Philadelphia-area school district leader reflects on new AI safety system added this year
Some schools in Upper Darby have a new security system powered by artificial intelligence
Some schools in Upper Darby have a new security system powered by artificial intelligence
Some schools in Upper Darby have a new security system powered by artificial intelligence
As the 2024–2025 school year wraps up, the superintendent of Delaware County's largest school system is reflecting on the impact of new technology designed to keep students safe.
Upper Darby School District Superintendent Daniel McGarry said since its installation on Dec.11, 2024, Evolv has detected a total of seven knives or box cutters, two brass knuckles and seven pepper spray devices across the three schools.
"We don't have any evidence that these weapons were coming on campus as a use of force," McGarry said. "It was usually an awkwardness like, 'I had this because I was cutting food.'"
Evolv, which utilizes artificial intelligence to scan for potential weapons, was installed at Upper Darby High School, Beverly Hills Middle School and Drexel Hill Middle School.
"There was fear and some trepidation that it would take hours to get kids into the school, that we would over-identify and improperly search kids," McGarry said. "Thanks to the work of our kids and our school community, none of those things actually happened."
When staff found weapons, they confiscated them and turned them over to police. Police conducted a background check on families and, in some cases, a threat assessment. Students were disciplined for having a weapon on school property, but they were not determined to be a threat in any of the cases.
Installing a weapons-detection system had been in the works for years, but the idea gained renewed interest after two firearms-related incidents in the district at the beginning of the school year.
McGarry said a student brought a gun to Upper Darby High School on Sept. 3, 2024, and then 10 days later, another student brought in an AR-15-style magazine.
McGarry previously told CBS News Philadelphia the weapons detection system is "not a metal detector." The superintendent said it's the same technology used at Lincoln Financial Field.
"Since we had the gun in the beginning of the school year, we have not found any guns on any individuals on campus at any of our secondary schools," McGarry said.
Certain harmless objects like Chromebooks are known to set off the scanners.
"We had almost 800,000 visitors from Dec. 11 to the last time we gave this update, which was this past month," Superintendent McGarry said. "Of those 800,000 visitors, there were 70,000 alerts. The vast majority of those alerts were for umbrellas, computers left in backpacks and eyeglass kits."
McGarry said he is confident that as students continue to get used to the technology, they will be more forthcoming about removing their laptops and eyeglass cases from their backpacks.
"To put anything in the middle of the school year, just weeks before you go on winter break, and to have the success we have, speaks to the type of people who work at this organization," McGarry said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
We can't ignore the danger from those who want to ‘globalize the intifada.' We need to take action
Americans are now used to hearing chants of "globalize the intifada" in American cities and campuses. It has become so normalized that even a leading mayoral candidate in New York City feels comfortable downplaying the phrase as an expression of "a desperate desire for equality and equal rights." That is jarring enough. But as evidence mounts of an actual intifada – an anti-Israel, Jew-hating terror campaign, waged on our shores – it is past time to take those demonstrations, and their rhetoric, seriously. A movement that foments attacks against Jews and Israel-supporters is not a harmless expression of solidarity with Gaza. Yet, many Americans contextualize anti-Jewish violence within the framework of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and, in particular, Israel's war on Hamas. That misses the point. There is a contingent of people in this country who despise Jews and Israel, seek to destroy both, and were simply waiting for an excuse to act on their hatred. Israelis know what an intifada really means, because they lived it, twice. It was when every cafe, bus and nightclub in Israel was made a target for gruesome attacks against civilians. Now, Americans are learning what it looks like when "globalized." Pennsylvania Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro had to evacuate his family in the middle of the night on Passover because an anti-Israel lunatic firebombed his house, ranting about the governor's support for Israel. In Washington, DC, in May, a radical activist chanting "Free Palestine" allegedly executed two Israeli embassy staffers leaving an American Jewish Committee event. Most recently, in Boulder, Colo., a foreign national who has been living here illegally since 2023 launched a fiery attack on demonstrators who were calling for the release of the hostages being held by Hamas. The attacker told investigators "he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead" and that he had researched and planned the attack for more than a year, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Rather than raise a national conversation about the violent anti-Israel, Jew-hating