10 rich countries non-committal on Zimbabwe's $2.6b bridge financing appeal
Zimbabwe is yet to secure any firm pledges of financial support from the 10 countries it appealed to in its ongoing bid to settle long-standing debt arrears.
Zimbabwe is actively seeking financial support from 10 nations to address its $21 billion debt burden.
The country has been unable to access global financial markets since its default in 1999.
Zimbabwe has requested $2.6 billion in bridge financing to address debts to international lenders.
Zimbabwe is yet to secure any firm pledges of financial support from the 10 countries it appealed to in its ongoing bid to settle long-standing debt arrears.
The southern African nation is burdened with a $21 billion debt, which has shut it out of global financial markets since it defaulted in 1999, according to Bloomberg.
According to Finance Minister Mthuli Ncube, he had sent letters to Algeria, Brazil, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and the UK, requesting $2.6 billion in bridge financing to help settle debts owed to major multilateral lenders, including the World Bank, the European Investment Bank, and the African Development Bank.
However, responses from the countries Zimbabwe approached for debt relief have been mixed.
"Some of them are very warm, some of them not so warm. You will get a varied response,' he said.
One of the major hurdles to securing the bridge financing is that seven of the countries he contacted, including China and Germany, are already creditors to Zimbabwe.
Collective support needed
Given the large amount of funding Zimbabwe is seeking, it's unlikely that a single nation will step in as a sponsor. Ncube stressed that it would require a collective effort of at least three countries.
He also noted that Zimbabwe may explore other avenues to raise funds for debt repayment, including asset sales, though he did not offer specifics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
T-Mobile may be quietly planning a change customers will hate
T-Mobile has been losing customers left and right, with the company reporting a 5 basis point increase in customer churn year-over-year. This report came in the company's first-quarter earnings report for 2025, and it refers to the number of customers who canceled service. Rising prices on older rate plans, coupled with publishing plan prices that didn't include taxes, are some of the potential reasons why customer dissatisfaction with the uncarrier is growing. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Unfortunately, current and future T-Mobile customers may soon get some more bad news about the company's policies. This time, the issue is not with the cost of the monthly plans that consumers have to choose from, but is instead related to T-Mobile's payment installment programs. These programs allow consumers to finance smartphones, which most people choose to do because the upfront cost is simply too high. T-Mobile has offered installment plans on phones for over a decade, dubbing them "Equipment Installment Plans" or EIPs. But now evidence suggests the phone carrier is planning to change how these plans work, a move that could wind up being very unpopular. Image source: Bloomberg/Getty Images Since T-Mobile began offering phone financing, the company has always allowed customers to pay off their phones over a 24-month period. But a listing glitch on the company's site, coupled with information from internal sources, suggests that this will be changing very soon. According to The Mobile report, an internal T-Mobile document revealed that at least some devices would soon shift to a 36-month EIP. The website also temporarily showed a 36-month EIP plan for certain Samsung Galaxy Watches on the site's product pages. Related: T-Mobile's new partnership will ease major customer concern Both the internal document and the website changes have been removed, but they are still fueling rumors that longer payment plans are on the way. Of course, stretching out the financing time for phones and other devices would help the company to keep its customers for a longer period of time. When you finance a phone, you can't leave the carrier until the device has been paid off, unless you come up with the cash. This means T-Mobile could effectively lock in plan users for a whole extra year. While the change may be good for the company's bottom line and could offer cheaper prices for those financing their equipment, there are also some big downsides for users. If T-Mobile makes this change, the company will undermine the value proposition it offered to consumers years ago with "Phone Freedom," which allows customers more flexibility in what they do with their devices. A key part of "Phone Freedom" was a "New in Two" guarantee, which promised customers that they would be able to upgrade their devices every two years on select plans. If T-Mobile makes financing a phone a three-year commitment, users will not be able to upgrade the device or leave the carrier as quickly. Related: T-Mobile's new free phone deal is hard to beat A T-Mobile shift to a 36-month financing plan would bring the company's policies more in line with competitors, as both Verizon and AT&T lock users into financing their phones over 36 months. AT&T made the change to longer financing periods in mid-2021, and Verizon followed along eight months later. It remains to be seen whether the new T-Mobile policy will eventually go into effect, or if the internal document and website glitch were just test cases. It's also unclear whether this change will apply to all devices - some plans do offer the New in Two promise, so the company may honor that commitment. More Retail: Costco quietly plans to offer a convenient service for customersT-Mobile pulls the plug on generous offer, angering customersKellogg sounds alarm on unexpected shift in customer behavior Ultimately, making this big change might give customers another reason to be dissatisfied. Of course, they may not be able to act on that anger if they get stuck in one of the new 36-month contracts that lock them in for the next three years. Related: Veteran fund manager unveils eye-popping S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Veteran chartist unveils eye-popping S&P 500 target
