logo
Customer prickles over small durian pieces with scanty flesh; seller says meatiness not guaranteed

Customer prickles over small durian pieces with scanty flesh; seller says meatiness not guaranteed

New Paper11-06-2025

A customer has lodged a complaint after spending $70 to buy five red prawn durians, only to find one of them had less flesh than expected.
The stall staff stood by their pricing, explaining that the price was marked clearly and the size was chosen by the customer.
Ms Liu, a 56-year-old marketing professional, told Shin Min Daily News about the frustrating experience at a durian stall located at Block 810 Hougang Central on June 8.
She recalled that she had bought five red prawn durians for $70, and while four of them had an average of six segments of flesh, the last one only had five, with the flesh being unusually small.
"I didn't expect a durian costing over $10 to have only five segments of flesh, and they were so tiny, about the size of a pinky. It could all fit in the palm of my hand," Ms Liu said.
Feeling that the purchase was unfair, she attempted to approach the stall staff for an explanation. However, she was met with a rude response as the staff insisted the owner was unavailable.
"I wasn't asking for a full exchange, I would've been fine if they had given me a little extra flesh or a discount. Instead, they told me if I wasn't happy, I could go somewhere else," Ms Liu added.
When a reporter visited the stall on June 9, the same staff member Ms Liu encountered explained that the durians were clearly priced and displayed for customers to choose from, but the amount of flesh in each durian could not be guaranteed.
Several signs displayed at the stall showed the variety of durian and its pricing. PHOTO: SHIN MIN DAILY NEWS
Several signs were displayed in front of the stall, outlining different durian varieties like "Musang King" and "Red Prawn", as well as the pricing according to the weight of each package.
Mr Su further clarified that if the customers chose the durians based on weight, and the staff opened it to realise that the durian contained less flesh, they would offer an additional durian to make up for it.
"If there's barely any flesh, we would open another one to make up for it. We don't want customers feeling like they paid for just the shell. But if the durians are sold in individual packages, this policy doesn't apply," he explained.
Regarding the complaint about his dismissive response to Ms Liu, Mr Su expressed that the stall was very busy at the time, and he had to juggle manning the stall and tending to customers.
He added that he had tried to explain the situation to Ms Liu multiple times, but she insisted on a replacement.
"If the flesh was spoilt, rotten or lacked flavour, we would absolutely replace it. But we can't guarantee that every durian will have a lot of flesh. We tried explaining this, but she refused to listen."
Ms Liu, however, denied that the stall staff had made any substantial attempt to explain the situation. "They just gave me a couple of brief responses and then ignored me," she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food delivery feud
JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food delivery feud

