Death toll from an attack by gunmen in north-central Nigeria reaches 150, survivors say
The death toll from an attack by gunmen over the weekend in north-central Nigeria has climbed to 150, survivors said Monday, as villagers were still digging through burned homes, counting their dead and looking for dozens of people still missing. Assailants stormed Benue state's Yelewata community late Friday night, opening fire on villagers who were asleep and setting their homes ablaze, survivors and the local farmers' union said.
Many of those killed were sheltering in a local market after fleeing violence in other parts of the state. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the killings, but such attacks are common in Nigeria's northern region, where local herders and farmers often clash over limited access to land and water. The prolonged conflict has become deadlier in recent years, with authorities and analysts warning that more herdsmen are taking up arms. The farmers accuse the herders, mostly of Fulani origin, of grazing their livestock on their farms and destroying their produce. The herders insist that the lands are grazing routes that were first backed by law in 1965, five years after the country gained its independence.
Nigeria's President Bola Tinubu, whose government has fallen short of expectations in ending the country's deadly security crises, described the Benue attack as 'senseless bloodletting,' while his office said he would visit the stricken community on Wednesday.
Titus Tsegba, who lost his wife and four of his children in the attack, said more than 20 bodies were recovered on Monday. The initial death toll was reported to be 100 on Saturday. His wife and children –– the youngest 8 and the oldest 27 –– were burned to ashes beyond recognition, he told The Associated Press, adding that he survived because he was sleeping in another part of the community. 'Everything is gone,' he said.
Benue Deputy Gov. Sam Ode said he suspected the perpetrators were herdsmen. Ode and the survivors spoke to the AP by phone. The gunmen made it difficult for many to flee after surrounding the Yelewata community, which is about 120 kilometers (75 miles) from the state capital of Makurdi, said Jacob Psokaa, who lost his 55-year-old father in the attack. 'They were coming from different sides at the same moment … it was sporadic shooting,' Psokaa said. 'The situation is very bad now with many people in the ground … your people leaving you suddenly.'
The gunmen also burned food stores in the local market, razing a year's harvest that included rice and yam, staple food mainly exported from Benue to other parts of Nigeria. 'Enough is enough!' said Tinubu, the president. 'I have directed the security agencies to act decisively, arrest perpetrators of these evil acts on all sides of the conflict and prosecute them.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
West African leaders admit security woes mounting in region
ABUJA: Leaders from the west African bloc ECOWAS on Sunday admitted during talks in the Nigerian capital that the region was in trouble, facing mounting unrest and political instability. 'Our region is at the crossroads,' said Sierra Leone's Julius Maada Bio as he took over the rotating chairmanship of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) from Nigeria's Bola Tinubu. West Africa is 'facing serious challenges, some long-standing, others new and evolving,' he said. They included 'insecurity in the Sahel and coastal states, terrorism, political instability, illicit arms flow and transnational organized crimes.' It was time to 'overhaul our collective security architecture' including intelligence-sharing and rapid response, he added. 'The democratic space is under strain in parts of our region — the constitutional order has been disrupted.' Coups and attempted putsches have rocked nearly half of the original ECOWAS member states in the last decade, straining relations between neighbors. Three junta-led countries — Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger — quit the bloc earlier this year, setting up their own alliances. Jihadists exploiting fraying ties between regional countries are gaining ground in the Sahel and Lake Chad region. They have recently intensified offensives in the Sahel region, staging bloody raids in Mali, incursions into major cities in Burkina Faso and inflicting heavy army losses in Niger. Summit host Nigeria has also witnessed a spike in attacks in recent weeks, targeting both villagers and military bases. In his speech, outgoing ECOWAS chair Tinubu spoke of the 'stark and consistent challenges that continue to impede our aspirations... violent extremism and other cross-border crimes that have continued to widen' and intensify. The three Sahel states' military juntas pledged during the coups that brought them to power to make security a priority. But, like their predecessors, they are struggling to contain the advance of jihadists, who are threatening neighboring countries on the west African coast more than ever. Tinubu said that under his leadership ECOWAS 'deployed all diplomatic means' to engage the three countries and expressed confidence 'that before too long, they may return' to the bloc. Bringing the three countries back into the ECOWAS fold will be the 'biggest test' of the chairmanship of Maada Bio, a former soldier who briefly led a military junta in his own country more than two decades ago, said Ikemesit Effiong, analyst with SBM Intelligence, a Lagos-based African geopolitical risk consulting firm. The three countries have so far formed a confederation called the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Earlier this year they announced the creation of a joint 5,000-strong force for joint military operations. ECOWAS leaders in August 2023 mustered plans to create a military 'standby force' aimed at fighting against terrorism and transnational crimes. At the time it was announced, it was aimed at the junta leaders in Niger who had toppled the sitting president. Tinubu said ECOWAS 'must act decisively to operationalize the standby force in the fight against terrorism to serve as an instrument for peace and stability for our region.' 'I am a little bit worried about the slow pace of its activation, which is taking longer than desired,' said Tinubu. ECOWAS did not give a timeline of when it would become operational. But the organization has a long history of military interventions having deployed since the 1990s in Liberia, Sierra Leone, Mali, Ivory Coast, the Gambia and Guinea-Bissau.