With the stock market again flirting with record highs, investors want to know if their portfolios can keep climbing the proverbial wall of worry or whether the recent gains have been a last gasp before headline risks kick in and the next downturn starts. It's a fair question in a market that has largely performed to analyst expectations only if you measure prognostications by their beginning and end points. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Plenty of analysts expected the market to be near peak levels by mid-year, but no one was calling for the bumpy ride that stock market has actually seen. The S&P 500's roller coaster ride this year has left many scratching their heads, wondering what may happen next. Many on Wall Street are revamping their S&P 500 targets, including two long-time technical analysts who recently shared their updated forecast. Bloomberg/Getty Images The Standard & Poor's 500 Index entered 2025 at 5,868 and peaked on February 19 at 6,144; it then proceeded to give back nearly all of that gain by the time April rolled around. But after President Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" – when he announced sweeping tariff plans that rattled the markets – the index lost another 15% in a matter of days, setting a new low on April 8 at 4,982. The market then began to grind its way back; a month after Liberation Day, on May 2, it had recovered the full measure of the decline triggered by the tariff announcement. By May 13, the S&P 500 was in positive territory for the year. Related: Fed official sends shocking message on interest rate cuts Since then, it has ground higher, crossing 6,000 on June 6; that – and the record of 6,144 – was where a lot of market observers expected to see resistance, where a market that failed to break through could fall back, potentially all the way back to the April lows. While news events don't become part of the S&P 500 chart until they show up in prices, they do factor into what market technicians think can happen next. Technical analysts can cite legitimate concerns about a potential economic slowdown, sticky inflation, uncertain tariff policies, geopolitical tensions around the world and more. Those headlines cast a shadow over the market, which has market technicians looking for a breakthrough to confirm that the recent bounce-back isn't just a bear market rally. Two prominent technical analysts have made it clear that they expect the rally to hold, with new record highs coming any day now. Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist at LPL Financial, says that investors see the messy economic backdrop and figure it's not conducive for a rally to new highs. Focus on the technicals and rely on history, however, and Turnquist says a different picture emerges. Related: Veteran strategist unveils updated gold price forecast For starters, bottoms are a process where the market hits lows and then tests them repeatedly, but the April downturn was V-shaped, steep and fast down but with a hard bounce and no-retest of the downturn. There is reason to believe in the upside, Turnquist says. In an interview on "Money Life with Chuck Jaffe," Turnquist noted that LPL research shows that over the last 75 years, when there is a meaningful new high three months after the last high was set, momentum tends to keep rolling, and the average return for the index over the ensuing 12 months is nearly 10 percent. "We can't discount the fact that we have a lot of trade uncertainty," Turnquist said. "Yes, we're past peak policy uncertainty when it comes to trade, but still very elevated, still a lot of headline risk. We talk about the deficit as well. There's risk there." Turnquist said if the market struggles to break through to new highs, a lot of analysts will call for a double-top and expect a fall back to at least the 5,400 level on the S&P 500. That's a 50% retracement on the rally, and it overlaps with some of the lows from last September. More Experts Analyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and goldTheStreet Stocks & Markets Podcast #8: Common Sense Investing With David MillerVeteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks For that reason, Turnquist expects the market to find "a confluence of support around those levels," but that's not the move he's calling for. Instead, he called this "a market where you want to be buying dips and not selling rips right now." He's not the only technical analyst who foresees those rips and new highs. Matt Fox, president of Ithaca Wealth Management, said in an interview on the June 17 edition of Money Life that the sell-off in April did a lot of the "technical damage" necessary to set up a rally. He said he now has a 7,000 target on the S&P 500, meaning a gain of roughly 20% in the next 12 months. "The momentum has been strong, and we have seen a lot of great participation across sectors," Fox said. "It's not just a handful of stocks that has driven this rebound from the April tariff lows; it has been the entire market. I think that's a good sign that not only will we test those new highs but we will keep on going up and keep on making new highs for the foreseeable future." Fox said the current charts are particularly strong, noting that he sees a lot of cup-and-handle patterns indicating stocks on the verge of a breakout. "It seems like we are in this sweet spot where the charts are lining up perfectly as the fundamentals are improving, and that can lead to some explosive moves," Fox said, noting that the conditions he sees in current charts remind him of 2013, a year in which the S&P 500 gained nearly 33%. "This is reminiscent of that," he said. "I'm worried to come off as too bullish, but I think it's hard not to be pretty constructive on the market going forward." Related: Veteran fund manager sends dire message on stocks The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How a Cornered Iran Could Wreak Havoc on Global Oil Trade
