KPDN: No reduction in LPG subsidy, focus remains on preventing leakages

KUALA LUMPUR: The Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) said that there is no issue of subsidy removal or reduction for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), contrary to public concern.
Instead, the ministry said current enforcement efforts are aimed at curbing leakages involving controlled goods and preventing manipulation in business activities.
Minister Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali said the LPG subsidy would continue to benefit the target group, the public, as it is a household kitchen subsidy and not intended for the commercial sector.
He said that the ongoing Operasi Gas Memasak (Ops Gasak), which began on May 1, is not a new policy introduced by the Madani government but is part of enforcement under the Supply Control Regulations (Amendment) 2021, which came into force on Oct 15, 2021, under the previous administration.
"Any party using fewer than three 14kg LPG cylinders, amounting to less than 42kg at any given time, need not worry, as they are not subject to the requirement of obtaining a scheduled controlled goods permit.
"Even food business premises storing or using no more than three subsidised LPG cylinders at a time are not required to have the permit," he said in a statement today.
Armizan said the Ops Gasak enforcement operation is focused on two main objectives, preventing the use of subsidised LPG cylinders in the commercial and industrial sectors, and cracking down on illegal decanting activities.
"Decanting refers to the transfer of gas from subsidised LPG cylinders into non-subsidised ones, which are then sold at various prices, between subsidised and market commercial prices.
"These 'subsidy pirates' make substantial profits by undercutting the commercial market, which fuels domestic sales and cross-border smuggling," he said.
Responding to claims that the government had introduced a new policy, Armizan clarified that enforcement officers have been conducting routine inspections under Ops Gasak.
He said KPDN officers will issue a Premises Inspection Statement to those found storing or using more than three LPG cylinders, exceeding the 42kg limit, in line with regulations enforced since 2021.
"Officers also conduct checks at various business premises to ensure compliance with laws under KPDN's jurisdiction, including price display, accurate measurement practices, hoarding activities, and the need for scheduled goods permits.
"For LPG, the regulations stipulate that storing or using more than 42kg, or over three 14kg cylinders, at any one time requires a permit," he said.
Armizan also acknowledged that there had been some confusion over the documents issued by enforcement officers to food outlets.
He clarified that it was a standard Premises Inspection Statement and not a compound notice, adding that no items were confiscated.
"This document is routinely issued during inspections.
"I stress that Ops Gasak is mainly targeted at illegal decanting and the use of subsidised LPG by the industrial sector. For food vendors, current enforcement is more focused on advocacy and legal awareness under the 2021 regulations," he added.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Barnama

10 hours ago

• Barnama

Mobile Rahmah Sale At Bawang Assan Community Hall Tomorrow

SIBU, June 20 (Bernama) -- The Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Ministry (KPDN) in Sibu will organise a mobile Rahmah Sale at the Bawang Assan Community Hall, here, tomorrow (Saturday, June 21). Irene Wong, special assistant to Sibu MP Oscar Ling Chai Yew, said the mobile sale will offer a variety of selected daily necessities at special prices to reduce the burden on the people's cost of living. 'The sale has received overwhelming response from the community as it directly benefits consumers by offering quality goods at lower prices,' she said in a statement today.

The Sun

12 hours ago

• The Sun

Whistleblowers get protection if rules are followed: MACC

KUALA LUMPUR: Individuals who report information about misconduct directly to enforcement agencies and meet the prescribed criteria and conditions will be granted protection as informants or whistleblowers. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Senior Director (Legal and Prosecution Division) Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said this is an important aspect the public needs to understand, apart from not being able to disclose the information to the public. He said that although the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 protects informants against improper retaliation, such protection is only applicable if reports are made through legal procedures to enforcement agencies such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or relevant government agencies. 'There's a misconception that anyone with information about misconduct can automatically seek protection as a whistleblower. In reality, it's not that simple. 'A common misunderstanding is the belief that informants can publicly disclose information, for example, to the media or on social media, before officially applying for protection. This is incorrect,' he told Bernama. He said that in order to qualify for whistleblower protection, a report must also be made in good faith and not be driven by personal motives such as revenge or defamation. Additionally, the whistleblower must not be involved in the offence being reported, he added. Citing Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, he said, protection can be revoked if the whistleblower is found to have participated in the misconduct they exposed. 'This provision is crucial to maintaining the integrity of whistleblowers and to prevent the misuse of protected status as a shield against offences they have committed,' he said. Wan Shaharuddin said that while the law provides legal protection, whistleblowers still face various challenges, including being labelled ass 'complainants' or 'traitors', fears of retaliation and discrimination, and a general lack of public understanding about the legal process for applying for protection. In efforts to encourage more individuals, especially civil servants, to report corruption cases, he said, the government has introduced cash incentives and official recognition for those who report corruption to the MACC since 2011. He shared that as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling over RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. In addition, Wan Shaharuddin said that to further enhance whistleblower protection, the government had tabled the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. 'The amendment aims to strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption within both the public and private sectors. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection to whistleblowers, including protection from harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal action. 'This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to come forward to report misconduct without fear,' he said.

The Sun

12 hours ago

• The Sun

Understand procedures for whistleblowers' protection , information cannot be made public

KUALA LUMPUR: Individuals who report information about misconduct directly to enforcement agencies and meet the prescribed criteria and conditions will be granted protection as informants or whistleblowers. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Senior Director (Legal and Prosecution Division) Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin said this is an important aspect the public needs to understand, apart from not being able to disclose the information to the public. He said that although the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 protects informants against improper retaliation, such protection is only applicable if reports are made through legal procedures to enforcement agencies such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM) or relevant government agencies. 'There's a misconception that anyone with information about misconduct can automatically seek protection as a whistleblower. In reality, it's not that simple. 'A common misunderstanding is the belief that informants can publicly disclose information, for example, to the media or on social media, before officially applying for protection. This is incorrect,' he told Bernama. He said that in order to qualify for whistleblower protection, a report must also be made in good faith and not be driven by personal motives such as revenge or defamation. Additionally, the whistleblower must not be involved in the offence being reported, he added. Citing Section 11(1) of the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, he said, protection can be revoked if the whistleblower is found to have participated in the misconduct they exposed. 'This provision is crucial to maintaining the integrity of whistleblowers and to prevent the misuse of protected status as a shield against offences they have committed,' he said. Wan Shaharuddin said that while the law provides legal protection, whistleblowers still face various challenges, including being labelled ass 'complainants' or 'traitors', fears of retaliation and discrimination, and a general lack of public understanding about the legal process for applying for protection. In efforts to encourage more individuals, especially civil servants, to report corruption cases, he said, the government has introduced cash incentives and official recognition for those who report corruption to the MACC since 2011. He shared that as of last year, 514 civil servants had received rewards totalling over RM1 million, with the highest individual reward amounting to RM100,000. In addition, Wan Shaharuddin said that to further enhance whistleblower protection, the government had tabled the Whistleblower Protection (Amendment) Bill 2025 in the Dewan Rakyat on March 6. 'The amendment aims to strengthen protection for whistleblowers who report misconduct, particularly in cases of corruption within both the public and private sectors. It is expected to provide more comprehensive protection to whistleblowers, including protection from harmful actions and immunity from civil or criminal action. 'This amendment is hoped to encourage more individuals to come forward to report misconduct without fear,' he said.