The first Lions match is about laying down a marker – but Pumas bring range of threats

Every single member of the British & Irish Lions squad is in the perfect sweet spot at the moment. Blair Kinghorn aside, they all arrived into camp with a spring in their step and a smile on their face because their dreams have been realised. Speaking from experience, it is amazing how quickly you can leave national allegiances at the door.
At this stage, there is no sense of what the Test team will be, no division, or feeling that you have to make do with being a midweek dirt-tracker – the thing you are probably most nervous about is who your roommate will be. You know it will be someone from a different country and my first roommate was Keith Earls. As the youngest member of the 2009 squad, he was responsible for looking after the Lions mascot and I felt like I needed to mind him. I soon realised there are few as competitive as Keith and he did not need minding at all.
You can arrive into camp with preconceived ideas of what certain people will be like. Whenever I had played against Ronan O'Gara I had to be so mentally switched on because he was such a fierce competitor with incredible drive and had this uncanny ability to catch you out of position with a spiral kick. He was pretty chirpy on the pitch too, but he is someone I am still in touch with to this day.
There were quite a few players about whom I was thinking: 'I'm not quite sure about you, I may not even like you.' But you then meet them and spend time in their company and you switch to: 'This is my teammate,' and feeling: 'This means everything,' really quickly.
I'm sure the current bunch have already had a few good nights out and they need that. They will learn more about each other from 30 minutes in the pub than they ever would in the gym or on the training ground.
Friday's match against Argentina is a first hit-out but, at the same time, it is probably the hardest game they will play before the Test series. If Argentina were playing against Australia on Friday, I'm not sure who my money would be on.
It's a daunting fixture but the Lions have to embrace it. They can't worry themselves about underdogs tags – this is the best of the best from the four nations and there can be no excuses. I don't expect them to be perfect against the Pumas but the minimum I want to see is evidence of what they are trying to do in attack and defence.
Make no mistake, everyone wants to play in the first match. Even all the Leinster players who were in action against the Bulls last Saturday, even Finn Russell after his topless celebrations during Bath's open-top bus parade on Sunday. That said, as much as there can be a sense of Fomo for all those not involved, there can be some Romo – relief at missing out – too.
In 2009, I was desperate to play in the first match of the tour against the Royal XV and gutted to be overlooked. As it turned out, those who were selected didn't cover themselves in glory, needed a late comeback to avoid defeat and those players suddenly had some catching up to do. It's amazing how your currency can rise when you're not involved.
The team Andy Farrell has selected is largely as you'd expect, all players who were at the Portugal camp, but I'm delighted Marcus Smith gets an early opportunity to show what he's all about. During the Six Nations he just got on with the job, having last year been England's most dominant player only to find himself out of favour or playing in a position that isn't his most preferred.
Sign up to The Breakdown
The latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewed
after newsletter promotion
As it has turned out, that versatility has worked to his advantage and when I look at this Lions backline, I see a lot of muscle, a lot of physical specimens, and the need for a second pair of playmaking hands becomes clear.
You would still say Kinghorn is the favourite to fill that role, but given he is still involved with Toulouse, Smith has the chance to lay down a marker. And he must stay true to himself to do that. He is an incredible individual talent but he's also a selfless player. Everything he does is with an eye on creating space for his teammates and Farrell will be aware of the threat he poses if Duhan van der Merwe, Bundee Aki, Sione Tuipulotu and Tommy Freeman can deliver front-foot ball.
Smith will have to be mindful of the aerial threat Argentina pose. He will be only too familiar with how strong Rodrigo Isgró is in the air given they are teammates at Harlequins. Smith constantly looks to Isgró with the boot to win the ball back, so effective is the winger in that regard. But Argentina have threats all over the park.
It is a mighty challenge for the Lions first up, but the XV selected have got the ability to deal with it.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

21 minutes ago

• The Independent

US billionaire John Textor sells stake in bid save Crystal Palace's European status

