Stumbling block in Trump tariff talks
The US is pushing for looser rules on American beef imports in tariff talks, a senior Albanese government minister says.
Australia has been vying for an exemption from both the Trump administration's baseline 10 per cent levies on foreign goods and the 50 per cent imposts on steel and aluminium.
Donald Trump had told Anthony Albanese that an Australian carve out was 'under consideration' but ultimately decided there would be 'no exemptions' as he set about prosecuting his 'America first' agenda.
Health Minister Mark Butler said on Friday that Australian officials were working through a request to accept beef from cattle slaughtered in the US that originated in third countries. American beef of third country origins is a key negotiating item in tariff talks with the US. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
'We will be making a decision in the national interest,' Mr Butler told Seven's Sunrise.
'That's what we've done in relation to pharmaceuticals – we've said there's no way our PBS will be on the negotiating table and we won't compromise our biosecurity laws either.'
He said the government had been 'reviewing this issue for some time'.
'This is US beef that's raised in Canada or Mexico, not cattle raised in the US itself but then brought into America, slaughtered there and proposed for exports,' Mr Butler said.
'This will be a decision taken on its merits, not for convenience, not to get a deal.'
Noting Australia's 'very strict biosecurity laws', he said the officials had been reviewing the safety of American beef with third country origins even before the request was made. Health Minister Mark Butler says biosecurity officials are reviewing the US request. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
Appearing opposite Mr Butler, opposition senator Jane Hume said the Coalition supported the caution.
'We certainly don't want to see a watering down of our biosecurity laws that would potentially put our beef industry in danger,' Senator Hume said.
'This isn't about protecting an industry's prosperity, it's about protecting an industry's integrity.
'If you are tweaking biosecurity laws by watering them down that's something I think we would be very concerned about.'
The Prime Minister has also ruled out watering down biosecurity laws to get a deal.
'No, we will not change or compromise any of the issues regarding biosecurity, full stop, exclamation mark,' Mr Albanese told the ABC.
'It's simply not worth it, so it's that simple.'
Only the UK has been able to secure a partial exemption from the US President's blanket tariffs.
A key UK concession was scrapping its 20 per cent duties on American beef and raising the import quota to 13,000 metric tonnes.
But with many British goods still subject to tariffs, analysts have questioned whether the deal was worth it.
The US has trade surpluses with both the UK and Australia.
Australia also has a free-trade agreement with the US, meaning goods should be traded mostly uninhibited.
The Albanese government has repeatedly criticised Mr Trump's decision to slap tariffs on Australian products as 'economic self-harm' and 'not the act of a friend'.
Trade Minister Don Farrell is in Europe this week for high-level negotiations on a free-trade deal with the EU.
He also met with his US counterpart and pressed for an Australian exemption from the 'unjustified' tariffs.
'Australia's position has been consistent and clear,' Senator Farrell said in a statement.
'These tariffs are unjustified and not the act of a friend.
'They are an act of economic self-harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade.
'We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.'
