Pink Batts disaster invoked over Albanese government's $2.3 billion solar batteries installation scheme
Labor's $2.3 billion bid to cut the price of solar battery installation has sparked fears of another disastrous situation like the Rudd government's Pink Batts scheme where four men died doing installation work.
Join SkyNews.com.au to watch the full interview on Business Weekend at 11am (AEST).
The Albanese government claims it will cut the price of battery installation by 30 per cent through its major rebate geared at bolstering the nation's renewables shift.
It has rekindled memories of Labor's Pink Batts scheme under former prime minister Kevin Rudd's Home Energy Efficiency Program where young, inexperienced installers were not protected and died on the job.
A Royal Commission found the deaths of the young men would not have happened if the scheme was properly designed and implemented.
Industrias Services Group CEO Daniel Lazarus has invoked the horror scheme just weeks ahead of Labor rolling out the new rebates.
'We've audited thousands and thousands of systems and batteries across the country over the last ... 12 months and I've seen a material amount of these batteries and solar systems, which are either substandard or a small percentage of being unsafe,' Mr Lazarus said on Sky News' Business Weekend.
'Even that small percentage of unsafe systems is big enough to create real worries about what the scheme might do with the tidal wave of what's going to happen around all these installs.'
He noted the design of the installation program was currently 'sound' and stressed that he was confident around industry standards, but warned Aussies would take advantage of the huge swath of rebates.
'The problem is with this huge influx of rebate schemes,' Mr Lazarus said.
'What will happen with the inevitable influx that will come within the industry to take advantage and what are they going to do to try and maximise the rebate that they obtain?
'How will they take advantage or at least avoid dodging a lot of these elements that are required to receive the rebate, that being standards?'
Despite protocols and standards that arose since the Royal Commission into the Pink Batts scheme, there remains a lack of key inspection mandates across the country, Mr Lazarus cautioned.
'What we're really advocating to industry is around how do you make it such that either all systems, or at least the majority of systems, installed by every installer that's taking advantage of this rebate scheme, is getting physically inspected,' he said.
The rebates under the Pink Batts scheme led to the number of businesses in the installation sector rising from 200 to more than 8000.
It was originally meant to run for five years but finished after just one year and about 30 per cent of inspected installations in 2010 were found to have faulty craftsmanship or to be unsafe.
Mr Lazarus said while there were a few fatalities, alongside less than 100 fires, it would only take a small number of incidents to destroy the whole scheme.
'The last thing that I want to see is a scheme like this which is meant for specific homeowners and the distribution of energy to be called off early,' he said.
Labor said it expects to deliver more than one million batteries under its scheme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Paul Murray: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Government are torpedoing relationship with the US
It's brutally realistic that the compulsion to fight for your life and your country's existence can affect someone's thinking about national defence. Israelis don't have the luxury of wishing and hoping that the world was a more peaceful place. Nor do the Ukrainians. Or the Taiwanese. An existential threat will focus the mind on how much to spend on your survival. Do Australians need a more obvious regional menace before we start to think seriously about our national security? As if China didn't make it plain enough with a live firing drill off Sydney and what was obviously meant to be a humiliating circumnavigation of our coastline by part of its navy just to ram home how defenceless we really are. If and when China wants to do anything about it. Should we just bet that it doesn't? Instead, stand back wishing and hoping while China buys off another of our regional neighbours that before President Xi Jinping's elevation — and his aggressively expansionist mindset — it didn't care a fig about. Cash-splashing agreements like the so-called Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with the far-distant Cook Islands, all demanding adherence to the One China policy, hardly reflect an altruistic interest in the welfare of the region's inhabitants well beyond its horizons. In the face of a more dangerous world, Australia's dripping-wet lefties write letters to the editor calling for peace. Write them to Xi. And Putin. Or the Ayatollah. Good luck there. The peaceniks admire our Foreign Minister, who always finds some mealy-mouthed way of censuring Israel's efforts to defend itself, words that barely conceal her contempt for the Jewish state. Our Prime Minister, who never matured his political leanings from indoctrination as an undergraduate Bolshevik, waves away demands for increased defence spending like an unwanted smell. The only thing Anthony Albanese