Beyond Utopia: Is India Tackling Inequality?

With $4.19 trillion (current prices), India has surpassed Japan in terms of GDP in the year 2025, as per the IMF. Now, India ranks fourth in the world, just below Germany ($4.74 trillion) with a small margin. It is expected to surpass Germany within two to three years if India continues its growth trajectory.
It is undoubtedly a remarkable feat for India. However, there is one concern raised in public discourse that needs to be addressed: 'Is India's growth inclusive or unequal?', and, 'Should India do more to eradicate inequality?' This question is frequently raised by a section of economists. In this article, an effort is made to understand this inequality, its trends, and how to tackle it based on secondary data and reports available, while considering all opinions.
The most common index to measure inequality is the Gini coefficient (values between 0 to 1, where 0 represents perfect equality and 1 shows extreme inequality). As per the Economic Survey 2024-25, inequality has shown declining trends. The Gini coefficient for rural areas declined to 0.237 in 2023-24 from 0.266 in 2022-23, and for urban areas, it fell to 0.284 in 2023-24 from 0.314 in 2022-23, based on consumption expenditure. Historically, the Gini index has fluctuated between 31.6% (the lowest in 1993) and 35.9% (the highest in 2017) between 1977 and 2021 (World Bank). However, some experts believe that the expenditure-based Gini coefficient does not represent the true picture, as households or individuals with low incomes tend to spend more than they earn, whereas high-income groups spend much less in percentage terms, resulting in long-term wealth inequality that remains uncaptured in the data. Other reports on this matter also need to be considered, as findings vary.
According to the 'Pandemic, Poverty, and Inequality: Evidence from India' report by Bhalla Surjeet S. et al. (2022), "Real inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, has declined to near its lowest level reached in the last forty years—it was 0.284 in 1993/94 and in 2020-21 it reached 0.292.". The percentage of total consumption at the national level by the top 10% income group changed from around 28% to 32%, while for the bottom 40%, it remained around 9% between the 1980s and 2013, as per the 'Inequality and Locational Determinants of the Distribution of Living Standards in India' report by the IMF in 2021. Other literature also shows that inequality has declined in recent years (Ghatak et al., 2022 and Gupta et al., 2021). A report titled 'State of Inequality in India' (Kapoor and Duggal, 2022) states that 6%-7% of total incomes are earned by just the top 1% and expresses concerns over the concentration of growth benefits without percolation to the poorer classes.
In contrast, some studies report stark inequality based on different parameters or data sets, such as unequal median-to-top pay ratios among NIFTY50 companies, flight usage data, the Forbes list, or even food-delivery app usage data. Most reports on inequality in India are based on expenditure data, but a few also derive estimation for income or wealth inequality. One of the world's leading voices on inequality, the World Inequality Lab (WIL), provided various estimates for India in its report. According to the report, the top 1% hold 40.1% of wealth, the top 10% hold 65%, and the bottom 50% hold just 6.4%. In terms of income, the top 1% earn 22.6%, the top 10% earn 57.7%, and the bottom 50% earn just 15% of the total income share for the year 2022-23. Although after liberalisation, between 1990 and 2022, the average real growth rate in income in India became 3.6% per year, significantly higher compared to 1.6% between 1960 and 1990. But most of the income share increased for the top 1% and declined for the bottom 50%.
Now, the question that arises is, is India unique in its inequality? The answer is no. The same report by WIL shows that India's income share held by the top 10% (57.7%) is in the middle with respect to other developing countries like South Africa (65.4%) and Brazil (56.8%), but higher than the USA (48.3%) and China (43.4%). Another report, 'Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth (2014)' by the OECD, states, "Today, the richest 10% of the population in the OECD area earn 9.5 times the income of the poorest 10%; in the 1980s, this ratio stood at 7:1 and has been rising continuously ever since.........incomes at the bottom grew much slower during the prosperous years and fell during downturns, putting relative (and in some countries, absolute) income poverty on the radar of policy concerns." This proves that inequality is a part of growth for most countries and is inevitable for free market-based economies.
Before delving deeper into the reasons behind inequality and strategies to tackle it, there must be clarity of thought. No matter what economic or market system a country has, inequality is a reality. No matter how hard a nation tries, inequality will persist. Except in the utopian communist system, which exists only theoretically or in propaganda literature. Such systems do not make everyone equally rich but equally poor, as experienced by many economically failed countries. Does this mean we shouldn't strive for equality and inclusivity in growth and development? No, we should certainly aim to maximise equality in a pragmatic way without falling into the trap - the trap of policies that sacrifice growth and turn a nation into a banana republic.
As rightly stated in The State of Inequality in India report 2022, "Inequality is not simply a lack of resources…It is living in vulnerability and deprivation with restricted means of upward mobility. Income distribution is not an accurate measure of assessing the degree of inequality, but as a variable...These socio-economic inequalities transcend into everyday lives in ways that restrict mobility, limit one's capability to make choices, and intensify their experiences of exclusion and isolation." Thus, it is more appropriate to focus on empowering the economically and socially deprived classes. Certainly, attacking market-friendly policies, businesses, and businessmen won't help in fighting inequality.
Often, incentives or tax relief for industries or corporate tax cuts are blamed for inequality and shown as the root cause. But it is essential to understand that these measures promote further investment in the economy and help create employment. High tax rates may seem attractive in the short run, but eventually, the economy suffers in the form of slow growth or business migration in the long run.
To counter inequality, the most reliable and potent weapon is the philosophy of 'Antyoday', that is, the upliftment of the poorest and most marginalised members of society. Inequality is triggered primarily by social vulnerabilities in health, education, and skills among the lowest sections of society. If the government keeps uplifting the lowest strata through schemes and policies, the results can be expected to be far more positive compared to policies that may sabotage the growth cycle.
Over the last decade, the government has worked in this direction. With initiatives like the 'Ayushman Card' coupled with schemes like 'Poshan,' the insecurity and risk of falling suddenly into the poverty cycle have reduced significantly. Health-related expenses are one of the most common 'emergency expenses' for low-income groups. According to the Economic Survey of India, between FY15 and FY22, the share of government health expenditure increased from 29.0% to 48.0%, and the share of out-of-pocket expenditure in total health expenditure declined from 62.6% to 39.4%. With these kinds of efforts, the government has achieved great success in eradicating extreme poverty (below 1%), poverty (low middle income PPP$3.2 per day, just 14.8% in 2019-20 compared to PPP$1.9 in 2011-12), and multi-dimensional poverty in India.
Improvements in access to health and education facilities, along with food security and other basic amenities, bring the poorest of the poor to an equitable platform. An opportunity and chance from which they can at least start dreaming and aiming for higher goals and become part of India's growth story. This is the actual equality for which we, as a nation, should strive. Schemes like 'Start-up India' have paved the path for many first-generation entrepreneurs to build successful startups and unicorns. Merit and equal opportunity-based competition motivate individuals to work harder and take risks to benefit from high returns. Thus, if India maintains its economic growth trajectory while empowering socially and economically weaker sections through quality education, access to health and nutrition and skill development, inequality will be reduced - not in a utopian sense, but in a practical one.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Standard