John Textor has sold his stake in Crystal Palace in a bid to meet Uefa 's rules and ensure the club's participation in the Europa League next season. The US billionaire has sold his 42.9 per cent stake to controversial tycoon Woody Johnson for around £200m, subject to approval from the Premier League. This should clear the path for Palace to keep their place in Europe next term, satisfying Uefa that the FA Cup winners are not in breach of multi-club ownership rules. The Independent understands that an official verdict from the European football governing body is expected in the coming days. The Eagles' first voyage into continental football was under threat due to Textor's position at the club, due to the fact he also owns a 77 per cent stake in Ligue 1 outfit Lyon - who akin to Palace are competing in next season's Europa League. To prevent collusion, Uefa does not allow multiple clubs under the same owner to compete in one of its competitions, and in the case that two teams under a multi-club model qualify for the same tournament, the side that achieved the better finish in its domestic season gets priority. Lyon finished sixth last term and qualified via their league position, while Palace finished 12th. Palace's failure to adapt their shareholdings structure prior to the Uefa deadline of March 1 meant they were in breach of competition guidelines and could have been expelled from the Europa League. Palace argued that their historic FA Cup triumph and subsequent Europa League qualification were achieved on their own merit rather than via the benefits of a multi-club system, and that the response to eject them from the competition would be disproportionate. They also refuted that they operate under such a multi-club model - something Nottingham Forest wrote to Uefa to express concerns about - with Textor previously holding just 25 per cent of the voting rights. It appears the club have now addressed the issue, with contentious New York Jets owner acquiring Textor's stake. The Jets faced scrutiny last year after reports of 'controversial and dysfunctional practices' under his watch. Textor's sale means the businessman is fully out of the Palace picture, losing all influence previously had at the club.

Times

34 minutes ago

• Times

John Textor agrees to sell £160m Crystal Palace stake to Woody Johnson

John Textor has agreed the sale of his company's stake in Crystal Palace to the US billionaire Woody Johnson in a move that should enable the FA Cup winners to play in the Europa League next season. Palace were facing exclusion from the competition because of Eagle Football Holding's ownership of the French club Lyon, with Textor and the club chairman Steve Parish attending a meeting at Uefa's headquarters in Switzerland earlier this month in the hope of resolving the matter. But Textor recognised a sale of Eagle Football Holding's 43 per cent stake, for what the Times understands is £160million, was the simplest way of removing the issue with the company's multi-club ownership model. Johnson, left, also owns the New York Jets NFL team and is an ally of Trump BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY IMAGES Sources have confirmed to The Times that a definitive agreement has been signed with Johnson, subject to Premier League approval. That should not prove an issue. Uefa are due to rule on Palace's involvement in the Europa League at the end of June. Nottingham Forest, who had hoped to be promoted from the Conference League to the Europa League if Palace were forbidden from taking part, wrote to Uefa with their concerns about Palace's participation. Johnson, 78, is worth more than £7billion as a member of the Johnson & Johnson pharmaceuticals family and is already an owner of the New York Jets NFL team. He is also the former US ambassador to the UK and a major ally of president Donald Trump.