Mr Albanese has vowed to raise tariffs with Mr Trump when the two leaders meet at the G7 in Canada later this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AU Financial Review
33 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Patent ‘trolls' come for Canva as it prepares for share sales
Canva is being targeted by a Canadian serial litigant alleging the Australian design software giant has stolen its patents for an artificial intelligence voice generator that is now integrated into its platform. Cedar Lane Technologies has made similar claims against hundreds of companies over the last five years including Amazon, Zoom and Huawei. Its lawyer, Isaac Rabicoff, has lodged separate patent claims against Canva in Texas on behalf of other companies over the last two months.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Scott Morrison: Donald Trump's strikes on Iran a necessary measure to achieve peace, not war in Middle East
The recent strike by the United States on Iran's nuclear facilities marks a critical turning point in global security. It is not just a matter for the Middle East or for U.S. foreign policy. It is a test for all nations that rely on the strength and credibility of the international rules-based order and the western alliance for their security, Australia included. Let me be clear, this strike was not an act of provocation. It was a necessary measure, undertaken as a last resort by a President who wants peace, not war. The purpose was clear, to disrupt the capabilities of a brutal authoritarian regime that has openly defied international norms, supported terrorist proxies, and pursued nuclear weapons with increasing brazenness. In times of geopolitical crisis, clarity of purpose and principle is essential. That is why I was compelled to speak out following the U.S. operation. What we have seen instead from the Australian government is a concerning lack of clarity and a reluctance to define where Australia stands when it matters most. It is in times like this when allies look around to see who is with them. For a country like ours, deeply integrated into global economic and security networks, reliant on open trade routes and US led allied deterrence, strategic ambiguity is not a strength. It is a vulnerability. Throughout my time as Prime Minister, I took the view that Australia's interests are best served when we speak plainly and act decisively in defence of our values. That is why we stood firmly with our allies against China's economic coercion. It is why we invested in AUKUS, strengthening our sovereign defence capabilities and deepening our technological integration with the U.S. and UK. it is why we worked so closely with our Indo-Pacific partners through the Quad to uphold regional stability. It is why we stood with Israel against those who sought their annihilation. In this context, the U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear facilities must be understood for what it is: an act of strategic deterrence, grounded in the reality that Iran has long been operating outside the bounds of good faith diplomacy. It is what President Trump meant when he spoke of peace through strength. For years, Iran has methodically violated its obligations under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), enriching uranium well beyond civilian thresholds, restricting IAEA inspections, and hardening its facilities in preparation for exactly this kind of confrontation. Attempts to revive the nuclear deal have failed, not because the West abandoned diplomacy, but because Tehran refused to comply with the very terms it had previously accepted. The question facing policymakers in Washington and, indeed, in Canberra is not whether we prefer diplomacy over conflict. Of course we do. It is whether diplomacy alone can halt a regime that has no intention of negotiating in good faith. At a certain point, the cost of inaction outweighs the risk of confrontation. That is precisely where the United States found itself. Given Iran's refusal to cooperate with international monitors and its aggressive posture across the region, including arming Hezbollah, enabling Hamas to commit atrocities on innocent Israelis, supporting Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping, the Trump administration concluded that a targeted strike was the only viable option left. Only the US could have taken this step and President Trump should be commended for his courage and leadership, especially by allies. This was not a broad campaign. It was a calibrated operation aimed at degrading the most advanced elements of Iran's nuclear infrastructure specifically, targeting Natanz, Isfahan and Fordow. The objective was not regime change. It was to halt Iran's progression toward nuclear weapons capability and to send a clear message that the West's red lines still mean something. Yet here in Australia, the official response from the government has been muted. No strong statement of support for the United States. That silence is telling. It suggests a reluctance to confront difficult choices and to support our most important ally in the righteousness of the actions that have taken. I believe that such an approach is short-sighted and fundamentally misjudges the nature of the challenge we face. Australia cannot afford to be passive in moments like this. Our voice matters, not just because we are a U.S. ally, but because we are a middle power with global responsibilities. We sit at the intersection of East and West, of advanced democracies and rising developing powers. Our stance sends signals across the region, from Beijing to Moscow, Jakarta to Seoul. We must make the case for resistance against authoritarian arrogance. That doesn't mean we should follow Washington blindly. It means we must be clear, consistent and credible in how we support a global order that has protected our prosperity and security for generations. This is a time for strategic clarity, not importantly, we must ensure our own defences are fit for purpose. AUKUS is not a theoretical construct. It is a practical framework for dealing with the kinds of threats we are now seeing unfold. That means accelerating delivery timelines, investing in sovereign capabilities, and ensuring that deterrence in our own region is not eroded by distraction or delay. The world is entering a more dangerous phase. The era of risk aversion is over. Strategic competitors are testing our resolve, our alliances, and our willingness to act in defence of shared values. The choices we make now will define the kind of world our children inherit. We must choose clarity over confusion. Strength over silence. And principle over passivity. We must know who we stand with. That is the standard Australia has upheld in the past. And it is the standard we must uphold again now Scott Morrison was Australia's 30th Prime Minister.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Iran could deal a ‘great deal of damage' in response to US attacks
Political analyst Joe Siracusa weighs in on Iran's potential response following US strikes on three of its nuclear sites. 'Iran has over 3,500 major missiles in their arsenal, and they could attack American bases,' Mr Siracusa said. 'They have the ability to do a great deal of damage.'
