Sir Robert McAlpine returns to profitability
THE civil engineering and construction firm Sir Robert McAlpine has reported a return to profitability, posting a pre-tax profit of £10.4 million for the year ending October 2024, a significant turnaround from the £104.6 million loss recorded the previous year. The construction company, with strong ties to the Irish community in Britain, has released its latest accounts.
The company also reported a 7% increase in turnover to £940 million and a cash balance of £143.5 million, up from £100.8 million in 2023, while remaining debt-free.
The order book stands at £1.3 billion, with an additional £1.2 billion in preferred bidder positions. So far this year, £813 million has been secured or delivered, with a further £129 million nearly over the line.
Notable project wins include the Agratas state-of-the-art battery cell manufacturing facility in Somerset, Tata Steel's new electric arc furnace at Port Talbot, a 90-bed mental health facility at Tolworth Hospital, and the NESST innovation hub in Newcastle.
CEO Neil Martin expressed confidence in the company's direction, stating that the benefits of the strategic changes are reflected in the stable performance of 2023/24. He emphasised the company's focus on client value, operational excellence, and targeting the right opportunities, supported by the expertise of supply chain partners.
Founded in 1869 by Robert McAlpine in Lanarkshire — an area with a large concentration of Irish immigrants from the 19th century onwards — the company became one of Britain's foremost civil engineering firms.
The hard life of the navvy has gone down in folklore. The song McAlpine's Fusiliers — written by Dominic Behan and made famous by The Dubliners — gives an overview, in amusing fashion, of life on Britain's construction sites, and of working for Sir Robert McAlpine.
The company is also mentioned in other songs, such as Building Up and Tearing England Down, also written by Behan, with a first verse that runs:
Oh, I've worked on the railways and I've worked on the roads,
I've worked with the gangway and I've carried me load,
I've dug the big tunnels and I've cut the big drains,
And I've blasted the rock and I've dammed up the mains.
Although these songs talk about tough times for the navvy, historian Ultan Cowley, and regular contributor to The Irish Post, has suggested that the relationship between Irish labour and senior management at Sir Robert McAlpine was more collaborative than what is related in these songs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Your questions answered: ‘My brand new €46,000 car constantly needs repairs. What are my options?'
Plus, your rights as a consumer under package holiday legislation Q I bought a new car in January for €46,095. I'd cashed in an old pension and got a credit union loan so I didn't need to use a PCP. I was meant to collect it on January 2, but this was delayed because I was told there was a manufacturing issue with the ball joints in the front suspension. Since then, it's been one problem after another. Initially, the rear camera wasn't working, and I had to take time off work to bring the car in to the dealership to get it fixed. At the end of February, the indicators stopped working. On April 7, it broke down completely. The car company arranged a recovery truck and a replacement car. On May 12, the dealership rang to say it was down to the gearbox, which needed replacing. It's ready for collection now. As I've been without the car for almost half the time since I bought it, I contacted the dealership, the carmaker and even its CEO on several occasions. I'm terrified that if I take the car back, something else will go wrong and I'll have to start this whole exhausting complaint process all over again. What can I do? Noreen, Limerick A When you bought the car, you entered into a sales contract with the dealership. Under consumer law, the dealer is obliged to provide a car that's fit for purpose and has the durability you would normally expect from a new car, taking account of factors like the car's make, its durability, any need for servicing or maintenance, and how far and how often you drive the car. If an issue with a car arises in the first year, the dealer must show that the car was not faulty when you received it. The dealership has already carried out several repairs to your car. If a business repairs a fault and the same or a different fault occurs afterwards, you can reject further repairs if you can't be reasonably confident in the business's ability to fix the car. Complain to the dealer in writing, outlining the issues with the car and request the remedy that you feel is most appropriate. If you don't want further repairs, you can seek a reduction in the price you paid for the car, or you can ask to cancel the sales contract and request a refund. You can get further information on your consumer rights for car purchases on our website. If the dealer doesn't give you a satisfactory response, you can choose to pursue the matter through the courts. We suggest you get independent legal advice. Given your safety concerns, you can report the problems to the Road Safety Authority (RSA) who can then assess if the model of your car needs to be recalled or recalled for repair. ADVERTISEMENT 'We had to cancel our package holiday to Spain. Can we get the tax back?' Q My wife and I, who are in our 80s, booked an all-inclusive package holiday to Spain for 10 days in May. We booked through a Germany tour operator via its Irish branch in February, paying €2,000. But my wife became seriously ill in April, and had to be hospitalised. The medical advice was that she was unfit to travel on the holiday – so we asked the tour operator to reschedule it, a week before we were due to travel. They refused. Our travel insurer reimbursed us, minus an excess of €300. But we believe that the holiday company should return the Vat, which we assumed was included in the total price of the holiday. Are we legally entitled to get these taxes back? Tom, Dundalk A I'm sorry to hear of your wife's illness and hope she is making a good recovery. The holiday you booked is covered under package holiday legislation. When you book such a holiday, you enter into a contract with the tour operator. You should receive all the essential information about your holiday before you agree to this contract. This includes the total price, including taxes and fees, and the tour operator's terms and conditions regarding cancellations. You can find more information about your rights under package holiday legislation on our website, at It's unfortunate your tour operator refused to reschedule your holiday on medical grounds. However, you were wise to have taken out travel insurance so you could claim back most of your holiday costs. A consumer generally has the option to apply for a refund of airfare taxes and charges directly from an airline for a cancelled flight. But the claim usually needs to be made within a set timeframe after the flight – within 30 days, for example. The airline may charge an administrative fee to process the refund. As you bought a package holiday, you should first refer to the terms and conditions in your holiday contract and then speak to your tour operator to confirm if you are eligible to claim back the tax on the flight portion of your package. You can also contact the airline about a refund but you'd need to inform them that the flights were booked as part of a package holiday. Gráinne Griffin is director of communications at the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission. You can email your questions to