(Bloomberg) -- US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities are sharpening the focus on one option Iran has yet to really deploy in the conflict: disrupting regional oil trade, especially through the critical Strait of Hormuz. Bezos Wedding Draws Protests, Soul-Searching Over Tourism in Venice One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Iran has over the years threatened multiple times to shut the strait — a narrow stretch of water through which a fifth of the world's oil supply flows each day. But in practice, Tehran has numerous less-drastic options at its disposal to calibrate a response that hurts its enemies while limiting the impact on allies like China, its biggest oil buyer. Follow Bloomberg's live blog on the US strikes A full closure of Hormuz for more than a few hours or days is a nightmare scenario that many observers think improbable. It would choke off flows and spike crude prices — JPMorgan & Co. analysts said by almost 70% — fueling global inflation and weighing heavily on growth. Up to Friday, oil shipping from the region, and indeed through Hormuz, had been relatively unscathed by the conflict. Shipments from Iran itself have surged, and oil tanker activity through the Strait of Hormuz remained largely steady. Still, Greece's shipping ministry on Sunday advised the nation's vessel owners to review the use of the strait. If it chooses to target oil in its retaliation against the US strikes, Iran's coastline onto Hormuz gives Tehran an array of options, from lower-impact harassing of ships in the region, to the more extreme alternatives: attacking tankers with drones, mines or bombs to the point that the strait becomes impassable for commercial trade. 'If Iran were to decide to begin to take action in the Straits of Hormuz, there's a wide range of things that can look like,' Daniel Sternoff, non-resident fellow at the Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, said on the center's podcast before the US attack happened. 'We can kind of draw a huge set of scenarios and unknowns which have all sorts of consequences.' Step Up Harassment An easy step for Tehran would be to increase harassment of commercial shipping through Hormuz. In the past, Iran has ordered ships into its territorial waters and even held vessels, a prospect that terrifies crews. A Giant Tanker's Fraught Journey Through the Strait of Hormuz The approaching of commercial shipping by small Iranian craft has been going on for some time anyway, according to the Combined Maritime Forces, a naval coalition operating out of Bahrain, which warned that the current tensions made the practice more dangerous. Depending how aggressive Iran were to be, this could force ships to travel in convoys under the protection of western navies. It would be highly inefficient for the maritime industry but, provided the tanker fleet had enough ships, it shouldn't affect oil supply. More Jamming One of the main impacts on shipping from the conflict so far has been the widespread jamming of GPS signals, with nearly 1,000 vessels affected daily since June 13. The disruption makes it harder to navigate safely in certain conditions, and was likely a factor in an oil tanker crash on Tuesday. The owner of one of the two tankers said that the incident had no relation to the conflict but the timing — just days after Israel had begun attacking — was unusual. Mining Ships Sea mines would have the potential for a significant supply impact by deterring traffic through the strait, although the resulting risk to Iran's own ships may make the move less likely. Bloomberg is tracking every ship that goes through Hormuz every day above 10,000 deadweight tons. About 110 to 120 per day have been going out, with little obvious sign of disruption through Friday. Back in 2019, American officials released images they said showed that Iran was involved in a mine blast that forced the evacuation of a tanker near the entrance to the Gulf. Tehran denied involvement at the time, and the owner of the ship refuted the US assertion that the blast came from a mine. Houthi Playbook Iran could mirror the tactics of the Houthi militants who have been attacking merchant shipping in the Red Sea in response to Israel's war in Gaza. The Houthis' targeting of commercial ships with ballistic missiles, sea drones and air drones forced owners to take the longer route around Africa instead of cutting through the Suez Canal, and commercial traffic through the area remains down by about 70% from 2022-2023 levels. While the militants officially targeted ships with ties to the US, UK or Israel, the link was often tenuous, and the attacks had a chilling effect on ship traffic across the board. Ships passing through Hormuz don't have an alternative route available to them, so the risk calculation will inevitably be different. But the supply impact could be significant if Iran targeted enough ships to create a deterrent. Regional Targets Iran's options to disrupt oil are not purely limited to Hormuz. The Basra oil fields in Iraq, for example, are just a few miles from the Iranian border. Back in 2019, Saudi Arabia blamed Iran for an attack on oil processing assets at Abqaiq, knocking out about 7% of global crude supply. Analysts say that a tit-for-tat that directly makes oil production a target is in neither side's interests, even if it can't be ruled out. Iran has filled up its key export terminal of Kharg Island and is ramping up crude exports, according to satellite imagery. Were that facility to be targeted this time, Iran would lose a key source of revenue but then have little reason not to strike back in kind. The only real winners in that scenario would be bullish oil traders and producers from outside the region. Relations with neighbors have improved and would be jeopardized by Iran taking action. Full Closure The extreme scenario for Hormuz is a full and prolonged closure. There is no other sea route for the about 20 million barrels a day of crude and fuels that goes out of the region. While OPEC+ members Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have spare capacity they could theoretically ramp up, they have very limited alternatives to Hormuz for getting oil out to export markets. 'We don't believe the Strait of Hormuz is going to close under any scenario,' said Navin Kumar, a director at maritime research consultancy Drewry. 'Maybe for a day or two, but it's unlikely there will be any closure for a week or more. It's highly unlikely.' Despite threatening to cut transit several times in the past, Iran never followed through with the threat, and it's unclear whether it possesses the military capability to implement it. US Vice-President JD Vance warned on Sunday that such a move would be 'suicidal' for the Middle East country's economy. 'You are looking at pretty much the biggest disruption to trade flows we've had in decades — prices would sky-rocket,' said Amrita Sen, director of research at consultants Energy Aspects Ltd. Healthy Buffer Still, while oil prices would inevitably surge, the duration of any disruption would be key. The world's consuming nations have at least 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel stockpiled between them, according to industry data compiled by Bloomberg that don't cover refined fuels held in non-OECD nations. The entire flow of petroleum through Hormuz is roughly 7.3 billion barrels a year, meaning there's a healthy buffer even in a worst-case scenario. Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