2 hours ago

• Business Standard

ADB, World Bank clear $1.5 bn loans to Bangladesh for reforms, climate push

The Asian Development Bank and the World Bank have approved loans worth $1.5 billion to help Bangladesh reform its banking sector, fight climate change among other projects, according to a media report on Friday. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved a $900 million loan, of which $500 million will support efforts to stabilise and reform the country's banking sector, while the remaining $400 million will promote climate-resilient and inclusive development initiatives, The Daily Star newspaper reported. The $500 million policy-based loan aims to strengthen governance, asset quality and stability within Bangladesh's banking system, the ADB said in a statement on Thursday. Separately, the ADB also approved a $400 million loan for the second phase of the Climate-Resilient Inclusive Development Programme (CRIDP) aimed at supporting Bangladesh's efforts to adapt to climate change, cut emissions and foster inclusive economic growth. Also on Thursday, the World Bank (WB) approved $640 million for two projects aimed at enhancing gas supply and improving air quality in Bangladesh. With the ADB and WB approvals, Bangladesh is set to receive more than $1.5 billion -- a development that will ease the continued strain on its foreign currency reserves.

The Hindu

2 hours ago

• The Hindu

ADB, World Bank approve loans worth $1.5 billion to Bangladesh

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the World Bank (WB) have approved loans worth $1.5 billion to help Bangladesh reform its banking sector, fight climate change among other projects, according to a media report on Friday (June 20, 2025.) The Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved a $900 million loan, of which $500 million will support efforts to stabilise and reform the country's banking sector, while the remaining $400 million will promote climate-resilient and inclusive development initiatives, The Daily Star newspaper reported. 'The $500 million policy-based loan aims to strengthen governance, asset quality and stability within Bangladesh's banking system,' the ADB said in a statement on Thursday (June 19, 2025). Separately, the ADB also approved a $400 million loan for the second phase of the Climate-Resilient Inclusive Development Programme (CRIDP) aimed at supporting Bangladesh's efforts to adapt to climate change, cut emissions and foster inclusive economic growth. Bangladesh wanted good ties with India, but 'something always went wrong': Yunus Also on Thursday (June 19, 2025), the World Bank (WB) approved $640 million for two projects aimed at enhancing gas supply and improving air quality in Bangladesh. With the ADB and WB approvals, Bangladesh is set to receive more than $1.5 billion — a development that will ease the continued strain on its foreign currency reserves.

