Are we intolerant of criticisms? — Hafiz Hassan
JUNE 2 — On the same day (May 30) the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) announced that it would pursue contempt of court proceedings against senior lawyer Shafee Abdullah, the Supreme Court of India (SCI) heard contempt proceedings against YouTuber Ajay Shukla for airing scandalous allegations against a senior Supreme Court judge. The SCI had taken suo moto cognisance of the issue the day before.
Suo moto is Latin for 'on its own motion'. So, it was the SCI who initiated the contempt proceedings, not the Attorney-General of India.
Shukla is the editor-in-chief of a digital channel. In a recent video, he allegedly made remarks about a Supreme Court judge.
The SCI considered the remarks 'scandalous allegations widely published on YouTube [which] are likely to bring disrepute to the august institution of judiciary.'
During the contempt proceedings before a bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justices A.G. Masih and A.S. Chandurkar, the SCI observed that while the Indian Constitution guarantees free speech, it is subject to reasonable restrictions.
Lawyer Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah speaks during a press conference at the Palace of Justice in Putrajaya on January 6, 2025. — Picture by Firdaus Latif
A person cannot make contemptuous allegations defaming a judge of the Supreme Court under the guise of free speech. It is detrimental to the judiciary.
Now, if contempt proceedings are taken against Shafee for his 'Nazi Germany' remarks, are we being intolerant of criticisms?
What say you?
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
No news on tenure extension, says Tengku Maimun
The first woman to serve as the country's top judge, Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat turns 66 on July 2. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said today there has been no updates regarding the extension of her tenure, as well as that of two other judges. 'No news,' Bernama quoted her as saying briefly when asked after the launch of a book, titled 'Law and Practice of Intellectual Property Law in Malaysia', here today. The other two judges are Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Federal Court judge Nallini Pathmanathan. The first woman to serve as the country's top judge, Tengku Maimun is scheduled to go on mandatory retirement on July 1, at the age of 66. Abang Iskandar is due to retire on July 2, and Nallini will reach the mandatory retirement age on Aug 22. Under Article 125(1) of the Federal Constitution, Federal Court judges may serve until the age of 66, with the possibility of a six-month extension, subject to the approval of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong. On May 20, Tengku Maimun confirmed that she had yet to receive any offer for a six-month extension of her tenure.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Najib could still apply for parole, says lawyer
Former prime minister Najib Razak has obtained a PhD while in prison, says his lawyer, Shafee Abdullah. KUALA LUMPUR : Najib Razak still has a shot at being freed even if he fails to obtain a judicial review on a royal addendum that purportedly allows him to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest. The former prime minister's lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, said Najib could still apply for parole in September or October. 'And the chances of him obtaining a parole is high considering that his jail term has been reduced to six years and he will receive an automatic remission after two years,' Shafee said. 'Najib has already served three years, so it's just another year left (before he is eligible for an automatic remission). He can be paroled,' he said. Najib is currently serving a six-year jail sentence on charges of abuse of power and corruption in the SRC International case. A Federal Court hearing has been set for July 1-2 on an appeal against a Court of Appeal decision allowing Najib to initiate a judicial review related to the addendum. The Court of Appeal had ordered the High Court to hear Najib's claim of the existence of a royal addendum. Separately, Shafee said that Najib has been a model prisoner. He also said Najib had obtained a doctorate while in prison and therefore saw no reason why he should be denied parole. 'His PhD is about developing the country. Many came to engage him. In many ways he is a model prisoner,' Shafee said.
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Indonesia's Pertamina to reroute oil shipments via Oman, India if Hormuz closes amid Iran-US tensions
JAKARTA, June 23 — Indonesia's state-owned oil and gas firm PT Pertamina will change its oil transportation routes to safer shipping lanes, such as via Oman or India, if the Strait of Hormuz is shut down, a spokesperson said on Monday. Fadjar Djoko Santoso, vice president of corporate communications at PT Pertamina, said the firm's vessels would use alternative shipping routes that ensure the safety of both ships and crew, reported Xinhua. Santoso made the statement following the approval by Iran's parliament of a possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz to shipping activities, in response to US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'Pertamina has anticipated this by securing our ships and diverting routes to safe passages via Oman and India,' he told reporters. The spokesperson added that the domestic crude oil supply for production remains sufficient and secure. 'In general, our crude supply is still under control,' he said. — Bernama-Xinhua
