Trump tariffs: ‘In economic terms, it makes no sense at all'

From world leaders, to the tiniest manufacturers thousands of miles away from Washington, decision-makers across the global economy are racked with uncertainty this weekend, as they scramble to come to terms with Donald Trump's historic tariffs.
Experts are all but unanimous that the impact of Wednesday's extraordinary Rose Garden press conference on global growth will be negative – but just how bad remains highly uncertain.
'In economic terms, it makes no sense at all,' said Jordi Gual, the former chair of CaixaBank, Spain's largest domestic lender, who is now an economics professor at IESE business school in Barcelona. 'It is hugely problematic, because we go back to a level we hadn't seen since the 1930s.'
Trump's announcement that he would impose tariffs from 10% to almost 50% on the US's largest trading partners – including a 34% additional border tax on Chinese imports and a 10% levy on the UK – was designed to encourage multinational companies to relocate their factories, jobs and supply chains to the US.
The president promised it would usher in a new 'golden age', but financial markets responded with a jarring two-day sell-off, underlining the potential risks of such an unprecedented policy, which is expected to bring higher prices in the US, and cause weaker growth worldwide.
The aggregate effects are hard to anticipate, because they will depend on several factors, including how successful governments are in negotiating carve-outs from the tariffs; and how the US currency responds.
Typically, economists would predict that the dollar would strengthen as a result of the tariff spree, cushioning the impact on US consumers in terms of higher prices – but the greenback has weakened on foreign exchange markets since Trump's announcement.
That could exacerbate the situation, by unleashing even more inflation than is already likely from higher import taxes – and complicating the task of the Federal Reserve in battling any slowdown in growth. The US central bank may be reluctant to cut rates in the face of rocketing prices.
'The ability of monetary policy to be the shock absorber may be more limited now because of the price impact of tariffs, and the stickiness of inflation,' says Gerard Lyons, chief economist strategist at Netwealth.
The scope for spending policy, to offset any potential slowdown – with tax cuts to boost demand, for example – also looks constrained inside and outside the US, with many countries already struggling with the debt hangover from Covid.
Another important factor driving the scale of the hit to growth is how aggressively US economic rivals hit back, with tit-for-tat tariffs likely to make a bad situation even worse.
Part of the answer emerged on Friday, after Beijing announced that instead of a forensically targeted response, it would simply slap 34% tariffs on all US imports. Markets plunged on the news.
Researchers at the consultancy Oxford Economics predict that Trump's measures could knock global GDP growth to below 2% this year, the weakest rate since the 2008 global financial crisis, excluding the pandemic.
After global growth of 3.2% in 2024, such an outcome would mark a significant decline, but would fall short of a global recession – which economistsview as GDP growth falling short of the 0.9% rate of world population growth.
Suggestions that the entire global trading system will be brought to a halt look wide of the mark, however. Although the US has lengthy supply chains stretching out into vital overseas markets, trade still stands as a relatively small proportion of its overall $30tn economy; and as much as 80% of global trade in goods does not directly touch the US, according to research from the Boston Consulting Group.
'Although we're focused on the US being the largest economy, and the largest importer, things have changed from 10, 20, 30 years ago,' said Butler. 'If you compare this with going back to the early 1970s when Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard and imposed a temporary 10% tariff on trade, the US was vastly more important then.'
And the impact across different countries will vary significantly, depending on what level of tariffs they will face – and how reliant they are on exports to the US, and on trade more broadly.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Analysts at consultancy Capital Economics reckon EU growth may be 0.25% lower as a result of the 20% levy its exports will face, and Chinese growth perhaps 0.75% lower, for example.
For the time being, they suggest the UK, which was not in Trump's sights because it does not have a major trade surplus with the US, so faces the minimum 10% tariff, will not be among the worst hit.
'In the UK, the effect on growth is still a rounding error: it's 0.1%,' said Capital's chief economist Neil Shearing. 'It hits exporters in particular sectors – but it doesn't necessarily hit the UK economy as a whole.'
For some economies in the global south facing eye-wateringly high tariffs, however, and with little negotiating power with the White House, the effects could be devastating. Cambodia will face 49% tariffs, Laos 48% and Vietnam 46%.
Back on Trump's doorstep, in the medium term, experts warn that a radically more protectionist US is likely to be less competitive and more expensive – and may encourage other economies to forge deeper trading links.
'You have a doughnut, where the US is an island surrounded by tariffs of 10-60%, while the rest of the world goes its own way,' says Creon Butler, who leads the global economy and finance programme at Chatham House in London.
'Look at how the Soviet Union performed in a state of autarky [economic isolationism]. If you do have this US island economy, you will have poorer quality, more expensive products, and international supply chains going elsewhere.'
Meanwhile, economists fret that in the immediate future, uncertainty itself is likely to be having a dampening effect – which could end up as damaging as the tariff policy itself.
'Some people argue he's playing the madman strategy. Or some sort of random behaviour so that rivals, enemies cannot anticipate his next move,' said Gual. 'Maybe that in geopolitics has some role. But in economics that increases the level of uncertainty and it is not supportive of economic growth and financial stability.'
How many thousands of individual businesses and consumers respond in the coming days and weeks, will be critical in determining the impact of 'liberation day'. Do multinationals rapidly reshape their supply chains for example – or hold back from investment, while they wait and see if Trump changes his mind? And does the mighty US consumer keep on spending, or balk in the face of rising prices?
As Shearing warns: 'The issue is that not only is it, 'where does the tariff policy land', but the range of different outcomes is extremely wide.' He adds: 'As economists, we don't have the tools to deal with the human side of economics – and there really are no historical parallels.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Auto Blog

