Paul Reid to be paid €50,000 to chair overhauled planning body
Former HSE chief Paul Reid is to be paid a €50,000 salary to chair the State's overhauled planning authority, the Housing Minister said.
The establishment of the new planning body was one of three housing proposals approved by Cabinet on Tuesday.
Advertisement
Mr Reid is to be the chairman of An Coimisiun Pleanala, which replaces An Bord Pleanala following allegations of conflicts of interest at the planning appeals body were raised in 2022.
A senior Government spokesman said Mr Reid was approached for the role by Housing Minister James Browne after a six-month competitive process through the Public Appointment Service 'was ultimately successful'.
The minister said the overhauled planning authority would be 'essential' and aim to provide more certain timelines for planning decisions.
Mr Browne said it was 'the single most important agency' in the state that would require a 'hands-on role'.
Advertisement
He said he identified Mr Reid, who headed up the HSE during the Covid-19 pandemic, as someone with 'that governance experience, that management experience'.
'In terms of his salary, it would be 50,000 euro per year as chair of a board but Mr Reid would be expected to be very hands on, on an almost daily basis, engaging with the CEO, to ensure that this change of management happens as well with this new body.'
He added that this does not include per diems and said he would have to check on allowances.
The other six board members, who will take up their roles on Wednesday, barrister Peter Dennehy; former chief executive of the National Transport Authority Anne Graham; former director general of Law Society of Ireland Mary Keane; accountant Penelope Kenny; businessman Peter Madden and Michael Moriarty from the NGO sector.
Advertisement
The other two housing measures approved by Cabinet on Tuesday were emergency legislation to quickly introduce rent caps to a fifth of tenancies not already covered.
Mr Browne said he expected that the extension of rent controls to be approved by the Oireachtas this week.
'I am confident we can get it done this week, I am in the hands of the Houses of the Oireachtas,' he said.
He said they wanted greater uptake on the renters' credit outlined as part of previous budget measures.
Advertisement
Taoiseach Micheál Martin (left) and Paul Reid, then-CEO of the HSE, in 2021 (Brian Lawless/PA)
The third measure was to expand the role of the Land Development Agency, including its geographical area of operation and to develop key public lands through infrastructure investment.
He said different entities competing for limited land was 'a real problem' and so he would be writing to local authorities in three weeks to encourage them to 'significantly rezone land right across this country'.
The housing and planning measures come a week after the Government announced a swathe of rent and tenancy reforms.
Mr Browne, who admitted that rents in Ireland are 'way too high', said the measures would give renters 'greater certainty' and would attract new investment in rental accommodation.
Advertisement
They included the extension nationwide of the rent pressure zone (RPZ) system, areas of high demand where rent increases are capped at inflation or 2 per cent, whichever is lower.
Rent increases in new developments will be capped only by inflation in an attempt to boost Ireland's apartment supply, Mr Browne said.
Other rental reforms will kick in from March 1st, 2026: the offer of six-year-minimum rolling tenancies and a ban on no-fault evictions for large landlords, defined as having four or more tenancies.
The opposition has criticised the proposals as 'a recipe for rocketing rents', particularly a measure that sees rents 'reset' to the market rate when a tenant voluntarily leaves a six-year-minimum tenancy.
Meanwhile, the Department of Housing is engaging with multiple potential candidates for the 'housing czar' role at the top of the new Housing Activation Office.
A joint-opposition motion on housing and homelessness, which will be voted on on Tuesday, calls for the introduction of a no-fault eviction ban and greater use of compulsory purchase orders to 'bring empty homes back into use'.
The motion is being proposed by Sinn Féin, Labour, the Social Democrats, People Before Profit, the Green Party and Independents.
A Raise The Roof protest will be held outside Leinster House at 6pm to coincide with the opposition motion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Calls to reform family visa rules as Brits face being split up from partners
A British father-to-be has spoken out against the UK's family visa rules, describing the experience as making him feel like a "second-class citizen" for falling in love with someone not from the UK. David Todd, 33, says he feels "completely helpless" due to the current policy. Mr Todd is urging the government to reform the system, specifically calling for the abolition or reduction of the Minimum Income Requirement (MIR). This controversial threshold dictates the earnings British citizens must demonstrate to bring their non-UK partners to the country, a policy currently under review by ministers. His plea coincides with the release of new reports from charities Reunite Families UK and Coram, published on Monday. These studies detail the "significant emotional and psychological harm" the policy inflicts on families, particularly highlighting the long-term separation endured by children from one of their parents. Mr Todd had hoped to move back to the UK from Germany with his American wife, Claire Todd, 32, before they are expecting their first child in October. But the couple are facing being split up for Mr Todd to return to the UK alone to build up enough income proof as the British citizen in the relationship, or raise savings of more than £88,500 dictated by the visa rules to allow them to return as a family. Mr Todd told the PA news agency: 'There's been lots of times where I've stayed awake at night worrying about it and how it's all going to work out, because you feel completely helpless. 'It's like we're second class citizens because we married someone who fell in love with someone who wasn't British.' Earlier this month the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) set out its recommendations after a review requested by the Home Secretary to look at how to set an MIR for family visas that balances economic wellbeing and family life. It warned against raising the threshold for family visas to the same level for skilled workers, as planned by the previous government. Skilled workers are only eligible to come to the UK if they earn a salary of £38,700 or more, compared to £29,000 required mainly for family visas. The UK's current £29,000 threshold, which was set in 2024, is high compared to other high-income countries reviewed by the MAC. It was previously set at £18,600 since 2012. Mr Todd, from Solihull, West Midlands, added increasing the level to £38,700 would be 'devastating'. 