I thought glasses-free 3D gaming was a gimmick, but this monitor may change my mind
I have to confess something: I was wrong.
Specifically, I was wrong about Acer's Predator SpatialLabs View 27 glasses-free 3D gaming monitor when I wrote about how it felt gimmicky at times.
If you read that article you might recall me reporting that while the monitor's setup process is fairly straightforward, I ran into some hiccups along the way that made it take longer than I expected to get working as intended.
And once I did have it properly connected to my PC and correctly running my supported games in glasses-free 3D via Acer's SpatialLabs TrueGame app, I found the experience itself to be horribly headache-inducing because the 3D image kept flickering every minute or so.
At the time I wrote about how it felt like the eye-tracking cameras in the top bezel of the View 27 weren't actually tracking my eyes, so I had to keep my head in a rigid position or else lose the 3D effect and instead see a nauseating double image.
I reached out to Acer representatives with questions, because I was afraid the unit might have been damaged or have defective cameras. Thanks to the kind assistance of Acer's technical experts I was able to sort out the ways in which I was getting in my own way (more on that shortly), but even after I had double-checked and tried to correct all my mistakes (using the wrong USB cable, not having enough light in the room, etc) I was still having a hard time reliably getting the 3D effect to work.
I had to stop futzing with the monitor for a month or so due to some other projects and travel, including popping up to Seattle to cover Microsoft Build 2025. When I got home I fired up the View 27 again to see if I could get to the bottom of why the glasses-free 3D effect wasn't reliably working, but suddenly it was working — and working well.
Since then I've spent a week or so testing it at different times of day and with different games, and I've barely noticed any flickering or failing of the glasses-free 3D effect. It does sometime occasionally flicker for a moment, but the display's cameras seem to quickly correct themselves and pull the glasses-free 3D effect back into place within seconds.
In fact, now that it seems to be working as intended I've noticed how the glasses-free 3D image will adjust itself in real time as you move your head around in front of the display. It's a really neat effect that causes the game world to sort of stretch and warp subtly in front of your eyes, in a way that wasn't nauseating to me but was kind of cool. It's almost like I can feel the monitor's cameras tracking my eyes and adjusting the image in real time, and it feels like the future.
So what changed?
I can't tell you yet. As far as I can tell, the glasses-free 3D effect wasn't working well on the Predator SpatialLabs View 27 loaner Acer sent us for weeks, and then suddenly it started working pretty much perfectly. According to an Acer representative the company is regularly updating both the SpatialLab Experience Center software and the profiles for playing games in 3D via the TrueGame app, so it's possible that a recent update fixed whatever issue I was experiencing.
In an RPG like Baldur's Gate 3 it fosters the illusion that there's a whole little world inside your monitor."
It's also possible I'm just an idiot, and I failed to perfectly set up the monitor or calibrate the lighting.
I had a lot of issues with setup in general, because getting the correct software, getting it to recognize the monitor as a 3D display and then ensuring the monitor works seamlessly with the SpatialLabs software was pretty tricky. For example, I spent a few days wondering why the 3D effect wasn't working, only for Acer to remind me to make sure and use the specific USB-C cable that comes with the display — you can't just use any ol' USB-C cable to connect it to your PC and expect it to work.
Even when I did have the correct cables connected and all the software updated, I typically get a "cable not plugged in" error when launching games in 3D and have to re-plug either the USB-C cable or the HDMI cable (both need to be connected between monitor and PC for the 3D software to launch) in a few times in order to get the error to go away.
But go away it does, and when I actually get into a game and start experiencing the glasses-free 3D it's always a fun gimmick. And in certain games it transcends the gimmick and makes the game more enjoyable in a meaningful way.
The Acer Predator SpatialLabs View 27 monitor is a 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) 160 Hz Stereoscopic 3D Display. When you're not using the 3D effect it's a functional 4K 160Hz gaming monitor with a pair of built-in speakers. It also supports Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync Premium.
For example, playing Skyrim in 3D on the View 27 is neat but not a huge improvement because the glasses-free 3D effect extends "into" the monitor.
That is, when the 3D effect is working well objects don't appear to jump out at you—instead, the objects closest to you in 3D appear to be on the surface of the monitor, and objects farther away appear to be "inside" the monitor as though it were a diorama.
This diorama effect isn't amazing in first-person games, but in an RPG like Baldur's Gate 3 it fosters the illusion that there's a whole little world inside your monitor that you can explore. And I bet if I played something like The Sims, the glasses-free 3D effect would reinforce the illusion that there really is a little neighborhood inside your PC full of digital people living out their own lives.
