West Lothian could see another 12,500 homes built in the decade to 2038
West Lothian could see another 12,500 homes built in the decade to 2038.
And communities have told planners that a more diverse choice of homes – including more bungalows- are needed to meet the needs of an ageing population.
A full meeting of West Lothian council agreed to approve the first stage of a new Local Development Plan as a blueprint for the future look of communities.
National planning demands call for West Lothian to have another 9.850 homes by 2038, but planners raised that to more than 12,000 having accepted community calls for greater diversity of house styles, including more bungalows as well as more smaller homes to allow downsizing among a growing elderly population.
There has also been a call for more affordable housing.
This initial stage known as the Evidence Report now goes to the Scottish Government for approval. It sets out where development should take place and what is needed to accompany that development.
Councillors gave cautious welcome to the proposals but aired concerns about health care provision and transport infrastructure, both of which dominate the conversation on existing housing development proposals.
Earlier worries that they would not have enough time to work through the hefty document's 1,000 plus pages were allayed.
Linlithgow Lib Dem Sally Pattle had, at a recent meeting, warned that developers 'would be watching us like hawks' as she stressed the need for councillors to 'get things right' in the plan.
She told the meeting: ' After being slightly alarmed a couple weeks ago I'm pleased to say I have had some really good discussions with officers and I really wanted to say extend my thanks for the time that they have provided me with in the last couple of weeks so that I understood the process and am a lot clearer about what is going happen going forward.
'I am now reassured that we have to get this evidence report in I understand the tightness of the timescales we are up against I also have been reassured that we just at the beginning of this process.
'As long as we all keep working together, we'll be able to get there with the best outcome for West Lothian so thank you very much.'
Proposing a motion accepting the paper council leader Lawrence Fitzpatrick said; 'We are taking a big step forward; it has required a significant amount of work by council officers. I'm glad to note there has been massive interaction between officers and councillors with regard to queries. I move that we accept the recommendation which includes the corrections to be included.'
Planning officers stressed that the Evidence gathering had consulted communities on their hopes and expectations for the future.
The final Local Development Plan which has to be in place for 2028 should reflect those community demands.
A West Lothian Council spokesperson said: 'We would like to thank everyone who engaged in the process that has enabled planning officers to prepare this evidence report. It is important to stress this is an early point in the process of creating a new Local Development Plan for West Lothian.
'Completion of this gate check process will then allow planning officers to prepare the first draft of the new local development plan for West Lothian. This process will once again require extensive engagement with key stakeholders and local communities and the council will once again be calling on members of the public to participate. Details of how you can get involved will be shared in due course.'
The latest information on LDP2 can be accessed via the West Lothian Council website: https://www.westlothian.gov.uk/ldp2-updates
By Stuart Sommerville, Local Democracy Reporter
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
4 hours ago
- Daily Record
The SNP Government must choose between greedy companies or the people on Flamingo Land at Loch Lomond
There have been a few times in our decade-long campaign to save Loch Lomond where I've held my breath and thought it was probably all over. Moments where I wondered if we could actually save this world-famous location from being destroyed by Flamingo Land's daft mega-resort. But time after time our people-powered campaign has held off this greedy company. We have - so far - stopped them from exploiting Scotland's natural heritage for their own profit. Over 155,000 of us lodged objections, making their mega-resort the most unpopular planning application in Scottish history. We were joined by experts like the Woodland Trust and the Government's own environment watchdog, SEPA. Last September we won, persuading the National Park's board to unanimously reject this destructive application. But then, in a move Ebeneezer Scrooge would be proud of, they lodged an appeal right before Christmas. And astonishingly, the Government official tasked with considering it decided to grant them permission, overturning the Park board's democratic decision and disregarding the overwhelming weight of evidence that the mega-resort would do huge damage. We couldn't let it end there though. For almost ten years the largely working-class community in Balloch has fought a David and Goliath struggle against this greedy developer. Our campaign to save Loch Lomond wasn't going to be defeated at the last minute on the whim of a single government official. In just two weeks over 50,000 of us wrote to the Planning Minister to demand that he recalled the decision. Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie raised it in Parliament, challenging the First Minister to step in. Our supporters across the country contacted MSPs of all parties but especially the SNP, calling on them to support our efforts. And just like that, on the eve of losing a vote in Parliament, the Scottish Government u-turned and recalled the decision. This is far from over, but Ministers themselves will now have the final say, not officials. That's how it should be for a development this big at the gateway to Loch Lomond. Decisions of national importance must be taken by elected MSPs. Government Ministers should not hide behind their officials. Loch Lomond i s the crown jewel of Scotland's natural environment. It's world famous for a reason. The gateway to the loch shouldn't be stuck behind traffic jams and resort gates. Both the environment itself and the community in Balloch deserve to be protected. From the flood risk and loss of ancient woodland to the extra 250+ cars per hour on already gridlocked local roads at peak times, the reasons to reject this application and end this saga are overwhelming. The Scottish Government has a choice. They can decide whether Scotland's national parks are just another 'investment opportunity' for greedy companies who would cause huge damage for a quick profit. Or they can finally side with the Scottish Greens, environmental experts, the residents of Balloch and 155,000 people across Scotland, end this saga, and save Loch Lomond.
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'For us, this is about building a legacy for our team'
Following a period of rapid growth over recent years, there are now nearly 300 employee-owned firms in Scotland. These concerns employ more than 7,500 people and turn over in excess of £1.5 billion collectively. And the number of Scottish firms where staff hold majority stakes, chiefly through employee ownership trusts (EOTs), is expected to continue to increase, despite recent changes to the tax regime, as the Scottish Government targets having 500 employee-owned businesses operating in the country to 500 by 2030. Nicholas Howie, partner in the corporate law team at Lindsays, which has advised on 25 employee ownership deals in recent years, said: 'An exit strategy can be one of the biggest issues facing owners of SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) in Scotland. Employee ownership is an increasingly effective - and empowering - way of managing that. It's transformational for many businesses. 'It allows sellers - often founders or families who have run businesses for generations - to continue to play a role in their future, while putting the legal and financial frameworks in place which create a long-term legacy for their employees. 'Owners who sell their shares to an EOT gain an exemption on capital gains tax. But, on top of that, EOTs are really starting to demonstrate their economic worth. Read more: 'The feedback that we've had is that businesses which make the change become more productive and profitable because the whole staff team has a stake in its success, with the ability to award employees annually with bonuses of up to £3,600 per year per employee.' Among the newest to make the change in Scotland is Wetrooms International Group, the Rutherglen-based bathrooms supplies business, which cited ambitious growth plans among the reasons for transferring the majority of its equity to its 80 employees. Founders Brian and Bill Crombie have retained a 26% shareholding following the transition to an EOT. Brian Crombie said: 'For us, this is about building a legacy for our team, recognising the loyalty of our staff. Becoming an EOT was the logical step for us to take. It makes sense for everyone. 'I'm 73 and Bill is 71. We've got ambitious plans for the business while naturally also considering what work looks like for us longer term. We've had approaches, but didn't like the idea of a trade sale, putting the business in the hands of someone who might not understand our unique ethos. Our team deserves better.' Bill Crombie added: 'The business is in a real period of growth with huge potential to expand significantly over the next five years.' Employee ownership is continuing to grow in popularity despite recent changes to the capital gains tax regime for EOTs in the Autumn Budget. The changes will aim, among other things, to 'restrict former owners or persons connected with former owners from retaining control of companies post-sale to an employee ownership trust by virtue of control (direct or indirect) of the employee ownership trust'. They also aim to 'require that the trustees must take reasonable steps to ensure that the consideration paid to acquire the company shares does not exceed market value' and will extend the capital gains tax clawback period from one complete tax year following the tax year of the sale to four complete tax years. Specialist advisor Carole Leslie, director of Ownership Associates, who has helped more than 150 firms make the transition in the last year, said: 'The interest in the EOT structure is continuing to accelerate at pace across all business sectors. As awareness grows, more companies are seeking out a succession option that allows the owners to realise their value in the company tax effectively and allows them to control their own exit from the company. 'It's great news for employees. They can be as reassured as possible that their employment will continue for as long as the company continues to be successful, whereas any other succession option would likely lead to disruption and possible relocation or downsizing.' The benefits that can be achieved from staff having a greater stake and say in how they work are being highlighted today, as Employee Ownership Day takes place.
