D.C. Council members say stadium approval is likely, but they need more time
D.C. Council members are working toward approving a football stadium for the Washington Commanders at the shuttered RFK Stadium site — but probably not by Mayor Muriel E. Bowser's (D) July deadline, several lawmakers said this week.
The prospect of the council delaying a vote on the $3.7 billion deal has the team 'outraged,' Bowser said this week, and 'sacrifices our exclusive seat at the table and $2.7 billion in private investment.' Bowser has wanted the council to approve the deal with the Commanders as part of the council's fiscal year 2026 budget process — and the Commanders said this week that any delay beyond that threatens the team's construction timeline.
But council members argued it was only fair that they take more time to consider a deal that involves more than $1 billion in taxpayer funds — especially since they said they still lacked key information, such as a full explanation of the Bowser administration's revenue projections for the project and an analysis of how much the proposed tax exemptions for the Commanders will cost the city.
'The mayor thinks that her deal is perfect, and that's great for her,' said council member Christina Henderson (I-At Large). 'I feel like there are areas where we can certainly improve.'
The timeline tensions came into public view Tuesday, after NBC Washington reported on a closed council meeting where members discussed the possibility of voting on the terms of the RFK deal separately from the overall budget, which lawmakers are expected to approve in late July. The council would still approve the capital funding Bowser has allocated for the development with the budget, two lawmakers said this week.
The discussion of RFK was one part of a broader talk about separating some of Bowser's policy proposals from the council's budget vote, according to a person who was in the meeting but spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it. Bowser's budget proposal included a host of changes to D.C. law, including a repeal of the city's 'sanctuary city' policy and amendments to eviction law. No final decision was made on RFK, the person said.
Council member Zachary Parker (D-Ward 5) said members talked about keeping the money for the RFK deal in the budget while taking out the policy language around the deal so they could possibly amend it.
'It is my belief that the deal will get done,' Parker said in a video he posted on social media in which he described the meeting. 'We will safeguard the money, and vote on this project sometime this fall.'
But voting on the deal in the fall would violate a deadline that Bowser negotiated with the Commanders; a term sheet between the two parties set July 15 as a deadline for a council vote and says the team would no longer exclusively negotiate with the city if the council did not vote on the deal by then, or if the council 'materially changes' the deal's terms. And Bowser said in an interview Friday that even if the council voted to approve the capital funds, that would mean little without them also approving the terms. 'The team can't take that to the bank,' she said.
The deal, which Bowser and the Commanders announced at the end of April, would involve $2.7 billion from the Commanders and more than $1 billion in city funds, some of which would help with stadium infrastructure and parking facilities for the stadium along with recreation improvements and other water and electric infrastructure. In recent weeks, council members have floated possible changes to the deal — including altering the placement and amount of parking, asking the Commanders to pay more than the proposed $1 per year in rent on the stadium and parking land, and exacting firmer labor commitments from the team.
Henderson cast some doubt on the idea that an additional couple of months of council consideration would cause the Commanders to walk away from the city. 'Every indication that I have from them, from the NFL, from their extraordinary involvement,' she said, 'is that they want to be here, which is great.' Henderson has said she would support a stadium deal, but only if it is improved for taxpayers and has a stronger labor agreement.
But Bowser said at a news conference Wednesday that the Commanders have 'very, very specific timelines' that would be upset by a council delay. 'I think they feel blindsided by the discussion,' she said of the team.
The Commanders said they would be willing to work 'morning and night' with the council to get the deal passed in July. 'Throughout the process we have been clear: the Commanders need a new home by 2030. Any delay will make us unable to deliver on that timeline as well as prevent us from attracting major concerts, performers, and international events such as the 2031 FIFA Women's World Cup to D.C.,' a team spokesperson said in a statement. Council member Wendell Felder (D-Ward 7), whose ward encompasses the RFK site, took to social media to call the delay 'a direct hit to Ward 7' and say he 'won't stand for it.'
Other lawmakers said they are missing key information they need to analyze the deal and noted that the council took months to consider past stadium deals like Audi Field and Nationals Park and approved them after adding cost-saving measures for the city. The council is paying an outside consultant to evaluate the term sheet and proposed legislation and is awaiting that report.
After requests from reporters and council members, the Bowser administration posted a slide deck summarizing revenue projections for the RFK project, which included a prediction that it would generate $5.1 billion in tax revenue over a 33-year period, but lawmakers have been seeking a more detailed explanation of how the firm hired by the administration arrived at those numbers. That additional understanding did not come until Friday, said council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D), when the company the city hired to develop revenue projections met with the council's budget office. 'What I'm told is that we got all the information we needed today,' he said in a brief interview Friday evening.
Also missing, lawmakers said, is a tax abatement financial analysis from the city's chief financial officer, which D.C. law requires ahead of a council hearing on any bill that would include a tax abatement or exemption. That analysis would explain how much tax money the city would miss out on because of the exemptions it is offering the Commanders. The council has requested one, said a spokesman for the chief financial officer, but the spokesman said he did not know how long it would take to complete.