That's a big deal for me because until now I've always felt like glasses-free 3D is kind of a gimmick. And I still think it is, for the most part — but the Acer Predator SpatialLabs View 27 has shaken my faith and made me wonder whether there really is some additive value to glasses-free 3D gaming after all.
Now that the display is working well I'm hoping to have a full review published soon, so stay tuned!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
8 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested this $159 gaming monitor thinking it was a joke — but it's now my favorite budget display
I've tested some premium, ultra-fast monitors with jaw-dropping OLED panels over the years, and it's hard to go back to anything less than the best gaming monitors once you've seen them upfront in all their glory. So, when the Acer Nitro KG272 E landed in our testing labs, I wasn't expecting much. A quick rundown of its specs will give you a good idea of what I mean: an FHD (1920 x 1080) IPS panel with a 100Hz refresh rate, 1ms response time and a 100,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio. All that doesn't exactly make me say "I need this monitor on my desk right now," not when there's a ridiculous LG UltraGear 45GX950A-B 5K2K OLED curved gaming monitor or an MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED boasting a 240Hz refresh rate and a 0.03ms response time. Impressive? Yes, but they're also both over the $1,000 / £1,000 mark. That's a whole lot of chump change for premium-quality visuals, but depending on your PC setup, some may not even take full advantage of what these monitors can deliver. Still, it's hardly a surprise that anyone would glaze over Acer's offering to check out these beasts instead. Me included, but that's until I took a peek at the Nitro KG272 E's price tag. At just $159, and even more impressive £129, (down to £109 as of writing!), this is one of the cheapest gaming monitors out there. For the specs it offers at this price, and having used it as my primary monitor for a week, I can confidently say that this is now my favorite budget display for both work and play. The Acer Nitro K272 E gaming monitor is a budget underdog for anyone looking for a simple yet effective display to play PC games or get some work done. With its 27-inch (1920 x 1080) IPS panel, 100Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time, it may pale in comparison to the top dogs, but for its price, it goes above and beyond. And it's even more of a bargain in the U.K.! Right now, you can get £20 off this already pocket-friendly monitor. Whether you're using it as a second monitor or your main display for work, gaming, or watching shows, it will do the job just fine for this cost. There's still more testing to be done, but I've put it through its paces during everyday tasks, watching shows and playing games. So far, it does everything I could ask for, considering its price — and that says a lot about how you don't need to spend a fortune to get ample performance on a gaming monitor like this. So, let's get this out of the way first. We've received the numbers from the test lab, and just as I expected, it falls far behind its premium competitors in terms of color accuracy and brightness. I mean, is that surprising considering the specs it sports? Hardly. But I'd argue that for its low price, its results are pretty manageable. Acer Nitro KG272 E MSI MPG 272URX Alienware AW2752Q sRGB 110.1% 131% 182.5% DCI P3 78% 97% 129.3% Delta-E 0.17 0.15 0.06 When putting it together (it's very simple) and setting it up with a 4K video just to see how it looks, though, I had a small hint of surprise on my face and said to my fellow tester Nikita Achanta, "Hey, that isn't too bad." And I was met with agreement. And so, I lugged it home and started using it as my main monitor. For work, I use my 13-inch MacBook Air M3, and while its display offers great detail for work and binge-watching shows, it's always nice to have a 27-inch monitor as a secondary display. Better yet, it worked like a charm. The Nitro KG272 E doesn't have many customizable settings, nor a display mode for Mac, but bumping up its brightness to max (it only measures 196.2 nits of SDR brightness, but more on that later) and using its "Normal" color mode allowed it to easily reflect exactly what I'd expect to see on my MacBook's display. That includes fine details, smoothness and fine color accuracy. A 27-inch monitor is big enough for a desk, and seeing as it only weighs 11.9 pounds with the stand (compared to the 24 pounds of the MSI MPG 272URX), it's light enough to shift around to get the right angle. Speaking of, and not something I'd expect from a monitor at this price, the display's angle can also be adjusted. That's only a simple feature, but it makes shifting the monitor to your liking all the more accessible. Anyway, it isn't just a few Google Docs and Google Sheets that it helped me out with, as I also threw on a few shows to see if it could dish out some decent visuals. Nothing mindblowing here, but I was decently surprised by the image quality it presented. In anticipation of "28 Years Later," I decided to throw on "28 Weeks Later" on Netflix. This is a 1080p display, so details weren't completely vivid, but I was still on the edge of my seat as Don (Robert Carlyle) fled the house with the rage-infected people coming over