Help ICE or lose your job, Florida attorney general tells Broward sheriff
Last week Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony said his department will not prioritize arresting undocumented immigrants who haven't committed crimes. On Monday, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier warned the sheriff that could cost him his job.
Uthmeier posted a strongly worded letter Monday morning addressed to Tony on X lambasting remarks the sheriff made during a June 3 Broward County Commission budget workshop meeting, in which he said that there are 'other priorities in this community that I'm focused on, and immigration is not one of them.'
'I don't care what country you're from. If you commit a crime in this county, I'm coming for you,' Tony said during the meeting. 'But what I refuse to do is take this notion that we need to be knocking on doors or arresting children or going into day care centers or restaurants and taking and snatching people off these streets who have been paying taxes and contributing to this society in some positive form regardless of if they are a U.S. citizen or not. It's not within our purview, it's not within our responsibility, and I won't participate in it.'
Tony's June 3 comments appear to put him at odds with President Donald Trump's sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration and Gov. Ron DeSantis' efforts to aid in the president's goals. In February, DeSantis touted that all 67 of the state's sheriffs signed a 'Task Force Model' agreement with ICE that gives deputies some immigration authority under the 287(g) program, including the Broward Sheriff's Office.
'Participation is not optional'
Uthmeier's letter stated that Tony must comply with a Florida Statute that says 'state and local law enforcement agencies and any official responsible for directing or supervising such agency shall use best efforts to support the enforcement of federal immigration law.'
'You are such an official, and therefore must use 'best efforts' to work with federal immigration authorities, including United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),' Uthmeier wrote in the letter. 'Your statements to the contrary suggest you misunderstand or intend to flout these requirements under Florida law.'
Penalties for failing to adhere to the law, Uthmeier wrote, include 'declaratory and injunctive relief, being held in contempt, or removal from office by the Governor.' Uthmeier doubled down on the threat against Tony's job Monday afternoon with a video posted on X.
'The choice is simple and participation is not optional. State, county and local officials can support and defend the United States and Florida constitutions and the laws therein,' Uthmeier said in the video. 'Or, we will find someone who will.'
Uthmeier wrote in his letter that he wanted Tony to 'clarify' his remarks. Tony responded with a letter of his own on Monday, reassuring the attorney general that the Broward Sheriff's Office works closely with ICE to arrest undocumented immigrants who have committed crimes and is in compliance with its agreements with the federal agency.
'It is BSO's priority to address criminal activity within our community, including crimes committed by unauthorized aliens, and to work with our federal partners in this endeavor,' Tony wrote. 'BSO is not only enforcing the law against unauthorized aliens who commit crimes in the community; it is a leader in this effort.'
'We're not ICE'
In his letter, Tony told Uthmeier that BSO entered two agreements with ICE in 2019: a 287(g) Warrant Service Office Agreement that authorizes trained deputies to serve ICE warrants to people in jail and a Basic Ordering Agreement to keep federal immigration detainees in the county jail for up to 48 hours to allow ICE to take them into custody. This year, Tony wrote, BSO entered into the 287(g) Task Force Model agreement 'to assist ICE with federal immigration enforcement upon request.'
While Tony's letter seems to try to allay the attorney general's concerns, it does not necessarily contradict the comments he made during the June 3 meeting when a county commissioner asked Tony about BSO's role in arresting undocumented immigrants.
'The patch on our sleeve says Broward County. We're not ICE. We're not immigration,' Tony responded. 'I don't work for the Department of Justice. I don't work for the president of the United States. I work for the people of this community.'
Tony said in the meeting that BSO is in compliance with state law and the 287(g) agreement. However, he said, while other Florida sheriff's have 'increased the availability of manpower to execute some of these responsibilities that fall under immigration,' BSO has not.
Earlier this year Tony told the Sun Sentinel that while BSO does comply with ICE, it does not deploy deputies to find and round up undocumented immigrants who have not committed any crimes. He echoed the same stance during the June 3 meeting.
DeSantis appointed Tony, a Democrat, as Broward sheriff in 2019. He won both his bids to keep his job in the 2020 and 2024 elections. Broward is the only firm Democrat stronghold in South Florida.
In March, Uthmeier sent a similar threatening message to the Fort Myers City Council after it voted against enrolling in the 287(g) program. 'Failure to correct the Council's actions will result in the enforcement of all applicable civil and criminal penalties, including but not limited to being held in contempt, declaratory or injunctive relief, and removal from office by the Governor,' Uthmeier wrote in a letter.