Bowser, in an interview Friday, rebutted the idea that the council lacks the information it needs to deliberate on the deal. She said her team and the Commanders were 'ready to work with the council,' provided they say exactly what they want to change.
'I recognize that the council members feel like this is a lot all at once, and it is a lot all at once, but this is our opportunity,' said Bowser. 'This is when the opportunity has presented itself.'
Even as the council's timeline has irked Bowser and the team, Mendelson this week gave a forceful indication that the council would approve the stadium in the end. Mendelson, who has been vocal about his personal opposition to public funds for football stadiums, said in a statement Wednesday evening that the council will 'move forward quickly to analyze the Mayor's terms, improve the deal where possible for taxpayers, and approve a new football stadium.'
'I can't guarantee votes, but I'm working toward understanding or improving the proposal to a point where a majority can vote yes,' Mendelson added in an interview Thursday, though he said it was 'way too soon' for him to provide specific changes to the deal and he planned to wait for the evaluation the council had commissioned.
Even Kenyan R. McDuffie (I-At Large), among the stadium's most vocal supporters on the council, said he wanted more answers from Bowser officials and the team before a vote.
'I plan to hold a hearing, hopefully working with the chairman,' said McDuffie. 'I think time is of the essence. The deal does need to happen. And the council has experience and history in making modifications that improve on these types of deals.'
Meagan Flynn contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Wisconsin and NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player
The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective VC Connect filed a joint lawsuit on Friday against the University of Miami, alleging it knowingly induced one of the Badgers' football players to abandon a lucrative name, image and likeness contract to play for the Florida this upcoming season. Allegations of tampering rarely get to this level and the 23-page lawsuit, which was filed in state court in Wisconsin and obtained by The Associated Press, is unusual. Depending on its resolution, it could have a a wider impact on future NIL deals across college athletics. The player in question in the filing is referred to only as "Student-Athlete A." But the case summary describes facts that line up with the situation involving cornerback Xavier Lucas, who last December announced his plans to enter the transfer portal. Shortly afterward, Darren Heitner, who has been representing Lucas, indicated that Wisconsin was refusing to put Lucas' name in the portal and that it was hindering his ability to talk with other schools. In January, Heitner announced that Lucas would be playing for Miami this fall. The situation is fallout from the rapid changes engulfing college athletics, specifically a combination of two things: Athletes went to court and won the ability to transfer with much more freedom and the 2021 NCAA decision clearing the way for them to strike NIL endorsement deals now worth millions of dollars. That has changed the recruiting landscape and forced the issue of contracts and signed commitments to the fore. "Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments," a portion of the lawsuit reads. Miami and Lucas were in talks before transfer decision, Wisconsin says Wisconsin said in January that it had credible information that Miami and Lucas made impermissible contact with each other before the former Badgers cornerback decided to transfer. Wisconsin and VC Connect allege that the inducement for Lucas to attend Miami happened within days of him entering his NIL agreement to play for the Badgers, and that they incurred substantial monetary and reputational harm. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and "a declaration that Miami's conduct directed towards Student-Athlete A constituted tampering." A message left with the University of Miami seeking comment was not immediately returned. In a text message Friday, Heitner declined to comment on the lawsuit but he said that Lucas still plans to attend Miami and play football. Wisconsin said it had the support of its leadership and the Big Ten Conference in filing the lawsuit, noting its commitment to "ensuring integrity and fundamental fairness in the evolving landscape of college athletics." "While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field," the statement said. "In addition to our legal action, we will continue to be proactive to protect the interests of our student-athletes, our program and the broader collegiate athletics community. Lucas, who is from Pompano Beach, Florida, had 12 tackles, an interception and a sack as a freshman for Wisconsin last season. Heitner said that Lucas hasn't received any money from Wisconsin and therefore owes no money to the school. Heitner also argued that Wisconsin had violated an NCAA bylaw by not entering Lucas into the transfer database within two business days of the player's request. Wisconsin issued a statement at the time saying it hadn't put Lucas' name in the portal because he had entered a two-year binding NIL agreement. In April, the surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava from Tennessee to UCLA prompted fresh questions about contracts and buyouts. Nico Iamaleava, who led Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season, walked away from a reported $2.4 million NIL contract. Arkansas freshman quarterback Madden Iamaleava entered the portal after spring practices wrapped up. Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek released a statement indicating he would support efforts by the Razorbacks' NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts. Iamaleava reportedly had a contract valued at $500,000 upon signing with Arkansas.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pacers' Tyrese Haliburton Opens Up on Calf Injury Before NBA Finals Game 7