the hill chasing him down at full speed. The vicious, bloodshot eyes were on point, and I didn't feel I was missing out on any finer details while watching the thrilling intro sequence. After that, I finally used the Nitro KG272 E for what it's intended for: gaming. More specifically, first-person shooters such as The Finals and Doom: The Dark Ages. With its 100Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time, this won't be the first choice for hardcore competitive gamers, and it won't take advantage of the powerful performance the Asus TUF Gaming A18 with an RTX 5070 can pull off (with DLSS 4 delivering frame rates over 200 FPS). Still, especially for budget gaming systems, this can pull off some mighty fine, buttery smooth visuals. With settings set to Epic at 1080p resolution, with Nvidia's multi-frame gen at x4, I was smashing down buildings, popping off shots and securing cash in The Finals in all its graphical, fast-paced glory. And frame rates were smooth enough to get me clean shots at the competition. With similar settings in Doom: The Dark Ages with patch tracing turned on, while it wasn't the same "wow" moment I had experienced on a 4K monitor, I was still impressed by the war-torn, demon-infused settings in the game. Visual cues, such as the green orbs you can parry back at enemies, were clear, and despite it looking just a smidge grainy, I was happy with what it was able to pull off. For those with budget laptops or gaming PCs, the Nitro KG272 E offers an affordable way to elevate your system's visuals, if only by a bit, and it's quite the wallet-friendly solution. While I've been impressed by its gaming potential and how it handles productivity, I noticed two downsides that are inevitable for a gaming monitor at this price. I tried putting on "Love, Death + Robots," known for its visually stunning animation. I watched "Can't Stop," which is basically a new music video for the iconic Red Hot Chili Peppers, seeing them as puppets. The Nitro KG272 E could capture the stunning lights and frantic movements of the band, but I did notice during the darker moments, environments that should be visible weren't on show. That's due to the display's brightness. At an average of 196.2 nits of SDR brightness (no HDR here), it isn't much. If it's in a room where the sun can get at it, it would be hard to see what's on display. The speakers aren't a key selling point, either. They can sound hollow without that oomph from the bass, and while it's fine for easy watching, you won't be blown away by the audio it fires. Essentially, you may want to get one of the best gaming headsets instead. Now, with all that said, these are only minor points that are common with budget monitors. Plus, don't expect absolutely jaw-dropping visuals, but for those who only need a simple and affordable gaming monitor solution to catch up with competitive multiplayer games or even the latest single-player adventures, then the Acer Nitro KG272 E does this in its stride. If I were a student after a display, I can imagine this being at the top of my list.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
These are the 5 best laptops under $500, recommended by a tech expert
Need a new computer, but don't have a healthy budget? You may be surprised what you can snag today, for a fraction of the price of a higher-end PC or Mac. In fact, despite rising global computer costs, you can find a handful of stellar laptops or Chromebooks for under $500 that are designed for work, school, or play. They're ideal for basic tasks, like web browsing and online shopping, reading email, accessing social media, word processing or spreadsheet creation, and some light gaming. If you're a university or college student or taking notes in high school, the prices are also digestible. We tested a handful of laptops under $500 from Lenovo, Acer, Dell and ASUS, and chose the following five as worthy are the 5 best TVs under $500, according to a tech expert The best headphones of 2025 for every budget, tested by a tech expert The best robot vacuums and mops we've tested in 2025
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia RTX 5050 GPU leaks suggest a generational leap at a budget price
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The RTX 5050 Mobile is Nvidia's upcoming entry-level GPU for laptops. Based on new leaks, this GPU looks far more capable than its 'budget' tier would suggest. Though Nvidia hasn't officially announced its specs, the chip has already appeared in product pages from Acer, HP, and Lenovo, with models like the Acer Nitro 5, HP Victus 16, and Lenovo Legion 5i all slated to include it. The RTX 5050 Mobile is built on the new Blackwell architecture, marking a clean break from the RTX 4050 Mobile's Ada Lovelace foundation. While the RTX 5050 shares the same CUDA ("Compute Unified Device Architecture") core count as its predecessor (2,560), everything else -- from the memory configuration to the clock speeds -- suggests this new chip represents a generational leap in capability. And this generational jump is available for an affordable price. The specs were accidentally leaked by the German IT company Kiebel (via momomo_us). Those specs point to two distinct RTX 5050 Mobile variants. Most laptops will ship with an 8GB GDDR6 configuration running at up to 100W TGP. However, a second version reportedly pairs the same core GPU