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Solar 21 founders Michael and Andrew Bradley to pay stg£667k cash for former Solar 21 plant once valued at €100m
Fearghal O'Connor Today at 21:30 A Solar 21 power station – that it valued at over €100m just two years ago – is to be sold for stg£667,000 in cash to a company controlled by brothers Michael and Andrew Bradley, the founders of the investment firm. The sale of the Tansterne biomass plant was expected to be central to Rathcoole firm Solar 21's attempts to raise cash to pay back its investors. But the sale – which has been agreed but is pending approval – as part of a 'pre-pack administration' for a total sale price of €4m, including €3.3m of debt, is a major blow to thousands of Irish investors. The Bradley brothers' former investment firm owes its investors as much as €300m and GB-Bio itself – the Solar 21 subsidiary that holds the ownership of Tansterne and its potentially lucrative grid connection – owed its creditors £123m before it was placed in administration last week. Solar 21's former CEO Michael Bradley – originally from Achill Island in Co Mayo – had told the High Court in Dublin in 2023 that 'following completion of the relevant repair programme, the Tansterne biomass plant has the potential to be sold lo a market sector participant for approximately £96,527,000,' according to court documents. The investment firm had said at the time that it had an offer of £116m for the biomass plant. But Tansterne had been previously damaged by fire and was not operational. The High Court had given Solar 21 nine months to recommission the plant under the scheme of arrangement that was put in place. But recommissioning was unsuccessful and the sales process failed to find a buyer for GB-Bio and the Tansterne plant. That sales process, led by EY, generated just one offer – and this was made on condition of GB-Bio being sold via administration for £4m, according to company filings. The potential purchaser was believed to be interested in using the power station as scrap metal – but the value of scrap fell due to Donald Trump's tariffs, according to a well informed source. ADVERTISEMENT Learn more A number of months after the offer was made, it fell through – and on June 10, RSM was appointed administrator to the insolvent GB-Bio. Discussions between RSM and Andrew Bradley's Isle of Man-registered firm Green Zone Consulting (which continued to hold a charge over GB-Bio) resulted in a new offer from a firm called Teesside Green Energy Park Ltd. Filings to the UK's Companies House show that Teesside is owned by Michael Bradley and Green Zone, and its directors include individuals who had previously led the recommissioning efforts at Tansterne on behalf of Solar 21. Under the proposed sale, which is pending approval, Teesside is to pay stg£667,000 in cash, as well as availing of a further stg£3.3m in debt to be repaid to Andrew Bradley's firm Green Zone, bringing the full purchase price to €4m. 'GB-Bio is owned by Solar 21 Renewable Energy Limited (56pc, Republic of Ireland-registered), Green Zone Consulting Limited (34pc, Isle of Man-registered) and Jeremy and Stuart Saunt (10pc),' the administrator's proposal stated. 'Solar 21 Renewable Energy Limited is 100pc owned by Michael Bradley, and Green Zone Consulting Limited is 100pc owned by Andrew Bradley,' it stated.
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Sunday Independent's View: Time is running out for the Government to get a grip on housing
For the Government, it offers an opportunity for reflection as it nears the halfway stage of its own first year. What has been achieved since coming into office again in January? The administration has been accused of seeming less like a new broom than a threadbare old brush; not so much sweeping clean as brushing the country's problems under a rug to be tidied up later. But defenders of the Fianna Fáil/Fine Gael-led Coalition would no doubt argue it has been faced with a series of obstacles since the start of the year, most notably the still unresolved threat of tariffs from Donald Trump. There is also the worsening international situation, which last week saw Ireland join other countries in pulling embassy staff from Iran as the conflict with Israel continues. These, however, are matters with which all our partners are having to deal. It is no excuse for not dealing robustly with domestic matters. The legislation programme for the summer term of the Oireachtas lists a number of bills as a priority, including the Defence (Amendment) Bill which will remove the so-called triple-lock on Irish troops serving abroad, as well as measures tackling air pollution, cyber security and terrorism. All important matters, no question about it. The logjam in planning and services is well documented But none directly addresses the deepest issue confronting the country: that is, of course, the lack of supply, and crippling cost, of housing. Last week there was more bad news as the Central Bank revised downward its forecast for the number of houses that will be built between now and 2027 — also the midway point of the 34th Dáil, a date which the Government may find itself careening towards at an alarming pace. This year, it now expects 32,500 homes to be built, well short of what is needed to make a significant dent in the target of 300,000 by 2030. The logjam in planning and services is well documented. Historically, it has often felt as if Irish bureaucracy stymies rather than stimulates innovation. No wonder we lag far behind comparable EU states when it comes to infrastructure. The apparent lack of urgency to break through these roadblocks remains a bigger concern. The Government already seems to have retreated into explaining rather than doing, as if seeking to justify in advance the failure to meet its own target, which it has already accepted is inevitable. The appointment of the former HSE chief executive as chair of the newly revamped An Coimisiún Pleanála may make a difference. If anyone has experience of cutting through red tape, it is Paul Reid. Health is another area where much-needed change sadly comes a cropper. Ministers must act swiftly to hand him the power to green-light the infrastructure projects needed to house an estimated population of six million by 2040. No other achievements by this Government will be worth a penny candle if the crisis in housing does not ease dramatically. The summer recess is set to begin less than a month from now, on July 18. When TDs and senators return in September, all eyes will be on the presidential election and it will be the winter solstice before we know it. It is still not too late to get a grip on housing, but it soon might be if more time is wasted.
