Google DeepMind CEO On What Keeps Him Up At Night: "AGI Is Coming, Society's Not Ready"

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis has warned that society is not ready for human-level artificial intelligence (AI), popularly referred to as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). In an interview with Time, Mr Hassabis was quizzed about what keeps him up at night, to which he talked about AGI, which was in the final steps of becoming reality.
The 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry winner said AI systems capable of human-level cognitive abilities were only five to ten years away.
"For me, it's this question of international standards and cooperation and also not just between countries, but also between companies and researchers as we get towards the final steps of AGI. And I think we are on the cusp of that. Maybe we are five to 10 years out. Some people say shorter, I wouldn't be surprised," said Mr Hassabis.
"It's a sort of like probability distribution. But it's coming, either way it's coming very soon and I'm not sure society's quite ready for that yet. And we need to think that through and also think about these issues that I talked about earlier, to do with the controllability of these systems and also the access to these systems and ensuring that all goes well," he added.
Sir Demis Hassabis on what keeps him up at night: As we approach "the final steps toward AGI," safety still matters -- but it's coordination that haunts him.
"It's coming… and I'm not sure society's ready."
How will countries, companies, and labs align before it's too late? pic.twitter.com/W0WZRmcaM8
— vitrupo (@vitrupo) April 23, 2025
This is not the first instance when Mr Hassabis has warned about the perils of AGI. He has previously batted for a UN-like umbrella organisation to oversee AGI's development.
"I would advocate for a kind of CERN for AGI, and by that, I mean a kind of international research focused high-end collaboration on the frontiers of AGI development to try and make that as safe as possible," said Mr Hassabis in February.
"You would also have to pair it with a kind of an institute like IAEA, to monitor unsafe projects and sort of deal with those. And finally, some kind of supervening body that involves many countries around the world. So a kind of like UN umbrella, something that is fit for purpose for that, a technical UN," he added.
AGI could destroy humanity
The assessment by the Google executive comes in the backdrop of DeepMind publishing a research paper earlier this month, warning that AGI may "permanently destroy humanity".
"Given the massive potential impact of AGI, we expect that it too could pose potential risk of severe harm," the study highlighted, adding that existential risks that "permanently destroy humanity" are clear examples of severe harm.
What is AGI?
AGI takes AI a step further. While AI is task-specific, AGI aims to possess intelligence that can be applied across a wide range of tasks, similar to human intelligence. In essence, AGI would be a machine with the ability to understand, learn, and apply knowledge in diverse domains, much like a human being.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Economic Times

32 minutes ago

• Economic Times

Former Meta VP Karandeep Anand takes on CEO role at Character. ai

Live Events Google-backed AI chatbot service Character. ai has appointed Karandeep Anand as its next chief executive officer on to this, he was vice president and head of business products at Meta . He has also held executive roles at the new role, Anand will focus on advancing Character. ai's long term strategy to enhance multimodal-AI technology and expand the user has been a board advisor to Character. ai for the last nine months. In a note, he laid out plans for the company over the next 60 days. These plans include working on refining open source models in an attempt to improve memory and overall model quality. He also aims to improve search and discoverability features to help users navigate parallel, Anand hinted at expanding Character. ai's creative toolkit to help creators design richer, immersive characters, with audio and video give users better control, he said he is going to make the content filters less overbearing to ease out restrictions. Additionally, he aims to roll out 'Archive' option to allow users to hide or archive characters if they wish company also announced Dominic Perella as chief legal officer and senior vice president (SVP) of global ai uses deep learning models similar to GPT-type models, offering conversational AI characters while also allowing character creation. However, it does not support generating images or code, making it a solely text-based model.

Time of India

2 hours ago

• Time of India

AI now writes 25% of code in the US: Should Computer Science students rethink their career plans?

Artificial Intelligence is no longer just supporting programmers—it's actively writing code. According to insights published by The Atlantic , major U.S. tech companies like Microsoft and Alphabet now rely on artificial intelligence to generate nearly 25% of their code. As generative tools become deeply integrated into software development workflows, they're not only boosting productivity—but also raising difficult questions about the future of entry-level tech jobs. Tech jobs shift as AI takes over AI's growing role in software development isn't just a behind-the-scenes shift—it's showing up in employment data. According to The Atlantic , the number of 22–27-year-olds employed in computer science and math roles has dropped by 8% in recent years. While some of this is attributed to tech layoffs, automation is also playing a central role. Even tech companies acknowledge the shift. Executives at Microsoft and Google's parent company Alphabet have already confirmed the impact of AI on their code output. Meanwhile, at startups like Anthropic, AI models are replacing the need for junior-level coders altogether. Software jobs seen as most at risk These fears aren't just limited to hiring managers and academics. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Mess-Free Dog Toy That's Safer for Heavy Chewers Petsume Undo A 2025 Pew Research Center survey found that 48% of Americans believe software engineers will be among the professions most affected by AI in the coming years. That's a higher percentage than for teachers, journalists, or accountants. While manual labor was long seen as most vulnerable to automation, high-skilled roles are now increasingly at risk—starting with tech. Why students are dropping CS While employees in the tech market are worried, the impact of this phenomenon is also seen among tech students. After years of explosive growth, computer science enrollment is flattening. According to recent data referenced in The Atlantic , national growth in CS majors in the U.S. has slowed to just 0.2% this year. At elite institutions such as Princeton and Stanford, once considered pipelines to Silicon Valley, the number of CS undergraduates has either plateaued or started to decline. Princeton's department, for instance, anticipates a nearly 25% drop in majors within two years. Students have now become increasingly cautious. With mass layoffs in big tech, changing visa norms, and rising uncertainty around the long-term role of junior programmers, CS is no longer the default 'safe bet' it once seemed. The road ahead for Computer Science majors The shifting ground poses serious questions for universities and future students. Should colleges reduce CS department sizes? Are interdisciplinary programs—like CS with ethics, bioinformatics, or design—better suited for an AI-enhanced future? And for students: If AI can write your code, what skills will set you apart? The answer may lie in hybrid expertise—combining technical literacy with creativity, strategy, and human-centered design. The next generation of engineers may need to be less about syntax and more about systems thinking. To be clear, computer science isn't dying—but it's evolving. Demand for AI-literate engineers, machine learning experts, and cybersecurity professionals remains strong. However, the pathway to these roles is becoming steeper and more selective. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Business Standard