with 8GB of faster GDDR7 memory. This version appears in a handful of higher-end laptops, including the Asus ROG Strix G16 and Lenovo Legion 5 Pro engineering builds. It may allow for improved bandwidth and power efficiency in demanding workloads, but for now, take all that with a pinch of salt. According to the leaked specs, which surfaced in a retailer listing, the RTX 5050 is expected to include 20 RT cores, 80 Tensor cores, 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, and clock speeds up to 2.52GHz. Power draw ranges from 60W to 100W, depending on the chassis. It also gains access to Nvidia's latest Max-Q 4.0 power optimization stack. That's the same efficiency-boosting tech used in the higher-end 5070 and 5090 mobile chips. The 50-class tier has traditionally been where Nvidia cuts corners, often stripping memory, limiting bus widths, and dialing down RT performance. That made previous 'entry-level' GPUs like the RTX 3050 or 4050 tough sells, especially for gamers looking to push modern titles with ray tracing enabled or DLSS turned on. But the RTX 5050 changes that equation. Thanks to Blackwell's improved power management and architectural upgrades, Nvidia is delivering more performance in the same power envelope, or less. It's a smarter GPU, not just a faster one. Thanks to Blackwell's improved power management and architectural upgrades, Nvidia is delivering more performance in the same power envelope, or less. Early analysis suggests the 5050 offers a ~45% uplift over the 4050 in raw FP32 compute power, aided by its wider memory bus (128-bit vs 96-bit), higher clock speeds, and more VRAM. With 8GB of GDDR6, it avoids the memory bottlenecks that hampered the 6GB RTX 4050 in some games and creative apps. More importantly, Blackwell's efficiency translates into real-world advantages. Frame generation, DLSS 4, ray-traced lighting, and AI-assisted game logic all benefit from the updated Tensor cores and 4th-gen RT units, even in a chip this size. While we don't have official benchmarks yet, we know enough to put the RTX 5050 Mobile in context. It's faster than the RTX 4050 Mobile in nearly every metric that matters. It runs cooler, clocks higher, and offers significantly better bandwidth. Thanks to DLSS 4 and increased memory headroom, games that struggled to hold 60 fps at 1080p on the 4050, especially with ray tracing enabled, should fare far better on the 5050. In some cases, it could even approach RTX 4060 Mobile performance levels, especially in thin-and-light laptops where the 4060 is power-constrained. When configured at 100W in larger machines like the Legion 5 or Nitro 18, the 5050 may even outperform a 4060 running at 65W. GPU Architecture Cores Memory Bus TGP RTX 4050 Mobile Ada Lovelace 2560 6GB GDDR6 96-bit 35–65W RTX 5050 G6 Mobile Blackwell 2560 8GB GDDR6 128-bit 60–100W RTX 4060 G7 Mobile Blackwell 2560 8GB GDDR7 128-bit 80–115W RTX 4060 Mobile Ada Lovelace 3072 8GB GDDR6 128-bit 60–115W That's not to say it's a 4060 killer — it isn't. The 4060 still has more CUDA cores (3,072 vs. 2,560) and a higher theoretical ceiling. However, the gap is much smaller than the model numbers imply. And in real-world gaming at 1080p, especially with DLSS and frame generation, the 5050 could close that gap further. This is where the RTX 5050 gets interesting. OEMs aren't treating this like a bargain-bin GPU. Acer, HP, and Lenovo have all listed RTX 5050 configurations in laptops that span midrange to premium territory. That includes gaming-focused machines like the Nitro 5, Legion 5i, and Victus 16, but also prosumer ultrabooks like the LG Gram Pro 16 and IdeaPad Pro 5. These systems will mostly use the standard GDDR6 version, but we expect higher-tier designs to quietly adopt the GDDR7 variant as a performance differentiator. Acer's Nitro line-up confirms multiple RTX 5050 configurations, with some using a 60W TGP and others going as high as 100W. That's a critical detail. The 5050's performance will vary significantly depending on how much power it's allowed to draw. A 60W version will struggle to match a 4060. A 100W version might trade blows with it. Expect pricing in the $1,199 to $1,499 range at launch, though GDDR7-equipped models could push closer to the $1,600–$1,700 mark depending on CPU and chassis pairing. The RTX 5050 Mobile isn't a cut-down afterthought. It's not a recycled 4050. It's a thoughtfully tuned, architecture-first evolution that delivers next-gen features in laptops that won't require a second mortgage. Thanks to Blackwell's efficiency gains and smarter feature integration, Nvidia has finally given the 50-class a reason to exist beyond marketing. The RTX 5050 offers legitimate 1080p gaming chops, full ray tracing and DLSS 4 support, and enough VRAM to future-proof budget laptops. And with the GDDR7 variant waiting in the wings, this might be the most dynamic 50-class release Nvidia has ever shipped. Buyers will still need to shop carefully. Not every RTX 5050 laptop will unlock its full potential, and some may be priced too close to 5060 models for comfort. But in the right system, the RTX 5050 Mobile could be the best value GPU of 2025. The Nvidia GPU you actually want could launch next month AMD's Ryzen Z2 Extreme just brought AI to handhelds — should the competition be worried? I used the Asus ROG Strix G16 for a week, and it may be the best value in gaming laptops right now