ever publicly professed a desire to fight is 'Tories.' And he's obviously far more comfortable in the ideological trenches than confronting the real emerging threats to our national security. Albanese was saved a potential confrontation with Donald Trump this week over his resistance to commit to a realistic national security target because the US President was too busy helping a worthy ally. One that more than pulls its weight in making the world a safer place. But Albanese's day of reckoning for his neglect of our national security will arrive one way or another soon enough. Reality has a nasty way of crashing in. We should all pray that we never face the same sort of existential threats that Israelis wake up to every day. But look at how it responds. Israel spends about 8.8 per cent of its GDP on defence, some US$46.5 billion provided this year. We have set aside US$38.5b ($59b) which represents a shade over 2 per cent. Israel's economy is about a quarter the size of Australia's, 34th in the world against 13th. We are significantly wealthier with GDP per capita of US$57,000 against US$42,000. It has a population of 9.5 million against 27 million. You could fit Israel's land mass 350 times into Australia's. Tasmania is three times bigger. And it is squeezed between countries that want to destroy it while we sit in the splendid isolation of an island continent at the bottom of the world. In the cyberworld, that isolation offers no defence. When Israel launched its attack on Iran's nuclear and missile launching facilities eight days ago, it had more than 200 fighter planes in the air simultaneously. Our air force notionally has 87. Obviously, the defensive needs of our two counties are vastly different. There's no way Israel has the same requirement as us for submarines, but it still has five German-made diesel-electric boats with air-independent propulsion for stealth operations. All are believed to be capable of carrying nuclear-armed missiles. We have six conventionally-armed Collins-class diesel-electric submarines of which only two are believed to be operational at any time. Which is why our commitment to the AUKUS deal and its provision of long-range stealthy nuclear-powered submarines from the US by the early 2030s is fundamental to our defence posture. And which is why the US decision to review the AUKUS deal against Trump's America First policy settings is far more serious than Labor is conceding to the public. Australians need to have a very clear understanding of the timeline that has led to this very serious brinkmanship and how our 'gift horse' attitude has been so damaging. The annual Shangri-La security dialogue in Singapore, much of it held behind closed doors, is one of the most important meetings held by world leaders to discuss the Asia-Pacific region. There were two notable firsts this year. A European, President Emmanuel Macron of France, delivered the keynote address, signifying piqued interest in the region's tensions, and the Chinese Defence Minister was not present for the first time since 2019. But the highlight was the address by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth who said America was 'reorienting towards deterring aggression by communist China' and seeking a situation of 'peace through strength' in which China 'cannot dominate us or our allies and partners.' 'Any attempt by communist China to conquer Taiwan would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Hegseth said. 'We are not going to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' He laid down the gauntlet: 'President Trump has said that communist China will not invade Taiwan on his watch.' Hegseth also had a public message for America's allies in the region: 'We ask — and indeed, we insist — that our allies and partners do their part on defence. Sometimes, that means having uncomfortable and tough conversations.' And he set a standard for the commitment: 'NATO members are pledging to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence, even Germany. 'So it doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat, not to mention North Korea.' While that was immediately reported, Hegseth's private demands to Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles were not. As the heat rose around Hegseth's comments, Albanese was again asked about America's demand to the Europeans to lift defence spending commitments — and again he came up short. 'What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it,' Albanese said. 'That's what my Government is doing.' He was leaning, not lifting. Typically. In a clear response to that, the Americans immediately released a readout of Hegseth's bilateral meeting with Marles in which he said Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 percent of its GDP as soon as possible. That the Americans saw the need to do that should be deeply embarrassing to Albanese and Marles. But they attempted, as usual, to deflect it. And then the Americans announced the review of AUKUS. That is the pickle we are in. If it is their genuine intention to measure the deal against America First principles, it is hard to see how it can stand in its present form. The so-called 'assurance' Trump gave on the fly to the UK Prime Minister at the G7 on the future of the deal is meaningless for us. It needs output