
Only 2.5% of private rentals in England affordable on housing benefit, study finds
Only 2.5% of private rented homes in England were affordable for people on housing benefit last year, with charities warning that more people will be pushed into rent arrears and homelessness as a freeze on the benefit takes effect.
From Tuesday, housing benefit rates will be locked at current rates until 2026, affecting 5.7m households on low income which rely on it to cover rent.
Research from the homelessness charity Crisis and the campaign group Health Equals found fewer than three in every 100 private rental properties listed in England were affordable for people on housing benefit between April and October 2024.
This figure is down from 12% in 2021-22. Over the past decade, rents in the private sector have risen by 45% in England.
Crisis said people on low incomes could be forced to sleep rough or pushed into poor quality temporary accommodation because of the growing gap between housing benefit and the cost of rent.
Matt Downie, the charity's chief executive, said it was becoming an 'impossible situation' and that the freeze represented a real-terms cut. 'Housing benefit is supposed to cover the lowest third of rents in the private sector. We are currently nowhere near that,' he said.
'There is no doubt that today's freeze on housing benefit will lead to rising homelessness. It also risks completely overwhelming local authorities who are already struggling to cope with the demand for support, and will leave more people stuck in unfit temporary accommodation that damages their health and wellbeing.'
The research found that, across Great Britain, 2.7% of private rented properties were affordable, and that households on housing benefit were being forced to find, on average, an additional £337 a month for a one-bed, £326 for a two-bed and £486 for a three-bed home.
Downie urged the government to reverse the benefits freeze, saying it would 'undermine their efforts' to end homelessness and pile further pressure on local authorities, which spent £2.3bn a year on temporary accommodation for homeless families in 2023-24.
In the 12 months to February 2025, average rent in England rose to £1,381. Meanwhile, 126,040 households in England are now in temporary accommodation, including more than 164,000 children – the highest levels on record.
In the autumn budget, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, announced that the local housing allowance (LHA) – the localised rates that determine how much housing benefit claimants are entitled to – would be locked at current levels until 2026.
LHA rates have been frozen periodically since 2016 – former Conservative governments froze it for seven out of 12 years, before increasing rates last year.
Crisis and Health Equals said rising rents were pushing more families into poor-quality homes, often beset with problems such as cold and damp, adding that the financial impact of poor housing was costing the NHS an estimated £1.4bn a year.
Paul McDonald, the chief campaigns officer at Health Equals, said: 'When people are forced to move house, sofa surf, live in temporary accommodation or cold, mouldy and overcrowded conditions, their health and wellbeing suffers. In the UK thousands of lives are already being cut short by up to 16 years by factors like poor quality and unaffordable housing.'
A government spokesperson said: 'We have inherited the worst housing crisis in living memory with rent levels unaffordable for far too many.
'We're building 1.5m homes to improve affordability for renters and helping those on the lowest incomes pay their housing costs by extending the household support fund and maintaining discretionary housing payments. Alongside this, we recently announced a £2bn investment for up to 18,000 new social and affordable homes, while our renters' rights bill will fundamentally reform the private rented sector by empowering tenants to tackle unreasonable rent hikes.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'No budget' for assisted dying service, health secretary says
Health Secretary Wes Streeting has said there is no budget for an assisted dying service, which MPs narrowly backed in a landmark vote on who was one of the most senior opponents of the legislation, posted a lengthy message on his Facebook page explaining why he voted against the other reasons, he said there was already a lack of access to high quality end-of-life care on top of tightened finances within the NHS, which could add to the pressure faced by dying patients. Streeting said he would "make sure that we do a good job with it for the country" if the legislation becomes law, but he worried MPs had made the wrong choice. The government remains neutral on the bill, which cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday and will now be scrutinised by the House of Lords. MPs were given a free vote on in favour of the bill say it will give terminally ill adults the choice on how they want to die and prevent painful deaths, but critics argue it risks people being coerced into seeking an assisted his post, Streeting quoted former Labour prime minister Gordon Brown's position that "there is no effective freedom to choose if the alternative option... is not available", referring to sufficient end-of-life care wrote: "The truth is that creating those conditions will take time and money. "Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service - and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest - setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. "There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one."The MP for Ilford North pledged to work "constructively" on technical aspects of the legislation as it progresses through Parliament and stressed he had enormous respect for the bill's impact assessment on the policy published in May provided a financial analysis of the costs and savings said that in the first six months, savings for the NHS could range from around £919,000 to £ figure included hospital care, primary and community care, hospice, medicines and other care costs that someone choosing an assisted death would not the time the system had been running for ten years, savings could range from £5.84m to £ assessment found there would be costs too. Staffing an assisted dying service could cost in excess of £10m a year within a decade, while training costs in the first six months alone could be over £11m. As peers prepare to examine the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday that Lords had a duty to perform but that it should not extend to overturning the will of the Commons."Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose," she said."So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through."Dame Esther said she was resigned to the fact her own terminal cancer would probably progress to the point she will "buzz off to Zurich" to use the Dignitas clinic before the bill becomes Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson, a Paralympian and opponent of the plans, told BBC Breakfast she hoped more safeguards could be introduced in the coming months."We're getting ready for it to come to the Lords and from my personal point of view, about amending it to make it stronger," she said."We've been told it's the strongest bill in the world, but to be honest, it's not a very high bar for other legislation, so I do think there are a lot more safeguards that could be put in."Another opponent, the Conservative peer and disability rights campaigner Lord Shinkwin, said he believed the bill needed "forensic scrutiny". "The margin yesterday was so close that many MPs would appreciate the opportunity to look at this again in respect of safeguards as they relate to those who feel vulnerable, whether that's disabled people or older people," he bill could still run out of parliamentary time if it is held up in the Lords, but the Labour MP who steered it through the Commons as a Private Member's Bill, Kim Leadbeater, said: "I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue". Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Dame Prue Leith's son blasted as 'condescending' after remark about famous mum
Dame Prue Leith's son, Danny Kruger, has been labelled 'arrogant' and 'condescending' after saying his mother doesn't 'see sense' in debate on the assisted dying law Dame Prue Leith's son, Conservative MP Danny Kruger, has been hit with backlash after he spoke out on the assisted dying law and said his mother has not 'seen sense' and 'come round' to his 'point of view'. After publicly sharing his opposing views to his mother, he was labelled 'arrogant' and 'condescending' by some viewers. The Great British Bake Off star's son has campaigned against assisted dying which will make it legal for people over the age of 18, who are terminally ill, to receive medical assistance to end their lives. However, Prue has an opposing opinion to her son and has voiced her support for assisted dying after watching her brother, David, live through struggles at the end of his life. In latest developments on the bill, it has been passed by 314 votes to 291, a majority of 23. Now the bill has to go through all the stages it went through in the Commons in the House of Lords, after which MPs will get a final say. MP Danny Kruger, 50, appeared on BBC 's Newsnight where he was asked for his thoughts on having opposing feelings on the bill to his mother, and how it might impact their relationship. The star's son said: 'This debate actually has not broken any friendships for me at all, including of my own Party and certainly with my mum. We seem to be able to disagree well on this. I think these are very profound issues, both in conscience but also practicality'. He continued: 'I regret my mum has not seen sense and come round to my point of view, but I understand why she hasn't.' Viewers quickly took to social media, where Danny received backlash and was labelled 'arrogant' and 'condescending'. One viewer commented: 'Breathtaking arrogance towards Prue Leith', while another said: 'How arrogant. Accusing his own mother of not seeing sense, because she doesn't share his views'. A third added: 'Massive man baby has a tantrum because a woman has her own point of view'. Dame Prue lost her brother David in 2012 and described him as her 'best friend' and 'confidant'. She has been passionately campaigning for assisted dying following David's struggle with bone cancer. During an interview with Sky News, she detailed that David was in 'absolute agony' and that he was 'begging for somebody to help him' towards the end of lis life. She said that the morphine only worked 'for a couple of hours' and that everyone suffered, including the nurses and his family. Dame Prue said: "For his family to be round while he was crying, begging to die, begging to be given more morphine, it was desperate to watch." The GBBO star also said "I'll miss him until the day I die" in a touching tribute.


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Blair 'helping' Scottish Labour with SNP election battle
It is expected to be a large part of Labour's campaigning next May as it seeks to make the problems in the NHS a central issue. It reportedly working on how to improve access to GPs and use technology to drive down waiting lists. There is no fee involved in the work. READ MORE: The former PM is a controversial figure inside and outwith Labour despite being the only person to lead the party to consecutive election wins. Mr Blair led Labour between 1995 and 2007. He was Prime Minister from 1997 for 10 years, winning three general elections. Scotland's NHS is facing huge problems, with one in six Scots on a waiting list for treatment. Jackie Baillie, Scottish Labour's health spokeswoman, told The Times: 'Our NHS is stretched to breaking point and technology is a way to ease that pressure — but the SNP is squandering the opportunity. "From GP practices using fax machines to doctors relying on pagers, the SNP is running an analogue health service in a digital age. GPs have been sounding the alarm about how a woeful lack of basic IT is holding them back — it's time we have a government that will listen. 'A Scottish Labour government will put Scotland on the cutting edge of medical innovation and modernise our NHS so it is fit for the future.' A Tony Blair Institute spokesman said: 'We are always happy to talk to any and all political parties who are interested in our work, all of which is published and publicly available." SNP MSP Clare Haughey said: 'That Anas Sarwar is taking advice on health from an organisation which has previously called for the selling of NHS patient's data for money is truly beyond belief. 'It is unbelievable that Scottish Labour are looking to the man that led us into the disastrous Iraq war to tell them what is best for Scotland. "Labour have nothing positive to offer Scotland - rather than listening to the people of Scotland, Labour are relying on the advice of has-beens like Tony Blair. "The SNP is the only party with a clear plan to build a better future for Scotland - improving our NHS, supporting families and workers through the cost-of-living crisis and creating new opportunities with the powers of independence."