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
First-time buyers removed from government housing scheme
Most first-time buyers have been dropped from a Scottish government scheme that helps people buy a home without having to fund its full cost, BBC Scotland News has Open Market Shared Equity (OMSE) scheme allows buyers to pay for 60% to 90% of a property's price, with the government buying the remaining of buyers have entered the property market this way since 2007 but there was a sharp drop last year, leading to some observers calling the scheme's price thresholds unrealistic.A government spokesperson said the scheme would now only focus on priority groups, such as social renters and people with disabilities, but experts called the move "short-sighted". In the past, the initiative had been mostly used by first-time buyers on lower incomes who lived in private rentals or with family. But the government's latest update has rendered first-time buyers ineligible, unless they fit into one of the priority mortgage advisers and buyers who have used the scheme in the past told the BBC first-time buyers were vital to the housing market and should also be a priority group. 'The government should be protecting first-time buyers' In recent years, campaigners have highlighted the growing number of Scots struggling with housing issues such as affordability, suitability and security of May last year, the Scottish government declared a national housing emergency, which set out aims to increase housing supply and tackle high mortgage rates and the rapidly increasing cost of renting have made it difficult for first-time buyers to enter the property to the charity Shelter Scotland, more than four in 10 adults are currently dealing with housing-related Moore from Edinburgh contacted Your Voice, Your BBC News last year because she had struggled to save enough funds to buy her first home as a private tenant of eight years. Although the 32-year-old copywriter had about £5,000 in savings, she had to borrow money from her family to cover a mortgage deposit and the extra funds to pay over the property's asking said: "I can happily pay the mortgage payments, but what I can't do is pull £30,000 out of nowhere - There's no way I'd be able to do this alone."Before she bought her flat, Lucy had considered using the OMSE scheme to split the property's cost with the Scottish the time, the scheme was aimed at first-time buyers and priority groups who could prove they couldn't afford to buy a home without was one of four initiatives the Scottish government has run in the past 20 years to make home ownership more accessible. A Scottish government spokesperson said the schemes had supported almost 52,000 households since 2007, with more than 80% of them being first-time buyers. The OMSE scheme doesn't allow the applicants to offer over a property's asking price if their bid exceeds the set thresholds. This is why Lucy gave up on using claims buyers in Edinburgh often have to compete with investors who can afford to make bids on properties which are far in excess of the asking price."What angers me, and I think it really shows how little support and protection first-time buyers get, is that a lot of the ads on property websites say 'perfect for a first-time buyer or as an investment'," Lucy said."Those two groups of people - that's not a fair fight. "The government should be protecting first-time buyers and giving them a cat in hell's chance of getting into this really hyper-competitive market." First-time buyers no longer a priority Although the government has advertised the OMSE scheme as a "low cost initiative for first-time buyers" for the past 18 years, the eligibility criteria changed in April first-time buyers that fit into one of the priority groups are currently eligible, leaving out those who live in private rentals or with family and obtained by BBC Scotland News shows that the majority of the scheme's past users did not belong to any of the priority year, 182 out of 210 successful OMSE purchases were made by first-time buyers. Priority group applicants were responsible for 6% of these sales in 2024, and 10% in latest evaluation of the scheme from 2021 also showed that 35% of buyers were private tenants, 32% lived with relatives and 24% came from social the government's decision to focus solely on priority groups, a spokesperson said: "Supporting social renters to make the transition to affordable home ownership will help free up social rented accommodation, which in turn could help families move out of temporary accommodation."They added that it was important to target limited government funding on buyers who would not be able to purchase at all without Ramsay, a Dundee-based mortgage broker, called this move short-sighted, adding that she