Savers facing ‘long-term threat' to cash Isa limits following spring statement

Concerns that cash Isa allowances are under 'threat' have been expressed, as the Government said it is looking at options for reforms.
There have previously been reports that the idea of lowering the annual cash Isa allowance to £4,000, from £20,000, was being mooted, to encourage more people to put their money into investments.
Several organisations, including building societies, have pushed back against the idea, while others have argued that it could encourage budding investors.
Government spring statement documents said: 'The Government is looking at options for reforms to Individual Savings Accounts that get the balance right between cash and equities to earn better returns for savers, boost the culture of retail investment, and support the growth mission.
'Alongside this, the Government is working closely with the Financial Conduct Authority to deliver a system of targeted support to give people the confidence to invest.'
Treasury costings documents released with the spring statement assume the overall Isa limit of £20,000 remains in place up to and including 2029/30.
The Government feels that engaging with stakeholders across the board is an important part of its work to boost financial services growth and competitiveness.
Richard Fearon, chief executive of Leeds Building Society, said: 'We remain concerned about the long-term threat of a reduction in cash Isa allowances.
'Reducing the amount which can be saved would have significant effects on savers, mortgage rates and wider aims to increase the size of the mutual sector.
Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.
Capital at risk.
Terms and conditions apply.
'We will continue to make the case on behalf of our members for retaining the current rules, whether that comes as a single change or part of wider Isa reforms.'
Jeremy Cox, head of strategy at Coventry Building Society, said the current 'sigh of relief' for savers 'may be short-lived'.
He said: 'We believe that the current Isa allowance offers simplicity and balance, allowing flexible saving and investing. Cutting tax-free limits or adding complexity with the amounts people can shelter from tax for cash or stocks and shares won't stop savers looking for low-risk, accessible cash accounts.
'Such changes will only lead to confusion for savers and higher costs for savings providers and HMRC, whilst making little impact on UK equity investment. One thing is certain – reducing cash Isa allowances will be deeply unpopular with millions of savers.'
Rachel Springall, a finance expert at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk said: 'There will be savers out there who do not want to be forced to place their hard-earned cash in a pot which could be at risk.
'A stocks and shares Isa is suitable for those who intend to invest over the longer-term, as fund performance can fluctuate over shorter-term timescales.
'However, over the longer-term, stocks and shares Isa can outpace cash returns and beat inflation, but there is never a guarantee that funds will perform well.'
Richard Wilson, chief executive of interactive investor, said: 'For some people, having their cash in an Isa is sensible, for others filling their Isa with stocks is the right choice. What is dumb is to load the bases to incentivise the wrong choice.'
Anne Fairweather, head of public policy and government affairs at Hargreaves Lansdown said the Government's approach 'makes sense'.
She said: 'We're fully behind the Government's mission to increase retail investment, and it's good to see that rather than making an arbitrary change to cash Isas, the Government is taking a more measured and holistic approach, exploring the best ways to support saving and investing through Isas.
'Isas are the first port of call for first-time investors, keeping the framework simple and easy to navigate will help build a British retail investment culture.
'It makes sense not to rush this process. Major change is already on the way, because the advice boundary review will introduce targeted support for retail investors, guiding them to get the asset mix that it right for them, in their circumstances.
'A slower pace of change to the Isa suite will enable the Government to assess the impact of these changes before considering what else should be done.'
Chris Cummings, chief executive of the Investment Association, said: 'We welcome today's commitment from Government to boost the culture of retail investment, including looking at options for Isas reforms that will get the balance right between cash and equities to earn better returns for savers.
'Our industry has long called for the Government to create a culture of inclusive investment, which will see more people benefit from investing, and we're pleased that the Government has now heeded this call.'
The average value of the top 25 stocks and shares Isas is around £8.8 million, compared with £650,000 for the top 25 cash Isas, according to figures obtained from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) by money app Plum, covering the year 2021/22.
Meanwhile, some pension experts welcomed a lack of announcements affecting retirement funds, saying it would give people room to plan.
Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis, Hargreaves Lansdown said the 'quiet' spring statement for pensions is 'something to be grateful for,' giving people 'valuable breathing room for long-term planning'.
Steven Cameron, pensions director at Aegon, said: 'We know further changes are coming in this summer's Pension Schemes Bill which will include new measures to ensure all pensions offer good value for money and plans to consolidate small pension pots individuals may have left behind when changing employers.'
Mr Cameron added: 'Looking ahead, should budgetary pressures worsen, future changes to the state pension cannot be ruled out. There is an ongoing review of the state pension age.'
He added: 'We also can't ignore the state pension 'triple lock', which has proven costly and unpredictable in recent years. While the Government is currently committed to maintaining it, the formula might be adapted.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Telegraph