Days later, the city council unanimously reversed its decision.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Ex-ICE chief warns Biden's border crisis likely fueled Iranian sleeper threat in US
The impact of the border crisis under the Biden administration likely added fuel to the fire of an Iranian sleeper cell threat domestically, according to a former top Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official who briefly led Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Following the strike on Iranian nuclear sites by the U.S. on Saturday, DHS issued a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin warning about the risk of domestic terrorism from Iranian-backed or inspired perpetrators. "Definitely," former acting ICE director and Fox News contributor Jonathan Fahey said when asked if the Biden border crisis likely made matters worse domestically. "I think one thing that's really concerning about that: One, they weren't doing any really meaningful vetting in the last administration. The second part of it is, you know, we have probably 2 million known gotaways come through the last administration, and the people that went through the non-ports of entry, we knew they went through but nobody caught them, so we have no idea who went through," he added. Fahey noted that other countries were likely paying close attention to the heavy flow of people crossing into the country illegally. He briefly led ICE toward the end of Trump's first term and was the former deputy assistant secretary at the DHS. "But the thing that's concerning is all of our adversaries knew at the time that we basically, in all intents and purposes, had an open border. So, to the extent they wanted to send people in to spy, to collect intelligence, to do us harm, to plan to do us harm in the future, they had carte blanche to get anyone in that they wanted to with really little or no resistance," Fahey said. "That's what makes what Biden, the Biden-Mayorkas open border just so unconscionable," he said. Fox News reported that roughly half of the 1,500 Iranian nationals who came through illegally during the Biden administration were let go into the U.S. "The likelihood of violent extremists in the Homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland," the DHS bulletin stated. "Multiple recent Homeland terrorist attacks have been motivated by anti-Semitic or anti-Israel sentiment, and the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict could contribute to US-based individuals plotting additional attacks," it continued. Other national security experts also doubled down that the releases and gotaways during the Biden administration continued to pose a risk. "We don't know where those thousand Iranians are and who knows how many others got across the border. We missed an opportunity when they caught and released those thousand. We missed the opportunity to gather intel by interviewing them and thoroughly vetting them. We just simply let them go, which is gross negligence on the part of the Biden administration," former FBI assistant director Chris Swecker told Fox News Digital. Border czar Tom Homan also sounded the alarm about gotaways on "Sunday Morning Futures" right after the Iran strikes. "We don't know who they are, where they came from, because they got away because border patrol is so overwhelmed with the humanitarian crisis that Biden created. Over two million people crossed the border and got away. That is my biggest concern. And that's what created the biggest national security vulnerability this country's ever seen," Homan said. When it comes to known releases, the Trump administration released nobody in May, compared with roughly 62,000 releases under the Biden administration last May, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Judge Destroys Trump's Case Against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
A judge in Tennessee eviscerated the government's case for keeping Kilmar Abrego Garcia detained ahead of his trial for criminal charges alleging that he transported undocumented immigrants around the country. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville said Sunday that 'the government failed to prove' that Abrego Garcia had endangered any minor victim, a claim not included in the official charges but was used to justify his ongoing detention. In a 51-page ruling, Holmes explained that not only had the government's evidence included 'double hearsay,' but that some of it also defied logic. Holmes wrote that ICE HSI Special Agent Peter Joseph had presented 'hearsay statements of cooperating witnesses' to establish that Abrego Garcia had endangered minors, including one cooperator who was 'a two-time, previously-deported felon, and acknowledged ringleader of a human smuggling operation' who'd cut a deal for early release from the government. Testimony from a second cooperator was similarly unreliable because 'his requested release from jail and delay of another deportation depends on providing information the government finds useful.' The government had not been able to prove that Abrego Garcia transported immigrant minors, but both male cooperators had claimed that he had endangered his own children. 'Both male cooperators stated that, other than three or four trips total without his children, Abrego typically took his children with him during the alleged smuggling trips from Maryland to Houston and back, some 2,900 miles round-trip, as often as three or four times per week,' Holmes wrote. 'The sheer number of hours that would be required to maintain this schedule, which would consistently be more than 120 hours per week of driving time, approach physical impossibility. For that additional reason, the Court finds that the statements of the first and second male cooperators are not reliable to establish that this case 'involves a minor victim.'' 'There is no dispute the offenses of which Abrego is charged are not crimes against children and the involvement of a minor child is not an element of the charged offenses,' Holmes wrote, disputing the government's claim that Abrego Garcia's alleged criminal activity technically 'involves minor victims.' Holmes scheduled another hearing for Wednesday to discuss the conditions of Abrego Garcia's release, but the government is expected to detain him upon release. The government has already filed a motion to appeal Holmes's decision and asked her to stay her order, arguing without evidence that Abrego Garcia could be deported in the future.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
