Sydneysiders were facing a 50 per cent water bill hike. That's now been halved
Households will be spared steep bill increases after the pricing regulator halved those sought by Sydney Water, which had called for a 50 per cent hike to pay for much-needed infrastructure upgrades.
However, furious developers say the move to limit hip-pocket pain over the next five years will only undermine housing supply.
'You can't have more homes without more water infrastructure,' Urban Development Institute of Australia chief executive Stuart Ayres said.
The Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal's (IPART) draft report includes an average 4.6 per cent increase, about $61, for each of the next five years before inflation.
As a state-owned monopoly utility provider, Sydney Water's pricing is set on five-year terms by the regulator. A final report is due in September and stakeholders are expecting little change to IPART's draft determination.
The 23 per cent hike is less than half of what Sydney Water proposed in a controversial submission to IPART in late November 2024. Household water bills would have soared by 50 per cent in the five years to 2030, including an 18 per cent rise in the first year alone.
Under IPART's revised proposal, average bills would increase from $1220 in 2024-25 to $1527 in the last year of the determination, excluding inflation. Comparatively, Sydney Water's submission would have resulted in an increase in the typical household bill to $1928 by 2029-30.
The hike was justified by the agency's then-chief executive Roch Cheroux as being essential to 'manage Sydney's water future', predominantly to ensure infrastructure was upgraded and expanded in line with the state's target of 377,000 new homes under the National Housing Accord.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 days ago
- News.com.au
Dan Andrews' ‘ghost' home legacy revealed as apartment towers stall
Thousands of Melbourne apartments have been abandoned or heavily delayed in a blow to the Victorian government's hopes to build its way out of a housing crisis. Families who have been waiting years for their next home are now having contracts torn up as the state's development woes worsen. Surging building costs and Daniel Andrews-era policy decisions have combined to turn huge numbers of the state's apartment pipeline into 'phantom approvals', with Victoria now ranked as one of the worst places to build units. Packer's $100m play to live longer Australian Bureau of Statistics data analysis shows one in six apartments approved for construction around the nation have still not been commenced two years later, with experts warning it is significantly worse in Victoria. By contrast more than 95 per cent of houses approved are built, as are similar numbers of townhouses. MCG Quantity Surveyors research shows that home completions in Victoria are on track to reach about 56,000 in 2025, which is 10,000 (15 per cent) below the state's peak of 66,000 in 2017. It is significantly short of the 76,000 annual home build target to meet obligations under the National Housing Accord's 1.2 million home target by 2029, and even worse when contrasted with the state government's own 80,000 homes a year goal for the next decade. MCG Quantity Surveyors director Mike Mortlock said the data showed far fewer homes were being built than officials citing approvals data were claiming. 'We need unit construction to be outperforming targets. The reality is the opposite,' Mr Mortlock said. Their figures show Melbourne's south east has a less than two month supply of new apartments, while there is just over three months' supply headed to the Mornington Peninsula, followed by the city's inner east where there is an about four-month supply of units. Mr Mortlock said there were multiple 'headwinds' to unit construction that were not as prevalent only a few years ago, a key one was that 'governments at all levels have become drunk on property taxes'. Housing Association Industry chief economist Tim Reardon said many of the multi-unit projects approved in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and other big city markets were 'phantom approvals'. 'For apartment building to increase meaningfully, we would need to wait for established units to become so scarce that the prices would catch up with those for new units,' Mr Reardon said. 'It could take years.' He noted that a key contributor to phantom approvals issue was increased taxes on foreign investment into new housing projects, with Daniel Andrews the first premier to increase stamp duty on internationals in 2015. 'These taxes are the goose that killed the golden egg,' Mr Reardon said. 'It's one of the worst housing policy own goals. Removing the taxes would see significant increases in the homes getting built.' A number of major Victorian projects have suffered as a result of international investment taxation as well as rising building costs. Buyers who have splashed as much as $35m on homes in 2022 for what was planned to be Australia's tallest skyscraper, STHBNK By Beulah, are now in limbo after the project manager BSSPV Pty Ltd was placed in voluntary administration in February. While it has since exited administration, the site is still waiting on the outcome of an expressions of interest with developer Beulah International looking to either sell the site or establish a joint venture for its continued development. Aspects of the Malt District redevelopment of the Nylex Clock site in Cremorne also remain undeveloped, years after its developer, Caydon, collapsed. In Alphington, Glenvill's YarraBend stopped sales for a development titled the Glass House as the cost of building soared, and while most buyers took back their deposit in the years that followed the building's launch to sales in 2022, one couple finally had their contract torn up in March this year. 'We stopped sales when we found out where building prices were headed,' said Glenvill sales and marketing director Sam Tucker. Mr Tucker added that the Glass House was being redesigned and going back through council planning and would be included as part of its Boiler House complex, with apartment sizes and formats to be revised – including the removal of most one-bedroom offerings which had become far more difficult to sell with prices touching on $700,000 due to building cost increases. Glenvill have been able to continue with other developments within the wider YarraBend infill project and a separate complex with close to 200 homes is due to reach settlement in the near future. Conveyancer Andrew Curtis worked with a number of buyers affected by the project's cancellation and said he was seeing a rise in the number of people buying off-the-plan apartments only to have their contract rescinded years later. 