movement, these incidents disappear into broader discussions of "antisemitism and Islamophobia" rising due to the war in Gaza. It's as if violence against American Jews is some kind of natural outcome of Israel's quest to free the hostages Hamas holds in brutal conditions and destroy Hamas, a terror group bent on destroying Israel. As a former envoy to the Middle East, I know the difference between a genuine peace movement and one that merely serves as a cover for chaos, violence and murder. But it doesn't take an expert to see which one the globalized intifada is. Calls for "intifada" to "free Palestine from the river to the sea by any means necessary" were always incompatible with characterizing these as "anti-war," "pro-ceasefire" protests, or a movement for "Palestinian rights," peace or a so-called "two-state solution." The movement has never been about establishing a Palestinian state. It's about destroying Israel because, the movement's adherents fundamentally believe, Jews are not legitimate sovereigns in the land of Israel. The movement's ideology licenses its adherents to take extreme measures to destroy Israel, including targeting Jews and Israel supporters worldwide. Treating anti-Jewish attacks as unfortunate byproducts of geopolitical tensions reveals a dangerous misunderstanding of how antisemitism operates. Jew-hatred doesn't emerge from policy disagreements; it's an ancient prejudice that adapts to contemporary circumstances. Medieval Europeans blamed Jews for the plague. Twentieth-century fascists blamed them for economic collapse. Today's antisemites target Jews around the world because Israel exists. The global intifada is just a rebranded version of a very old hatred. And it's not just a Jewish problem. The global intifada does not care who it harms in its quest. One way we can contain the problem is by keeping the intifada out. Some international students and some immigrants who were indoctrinated to hate Jews and Israel have imported intolerable bigotry. President Donald Trump deserves credit for having highlighted this issue long ago, recognizing that violent individuals crossing our borders pose a threat to our country, Jews and non-Jews alike. As a former envoy to the Middle East, I know the difference between a genuine peace movement and one that merely serves as a cover for chaos, violence and murder. But of late, the threat to Jews has become very significant. It's alarming that these terrorists got as far as they did, and it is highly likely that there are more radicals just like them biding their time. Effective anti-intifada strategy requires deporting aliens who support violence – and keeping them out in the first place. Hopefully by now we clearly see the danger. Anti-Jewish violence – even when cloaked as "anti-Zionist" – is not political discourse. Calling to "globalize" a campaign of civilian murder and mayhem is not part of a political debate. Targeting individuals with violence due to who they are or what they believe is a violation of every principle we hold sacred. Those who chant "globalize the intifada" have told us exactly who they are and what they intend — it's time we paid attention and connected the dots.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
The Biggest Existential Threat Calls For Philosophers, Not AI Experts
Google's former AI chief, Geoffrey Hinton distinguishes between two ways in which AI poses an ... More existential threat to humanity. (Photo by Jonathan NACKSTRAND / AFP) (Photo by JONATHAN NACKSTRAND/AFP) Geoffrey Hinton, Nobel laureate and former AI chief in Google, recently distinguished between two ways in which AI poses an existential threat to humanity. According to Hinton, the threat unfolds when: Hinton cites cyberattacks, creation of viruses, corruption of elections, and creation of echo chambers as examples of the first way AI poses an existential threat. And deadly autonomous weapons and superintelligent AI that realizes it doesn't need us and therefore decides to kill us as examples of the second. But there is a third existential threat that neither Hinton nor his AI peers seem to worry about. And contrary to their warnings, this third threat is eroding human existence without reaching any of the media headlines. The third way AI poses an existential threat to humanity unfolds when: The simplest definition of an existential threat is 'a threat to something's very existence'. But to know whether humanity's existence is threatened, we must know what it means to exist as a human. And the AI experts don't. Ever since Alan Turing refused to consider the question: 'Can machines think?', AI experts have deftly failed to define basic human traits such as thinking, consciousness and creativity. No one knows how to define these things, they say. And they are right. But they are wrong to use their lack of definitions as an excuse for not taking the question of what it means to be human seriously. And they add to the existential threat to humanity by using terms like human-level intelligence when talking about AI. German philosopher Martin Heidegger said that our relationship with technology puts us in constant ... More danger of losing touch with technology, reality, and ourselves. (Photo by Fritz Eschen / ullstein bild) What Existential Threat Really means Talking about when and how AI will reach human-level intelligence, or outsmart us altogether, without having any idea how to