Telegraph

38 minutes ago

• Telegraph

What the mad Battle of the Surfaces taught us about tennis

Just over 18 years ago, in May 2007, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer engaged in one of the most bizarre tennis matches in the history of the game. In front of an intrigued crowd of some 7,000 packing the temporary stands installed in the tennis club in Palma Majorca, they played out three sets on a court that was grass on one side of the net, clay on the other. The idea of this grandly titled Battle of the Surfaces was to highlight the different approaches required to master the two types of court, to see who could adapt quickest to the altered rhythms and requirements each demands. And they are different. Very different. Clay courts are made of crushed brick particles, and the surface creates substantial friction that slows the ball down as it hits the surface. Whereas on grass the ball skids and slips, retaining much of its pace. A serve hit at 100mph would strike grass and rise off at 92mph; on clay it would slow to 78mph, a difference of 20%. The angle of bounce is also substantially different. On grass, a ball hitting the surface at 16 degrees will not deviate, it goes up and away still at 16 degrees. On clay, it bounces much higher, up to 20 degrees. Which means players need to stand further back in order to adequately return the ball. On clay, moreover, a player can use the surface to slide into a shot. On grass, attempting such a manoeuvre would merely result in slipping over. In short, clay favours the baseline game, grass the serve and volley. It means players have to adapt. But generally, between the end of the clay season with the French Open in May and the climax of the grass season at Wimbledon in late June, players have a bit of time to do so. Not in The Battle of the Surfaces. Federer, the serial Wimbledon champion – at the time unbeaten in 48 matches on grass – had just two games to alter his grip, stand further back and bring more spin to his game. Nadal, the King of Paris, unbeaten in 72 matches on the red stuff, was suddenly obliged, when playing on the grass half, to charge at the net, to volley where he might have rallied. And that is without mentioning the sudden strain on their bodies. 'We call it 'Grass Arse',' says Emily Webley-Smith, the British doubles player who has spent the past 20-odd years on the women's circuit. 'For the first couple of days after switching from clay to grass you get such tight glutes from forcing yourself to stay low because of the difference in bounce.' Indeed, as she moves from clay to grass at this time of year, Webley-Smith's entire training programme changes in preparation for the new conditions. 'It's better to concentrate on what we call 'serve plus one' rather than rallying for 15 shots, simply because the rallies are so much shorter on grass,' she says. 'Your speed drills are shorter and more explosive – five to eight seconds instead of 10-15 seconds. There is lots of focus on first-step speed. It's a mental workout, too. You play at least a metre further back from the baseline on clay. So you have to keep telling yourself to get forward on grass.' In 2007, Federer and Nadal were doing this every time they switched ends. As supreme practitioners, they were better equipped than most to modify their game. But even the best find it a challenge. Last year Carlos Alcaraz became only the sixth man to have won both the French Open and Wimbledon in the same season: before Alcaraz, Björn Borg did it three times, Nadal twice, Rod Laver, Federer and Novak Djokovic once each. Great champions such as Pete Sampras, despite lifting the Wimbledon title seven times, only once got so far as the semi-finals at Roland Garros. Andy Murray fared a touch better, once reaching the French Open final. And it is not much more frequent an occurrence in the women's game. Steffi Graf did the double four times, Serena Williams and Martina Navratilova twice, Margaret Court, Evonne Goolagong Cawley, Billie Jean King and Chris Evert once each. 'It's crazily hard,' says Webley-Smith of the switch. 'Especially as for the majority of the season, you're playing on a different surface again: hard courts.' @peystearns DIY Wimbledon… #tennis #wimbledon #tennisplayer #tennistiktok #grass ♬ what is love haddaway - whitelinesprettybabyy Modern players try all sorts of ways to speed up the process. The American Peyton Stearns posted a video of herself in June practising for the grass season on what appeared to be an old green carpet laid out across a hard court. 'It was bizarre. It looked like the kind of Astroturf they use in cricket nets,' says Webley-Smith. 'I'm not sure how much help that will be. But we'll see.' For many players, no amount of adaptation will compensate for the fact their game was built on the kind of surfaces they played on in their youth. In Europe that means clay. Across the rest of the world it is hard courts. And in Britain, well that is changing. 'Fewer clubs here have grass courts these days,' says Webley-Smith, who was playing on the green stuff from the age of eight. 'I much prefer it, aesthetically if nothing else. For me, it is what tennis should be played on. I remember going to Wimbledon as a kid and seeing those beautiful green courts and thinking: 'I want to play here'.' Even as developments in ball technology and the type of grass used at the All England Club have made the difference less pronounced, it remains one of the oddities – and attractions – of the sport that the surface conditions have such a profound effect on the style of play. Not that we will ever see a repeat of the match that tried to demonstrate which was the better way of doing things. Not least because the odd half-and-half court for that contest in Majorca took 19 days of hard labour to prepare and reportedly cost an eye-watering £1.2 million. As for the outcome, much to the delight of his home crowd, Nadal won by two sets to one. A result that was almost immediately forgotten.