didn't believe it would attract more social renters to the scheme."Many people won't look to move from affordable renting to having to worry about the cost of having your own home, to cover ongoing repairs, everything else that goes with that," she Ramsay believes first-time buyers on lower incomes should be a priority group because they usually buy at the most competitive lower end of the said: "It pushes the house price up because there could be five or six people looking at a property, and some of them may well have financial backing where they can pay over the asking price for that property. It's not a level playing field."These are the people that will keep our housing market moving. It really is a kick in their teeth."In response, the Scottish government said that it still supported first-time buyers by charging no tax on the first £175,000 of their new home, and through the NSSE allows buyers split the cost of a new-build property sold by councils or housing associations. However, there are currently only six local authorities in Scotland with eligible properties, according to the scheme's website. 'Almost impossible' to meet the price cap Martin and Anna Sutherland said they would not have been able to purchase their first home without the OMSE had spent six years privately renting, which left them with just enough money to afford a 5% mortgage deposit, something not many lenders accept, according to the the government paying for 20% of the property price through the OMSE scheme, they managed to secure a lower mortgage and bought a four-bedroom bungalow in Fife. However, Mr Sutherland emphasised it was "almost impossible" to find a property that would fit into the price thresholds set by the government."There wasn't one property available to us by using the (OMSE) LIFT scheme, except for this one," he bought their house for £174,000, which was just £1,000 short of the scheme's threshold for South Fife. According to Rightmove, an average price for a four-bedroom property in Fife is just over £343, though the property requires lots of renovations, Mr Sutherland said the whole family felt very lucky to secure their first home. The thresholds are based on the property size and location, with noticeable differences across Scotland's local Ramsay and other mortgage advisers have told BBC Scotland News the scheme's price caps were the government claimed the thresholds were being updated every year in line with inflation, they remained the same between August 2022 and the latest update in April 2025. In response, the government stated there were no changes in December 2023 and 2024 because the scheme had closed to new applications at the South Fife, where Martin and Anna bought their house in 2024, a four-bedroom property is now capped at £185, BBC News Scotland questioned the government about the thresholds, it said: "We accept that in certain small geographical areas there will be a limited number of properties for sale which fall within the OMSE thresholds at any one point in time."It added that the way the thresholds are calculated ensures that all areas across Scotland are able to benefit from a viable scheme with a reasonable number of properties to choose from. Last year, the scheme's users also only had four weeks to apply, with the government claiming the budget had been "fully utilized by all applications received at the time." We later found out that only a half of the dedicated £27m was actually spent. Responding to our findings, a Scottish government spokesperson said: "After all applications were assessed, approximately £13.5m of the initial budget remained."At the end of November the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice made the decision to redistribute the remaining £13.5m of Financial Transactions allocated to OMSE to Charitable Bonds." The government uses these bonds to provide loans to registered social landlords for the development of new affordable number of applicants to the scheme and its funding have steadily declined in the past five most money allocated to the scheme was £80m in 2019, which supported 1,145 sales. In 2024, only about 0.6% of all of Scotland's first-time buyers benefited from it and the budget was the lowest in a John Boyle, the director of research and strategy at estate agent Rettie & Co, said the shared equity schemes were more successful 10 years ago."That's because it did help more substantial numbers of people onto the housing ladder at a time when it was difficult for first-time buyers to access mortgage finance," he he believes the solution to Scotland's housing problem lies elsewhere."Unless we do something about the supply problem, we won't really do anything about the affordability problem," he said."That's where the bulk of the money should be going."