understand human thinking, consciousness, and creativity is not only optimistic. It also erodes our shared understanding of ourselves and our surroundings. And this may very well turn out to be the biggest existential threat of all: that we lose touch with our humanity. In his 1954 lecture, 'The Question Concerning Technology', German philosopher Martin Heidegger said that our relationship with technology puts us in constant danger of losing touch with technology, reality, and ourselves. Unless we get a better grip of what he called the essence of technology, he said we are bound to: When I interviewed Neil Lawrence, DeepMind professor of machine learning at the University of Cambridge, for 'An AI Professor's Guide To Saving Humanity From Big Tech' last year, he agreed that Heidegger's prediction has proven to be frighteningly accurate. But instead of pointing to the essence of technology, he said that 'the people who are in control of the deployment of [technology] are perhaps the least socially intelligent people we have on the planet.' Whether that's why AI experts conveniently avoid talking about the third existential threat is not for me to say. But as long as we focus on them and their speculations about what it takes for machines to reach human-level intelligence, we are not focusing on ourselves and what it takes for us to exist and evolve as humans. Existential Philosophers On Existential Threats Unlike AI experts, founders, and developers, the existential philosophy that Heidegger helped pioneer has not received billions of dollars in annual investment since the 1950's. Quite the contrary. While the AI industry has exploded, the interest and investments in the humanities has declined worldwide. In other words, humanity has for decades invested heavily in understanding and developing artificial intelligence, while we have neglected to understand and develop ourselves as humans. But although existential philosophers like Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty have not received as large grants as their colleagues in computer science departments, they have contributed insights that are more helpful when it comes to understanding and dealing with the existential threats posed by AI. In Being and Nothingness, French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre places human consciousness, or ... More no-thingness (néant), in opposition to being, or thingness (être). Sorbonne, à Paris, France, le 22 mai 1968. (Photo by Pierre BLOUZARD/Gamma-Rapho) Like different AI experts believe in different ways to reach human-level intelligence, different existential philosophers have different ways of describing human existence. But unlike AI experts, they don't consider the lack of definitions a problem. On the contrary, they consider the lack of definitions, theories and technical solutions an important piece in the puzzle of understanding what it means to be human. Existential philosophers have realized that consciousness, creativity, and other human qualities that we struggle to define, are not an expression of 'something', that is, a core, function, or feature that distinguishes us from animals and machines. Rather, they are an expression of 'nothing'. Unlike other creatures, we humans not only exist, we also question our existence. We ask why and for how long we will be here. We exist knowing that at some point we will cease to exist. That we are limited in time and space. And therefore have to ask why, how and with whom we live our lives. For existential philosophers, AI does not pose an existential threat to humanity because it might exterminate all humans. It poses an existential threat because it offers answers faster than humans can ask the questions that help them contemplate their existence. And when humans stop asking existential questions, they stop being human. AI Experts Agree: Existential Threats Call For Philosophy While existential philosophers insist on understanding the existential part of existential threats, AI experts skip the existential questions and go straight to the technical and political answers to how the threats can be contained. That's why we keep hearing about responsible AI and regulation: because that's the part that calls for technical expertise. That's the part where the AI experts are still needed. Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, recently called for new, great philosophers to understand ... More the implications of developments in AI. (Photo byfor TIME) AI experts know how to design and develop 'something', but they have no idea how to deal with 'nothing'. That's probably what Hinton realized when he retired to spend more time on what he described as 'more philosophical work.' That also seems to be what Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind, suggests when he says that 'we need new great philosophers to come about to understand the implications of this.' And that's certainly what Nick Bostrom hinted at in my interview with him about his latest book, Deep Utopia, when he declared that some questions are 'beyond his pay grade'. What 20th-century existential philosophy teaches us is that we don't have to wait for the AI experts to retire or for new great philosophers to emerge to deal with the existential threats posed by AI. All we have to do is remind ourselves and each other to ask how we want – and don't want – to live our lives before we trust AI to know the answer.