an hour ago

• Auto Blog

Trump Tariffs to Add $1,760 to New Car Prices in 2025

Automakers Expected to Pass Tariff Costs to Consumers If you've been saving your pennies, hoping to scrimp together enough money to afford the new vehicle you've been wanting, you may need to dig deeper into the couch cushions. Its price is likely to go up by nearly $2,000 – and possibly a good bit more thanks to Pres. Donald Trump's new tariffs on imported autos and auto parts. All told, automakers will take a $30 billion hit this year due to the new trade sanctions and while manufacturers will swallow some of the tab, predicts a new study, they'll pass 80% of the cost onto consumers. Don't be surprised to see some products disappear from the market entirely, said suburban Detroit consultancy AlixPartners, especially some of the import models likely to be hit hardest by the new tariffs. Land Rover Defender 90 'A Big Wall of Cost' 'These tariffs bring a big wall of cost,' Mark Wakefield, the head of AlixPartners' auto practice said during an online briefing with reporters, with 'consumers taking the majority of the hit.' If there's any shred of a silver lining to the 2025 AlixPartners Global Automotive Outlook it's that we could see the White House continue to revise its tariffs on import autos and auto parts, even as it works up trade deals that. The consultancy anticipates this will eventually lower the sanctions from 25% to an average closer to 7.5%. Even Domestic Models Will be Impacted The White House has rolled out an assortment of new tariffs and has yet to fully lock down the rules, David Steinert, a partner in the AlixPartners auto practice, said during a follow-up interview with Autoblog. 'The tariffs have changed a lot over the last 60 days,' and will likely continue to be revised in the months ahead. As a result, it's difficult to come up with hard numbers – but the consultancy's 'best guess,' he added, is that the typical vehicle will cost at least $1,760 more than before the tariffs went into effect. And for foreign-made luxury models that could ran into the tens of thousands. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. 'Vehicles that are produced in the US today are the most advantaged,' Steinert said, 'but even domestically-sourced vehicles bring in lots of (foreign-made) parts' that are now subject to tariffs. And the duties will be especially high if those parts come in from China. Entry-Level Cars May Vanish as Costs Rise Automakers are expected to pass on about 80% of their tariff costs – though they won't do it uniformly, the AlixPartners study anticipates. 'Entry-level and mainstream cars will have less of a pass-through' than luxury and exotic models, explained Steinert. Automakers want to avoid driving budget buyers out of the new vehicle market. On the other hand, with 'higher-end brands, with customers who are less price-sensitive, more of the tariffs (will be) passed through.' In some cases, manufacturers may not find it worthwhile to absorb tariff costs. Nissan has already decided to dump the Versa, what is today the most affordable product line in the U.S., at the end of this year, according to Automotive News. Even some higher-end models could be dropped, said Steinert, if manufacturers find higher prices dry up sales. Luxury and Imported EVs Face Steepest Increases Battery-electric vehicles are seen as especially vulnerable, warned AlixPartners. A number of today's models, such as the Audi Q5 e-tron and Mercedes EQE sedan, are imported and face hefty tariffs. Even domestically assembled models, like the Tesla Model Y, typically rely on batteries either shipped in from China or built domestically using Chinese raw materials. Complicating matters: the federal budget bill backed by the Trump administration and now working its way through Congress. It is expected to eliminate federal tax credits of up to $7,500. And, said Wakefield, buyers are likely to 'follow their pocketbook' and stick to more affordable vehicles with internal combustion engines. In its 2023 Global Automotive Outlook, AlixPartners forecast EVs would account for 31% of the U.S. market. It now anticipates a figure closer to 17%. Source: Mercedes-Benz New Car Sales Likely to Decline Through 2027 Conventional wisdom suggests the new tariffs will result in declining new vehicle sales. The real question is how much of a slump might they trigger. Last month, Cox Automotive forecast demand could drop to as low as 15 million, about 1 million below the 2024 total. And the study warned that could dip into the low 14 million range in the event of a recession. For his part, AlixPartner's Wakefield is more upbeat. He thinks the U.S. market will decline by about 1 million – but over a three-year period – and then begin to bounce back. But there's a caveat. This would require the Trump administration to deliver on its promise to negotiate new trade agreements with key partners. So far, however, it's struggling to follow through, with only one big deal in place with the United Kingdom. About the Author Paul Eisenstein View Profile