History shows prosecuting officials challenging ICE raids won't be easy
President Trump's promised retribution against what he has called the 'core of the Democrat Power Center' includes siccing thousands of ICE agents on 'blue cities.' The assault has already led to the prosecution of public officials who challenged his abusive immigration seizures. But the Trump administration will likely lose those cases, thanks to the strong American tradition of jury resistance, sometimes called nullification, dating to before the Civil War. In New Jersey, Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) was indicted for allegedly interfering with the arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka during an immigration protest rally at an ICE detention center. If convicted of the two forcible felonies, McIver would face a maximum sentence of eight years. McIver denies the accusations, pointing out that she had a legal right to inspect the facility as a member of Congress. She has raised the Constitution's speech and debate clause as a defense. In Wisconsin, the Trump administration brought criminal charges against Milwaukee County Court Judge Hannah Dugan for allegedly preventing the arrest of a migrant in her courtroom. Dugan pleaded not guilty and moved to dismiss the case on the basis of judicial immunity. McIver's and Dugan's defenses are robust and may well prevail. But even if the prosecutors manage to overcome the immunity arguments, they will still have to face juries in Newark and Milwaukee, two of the heavily Democratic cities reviled by Trump. As detailed in my book, 'Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial,' American juries have historically refused to enforce unpopular laws against sympathetic defendants, in cases far more extreme than McIver's or Dugan's. In September 1851, shortly after the passage of the infamous Fugitive Slave Act, a band of slavehunters from Maryland, holding a federal warrant and under the leadership of a deputy U.S. marshal, attempted to apprehend four alleged runaways near the village of Christiana, Pennsylvania. When the posse's presence was discovered, the local Black community, along with some white allies, rallied to the defense of the fugitives and drove it away in a hail of rocks and bullets. One would-be kidnapper was killed in the melee, and the deputy marshal was humiliated. The fugitives escaped to Canada with the assistance of Frederick Douglass. The Millard Fillmore administration obtained indictments against 41 defendants — 36 Black and five white — accusing them of forming a 'traitorous combination' to 'prevent the execution' of the Fugitive Slave Act. The formal charge was treason, which carried the death penalty. The first defendant brought to trial — ironically, in Philadelphia's Constitution Hall — was a white miller named Castner Hanway. The prosecutors wrongly claimed that Hanway had been a mastermind of the rebellion, because they could not believe Black people capable of organizing a successful resistance against heavily armed whites. Hanway was represented by Rep. Thaddeus Stevens (R-Pa.), one of the great abolition advocates of his time and later author of the 13th Amendment. Stevens put on a defense that emphasized the frequent 'kidnapping and carrying away of colored persons' to nearby Maryland. As an explanation for the resistance, he noted the seizure of 'Black people … by force and violence and great injury and malice, without authority from any person on earth.' It took the jury only 15 minutes to acquit Hanway. Recognizing the futility of proceeding, the prosecution eventually dropped the charges against all defendants. Also in 1851, an alleged fugitive named Shadrach Minkins was arrested in Boston by agents operating under the Fugitive Slave Act. He was hustled into a federal courtroom where abolitionist lawyers volunteered to represent him. As the court convened the next day, about 20 Black men shoved their way through the doors and carried Minkins into the street. Onlookers cheered while 'two powerful fellows hurried him through the square,' later to be taken by wagon to Canada. Two of the most important leaders of Boston's free Black community were arrested for violating the Fugitive Slave Act: a prominent merchant named Lewis Hayden and attorney Robert Morris, one of the first Black lawyers in the U.S., as well as a white newspaper editor named Elizur Wright. All three defendants were represented by Richard Henry Dana, author of the memoir 'Two Years before the Mast,' and scion of one of Boston's oldest families. Despite substantial evidence of the defendants' participation in the rescue, there were no convictions, with two acquittals and a hung jury. As tensions increased between North and South, there were fizzled prosecutions in Syracuse, Milwaukee, again in Boston, and elsewhere. Even when prosecutions succeeded, sentencing judges could be unusually lenient. More important than any of the individual outcomes was the political movement built around the Fugitive Slave Act trials. Before the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, many northerners were content to condemn enslavement from a distance, expressing disapproval but taking no action to oppose it. Afterward, the repeated arrests of alleged runaways and the trials that followed, of both fugitives and rescuers, made it impossible to ignore the federal government's intrusive role in enforcing human bondage. The McIver and Dugan prosecutors will have to contend with potential jurors appalled by Trump's indiscriminate pursuit of migrants, just as jurors in antebellum Boston and Philadelphia were appalled by the kidnapping of fugitives and arrests of rescuers. Defense counsel will surely highlight the hypocrisy of prosecuting McIver and Dugan for minor incidents, versus Trump's mass pardons of the Jan. 6 insurrectionists. In the 1850s, northern opposition to the spread of slavery, sharpened by confrontations with slave hunters and federal marshals, led to Abraham Lincoln's election in 1860. Will the prosecution of Democratic officeholders and the arrests of countless migrants by masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents have the same impact on the mid-term elections of 2026? Steven Lubet is the Williams Memorial Professor Emeritus at the Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. He is the author of 'Fugitive Justice: Runaways, Rescuers, and Slavery on Trial' and other books on abolitionist lawyers and political trials.
