Pakistani politicians, activists call on govt to review Trump's nomination for Nobel peace prize
Several Pakistani politicians and notable figures have asked the government to reconsider its decision to recommend President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize after the US bombed Iran's three nuclear sites. Pakistan said it would support US President Donald Trump's nomination for a Nobel peace prize(AP)
The government, in a surprise move on Friday, announced that it would nominate Trump for the prestigious award due to his peacemaking efforts during the recent India-Pakistan conflict.
A letter of recommendation, signed by Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, has already been sent to the Nobel Peace Prize Committee in Norway.
But the decision came under scrutiny after the US bombed Iran's Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz nuclear sites, joining Israel to dent Tehran's nuclear programme.
Also Read: Pakistan condemns US strike on Iran day after nominating Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
The Dawn newspaper reported that some leading politicians demanded the government review its decision in light of the latest development.
Veteran politician Maulana Fazlur Rehman, who heads the Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam (JUI-F), demanded that the government rescind its decision.
'President Trump's claim of peace has proven to be false; the proposal for the Nobel Prize should be withdrawn,' Fazl told workers at a party meeting in Murree on Sunday.
He said that Trump's recent meeting and lunch with Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir 'pleased Pakistani rulers so much' that they recommended nominating the US president for the Nobel Prize.
"Trump has supported the Israeli attacks on Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iran. How can this be a sign of peace?' Fazl questioned.
'With the blood of Afghans and Palestinians on America's hands, how can he claim to be a proponent of peace?'
Trump had campaigned for office as a 'peacemaker' who would use his negotiating skills to quickly end wars in Ukraine and Gaza, but both conflicts are still raging five months into his presidency.
Former senator Mushahid Hussain wrote on X: 'Since Trump is no longer a potential peacemaker, but a leader who has willfully unleashed an illegal war, Pakistan government must now review, rescind and revoke his Nobel nomination!'
He said Trump had been 'trapped by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli war lobby, committing the" biggest blunder of his presidency'.
'Trump will now end up presiding over the decline of America!'
Trump 'engaged in deception and betrayed his own promise not to start new wars', Mushahid said in another post, strongly condemning the US attacks on Iran.
Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) lawmaker Ali Muhammad Khan wrote 'reconsider' on his X account, highlighting the 'US attack on Iran and continuous US support of Israeli killings in Gaza'.
In a separate post, the Opposition PTI condemned the 'unprovoked' US strikes and voiced 'total support' for Iran's sovereignty.
Raoof Hasan, head of PTI's political think-tank, said the government's decision was now a 'cause of unmitigated shame and embarrassment for those who were instrumental in making the choice'.
'That's why it is said that legitimacy can neither be bought nor gifted,' said Hasan, as he took a jibe at the government.
He also denounced the US' 'total disregard for international covenants' through attacks on Iran.
Former senator Afrasiab Khattak said, 'The sycophancy adopted by the Pakistani ruling elite in nominating President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is not part of normative conduct in international diplomacy.'
'It was most embarrassing to announce the nomination hours before Trump ordered to bomb Iranian nuclear sites,' the veteran politician noted.
Jamaat-i-Islami chief Naeemur Rehman has said the decision 'undermines our national dignity and grace'.
Maleeha Lodhi, Pakistan's former ambassador to the US, termed the move 'unfortunate' and said it did not reflect the public's views.
Senior journalist Mariana Baabar, in a post on X, said that 'today Pakistan does not look too good either', sharing the government's post announcing its intention to nominate Trump for the Nobel.
Author and activist Fatima Bhutto asked: 'Will Pakistan withdraw its nomination for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
With its stock in sharp decline, Trump's media company will buy USD 400 million of its shares
President Donald Trump's media company plans to buy back up to USD 400 million of its stock, which have lost 46 per cent of their value this year. ADVERTISEMENT Trump Media and Technology Group, which operates the Truth Social media platform, said Monday that the acquisition will improve its financial flexibility. It will retire the shares after they are purchased, meaning these particular shares can't be reissued. Companies can drive their stock higher by acquiring or removing the number of company shares outstanding. Trump is the largest stakeholder in Trump Media, with about 114 million shares. Shares of Trump Media rose just over 2 per cent Monday. But the shares appeared to peak about a month after the company went public in late March. Shares have been on a steady, downward trajectory since. The company said early this year that it lost USD 400.9 million in 2024 and its annual revenue declined 12 per cent to USD 3.6 million. After winning the US presidential election in November, Trump transferred all of his shares in the company - worth around USD 4 billion on paper - as a gift to the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust. Trump's shares amounted to more than half of the company's stock. ADVERTISEMENT The company said Monday that it will fund the buyback separately from its Bitcoin treasury strategy. Under that plan, institutional investors will buy USD 2.5 billion in the company's stock with the proceeds going to build up a bitcoin reserve. Trump Media joins other companies with similar cryptocurrency strategies, including cloud and mobile software developer MicroStrategy, which is building a reserve containing billions worth of bitcoin. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
New Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump thrives on the idea of war, it seems to bring out the Julius Caesar in him