of 2.3 new Virginia-class submarines a year by the early 2030s, but is currently running at 1.2 with no signs of immediate improvement despite an extra injection of $10 billion to boost production. The Americans have already decided that Australia is dragging its feet on defence spending after repeated proddings. Trump has almost certainly concluded that Albanese is recalcitrant. Regardless of what is going on behind the scenes, Trump requires his allies to make public shows of fealty. Albanese was given plenty of opportunity, but preferred to stubbornly decline. The proposal by former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo, author of the 2009 defence white paper, to offer the submarine repair shipyard at Henderson, south of Perth, as a joint US/Australian facility went unheeded. The US Navy has a severe backlog in its submarine maintenance program and assured access to Henderson would help clear that, allowing more boats at sea. That in turn would reduce the risk of a US president in 2032 not certifying the transfer of US subs to Australia — as required by law — on the grounds that it would degrade the US submarine capability. Albanese's ingrained leftist instincts against increased defence spending — which traditionally drops under Labor governments anyway — are obvious to everyone. And that includes Trump. For electoral gain, Labor ruthlessly demonised Peter Dutton to look like he was standing too close to Trump. Now Albanese will be made to pay for not being close enough.
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Steve Martin: Government's response to concerns about trains shows Labor's arrogance
Over 300 WA train drivers blew the whistle on the Government with major concerns about the safety and operability of WA Labor's Metronet C-series trains. The arrogant and dismissive response from Transport Minister Rita Saffioti should horrify every Western Australian. A six-railcar C-series train has 400 seats and can carry more than 1000 passengers. So, when the union that represents the people driving those trains releases a survey stating that the majority of drivers support withdrawing the trains until the issues can be resolved, you would expect the State Government to pay attention. The survey is genuinely shocking: 94 per cent of train drivers believe the trains weren't ready for service when they launched; 91 per cent believe the training they received was inadequate; 83 per cent report serious safety issues such as braking, speed and communication issues; 73.8 per cent of drivers said they themselves have felt unsafe while operating a C-series railcar. The 59-page report from the Rail Tram and Bus Union raised a plethora of specific issues. Doors opening or closing when they shouldn't, braking inconsistencies, difficulty communicating using the passenger emergency intercom, auto speed issues causing surging and/or over-speeding. There were also pages of testimony from drivers not holding back with their criticisms. The report also states that drivers felt the introduction of the C-series was 'politically motivated and rushed.' When 75 per cent of train drivers tell you they feel unsafe operating these massive machines, you sit up and pay attention. So, it has been surprising to see the level of willingness of the Cook Labor Government to completely deny and dismiss genuine concerns raised by professional train drivers. Premier Roger Cook, after spending quite a bit of time during the last election campaign riding around on the trains, had this to say: 'We understand that, you know, changing the model of trains always challenges the work force.' Ms Saffioti was even more blunt, responding to questions in Parliament from Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas by saying: '… drivers need to get used to the new trains.' It is difficult to think of a more disdainful response from the State Government to train drivers than to tell them that they, not the machinery they are paid to professionally operate, are the problem. It is the sort of arrogance that is becoming a constant theme from WA Labor in their third term. The drivers have good reason to be cynical of the Minister's priorities. The Bussell Highway duplication was 'opened' in time for Easter this year after years of delay — but the red warning cones, lane closures and speed reductions were swiftly back in place afterwards and roadworks continue to this day. The ultimate disdain of the Minister, who is also the Treasurer, is for WA taxpayers. Metronet has now blown out by over $12.5 billion. That's not her money, that is yours. Western Australians deserve better than a Transport Minister and Treasurer who is it in for herself and not for you. Steve Martin is Shadow Transport Minister
The Advertiser
5 hours ago
- The Advertiser
If you're going for a home loan but still have a HECS debt, you might want to wait