CNET
3 hours ago
- CNET
Here's What to Do if You Find Old Security Tech in Your New Home or Rental
When you're ready to move into your new home or rental, you may find a surprise: Past owners may leave security systems and other smart home tech behind, especially if it's screw-mounted or wired in. These connected devices create a new problem: What should you do, and could anyone be controlling the systems from afar? Fortunately, it's easy to guarantee your safety even if leftover cams and sensors seem ominous. I've broken the best response down into several steps you should take based on your situation. Read more: Are Homebuyers Really Being Secretly Monitored With Security Cameras? Contact the landlord or owner right away Get to the bottom of this mystery by making some quick calls. If you're renting, message your landlord and ask about the system, what it's for and how you can use it. If you're a buyer, contact the seller's real estate agent (try to avoid contacting the seller directly) and ask for an explanation of the system, if it works and why it was left behind. You need to get answers ASAP before you decide what to do next. In the meantime, you can continue moving in. If the system looks like it's powered on, we recommend shutting it off for privacy until you find out what's going on. Google's Nest cam, mounted discretely indoors. Chris Monroe/CNET Consult your lease or purchase agreement While you're waiting for direct answers about the unexpected security devices, look up your lease or purchase agreement and see if there's any section about home security. Check whether it mentions an existing security system, what will happen to the security system -- and especially who's responsible for it or has to pay for it's removal. Leases in particular often have a section about security devices and what the landlord is responsible for. You'll want to know exactly what's in writing. If it's the landlord's security system, it's usually legal for them to install and control it, although most landlords prefer to keep security devices like home security cameras outside the rental. Tenants do have rights, including a right to privacy, so if the system feels invasive, you can absolutely complain and even consult a lawyer about your options. At minimum, a landlord should have told you about the system and given you a code to arm and disarm it. If you're a homebuyer, this is the time when you decide if you want to keep the system or have it removed. If you're not too far along in the buying process, you may be able to ask the seller to pay for the alarm system's removal as part of the purchase agreement. Otherwise, you should be able to dismount most devices with a screwdriver, although some panels may need wiring work. Talk to your real estate agent about the details. Check security system power and components Explore the nuts and bolts of the security system and get to know it a little better. See if it's powered on, or if you need to flip a breaker or plug in a hub to turn it on (or keep it off, if you're nervous about privacy). Look for a model number on the keypad or hub, and look up the system online to learn about it. Check for all system components to see what's included and where any sensors or cameras are. In some cases, part of the system, like the keypad or hub, may have been removed, which renders the system useless unless you order a replacement. Arlo's home security hub is unobtrusive and easy to read Karen Freeman/CNET Fully wipe the system (if possible) The last thing you probably want is a security system in your home that a stranger can log in to remotely and use or even spy on you with. If you intend to keep using the security system or have permission from your landlord to "own" the system while you're renting there, look for the proper way to wipe the system and set up a new account. In most cases, you'll need access to the old account to do this. With a SimpliSafe system, for example, you can log in to an account, go to System Settings, and choose the reset option to wipe it. You may have to require the home seller to do this part before they move out. It's also a good idea to call the security company's customer service line. If you provide them with your address and related information, they may be able to look up accounts to see if any active accounts are registered in your home -- or provide you with additional useful advice. Check subscription details When you look up your system and contact the security company and/or previous owner, see if the security system needs a subscription. Some security systems, like those from ADT or Frontpoint, require a subscription to work at all. Others may require at least a monthly fee for managing the system yourself. Some, like Arlo's security system or Ring Alarm systems, have a free tier or offer core features at no charge. You need to know what fees you're dealing with before making final decisions. Big brands can charge over $50 per month for using security systems with monitoring, but you can find the feature for around $20 too. Read more: We Do the Math: How Much Do You Save With DIY vs. Professional Home Security? Abode's starter kit is super affordable and works with many third-party products. Abode Contact the security brand if necessary If you have a system that was professionally installed or that requires a subscription to operate, it's time to call the brand's support number and ask if the company will reboot the system for you. Brands like ADT, Vivint, Frontpoint and others often require a formal request, and can remotely test the system for you. They may need to have a local dealer come out as well. You'll have to start a new contract at this time, so be aware of the company's price tiers. Arlo's fob lets users combine doorbell and security system features. Arlo Integrate wired systems with new apps For wired security systems that can't be easily removed, you have another innovative option. You can use retrofits like which are kits that -- with basic electronics work -- convert old wired systems into new versions that can connect to your Wi-Fi and provide valuable smart features. You can then control and expand these security systems with platforms like Home Assistant, Hubitat or Samsung SmartThings. Create your own account and set up the system With the system wiped and ready, you can download the app and set up your own account. Be ready with a secure password and the login information for your home Wi-Fi router to set up the system. Take the steps slowly so you can learn how the system works, what it does, how it sends alerts and your options for arming/disarming it. If you run into trouble at this point, we recommend calling customer support for a walk-through. Test the system With the system under your control, it's time to test it out. Go through the app settings to check the details, work on arming and disarming it, and see how sensitive the sensors are. Practice sending or keying in the disarm code. Have your family and loved ones practice using the system, too. Now you're ready to adopt it as your own! For more tips on living with home security, check out our home security cheat sheet, our tips on where to put security cameras, our rundown of what to do about roommate theft, and our look at whether it's legal to record video or audio in your own home.
