Disabled children ‘denied' school support, Senedd hears
Senedd members considered a 1,454-name petition calling for a ban on the term 'universal provision' – which refers to the support available to all pupils.
Parents warned councils are using the term to deny disabled children the person-centred, additional support they need in school to reach their full potential.
As part of a 'transformation programme', the Senedd passed a law in 2018 to bring in an additional learning needs (ALN) system to replace special educational needs (SEN) support.
The number of disabled children receiving support has fallen by nearly half since 2020/21 when roll-out began – with 40,000 fewer pupils receiving ALN or SEN support in 2023/24.
In 2017, then-minister Alun Davies assured the Senedd's education committee that the cohort of pupils within the scope of the new system would be 'broadly similar'.
Victoria Lightbown, who submitted the petition, wrote: 'Despite this clarification, local authorities and members of Welsh Government continue to allow this term to be used to refuse a learner ALN status and provide additional learning provision.
'There can only be one solution and that is that this term is banned from use.
'While members of the Welsh Government still use this term when discussing ALN including during media interviews, it gives local authorities opportunity to follow suit and continue to deny ALN to learners.'
Lynne Neagle wrote to the Senedd's petitions committee in response to the petition, apologising for a near-three month delay in replying to correspondence.
Wales' education secretary, who chaired the education committee as it scrutinised reforms in 2017, said: 'I want to be clear that 'universal provision' should not be a reason to deny ALN.
'However, I am aware that the term 'universal provision' is widely used by schools and local authorities when describing the provision… generally available to all pupils of the same age.
'Estyn's recent thematic review of the ALN reforms reports there is confusion in schools and local authorities around what constitutes 'universal' provision and what is ALP. This confusion is causing difficulties when determining whether a learner has ALN.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
MPs deny Welsh Parliament veto on assisted dying in Wales
The Senedd has lost a potential veto over whether assisted dying will be legal in Wales after a vote of Commons reversed a change made to the bill at an earlier stage which would have given Members of the Senedd (MSs) the power to decide when the law comes into the plans now, the Senedd will be able to pass regulations on assisted dying services in Wales - but so will the UK will vote later on Friday to decide whether the bill proceeds for further consideration in the House of Lords. The Senedd still faces a significant decision on whether to give its consent to the legislation, in a vote expected in the will not be legally binding, but is supposed to be respected by the UK Parliament and could indicate whether the Welsh government is willing to pass its own regulations for how the system would is not clear what would happen in Wales if the Senedd did not come on board. The Senedd voted against a motion on a similar topic that failed to pass in January, albeit with a number of Health Secretary, Jeremy Miles, has expressed opposition to the situation has been created because while criminal justice is controlled by Westminster, health in Wales is handled in Cardiff Bay. The England and Wales legislation spans both topics. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who has drawn up the assisted dying legislation, sought through amendments to remove commencement powers for the Senedd added by Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Olney at the earlier committee amendments on the Senedd's powers passed 274 votes for, 224 against, with a majority of a debate last week supporters of the amendments said the changes better reflect the fact that criminal law is not the Senedd's said the bill gave the UK parliament the power to impose the law on the Senedd, despite having rejected the bill would only allow those over the age of 18 and with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die.
South Wales Argus
11 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd members lambast bluetongue response as 'total chaos'
Samuel Kurtz, who is from a farming family, expressed deep concern about the Welsh Government's handling of the disease, saying it 'falls far short of what farmers deserve'. The Conservatives' economy secretary said Senedd members received no briefing from the deputy first minister nor the chief veterinary office on the science behind the decision. Mr Kurtz warned: 'There has been no economic impact assessment despite the far-reaching consequences for our rural community. 'And perhaps most troubling of all, the decision was issued via a written statement on a Thursday afternoon – just after the Senedd week had ended, ensuring no scrutiny, no questions and no answers until today.' He told the Senedd: 'We all understand the importance of protecting Welsh livestock from bluetongue but the measures imposed are not only excessive, they're unworkable.' 'Requiring pre-movement testing for all live imports, even vaccinated animals, might look reasonable on paper but – in the real world of Welsh farming – it's chaos." He put the cost of vaccinating all livestock in Wales at £32m – £6 a cow and £3 for every sheep or goat – placing a 'staggering financial' burden on a struggling industry. During a statement on the Welsh Government's approach to bluetongue on June 17, deputy first minister Huw Irranca-Davies said policy will be kept under regular review.
South Wales Argus
11 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd rejection for renewed calls for M4 relief road
Sam Rowlands described the M4 relief road as a golden opportunity, not only to ease congestion for motorists but also to boost the economy. The Conservatives' shadow finance secretary said the Welsh Government spent £135m of public money on the project before it was scrapped in June 2019. He accused then-first minister Mark Drakeford of breaking a pledge on the £1.6bn relief road and going against an inquiry's finding that the costs would outweigh the benefits two to one. Mr Rowlands told the Senedd: 'At every step of this journey, there's been indecision and money wasted. At the end of it all, it's been the Welsh people who've had to suffer as a result. And nothing has been done to ease congestion around Newport ever since.' Peredur Owen Griffiths, Plaid Cymru's shadow transport secretary, criticised the Tories for calling for a new road through a site of special scientific interest. Calling for a more affordable and environmentally sustainable solution, he raised the lengthy and costly completion of the Heads of the Valleys Road improvements. He told the Senedd: 'After 23 years of roadworks and around £2bn later, [the] Welsh Government will now pay more than £40m a year for 30 years to a private firm before the road will be publicly owned in 2055.' Mr Owen Griffiths, who represents South Wales East, criticised the Welsh Government for being 'too slow' to put forward a genuine alternative solution to M4 congestion. John Griffiths welcomed £445m from the UK spending review for rail in Wales, including three new railway stations planned in his Newport East constituency. Mr Griffiths called for urgency in taking forward the recommendations of the Burns commission 'after far too much delay'. Natasha Asghar said her constituents in South Wales East are regularly faced with bumper-to-bumper traffic and long delays on the route which is not fit for purpose. 'These never ending clogs are not just a nightmare for those stuck in them, they're also a major economic roadblock,' she said. 'The constant gridlock and unreliable nature of the M4 is undoubtedly making Wales a less attractive place to do business.' Senedd members voted 32-12 against the Tory motion following the debate on June 18.