Arab News
17 hours ago
- Arab News
Toll in lynching of Nigeria wedding guests rises to 12
JOS: The number of people killed after a mob stormed a bus carrying Muslim wedding guests in central Nigeria's volatile Plateau state has risen to 12, according to the Nigerian presidency. The dead include the groom's father and brother, it said. President Bola Tinubu has condemned the killings, the latest attack to hit the region where tensions are high after a series of bloody attacks in recent days, with ethnic Fulani nomadic Muslim herders suspected of killing dozens of people in Plateau's Mangu local government area. Police, survivors and local organizations said around 30 people on a bus to a wedding lost their way, stopped to ask for directions, and were accosted by an irate mob. They were attacked with sticks, machetes and stones and their bus set ablaze, a survivor told AFP. Initially authorities had confirmed eight dead with four reported missing. Tinubu described the lynching 'as unacceptable and barbaric,' said a statement from his office which said the dead included the groom's father and brother. The Nigerian leader ordered the arrest and punishment of the culprits as he urged the Plateau state government to 'take decisive action in handling these vicious cycles of violence.' Fulani herders in the state have long clashed with settled farmers, many of whom are Christian, over access to land and resources. Police say they have arrested 22 suspects in connection with the attack.
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
An African credit rating agency? Easier said than done
Africa's sovereign debt crisis is not merely a story of fiscal mismanagement or external shocks. It is amplified by a systemic anomaly: The continent pays more to borrow than its peers with comparable economic indicators. This penalty, often termed the 'African premium,' costs the region an estimated $24 billion annually in excess interest payments, and has deprived it of more than $46 billion in potential lending. With 20 low-income African nations in or near debt distress, and 94 percent of rated African sovereigns downgraded over the past decade, the search for solutions appears to be culminating in the establishment of an African Credit Rating Agency, or AfCRA for short. For now, the move is being framed as both a corrective measure and a symbol of financial sovereignty. Yet while politically sound, it faces profound operational and philosophical challenges. Even if the ambition to establish the agency is framed as a bold act of sovereignty, the terrain it seeks to conquer is littered with the wreckage of similar aspirations in richer, better-equipped regions. Granted, the financial logic behind the move is well-established: Africa's sovereign debt is routinely mispriced, with subjective and often opaque assessments by the 'Big Three' credit rating agencies — Moody's, Fitch and S&P — inflating risk perception and pushing average borrowing costs ever higher. As a result, total annual lending losses and excess interest payments exceed annual official development aid to the continent. That Africa is being 'penalized' beyond its macroeconomic fundamentals is no longer a niche theory among a few experts, policymakers or scholars at poorly attended conferences, it is a measurable economic hemorrhage. But attempting to correct this through AfCRA introduces a dilemma. Can a continent hobbled by thin capital markets, erratic fiscal transparency, and a fragmented political economy build a ratings agency that would be perceived as credible by the very investors it seeks to court? The evidence so far is not encouraging. Europe, despite its institutional depth and capital abundance, has failed to create a viable alternative to the Big Three, even after sinking more than €300 million ($346 million) into various experiments, all of which ended in regulatory quagmires or strategic surrender. The most successful nonaligned agencies, such as Scope in Europe or Morningstar DBRS in Canada, only survived by serving niche markets and accepting that they could not displace the incumbents. Africa's task is even tougher. Most of the continent's 21 Eurobond issuers are repeat borrowers, yet their ratings have on average worsened since their inaugural issuances. This contradicts the usual pattern in emerging markets, where familiarity tends to reduce pricing premiums. Even the most prominent issuers — Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa — have faced frequent downgrades, often based on models that lack local granularity or fail to consider governance heterogeneity. Furthermore, agencies frequently do not send analysts to the countries