3 hours ago

• Business Standard

Dark energy discovery changed understanding of universe: Nobel laureate

Dark matter pulls the universe and dark energy pushes, both mysteries that endure. And the discovery that a majority of the universe is made up of stuff that makes gravity push rather than pull was a gamechanger, says Nobel laureate Brian Schmidt. The US-born Australian astronomer along with Adam Riess and Saul Perlmutter from the US discovered the stuff, later termed dark energy, in 1998. The three won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2011. Explaining the significance of their discovery that changed the understanding of how the universe functions, Schmidt told PTI, "Dark energy is really saying (that) there is energy tied to space itself. If we didn't have dark energy, the universe would be curved and the universe wouldn't accelerate -- and that changes how cosmic objects, such as galaxies, looks. It really makes a difference," the astronomer, who was visiting Ashoka University for the Lodha Genius Programme, added. The term dark energy is intentionally similar to dark matter. Dark matter refers to particles in the universe that hold galaxies and other structures in space (the cosmos) together. It is said to have peculiar properties, such as being invisible, as it does not interact with light. However, while "dark matter and atoms (that make up ordinary matter) are pulling the universe, dark energy is pushing the universe. There's a balance at any given time of who's winning the war -- dark energy has won the war, it seems now and is pushing the universe apart", Schmidt explained. That's because dark energy had a density set at the time of the Big Bang, said the 58-year-old former president of the Australian National University and currently a distinguished professor of astronomy. The Big Bang, believed to have given birth to the universe, happened some 13.8 billion years ago. Dark matter is among the particles formed immediately after the event, gravity exerted from which is said to produce a slowing effect on the universe's evolution. "And (dark energy) stayed at that density. But as the universe expanded, and the density of atoms and dark matter dropped over time, the two crossed about 6.5 billion years back -- and that crossing meant the dark energy could take over and accelerate the universe," Schmidt said. Work on the discovery that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate and that dark energy is the driving force began in 1994. Schmidt and colleagues intended to look at distant objects and measure how fast the universe was expanding in the past, and then look at nearer objects to see how it slowed down over time. "And if we measured the universe slowing down really quickly, then we'd know that the universe was heavy and you're gonna get a Gnab Gib -- the Big Bang in reverse. But if the universe was slowing down slowly, then we'd know the universe is light and it's gonna exist forever. So that's what we were going to do." Three and a half years later came the answer. What we saw was the universe was expanding slower in the past and it sped up. So instead of slowing down, it's actually the other way -- it's speeding up," the Nobel laureate said. In 1917, physicist Albert Einstein first imagined dark energy as a concept -- only he did not think of it in those exact words but instead accounted for it in his equations of general relativity as a 'lambda' term. Einstein is said to have considered the lambda term irrelevant, even denouncing it as his greatest blunder. "When we made our discovery of the acceleration (of the universe), it was the only sensible way of making it happen. So that thing (the lambda term), that he (Einstein) brought in 1917 and then later discarded as being irrelevant, that seems to (be validated from) what we discovered," Schmidt continued. "In 1998, cosmology was shaken at its foundations as two research teams presented their findings...," states the press release dated October 4, 2011, announcing the recipients for the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2011. The 1998 model has since been scrutinised through experiments, mainly aimed at understanding the nature of dark energy -- is it constant or does it vary? "We put in some extra knobs in the model of 1998, where we allow dark energy to change over time. The models with the most recent data seem to prefer a dark energy that changes," Schmidt said. But he is sceptical. "I'm not saying they're wrong. I'm saying I need better data to be convinced they're right. He said he is also glad that someone else is working on it. Schmidt leads the 'SkyMapper Telescope Project' for which he conducted a survey of the southern sky as seen from Australia, focussed on looking at the "oldest, first stars in the galaxy". "We could see essentially what the chemistry of the universe was back really close to the Big Bang -- because if a star was formed right after the Big Bang, it's made up of the stuff that was in the universe at the time. "And so, we found the most chemically pure stars that have ever been discovered, ones that were almost certainly not formed from the remnants of the Big Bang, but from a single exploding star after the Big Bang. That just gives us a sense of what the first stars look like," said Schmidt, who has published his findings in several journals, including Nature. Schmidt, who addressed high schoolers and others on science as a potential career at the university, advised them to get the skills that seem useful for life by working on something that interests them. Not knowing what to do in life and the fact that he enjoyed astronomy made Schmidt pursue the field. "In learning astronomy, I'd learned math, I'd learned physics, I'd learned computing, I'd learned some engineering. And (while) I didn't think it was likely that I would get a job to be an astronomer, I knew math, engineering, physics, and computing liable to give me a good job doing something. And of course, I did end up being an astronomer," he said. "You don't really know how all of this is going to come together in your life, but if you work on something you're interested in, with a set of skills that seem useful for life, then don't overthink your life, don't overplan your life," Schmidt said.