People with outstanding student loans will have an easier time getting a mortgage from September, when new lending rules will take effect. Banks will be able to disregard higher education loan program (HELP) debts, which include HECS debt, when assessing a homebuyer for a mortgage. The changes were finalised this week, after the Albanese government made a pre-election pledge in February to level the playing field for people with student debts. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has advised banks to remove HELP debt from debt-to-income reporting, a metric used to determine a person's capacity to repay a mortgage. The regulator has also clarified that it may be reasonable for banks to completely disregard a person's HELP debt from serviceability assessments, where it's expected the loan will be paid off within 12 months. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the changes would make lending rules fairer. "We're making sure young people with a HELP debt are treated fairly and supporting them to get into the property market," he said. The changes mean a dual-income household with two student debts could borrow an additional $50,000 in the year they expect to pay off their student loan, according to the government's own analysis. APRA has written to lenders and the industry to advise them of the changes and their new obligations. The revised standards for banks will come into effect on September 30, 2025. In its letter to lenders, APRA said the changes would provide regulatory clarity and reaffirm the flexibility banks had in considering borrowers' individual circumstances. The regulator expects the changes will allow some borrowers with student debts to secure a home loan sooner. Education Minister Jason Clare said the Universities Accord found that banks' assessments of student debt made it harder for young Australians to buy a home. "HECS was never meant to be a handbrake on owning a home," he said. "That's not fair and we're fixing it." The federal government will also move ahead with its plan to reduce student debts by 20 per cent, something it committed to before the May election. During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised the legislative changes would be his first priority if his government was to be re-elected. The government has reaffirmed this, saying it will be the first piece of legislation introduced when Parliament returns on July 22, 2025. The 20 per cent reduction will occur once the legislation passes Parliament. However, the government has clarified the discount will be calculated based on a person's HELP debt amount as at June 1, 2025, before indexation was applied. This means the 2025 indexation will only apply to the remaining balance after the 20 per cent reduction. People with outstanding student loans will have an easier time getting a mortgage from September, when new lending rules will take effect. Banks will be able to disregard higher education loan program (HELP) debts, which include HECS debt, when assessing a homebuyer for a mortgage. The changes were finalised this week, after the Albanese government made a pre-election pledge in February to level the playing field for people with student debts. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has advised banks to remove HELP debt from debt-to-income reporting, a metric used to determine a person's capacity to repay a mortgage. The regulator has also clarified that it may be reasonable for banks to completely disregard a person's HELP debt from serviceability assessments, where it's expected the loan will be paid off within 12 months. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the changes would make lending rules fairer. "We're making sure young people with a HELP debt are treated fairly and supporting them to get into the property market," he said. The changes mean a dual-income household with two student debts could borrow an additional $50,000 in the year they expect to pay off their student loan, according to the government's own analysis. APRA has written to lenders and the industry to advise them of the changes and their new obligations. The revised standards for banks will come into effect on September 30, 2025. In its letter to lenders, APRA said the changes would provide regulatory clarity and reaffirm the flexibility banks had in considering borrowers' individual circumstances. The regulator expects the changes will allow some borrowers with student debts to secure a home loan sooner. Education Minister Jason Clare said the Universities Accord found that banks' assessments of student debt made it harder for young Australians to buy a home. "HECS was never meant to be a handbrake on owning a home," he said. "That's not fair and we're fixing it." The federal government will also move ahead with its plan to reduce student debts by 20 per cent, something it committed to before the May election. During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised the legislative changes would be his first priority if his government was to be re-elected. The government has reaffirmed this, saying it will be the first piece of legislation introduced when Parliament returns on July 22, 2025. The 20 per cent reduction will occur once the legislation passes Parliament. However, the government has clarified the discount will be calculated based on a person's HELP debt amount as at June 1, 2025, before indexation was applied. This means the 2025 indexation will only apply to the remaining balance after the 20 per cent reduction. People with outstanding student loans will have an easier time getting a mortgage from September, when new lending rules will take effect. Banks will be able to disregard higher education loan program (HELP) debts, which include HECS debt, when assessing a homebuyer for a mortgage. The changes were finalised this week, after the Albanese government made a pre-election pledge in February to level the playing field for people with student debts. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has advised banks to remove HELP debt from debt-to-income reporting, a metric used to determine a person's capacity to repay a mortgage. The regulator has also clarified that it may be reasonable for banks to completely disregard a person's HELP debt from serviceability assessments, where it's expected the loan will be paid off within 12 months. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the changes would make lending rules fairer. "We're making sure young people with a HELP debt are treated fairly and supporting them to get into the property market," he said. The changes mean a dual-income household with two student debts could borrow an additional $50,000 in the year they expect to pay off their student loan, according to the government's own analysis. APRA has written to lenders and the industry to advise them of the changes and their new obligations. The revised standards for banks will come into effect on September 30, 2025. In its letter to lenders, APRA said the changes would provide regulatory clarity and reaffirm the flexibility banks had in considering borrowers' individual circumstances. The regulator expects the changes will allow some borrowers with student debts to secure a home loan sooner. Education Minister Jason Clare said the Universities Accord found that banks' assessments of student debt made it harder for young Australians to buy a home. "HECS was never meant to be a handbrake on owning a home," he said. "That's not fair and we're fixing it." The federal government will also move ahead with its plan to reduce student debts by 20 per cent, something it committed to before the May election. During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised the legislative changes would be his first priority if his government was to be re-elected. The government has reaffirmed this, saying it will be the first piece of legislation introduced when Parliament returns on July 22, 2025. The 20 per cent reduction will occur once the legislation passes Parliament. However, the government has clarified the discount will be calculated based on a person's HELP debt amount as at June 1, 2025, before indexation was applied. This means the 2025 indexation will only apply to the remaining balance after the 20 per cent reduction. People with outstanding student loans will have an easier time getting a mortgage from September, when new lending rules will take effect. Banks will be able to disregard higher education loan program (HELP) debts, which include HECS debt, when assessing a homebuyer for a mortgage. The changes were finalised this week, after the Albanese government made a pre-election pledge in February to level the playing field for people with student debts. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority has advised banks to remove HELP debt from debt-to-income reporting, a metric used to determine a person's capacity to repay a mortgage. The regulator has also clarified that it may be reasonable for banks to completely disregard a person's HELP debt from serviceability assessments, where it's expected the loan will be paid off within 12 months. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the changes would make lending rules fairer. "We're making sure young people with a HELP debt are treated fairly and supporting them to get into the property market," he said. The changes mean a dual-income household with two student debts could borrow an additional $50,000 in the year they expect to pay off their student loan, according to the government's own analysis. APRA has written to lenders and the industry to advise them of the changes and their new obligations. The revised standards for banks will come into effect on September 30, 2025. In its letter to lenders, APRA said the changes would provide regulatory clarity and reaffirm the flexibility banks had in considering borrowers' individual circumstances. The regulator expects the changes will allow some borrowers with student debts to secure a home loan sooner. Education Minister Jason Clare said the Universities Accord found that banks' assessments of student debt made it harder for young Australians to buy a home. "HECS was never meant to be a handbrake on owning a home," he said. "That's not fair and we're fixing it." The federal government will also move ahead with its plan to reduce student debts by 20 per cent, something it committed to before the May election. During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese promised the legislative changes would be his first priority if his government was to be re-elected. The government has reaffirmed this, saying it will be the first piece of legislation introduced when Parliament returns on July 22, 2025. The 20 per cent reduction will occur once the legislation passes Parliament. However, the government has clarified the discount will be calculated based on a person's HELP debt amount as at June 1, 2025, before indexation was applied. This means the 2025 indexation will only apply to the remaining balance after the 20 per cent reduction.