'Even with this MAC report now, we don't know what the Government's going to do, how they're going to react,' the classical music conductor said. 'It's this feeling that you're kind of helpless, you're stuck in limbo, and you're desperately trying to contort yourself into this position where you can make it work just because you want to live with your wife or husband.' The couple, living in Wurzburg, Germany, were first left after Ms Todd's student visa ended in the UK, and moved to the European nation so they could be together seven years ago. After building 'good careers' as classical musicians on the continent, the couple began trying to make a return to the UK up to a year ago, wanting to be near family as they start their own. For Mr Todd, he said the Government should at least make the ways to prove income easier, and to include the spouse's salary to contribute to the income threshold. He said it is 'ridiculous' his wife's income cannot be used to meet the salary requirement despite her remote job as a content creator paying enough and means they 'could move to the UK tomorrow'. Mr Todd said he wants to 'avoid at all costs' the prospect of being separated from his wife and child, adding: 'It just feels wrong, am I going to have to turn to my child when she's older and say to her: 'Well, sorry, the reason I wasn't with you for the first year of your life was because I was trying to get work for the family to move.'' British father Ed Moon, currently living in Taipei with his Taiwanese wife Amber Moon and four-year-old daughter Maya, is also applying to the family visa route to move back to the UK as Maya reaches school age. He told PA the most difficult thing is the 'extremely extensive' documentation you need to provide, which if you get wrong will mean the visa being denied to start the process again, with visa fees costing around £2,000. 'We're having to dip into every ounce of our savings to do this,' the 36-year-old from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, said. 'You feel just unwanted by your country essentially. It's been especially tough, really like from a personal perspective.' The journalist also said it is a waste of money for the taxpayer for him to grow up and be educated in the UK, to then not let him and his family live there, adding: 'I want to be able to contribute to the UK.' The research by Reunite Families and Coram found that British citizens face exile, increased financial pressure and separation from their partners often for long periods of time from the family visa policy. For children separated from one of their parents, the charities warned they can face life-changing trauma and distress. The report also highlighted how the rules particularly discriminate against those including British mothers, who are more likely to experience hardship, working class and low income partners and black and ethnic minority workers, who are more likely to earn less than their white counterparts. Reunite Families UK executive director Caroline Coombs said 'simple and practical changes' from the Home Office could make significant differences to families, starting with scrapping the MIR and simplifying the rules and application process to stop the need for expensive legal advice. 'These rules have become the tax on love. People are suffering and want to be heard.'
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
One in seven people ‘have lost money to fraud in past year'
One in seven people say they have lost money to fraud in the past year, according to a survey. Some 14% of people surveyed in February said they had lost money to fraud in the past 12 months, financial insights company TransUnion found. Half (50%) said that a fraud attempt had been made against them in the past three months. The 'consumer pulse' survey also found that a significant proportion of people favour account security processes over ease of access, with over three-quarters (78%) saying they do not want access to their accounts without being explicitly authenticated first. Nearly half (49%) of people said they do not mind being authenticated again after an initial login, for example, when making a payment or changing a password. Chad Reimers, general manager of fraud and identity at TransUnion in the UK said: 'Quick and seamless journeys have become the norm. 'However, consumers are increasingly demanding trust as part of their interactions with digital channels. 'There are increasing demands from consumers to ensure security and authentication – and this spans across sectors, from financial services, to gaming, to online dating.' TransUnion commissioned Dynata to carry out the survey among 1,000 people aged 18 or over across the UK. As well as reporting incidents to the police, people who are concerned that they may have fallen victim to fraud should tell their bank or payments provider as soon as they can. 'This may help the provider to claw the money back and could also help to prevent further fraud attempts on the account. Many banks have signed up to the 159 service – a memorable number that people can call if they have received contact that they suspect to be fraudulent. People can also check their credit reports for any activity which may indicate fraud.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Surge in firms using loans to pay tax bills amid April increases
The number of businesses using loans in order to pay for tax bills has soared by more than a third so far this year in the face of April cost increases, a major financing firm has warned. Billions of pounds of tax and VAT payments are set to be covered by credit and financing arrangements this year, according to specialist lender Premium Credit. Bosses at the finance provider said it comes as small businesses across the UK face increased 'strain' on their finances due to the recent increase in employers' national insurance contributions. In April, firms were hit by higher NI payments alongside the increases in the national minimum wage and tax increases, such as higher business rates payments and new packaging taxes. Premium Credit said it witnessed a 37% jump in customers using its tax and VAT financing service in the first quarter of 2025 against the same period last year as firms prepared for tax hikes. The number of customers using financing for tax and VAT has jumped by 109% over the past two years, the company added. It added that the average loan used to help pay VAT tax bills was worth around £108,000 in 2024, with this around £70,000 for non-VAT bills. Jennie Hill, chief commercial officer at Premium Credit, said: 'Around £3 billion to £5 billion of tax and VAT liabilities are financed each year and recent increases to employers' national insurance are adding to the strain on SME (small and medium-sized enterprise) cashflow.' Meanwhile, research commissioned by the business surveying small business owners found that 20% of small firms said they worry that paying tax bills will be more difficult this year. Around 28% also cautioned that they think they will struggle to pay a tax bill in the next five years.