Straits Times

timea day ago

  • Straits Times

JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food delivery feud

BEIJING – One unusually warm evening in April, Richard Liu revved his scooter through Beijing's traffic-snarled streets alongside other delivery workers, and then personally handed food orders to surprised customers. Later that night, over spicy hotpot and ice-cold beer, the founder welcomed a pair of riders from two rival delivery firms to his company. The publicity stunt, broadcast on viral online videos, reignited a fight for China's US$80 billion (S$102.9 billion)-plus food delivery market. In just a few months, JD, China's largest online retailer by revenue, amassed 25 million daily takeout orders across 350 cities, capturing more than half the volume of Alibaba Group Holding's the runner-up to market leader Meituan. Neither saw Mr Liu coming. China's food delivery industry has been in an effective duopoly after brutal price wars forced out many smaller players almost a decade ago. Takeout became more expensive even as merchants and riders complained about making less. Mr Liu is now turning to an old playbook: charging restaurants no commission, generous hiring bonuses for 100,000 new full-time riders, plus a 10 billion yuan (S$1.8 billion) discounting campaign for consumers. During its flagship shopping festival this month, JD sold coffee and bubble tea for as cheap as 1.68 yuan. The food delivery war is indicative of the bifurcation in China's mammoth tech industry. On the one hand, players like DeepSeek are spurring major tech firms to invest in innovations like generative AI. On the other, the effects of Beijing's yearslong Covid lockdowns and regulatory campaigns against Big Tech still linger, and many companies are desperately searching for sources of growth in a saturated market. Mr Liu's marketing stunt is also personal. The viral videos of him waiting to pick up boxed lunches and downing beers with other riders mark a surprise return to the public eye for the 52-year-old tech mogul, who faded from the spotlight in 2018 when he was arrested in the United States on suspicion of rape, though prosecutors in Minneapolis ultimately declined to press charges. During Beijing's crackdown on the tech sector in 2022, Mr Liu joined a long list of tech founders who stepped down. His departure coincided with some of JD's toughest times since its founding as a tiny electronics outlet in 1998. Its premium online shopping service ran into China's slowing economy, its own bargain app flopped, and an overseas foray was abandoned. That left JD with no growth story, as giants Alibaba and Tencent Holdings bet big on generative AI and smaller rivals such as Meituan and Didi Global exported their gig-economy models abroad. Even Meituan has begun selling and delivering everything from iPhones to washing machines in a few hours. 'For JD, it's a lost five years, to put it bluntly,' Mr Liu said during a rare news conference at the company's Beijing headquarters on June 17. 'No innovation, no growth, no progress. It should be considered the most unremarkable and least valuable five years in my entrepreneurial history.' Explaining their rationale of getting into food delivery, Mr Liu said that it's about leveraging JD's battle-tested logistics network to acquire new users, 40 per cent of whom have already been converted into e-commerce customers. 'Our losses are smaller than what we would have spent on advertising,' he said. Not everyone is convinced. JD's takeout business could generate as much as 18 billion yuan in annualised losses, wiping out 36 per cent of its parent's operating profit for 2025, says JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Arete Research estimates that as the market leader, Meituan will only need to spend about a quarter of JD's costs to defend its position. JD's loss per order will narrow to 3 yuan in the second half of 2025 from 8 yuan this quarter as it pares back subsidies to confront the economic reality, the equity research house predicts. 'We do not think JD will find material success in local services like insta-commerce, but understand management's sense of urgency in needing to diversify its business mix and feeling threatened by Meituan,' Arete analysts wrote in a note in June. Representatives for JD, Alibaba, and Meituan didn't respond to requests for comment for this story. What's clear is that JD has injected new life into a long-dormant market. hardest hit by JD's offensive, gave out 10 billion yuan in subsidies to customers, then another 1 billion yuan to restaurants. Alibaba also integrated the takeout app into its flagship e-commerce platform Taobao in the hope of diverting more traffic to it. Meituan for the first time ever is giving away vouchers on things like smartphones and liquor during the June 18 sales event that JD invented more than a decade ago. Its founder Wang Xing declared to investors in May that it would do 'whatever measure it takes to win the game.' The renewed food-delivery battle is reminiscent of the all-out war in online shopping just years ago, when alleged abuses like forcing merchants into exclusive arrangements helped fuel Beijing's Big Tech crackdown, wiping out trillions in wealth. Though pressure has eased, government scrutiny remains heightened as high youth unemployment drives more and more people to take up gig work. Regulators in May summoned executives from the three takeout firms into meetings on fair competition and protection of riders, among other topics. By 2024, China had more than 10 million delivery riders, official data showed. In Beijing, there were 17,000 riders in the first half of 2024, up 50 per cent from a year ago. And amid growing awareness of how riders often prioritize speed over safety to earn more, said in April that it would gradually phase out a cash penalty system for riders who miss their deadlines. JD is going further in worker benefits by paying social security – a government-sponsored welfare system including pensions and medical insurance – for all of its full-time riders. Meituan and followed suit with similar policies. Tang Zequan, 36, recalls how in 2016 he could make more than 10 yuan per order as a new driver for Meituan in Guangzhou. After Meituan emerged dominant, his earnings went down to 7 yuan per order. As a high-school dropout, he acknowledges that no other job could have helped him pay off debts so quickly after his real estate brokerage business went under during Beijing's crackdown on the property market. 'I have great gratitude for the food delivery industry, but I won't pay allegiance to any firm,' Mr Tang said. 'Without choices we are left with a monopoly.' BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food-delivery feud
JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food-delivery feud