10 minutes ago

• Telegraph

King meets Zelensky ahead of Nato summit

The King has met with Volodymyr Zelensky ahead of a crunch Nato summit in The Hague. The monarch welcomed the Ukrainian president to Windsor Castle on Monday before they had lunch together. The pair, who last met on March 2, were pictured chatting as they made their way through the castle's Grand Corridor, the King wearing a grey suit and Mr Zelensky in his trademark black clothing. The audience came ahead of Mr Zelensky's afternoon meeting with Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, in London. Mr Zelensky said he expected to discuss his country's defences and new ways to increase pressure on Russia ahead of the Nato summit on Tuesday. His arrival in the UK followed reports that Russia had fired 352 drones and 16 missiles at Ukraine overnight, killing at least 10 civilians including seven in Kyiv. The King met with Mr Zelensky earlier this year at Sandringham House, Norfolk, where they posed briefly for photos before taking tea in the property's Saloon room. The hour-long audience came after the Ukrainian leader attended a defence summit on Ukraine in London. The meeting came at a time of huge political turmoil, during which the Government increasingly leant on the Royal family to deploy its unique brand of soft diplomacy. Mr Zelensky had arrived in the UK just hours after his angry clash with Donald Trump at the White House, during which the US president warned that he was 'gambling with World War Three'. The pair previously met at Buckingham Palace during Mr Zelensky's surprise visit to the UK in February 2023. They also shook hands and had a private summit at the European Political Community summit in Oxfordshire in July 2024.