they rate; Fitch has no office at all on the continent, and both S&P and Moody's operate out of a single office in Johannesburg, covering dozens of vastly different economies. Meanwhile, unsolicited ratings, those issued without government request or input, are both more common in Africa and more damaging. Moody's leads the way in such unsolicited assessments, despite objections by African governments to their inherent opacity. It is not surprising, therefore, to see a resurgent push for an independent agency, given the cost of delays. Between 2021 and 2024, for instance, the average coupon on African Eurobonds nearly doubled to just under 11 percent, even as fundamentals remained stable. The continent pays more to borrow than its peers with comparable economic indicators. Hafed Al-Ghwell Moreover, the absence of localized assessment left 22 African countries unrated, starving them of institutional capital. When Botswana and Mauritius secured investment-grade ratings, they accessed financing at 300-400 basis points below regional peers. At a continental level, each one-notch upgrade in a rating could unlock more than $15 billion in much-needed capital. The cost of waiting is clear and unambiguous. Yet, the creation of AfCRA cannot be reduced to a matter of injustice alone. The economics of operating a credit rating agency are ruthless. Even the most optimistic forecasts suggest that the launch of a credible African agency would require $400–500 million in capital, an amount that dwarfs the annual budget of the African Union itself. A very familiar, and suffocating, dependency loop swiftly kicks in; the AU's own programs remain more than 60 percent funded by the EU and other external partners, and if these same entities are now expected to bankroll an 'African-owned' ratings apparatus, the concept begins to cannibalize its own purpose. Beyond the matter of funding, AfCRA would also find itself confronted by the same structural hurdles that felled its European predecessors. Regulatory legitimacy, for one thing, cannot be assumed. In many global markets only ratings from the Big Three are recognized, particularly among institutional investors bound by prudent regulation. Even with improvements in rating models, the acceptance of new agencies into the portfolios of pension funds or sovereign wealth funds hinges on an arduous and opaque process of validation by regulators located far outside Africa. Without international regulatory recognition, AfCRA risks becoming an advisory service masquerading as an agency; technically useful but irrelevant where it matters. Even if credibility can somehow be established, the pipeline of rating activity might not justify the operating costs. Government debt issuance in Africa remains sporadic and constrained. Moreover, much of the domestic debt, particularly in Francophone Africa, is already absorbed by regional banks under arrangements that do not require third-party ratings. Corporate appetite for ratings is growing but still shallow. GCR Ratings, once Africa's most promising homegrown agency, did not consider government bond ratings a serious business line, and it has since been acquired by Moody's, effectively reversing the localization effort. And then there is the governance risk. Africa's existing national and regional agencies have not been free from scandal. Recent cases, such as West African agency DataPro's withdrawal from a local firm because of a fraudulent rating that was exposed by a US research organization, highlight the fact that domestic proximity does not immunize against error or, worse, complicity. Creating an agency without a ferociously independent mandate, transparent methodology, and hard, legal accountability would not reduce bias, it would simply substitute one form of distortion for another. Ultimately, the issue is not whether Africa deserves better ratings; it certainly does. However, establishing an agency without first fixing the deficits in data integrity, fiscal reporting, macroeconomic coherence, and regulatory independence might produce only a costly mirror image of the very system it seeks to escape. A credible alternative cannot be built on grievance alone, but it could be a catalyst for data reform, methodological innovation, and investor dialogue, which might finally ensure that finance costs reflect Africa's true risk and not perceived ghosts from the past. However, such an undertaking must emerge as a result of discipline, innovation and, above all, proof of its usefulness to markets. Otherwise, AfCRA runs the risk of being filed away in the continent's growing archive of initiatives that were politically resonant but financially futile.