Business Times

timea day ago

  • Business Times

JD.com billionaire's viral stunt reignites China's food-delivery feud

ONE unusually warm evening in April, Richard Liu revved his scooter through Beijing's traffic-snarled streets alongside other delivery workers, and then personally handed food orders to surprised customers. Later that night, over spicy hotpot and ice-cold beer, the Inc. founder welcomed a pair of riders from two rival delivery firms to his company. The publicity stunt, broadcast on viral online videos, reignited a fight for China's US$80 billion-plus food delivery market. In just a few months, JD, China's largest online retailer by revenue, amassed 25 million daily takeout orders across 350 cities, capturing more than half the volume of Alibaba Group Holding's the runner-up to market leader Meituan. Neither saw Liu coming. China's food delivery industry has been in an effective duopoly after brutal price wars forced out many smaller players almost a decade ago. Takeout became more expensive even as merchants and riders complained about making less. Liu is now turning to an old playbook: charging restaurants no commission, generous hiring bonuses for 100,000 new full-time riders, plus a 10 billion yuan (S$1.8 billion) discounting campaign for consumers. During its flagship shopping festival this month, JD sold coffee and bubble tea for as cheap as 1.68 yuan. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The food delivery war is indicative of the bifurcation in China's mammoth tech industry. On the one hand, players like DeepSeek are spurring major tech firms to invest in innovations like generative AI. On the other, the effects of Beijing's years-long Covid lockdowns and regulatory campaigns against Big Tech still linger, and many companies are desperately searching for sources of growth in a saturated market. Liu's marketing stunt is also personal. The viral videos of him waiting to pick up boxed lunches and downing beers with other riders mark a surprise return to the public eye for the 52-year-old tech mogul, who faded from the spotlight in 2018 when he was arrested in the US on suspicion of rape, though prosecutors in Minneapolis ultimately declined to press charges. During Beijing's crackdown on the tech sector in 2022, Liu joined a long list of tech founders who stepped down. His departure coincided with some of JD's toughest times since its founding as a tiny electronics outlet in 1998. Its premium online shopping service ran into China's slowing economy, its own bargain app flopped, and an overseas foray was abandoned. That left JD with no growth story, as giants Alibaba and Tencent Holdings bet big on generative AI and smaller rivals such as Meituan and Didi Global exported their gig-economy models abroad. Even Meituan has begun selling and delivering everything from iPhones to washing machines in a few hours. 'For JD, it's a lost five years, to put it bluntly,' Liu said during a rare news conference at the company's Beijing headquarters Tuesday. 'No innovation, no growth, no progress. It should be considered the most unremarkable and least valuable five years in my entrepreneurial history.' Explaining their rationale of getting into food delivery, Liu said that it's about leveraging JD's battle-tested logistics network to acquire new users, 40 per cent of whom have already been converted into e-commerce customers. 'Our losses are smaller than what we would have spent on advertising,' he said. Not everyone is convinced. JD's takeout business could generate as much as 18 billion yuan in annualised losses, wiping out 36 per cent of its parent's operating profit for 2025, says JPMorgan Chase & Co. Arete Research estimates that as the market leader, Meituan will only need to spend about a quarter of JD's costs to defend its position. JD's loss per order will narrow to 3 yuan in the second half of 2025 from 8 yuan this quarter as it pares back subsidies to confront the economic reality, the equity research house predicts. 'We do not think JD will find material success in local services like insta-commerce, but understand management's sense of urgency in needing to diversify its business mix and feeling threatened by Meituan,' Arete analysts Shawn Yang and Richard Kramer wrote in a note in June. Representatives for JD, Alibaba, and Meituan didn't respond to requests for comment for this story. What's clear is that JD has injected new life into a long-dormant market. hardest hit by JD's offensive, gave out 10 billion yuan in subsidies to customers, then another 1 billion yuan to restaurants. Alibaba also integrated the takeout app into its flagship e-commerce platform Taobao in the hope of diverting more traffic to it. Meituan for the first time ever is giving away vouchers on things like smartphones and liquor during the June 18 sales event that JD invented more than a decade ago. Its founder Wang Xing declared to investors in May that it would do 'whatever measure it takes to win the game.' The renewed food-delivery battle is reminiscent of the all-out war in online shopping just years ago, when alleged abuses like forcing merchants into exclusive arrangements helped fuel Beijing's Big Tech crackdown, wiping out trillions in wealth. Though pressure has eased, government scrutiny remains heightened as high youth unemployment drives more and more people to take up gig work. Regulators in May summoned executives from the three takeout firms into meetings on fair competition and protection of riders, among other topics. By 2024, China had more than 10 million delivery riders, official data showed. In Beijing, there were 17,000 riders in the first half of 2024, up 50 per cent from a year ago. And amid growing awareness of how riders often prioritise speed over safety to earn more, said in April that it would gradually phase out a cash penalty system for riders who miss their deadlines. JD is going further in worker benefits by paying social security - a government-sponsored welfare system including pensions and medical insurance - for all of its full-time riders. Meituan and followed suit with similar policies. JD has won over riders like Jiang Xiaoxi, a migrant worker in Shenzhen who joined Meituan before Covid but quit last year to take care of her sick grandfather in her hometown in Hunan province. When the 25-year-old returned to Shenzhen this year, she picked JD instead for regular eight-hour shifts and persuaded her peers to jump ship. 'I signed a contract on day one,' she said. 'Having social security as a full-time employee gives me a sense of belonging.' Others are wary of such promises, with memories of the past delivery price-war still fresh. Tang Zequan, 36, recalls how in 2016 he could make more than 10 yuan per order as a new driver for Meituan in Guangzhou. After Meituan emerged dominant, his earnings went down to 7 yuan per order. As a high-school dropout, he acknowledges that no other job could have helped him pay off debts so quickly after his real estate brokerage business went under during Beijing's crackdown on the property market. 'I have great gratitude for the food delivery industry, but I won't pay allegiance to any firm,' Tang said. 'Without choices we are left with a monopoly.' BLOOMBERG