South Wales Guardian

20 minutes ago

• South Wales Guardian

Stopping Iran's nuclear programme ‘a good thing', says Downing Street

A Number 10 spokesman said the Government's focus remained on securing a diplomatic solution in the wake of the American attack against Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. He said: 'We're clear that the prevention of Iran getting nuclear weapons is a good thing for this country. 'But our focus is on diplomacy. That is the priority and that is what every member of this Government is working towards and that's been the focus of the calls with international partners over the weekend.' But asked whether the strikes had breached international law, the spokesman declined to comment, citing the 'long-standing position' that the Government does not disclose the content of legal advice. Earlier, Foreign Secretary David Lammy urged Iran to take a diplomatic 'off-ramp' and engage in talks, as he cautioned Tehran against blockading the Strait of Hormuz or attacking US bases in the Middle East. Questions are being asked about whether the shipping channel or oil exports through it could be blocked amid the tensions. Important discussion with @SecRubio this evening on the situation in the Middle East. We will continue to work with our allies to protect our people, secure regional stability and drive forward a diplomatic solution. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) June 22, 2025 Speaking to BBC Breakfast on Monday morning, Mr Lammy said he had been 'crystal clear' that 'it would be a huge, catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time. We have forces in the region at this time. 'It would be a catastrophic mistake. It would be a mistake to blockade the Strait of Hormuz.' He said he thinks his counterpart 'gets that and understands that'. The UK has been pressing for Iran to engage in negotiations and diplomacy over the issues, and Mr Lammy told the same programme: 'Let's take the diplomatic off-ramp. Let's get serious and calm this thing down.' Mr Lammy is expected to address MPs in the Commons about the situation on Monday. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer warned on Sunday that there is a risk of the crisis escalating beyond the Middle East, telling reporters 'that's a risk to the region. It's a risk beyond the region, and that's why all our focus has been on de-escalating, getting people back around to negotiate what is a very real threat in relation to the nuclear programme.' Sir Keir spoke to US President Donald Trump on Sunday, and Downing Street said the leaders agreed Tehran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and called for Iran to return to negotiations. The conversation came after the air raid by American B-2 stealth bombers and a salvo of submarine-launched missiles hit Iran's nuclear facilities. 'They discussed the actions taken by the United States last night to reduce the threat and agreed that Iran must never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon,' Downing Street said. Mr Lammy declined to say on Monday whether the US military action was legal, but added: 'I don't say it's not legitimate'. During an interview on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, it was put to him that it was extraordinary he could not answer the question as critics argue Iran is also a sovereign nation which was attacked without warning. He said: 'I don't think it is extraordinary because this was not the UK's action, we were not involved, we were clear when this began and Israel's attacks began that we were not involved… so I don't say it's not legitimate, but I can tell you as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves was asked about the legality of the strikes as she visited the West Midlands, and said: 'It is up to the US to make that case. We were not involved in these actions and, of course, we would never comment on the legal advice that the Government receives.' — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 21, 2025 Mr Lammy also suggested that the action by Mr Trump 'may well have set back Iran several years'. He told the same BBC radio programme that the US president's rhetoric was 'strong' but that strikes had been 'targeted' to 'deal with Iran's nuclear capability'. The Foreign Secretary later added: 'Donald Trump made a decision to act to degrade that capability. It may well have set back Iran by several years. That was a decision that he took.' Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has called on the Prime Minister to address the Commons about the situation in the Middle East. He called Mr Trump's strikes a 'seismic moment' and added: 'UK ministers are dodging questions on whether they support these strikes, and failing to guarantee that we won't be dragged into another illegal American war in the Middle East. 'The Prime Minister has not even spoken once in the Commons since this crisis began. He needs to come to Parliament today, update the country on where the UK stands and what he is doing to ensure the situation does not escalate any further.' Overnight, Mr Trump called the future of the Iranian regime into question, posting on his TruthSocial platform: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' It appeared to be a different approach to that of his defence secretary Pete Hegseth, who had said on Sunday that 'this mission was not and has not been about regime change'.

Western Telegraph

26 minutes ago

• Western Telegraph

Swinney ‘concerned' about UK being drawn into Middle East conflict

Tensions escalated further over the weekend as the US struck three of Iran's nuclear sites and President Donald Trump floated the idea of 'regime change' in the country following strikes between it and Israel. While Downing Street said on Monday the focus would be on 'diplomacy', a spokesman for Number 10 said preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon was a 'good thing'. I have made a strong plea for every resource of the international community to be deployed to de-escalate the situation and to get the world to step back from the brink John Swinney Speaking during a visit to a school in the Springburn area of Glasgow on Monday, John Swinney urged the international community to work to find a resolution. 'I share the concerns of Scots about the events in Iran over the weekend,' he said. 'To wake up to what we woke up to yesterday morning is very, very frightening and alarming and I don't think any of us should underestimate the significance and the severity of the situation that we face.' He added: 'That's why I have made a strong plea for every resource of the international community to be deployed to de-escalate the situation and to get the world to step back from the brink.' Mr Swinney went on to encourage the UK Government to 'put all of their weight' behind diplomatic efforts to stem the conflict. Asked if he was concerned about British involvement in the conflict, he said: 'There's obviously the potential for this to have very wide-ranging implications and they could involve the United Kingdom. 'So of course I'm concerned about that point. 'I think we need to step back, to find a negotiated settlement to the issues that have been raised and to avoid any further escalation, which will simply increase the severity and the significance of the dangers that we all face.'