Pacers' Tyrese Haliburton Opens Up on Calf Injury Before NBA Finals Game 7 originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Indiana Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton entered the team's first elimination game of these NBA Finals at home at Gainbridge Fieldhouse as a great question mark. He had injured his calf in Game 5, and did not look healthy in closing out that game, walking with a notable limp. Advertisement The question going into the win-or-go-home Game 6 for Indiana was two-fold: Would Haliburton play, and if so, would he be effective? We learned early on Thursday that the intention was that Haliburton would be on the floor. And we learned early in the game that he would, indeed, be effective. Haliburton led the Pacers to a laugher in the game, a 108-91 win that will now send the series to a Game 7 finale. Haliburton had 14 points and five assists, but was a plus-25 on the floor, as his presence was what really mattered for Indiana. After the game, he explained what went into him playing in Game 6--and what he'll carry into Game 7, injury-wise. Indiana Pacers guard Tyrese Haliburton (0) drives to the basket against Oklahoma City Thunder guard Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (2) in the first quarter during game six of the 2025 NBA Finals at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Trevor Ruszkowski-Imagn Images "I just look at it as I want to be out there to compete with my brothers. These are guys that I'm willing to go to war with and we've had such a special year, and we have a special bond as a group, and you know, I think I'd beat myself up if I didn't give it a chance," he said. Advertisement "I just want to be out there and fight and just had to have an honest conversation with coach (Rick Carlisle) that, you know, if I didn't look like myself and was hurting the team, like sit me down. Obviously, I want to be on the floor. But I want to win more than anything. So had an honest conversation with coach. But yeah, I want to be on the floor, and if I have the ability to, if I can -- like I said, if I can walk, I want to be out there." He will get one more chance to be out there for the Pacers. That will come Sunday in Oklahoma City for the finale. He said he knows the key for the Pacers will be putting Game 6 behind them and moving on. "Celebrate this one tonight and move on. It's done with. We did our job to take care of home court, and we have to be ready to compete in Game 7," he said. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 20, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Comtech Rejoins iCERT, Deepening Commitment to Public Safety Innovation
Renewed Membership Reinforces Public Safety Commitment and Expands Advocacy Platform CHANDLER, Ariz., June 20, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun. 20, 2025-- Comtech Telecommunications Corp. (NASDAQ: CMTL) ("Comtech" or the "Company"), a global communications technology leader, today announced that its Terrestrial & Wireless Networks ("T&W") business segment has rejoined the Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies, Inc. ("iCERT"). Founded in 2005, iCERT is a commercial sector trade association that brings together leading technology companies to drive innovation, shape effective policy, and promote open standards that improve public safety and emergency response. This return to iCERT is part of a series of strategic moves by the T&W business segment, including the launch of Allerium Mira - a cloud-native call handling platform designed to simplify complexity and support evolving 9-1-1 needs. Together, these efforts reflect a renewed commitment to public safety and essential service providers, backed by the same trusted team, proven solutions, and industry-wide support. "We're excited to collaborate with iCERT as it expands its focus on key issues and innovations in emergency communications," said Susan Ornstein, Senior Director of Legal & Regulatory Affairs of Comtech T&W, who joined the association's board of directors earlier this month. "Under its new leadership, iCERT is amplifying the voice of its members on public policy issues and engaging partner associations like NASNA, NENA, and APCO to advance shared priorities across the public safety community. Together with iCERT, Comtech is well positioned to address pressing public safety and regulatory matters, and advocate for federal funding, legislation, and FCC policy updates." "Few organizations have meant as much to me throughout my career as iCERT," said Jeff Robertson, President of Comtech T&W. "Twenty years ago, I worked alongside two industry visionaries to establish this organization with the shared goal of fostering collaboration between the public and private sectors. I was privileged to serve as iCERT's inaugural executive director and have remained a strong advocate of its mission throughout my career. Seeing our company rejoin the iCERT community is especially meaningful. Comtech is committed to delivering results that help communities become safer, more connected, and resilient, and iCERT is a vital partner in advancing that work." "iCERT stands committed to propelling public safety forward, facilitating collaboration among its member base and industry stakeholders, and creating an environment that fosters innovation and progress," said Don Brittingham, Interim Executive Director of iCERT. "Members like Comtech play a vital role in strengthening the organization's depth and breadth of experience across the full public safety call flow. I am excited to welcome Jeff Robertson and his team back to iCERT and look forward to empowering public safety together." About Comtech Comtech Telecommunications Corp. is a leading provider of satellite and space communications technologies; terrestrial and wireless network solutions; Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) and emergency services; and cloud native capabilities to commercial and government customers around the world. Through its culture of innovation and employee empowerment, Comtech leverages its global presence and decades of technology leadership and experience to create some of the world's most innovative solutions for mission-critical communications. For more information, please visit About iCERT iCERT—The Industry Council for Emergency Response Technologies—is the only industry trade association focused exclusively on emergency response technologies and related equipment, systems, and services. iCERT is dedicated to improving public safety through innovation. For more information, please visit Forward-Looking Statements Certain information in this press release contains statements that are forward-looking in nature and involve certain significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results and performance could differ materially from such forward-looking information. The Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings identify many such risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking information in this press release is qualified in its entirety by the risks and uncertainties described in such Securities and Exchange Commission filings. View source version on Contacts Investor Relations Maria Ceriello631-962-7102investors@ Media Contact Jamie