JD.com billionaire unveils turnaround plan after five-year slump
JD.com billionaire unveils turnaround plan after five-year slump

Business Times

time3 days ago

  • Business Times

JD.com billionaire unveils turnaround plan after five-year slump

[BEIJING] founder Richard Liu vowed to speed up an overseas foray and compete with Meituan in new arenas from food delivery to travel, describing his boldest attempt yet to revive an online retailer that's languished since a 2020 government crackdown. The past half-decade was the darkest period for his company, Liu said during a rare news conference at JD's Beijing headquarters on Tuesday (Jun 17). The company lost its way, the 52-year-old tech mogul said, at a time when rivals such as PDD Holdings surged ahead. JD's future growth should all be about leveraging a battle-tested logistics network in areas such as meal delivery, where it's making headway despite initial losses, the founder said. 'For JD, it's a lost five years, to put it bluntly,' Liu said in comments published in Chinese media, which a company spokesperson later confirmed. 'No innovation, no growth, no progress. It should be considered the most unremarkable and least-valuable five years in my entrepreneurial history,' Liu told reporters on the eve of JD's signature Jun 18 shopping festival. In March, JD made an aggressive entry into China's US$80 billion-plus food delivery market, a long-dormant arena controlled by Meituan and Alibaba Group Holding's Liu personally handed out takeouts to customers during a publicity stunt, gave away 10 billion yuan (S$1.8 billion) in user subsidies, and promised above-industry benefits for his army of 100,000 delivery riders. His offensive has forced the two rivals to step up discounts and coupons in a similar fashion, a renewed price battle that quickly caught the attention of regulators. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up About 40 per cent of JD's new food-delivery users have since converted into e-commerce customers, Liu said. Despite the frenzy, Liu said that JD has always played the long game of investing in supply chain and branded products. It plans to roll out its e-commerce platform in Europe in 2026, after three years of building infrastructure there. On its home turf, the company will challenge Meituan in another key market – hotel and flight bookings – offering a three-year membership programme that waives commissions for hotels. Meituan founder Wang Xing was among the guests at a recent dinner Liu hosted for tech founders, the JD chief said. 'I told him straight up, 'bro, we are making a move into food delivery'.' During Tuesday's briefing, Liu portrayed China's largest online retailer by revenue as the anti-PDD – one that focuses on high-quality products and disdains the model of cross-border shipping that underpinned the success of PDD's bargain app Temu. Liu has been vocal of late. The billionaire faded from the spotlight around 2018, when he was arrested in the US on suspicion of rape, though prosecutors ultimately declined to press charges. During Beijing's crackdown on the tech sector in 2022, he joined a long list of tech founders who stepped down as chief executive officer. CEO Sandy Xu – who previously served as the company's finance head – will eventually take full leadership of JD's domestic business, Liu said, which will free him up to steer an international expansion. BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store