Daily Mail​

2 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Utterly staggering sum Barron Trump has already made at 19... outshining his dad and brothers

Barron Trump just completed his freshman year of university. But in a year attending introductory NYU business classes, President Donald Trump's youngest son amassed a giant crypto sum that could make some of Silicon Valley's executives blush. Barron, 19, is reportedly sitting on a fortune of up to $40 million, largely thanks to a family-linked cryptocurrency firm called World Liberty Financial. The venture, co-founded by Trump and his three adult sons, has quickly exploded in value, selling at least $550 million of tokens. After the first $30 million in sales, the money flowed directly from investors and into the Trump family members' bank accounts. Barron is reportedly one of the biggest beneficiaries of that cashflow, with the executive title 'Web3 ambassador,' alongside his half-brothers Don Jr. and Eric. Each of Trump's sons is believed to hold a 7.5 percent stake in the company. There are some disclosure and partial interest sales that could complicate the overall take-home pay from the venture. But at just 19 years old, he appears to have earned far more than his older siblings did at the same age — thanks to a digital gold rush that's become the centerpiece of the Trump family's modern empire. The college student may have raked in $25 million after taxes while his father returned to the White House, according to Forbes. Barron, who reportedly introduced his father to the concept of digital wallets, has been credited by Trump as the family's crypto brain. 'Barron's a young guy, but he knows it — he talks about his wallet,' Trump said in a previous interview. 'He's got four wallets or something, and I'm saying, "What is a wallet?"' President Trump is also making a healthy sum, too. A newly released 234-page financial disclosure revealed the President raked in more than $57 million last year from cryptocurrency ventures. Trump himself owns a 52.5 percent stake in the company, per his disclosure. He also made millions off retail offerings, like gold-plated shoes, high-end watches, collectible coffee table books, and electric guitars. Trump watches are another retail avenue of revenue for the Trump empire President Trump had long railed against the Biden administration for allegedly allowing the the then-President's son, Hunter, to profit off his White House proximity But the cryptocurrency is ruffling the feathers of White House watchdogs. Investments in the currency are shielded from public view, making skeptics nervous about potential foreign investment or unseen lobbying via trades in the Trump-branded coin. In May, the President hosted a lavish dinner with some of the biggest investors in his crypto empire. The White House has long argued that President Trump remains walled off from political corruption because he ceded financial power of his profit-making organizations to his sons. But that argument also came after President Trump railed against the Biden administration for allowing the former President's son, Hunter, 55, to allegedly profit from his closeness to the White House. 'Ultimately, no matter what it is, I always put the country way ahead of the business,' President Trump said, adding 'You can't say that about Hunter.'

Reuters

2 hours ago

• Reuters

Voice of America parent terminates over 600 more staff in likely death knell

WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - The parent agency of Voice of America said on Friday it had issued termination notices to over 639 more staff, completing an 85% decrease in personnel since March and effectively spelling the end of a broadcasting network founded to counter Nazi propaganda. Kari Lake, senior advisor to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, said the staff reduction meant 1,400 positions had been eliminated as part of U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda to cut staffing at the agency to a statutory minimum. "Reduction in Force Termination Notices were sent to 639 employees at USAGM and Voice of America, part of a long-overdue effort to dismantle a bloated, unaccountable bureaucracy," Lake said in a statement. She said the agency had been "riddled with dysfunction, bias, and waste." Lake said the move meant USAGM now operated near its statutory minimum of 81 employees. She said 250 employees would remain across USAGM, Voice of America, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, which transmits news into communist-run Cuba. She said none of OCB's 33 employees had been terminated. The move likely marks an end to VOA, which was founded in 1942 to counter Nazi propaganda, operated in nearly 50 languages and reached 360 million people a week, many living under authoritarian regimes. In May, nearly 600 VOA contractors were dismissed. Some Republicans have accused VOA and other publicly funded media outlets of being biased against conservatives, and called for them to be shuttered as part of wider efforts to shrink the government. Another USAGM station, Radio Free Asia, which has already been reduced to skeleton staffing, said in a staff email on Friday that it was implementing additional furloughs in its human resources, ordinance, journalist security, and research, training & evaluation teams. Various court cases are in train against the USAGM cuts.