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 respectively. The need for constant updation of the electoral rolls arises due to various reasons, such as migration/shifting of electors. "The country continuously witnesses inter-state, intra-state, inter-district and intra-district migration due to reasons such as marriage, job opportunities, education, family requirements etc. For instance, during the year 2024 as per forms received by the ECI, 46.26 lakh persons shifted their residence, 2.32 crore applied for corrections and 33.16 lakh requested for replacement. Thus, in a single year, nearly 3.15 crore changes were required to be made across the country," ECI sources said. The number of deletions of dead voters is much lower compared to the registered deaths since the families do not approach the ECI for deletion of names of their kin. Also, another reason for constant updating is the addition of the names of young electors attaining the age of 18 years. It also includes corrections in the elector details such as names, photographs or address. Among other reasons for constant updation are rationalisation of polling stations as ECI wants to ensure no elector has to travel for more than 2 kilometers to cast their vote, and subsequent deletion names of foreign illegal immigrants in the electoral rolls.
India Gazette
15 hours ago
- India Gazette
ECI mulling intensive house-to-house verification during Electoral Rolls revision for Bihar Polls
New Delhi [India], June 22 (ANI): Election Commission of India (ECI) is contemplating an intensive house-to-house verification during the upcoming electoral roll revision before Bihar Assembly Polls in order to make the Electoral Rolls completely robust and free of any kind of errors, according to ECI sources. Such intensive and rigorous revision of the electoral rolls has been done in the past as well. The last such exercise was undertaken in the year 2004, ECI sources said. Over the past, persistent concerns have often been raised by various civil society organisations, political parties and agencies regarding the inclusion or deletion of names of the electors in the Electoral Rolls. Sanguine about its responsibility, the Election Commission of India has repeatedly emphasised that it is committed to ensuring that only genuine and eligible citizens are enrolled in the electoral rolls. Regular exercise of revision of the Electoral Rolls is undertaken annually throughout the country by the ECI and also before the holding of Elections/Bye-polls by the ECI. Constitutional and legal frameworks are also quite clear and robust in this regard. The provisions regarding eligibility to be registered as a voter and disqualifications for registration in an electoral roll are clearly laid down in Article 326 of the Constitution of India and Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 respectively. The need for constant updation of the electoral rolls arises due to various reasons, such as migration/shifting of electors. 'The country continuously witnesses inter-state, intra-state, inter-district and intra-district migration due to reasons such as marriage, job opportunities, education, family requirements etc. For instance, during the year 2024 as per forms received by the ECI, 46.26 lakh persons shifted their residence, 2.32 crore applied for corrections and 33.16 lakh requested for replacement. Thus, in a single year, nearly 3.15 crore changes were required to be made across the country,' ECI sources said. Deletion of names of dead electors: Generally, number of deletions of dead voters is much lesser than the registered deaths as the families do not approach the ECI for deletion of names of their kin. The other reason for constant updating is addition of names of young electors attaining the age of 18 years and corrections in the elector details such as names/photographs/address. Rationalisation of Polling stations for various reasons, especially in view of the new limit set by the ECI of 1200 electors per polling station from the earlier 1500 and the commitment of the ECI to ensure that no elector has to travel for more than 2 kilometers to cast their vote and identification and subsequent deletion names of foreign illegal immigrants in the electoral rolls are the other reason to constantly update the electoral rolls. The entire process of updation of the electoral rolls is conducted as per law/rules/instructions of the ECI, and sufficient opportunity is provided to the political parties to file claims, objections and appeals before the final electoral is published. However, in spite of following a detailed protocol, insinuations and allegations are often made against the ECI for arbitrarily inflating the electoral roll, even though, the exercise is conducted with complete transparency and under constant scrutiny of the political parties. (ANI)