'The vast majority of developers, you don't run into these sort of problems; and a lot of this was impacted by Covid,' Mr Curtis said. 'But the issue is becoming more common. 'And it is going to get worse. The building costs are still ridiculous and that's still causing a lot of issues for builders in the industry.' In many instances, the conveyancer said stalled or abandoned developments would likely have gone ahead if not for the Daniel Andrews-era policy increase to stamp duty for international investors. 'One of the reasons these projects are running into trouble is that they aren't selling to offshore investors,' Mr Curtis said. Charter Keck Cramer national executive director of research Richard Temlett said building costs had increased by 30-50 per cent, adding hundreds of thousands of dollars to the cost of many projects, with the state's tax regime also a major factor in development woes. 'Rather than tax at 5 per cent and nothing gets built, if they taxed at 2.5 per cent and 10 times the number of homes get built, they would at lease get some revenue,' Mr Temlett said. 'Melbourne is the weakest apartment market right now, because of the loss of overseas revenue. And that's one of the biggest missteps the government has made and we are now seeing it. 'It's all things lingering from the Andrews era.' He noted buyers looking for certainty in the apartment sector could still look for well-funded groups and those with a listing on the Australian Stock Exchange as a way to find groups more likely to be able to proceed with projects in a timely way. Australian Property Development Association president Alex Huang said Victoria had become 'probably one of the worst places that a developer can pick to launch a project'. Over the past year he said he was hearing of contracts being torn up 'more and more frequently', estimating 100s of would have been rescinded, though he was optimistic falling interest rates would help to improve the situation for the sector in the year ahead.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
NSW needs to build thousands more homes. Developers say this change will help
The NSW opposition has seized on proposed changes to the way developer contributions are used to criticise the state government for offloading the responsibility for building basic infrastructure, while property developers say the shake-up will advance the delivery of greenfield developments. Premier Chris Minns on Thursday released long-awaited draft guidelines for a scheme that enables property developers to choose between paying a $12,000 levy per residential lot, or delivering infrastructure such as parks and roads as a 'works-in-kind' contribution for new developments. The changes underscore debate about the provision of infrastructure in fast-growing parts of Sydney, as the state government seeks to ramp up the delivery of desperately needed housing stock. Developers will be able to dedicate land for public purposes or deliver infrastructure projects, rather than paying through the Housing and Productivity Contribution. The government introduced the contribution as a tax on new developments across Sydney, the Illawarra, Hunter and the Central Coast to replace the existing Special Infrastructure Contributions scheme in 2023. The state government hopes the proposed guidelines will improve the feasibility of greenfield developments, as developers will not be required to hand over significant amounts of cash before the issue of the first construction certificate or throughout the development approval process. Loading Urban Development Institute of Australia chief executive Stuart Ayres said the absence of a works-in-kind framework for the past couple of years had been a roadblock to starting construction on new homes. 'In the middle of a housing crisis we need more green lights for housing. This will take the pressure off the taxpayer and allow developers across the state to use their own capital to fund critical infrastructure, and that means projects can get rolling much earlier.' But Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the draft scheme was 'an admission that Labor can't build the infrastructure needed to support housing – so now they're begging the private sector to do it instead. But the $12,000 tax per home still exists, driving up costs and driving down supply.
The Age
3 days ago
- The Age
NSW needs to build thousands more homes. Developers say this change will help
The NSW opposition has seized on proposed changes to the way developer contributions are used to criticise the state government for offloading the responsibility for building basic infrastructure, while property developers say the shake-up will advance the delivery of greenfield developments. Premier Chris Minns on Thursday released long-awaited draft guidelines for a scheme that enables property developers to choose between paying a $12,000 levy per residential lot, or delivering infrastructure such as parks and roads as a 'works-in-kind' contribution for new developments. The changes underscore debate about the provision of infrastructure in fast-growing parts of Sydney, as the state government seeks to ramp up the delivery of desperately needed housing stock. Developers will be able to dedicate land for public purposes or deliver infrastructure projects, rather than paying through the Housing and Productivity Contribution. The government introduced the contribution as a tax on new developments across Sydney, the Illawarra, Hunter and the Central Coast to replace the existing Special Infrastructure Contributions scheme in 2023. The state government hopes the proposed guidelines will improve the feasibility of greenfield developments, as developers will not be required to hand over significant amounts of cash before the issue of the first construction certificate or throughout the development approval process. Loading Urban Development Institute of Australia chief executive Stuart Ayres said the absence of a works-in-kind framework for the past couple of years had been a roadblock to starting construction on new homes. 'In the middle of a housing crisis we need more green lights for housing. This will take the pressure off the taxpayer and allow developers across the state to use their own capital to fund critical infrastructure, and that means projects can get rolling much earlier.' But Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said the draft scheme was 'an admission that Labor can't build the infrastructure needed to support housing – so now they're begging the private sector to do it instead. But the $12,000 tax per home still exists, driving up costs and driving down supply.