Mint

3 hours ago

• Mint

Centre to launch online MSME dispute resolution portal on 27 June

NEW DELHI : The government is set to launch an online dispute resolution (ODR platform for small businesses to improve their ease of doing business on 27 June, according to two officials directly aware of the development. 'The MSME ODR portal has been tested, and dispute resolution using the portal has also begun during the testing phase," said one of the officials on the condition of anonymity. The portal, a part of the government's World Bank-supported Raising and Accelerating MSME Performance (RAMP) scheme, is aimed at resolving delayed payment disputes by facilitating communication between debtors and micro and small enterprises (MSEs), said the second official. Also Read: Bank loan sanctions to MSMEs for job creation down nearly a third in FY25 Mint first reported on 12 March that the government was going to digitize to dispute resolution for small businesses. So far, micro and small enterprises facilitation councils (MSEFCs) have resolved disputes, especially those related to delayed payments. As of the date, 161 councils have disposed of over 52,000 cases involving transactions worth ₹9,241 crore, out of nearly 100,000 such complaints by MSEs. Data on the micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSME) ministry's delayed payment monitoring system, Samadhaan portal, showed that more than 20 MSEFCs had not resolved a single case since their launch in 2017. The data also showed a wide variance in MSEFCs' actions. While 27 MSEFCs saw not even a single case, a few councils, such as MSEFC Mumbai, MSEFC Pune, and MSEFC Gandhinagar, resolved a considerable number of cases. MSEFC Mumbai resolved 4,625 matters involving about ₹750 crore out of the 7,756 cases it received. MSEFC Pune saw 6,956 complaints and resolved 5,271 of them, involving ₹223 crore. MSEFC Gandhinagar received 6,297 grievances and resolved 5,777 cases involving ₹809 crore, showed the data. 'As of the date, approximately 42% of the applications filed by MSEs are either yet to be viewed by MSEFCs or are at the consideration stage," said Krunal Modi, founding member and chief of staff, ODR platform Presolv360. 'One of the local MSEs recently shared with us that their first meeting was called by the concerned council after four months of filing the case. Additionally, our interactions with various MSEFCs have revealed that there is not only a manpower constraint but also a lack of physical infrastructure," he added. Also Read: MSMEs call for relaxations in the new FEMA regulations for exports and imports Under the procedure laid down in the MSME Development Act, 2006, micro and small businesses can approach these councils to seek payments from buyers that have been delayed longer than 45 days. Private mediators Interestingly, the new portal will allow private ODR service providers to be empanelled, putting into motion a key provision in the Act allowing MSEFCs to delegate cases to private institutions. As per the powers given to an MSEFC under Section 18 of the Act, an MSEFC can either conduct arbitration and conciliation proceedings in cases filed or provide assistance to any institution that provides alternative dispute resolution services. Alternative dispute resolution refers to any dispute resolution that takes place beyond courts. It includes procedures such as arbitration, mediation, and conciliation, where parties can resolve their issues speedily. Independent or private institutions providing ODR services shall only provide services through the new portal, as stated in the 2 April guidelines for appointment of such firms. The guidelines said these institutions should maintain a panel of arbitrators, mediators, and conciliators to resolve disputes on the portal. MSEFCs are created and operated by state or Union territory governments, as per the MSME Development Act. These states will have to enter into agreements with private ODR service providers after seeking information related to their operations. State governments will gather information related to the private ODR firms' incorporation, as well as about fees charged, the number of disputes resolved through arbitration, mediation, or conciliation, the guidelines said. More needs to be done However, the model followed by MSEFCs may not follow a key principle of arbitration—party autonomy, according to experts. 'The ADR procedure laid down in the Act has an element of conflict of interest, where the MSEFC can itself refer the matter for arbitration without mutual consent of the parties. Also, there is no bar for the conciliator or mediator sitting as an arbitrator," said P. Madhava Rao, registrar at Hyderabad's Amika Arbitration and Mediation Council, which provides ODR services. Also Read: MSME makeover: New definitions unlock bigger benefits, faster resolutions 'The main obstacle in the MSEFC ecosystem is the delay in resolving grievances and the presence of conflicts of interest," Rao added. States will also have to ensure that the dispute resolution personnel from private ODR firms abide by the MSME Development Act and the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. The Arbitration & Conciliation Act is currently undergoing reform, with the Union ministry of law and justice pushing for more institutional arbitration, Mint reported on 18 October 2024.