We are suffused with misinformation, falsehood, and lies. Very often, justifications are provided after the event. The Israeli attack has failed to damage or seriously annihilate the Iranian nuclear programme. So it changed the entire process and said that regime change was the intention. Iran and the US had five rounds of nuclear talks. In the first four rounds, the Americans accepted that Iran could do a degree of enrichment. The percentage, however, was not mentioned in the public domain. But in the fifth round in Rome, Americans abruptly insisted on zero enrichment, knowing fully well that the Iranians would reject it. But both the parties still agreed to the sixth round. That is when Donald Trump went public and said, 'I have given them a deal. I've offered it to them. I've given them 60 days. They better make up their mind.' I feel it will be investigated later on because even the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) allowed a degree of enrichment. The nuclear non-proliferation treaty has also allowed enrichment. This is a highly technical matter. In the case of the JCPOA, whatever the Iranians had above the prescribed limit had been shipped off to Russia. That's right. My view is that the Israelis deliberately initiated the conflict so that the sixth round would not take place because they feared a deal. This is more or less now consensual. More and more people are saying this. What did Trump do? Instead of expressing doubts about the preemptive attack, Trump called it excellent. He gets a charge from the idea of war. He wants to do business. He's a dealmaker. But somehow, war, destruction, killing, and assassinations seem to bring out the Julius Caesar inside him. Trump loves to strut as a general. You saw that he took the parade and stood there feeling good about himself. He later stated that he had a big plan, and it was not just a ceasefire. He said he wanted the unconditional surrender of a country (Iran) with which his country was not at war. This is farcical. Now, there is another load of absolute rubbish, and that is that the Iranian people are hostile to their regime. Now, whether anyone is hostile or not, in any country, you have a wide variety of opinions. But the minute you threaten that country, they all come together. If you remember when the Iraqis attacked Iran in 1980, they were under the impression it was a broken country. The armed forces were broken. The regime had barely taken charge. Their institutions were not in place, and everything was very confusing. The minute the Iraqis crossed the border, the country became one. They were able to hold their own. You could find parallels in the Iraq experience of 1980 to 1988. Look at the damage that the Iranians suffered, day after day, week after week, and month after month. The entire international community supported Iraq. They allowed them to use chemical weapons. And yet the Iranian did not surrender. It is only right at the end that they agreed to a truce, which he called a bitter challenge. You cannot destroy a regime based on war. What you are going to do is not a regime change. It is the destruction of Iran that is an end in itself. It would be similar to what Americans did in Iraq. Americans sent them back to the old stone age, literally. Iraq took 20 years to recover. But do remember that the assault upon Iraq gave birth to Zarqawi and the Islamic State. And that was a scourge. Look at how the American occupation was undermined by the very forces that emerged because of the occupation. The Iranians have an Islamic Republic. But it is not monochromatic. It has a wide variety of people who have been at its head. They have had people such as Rafsanjani, Khatami, Rouhani and Pezeshkian. I think the current President Pezeshkian was truly committed to changing the scenario at home and having a new diplomatic initiative abroad. Israel thrives on Iran-US conflict and is a major instigator of it. Indeed, I would say that the Israelis were terrified that Pezeshkian might actually do an outreach to the Americans and just possibly come to an arrangement.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Thomas Fugate? Meet the 22-year-old leading Trump's terrorism unit amid Iran fiasco
Image credits: X U.S. President Donald Trump on June 22, 2025 announced that American forces had carried out airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, marking Washington's formal entry into Israel's ongoing conflict with Iran. 'We have completed our very successful attack on the three Nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. All planes are now outside of Iran air space,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. Ever since, the entire world has been in a state of dread, anticipating a full-out war considering the already ongoing wars between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas. With Iran yet to respond to the bombings, American people have been anticipating counter-attacks in the country and military drafts in case a war breaks out. Amid all this ongoing tension, one would expect the government to be on the frontline of handling situations. But, the people of America can't help but question their safety with a 22-year-old former 'gardener' being appointed as the head of the terrorism unit by the President. Who is Thomas Fugate ? Image credits: X Thomas Fugate was assigned to a major terrorism-prevention post by Trump and his qualifications and ability are being questioned by netizens who are worried for the country. Recently, Senator Chris Murphy criticised the president for appointing Fugate to a role at the Department of Homeland Security where he oversees the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnership (CP3) 'As our nation girds for possible Iranian terrorist attacks, this is the person Trump put in charge of terrorism prevention,' Murphy wrote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo '22 years old. Recent work experience: landscaping/grocery clerk. Never worked a day in counter-terrorism. But he's a BIG Trump fan. So he got the job." It is not just Fugate's age that has left the American netizens unimpressed by his appointment. It is also his lack of experience. As per a June 4 investigation from ProPublica, he got the position after William Braniff, an Army Veteran with more than two decades of experience resigned in protest of the cuts to CP3. On his LinkedIn, Fugate mentioned that he spent several months performing "lawn care work around my neighbourhood." He also worked part-time as a clerk at an H-E-B supermarket. He graduated from the University of Texas at San Antonio just a year ago. Additionally, according to the Independent, Fugate is a former Heritage Foundation intern and self-described "Trumplican." Social media reactions Image credits: X Now, with the war in sight, many others on the internet are questioning Fugate's capabilities in protecting America and Americans from the situation. "DOES THIS MAKE YOU FEEL SAFE? U.S. officials say Iran will likely mobilize terrorist cells worldwide, including on U.S. soil. Just a reminder Trump has placed Thomas Fugate, a 22-year-old kid in charge of counterterrorism. He's a former grocery store clerk" wrote a person on X. "He's not had enough life experience to be able to handle this job. Jeez." added many others pointing out Fugate's life history and lack of experience. "Cause experience with shoplifters really prepares you for dealing with suicide bombers!" added another.
