Despite pro-Trump past, trans state champ's mom gives daughter unwavering support
CLOVIS, Fresno County — Nereyda Hernandez, the mother of transgender track and field athlete AB Hernandez, 16, who was recently crowned a California state champion in girls triple jump and high jump, told the Chronicle in an exclusive interview that she used to be a supporter of President Donald Trump.
She raised her four daughters, including AB, in the Catholic faith. They regularly attended Sunday service in the small town of Jurupa Valley in Riverside County, which Trump won by a slim margin of 1.26% in the 2024 election.
As reported by Capital & Main in April, Nereyda did not find out that AB, now a junior at Jurupa Valley High School, was trans until she was in the eighth grade. The journey they then embarked upon together led Nereyda, who did not specify in which election or elections she voted for Trump, to rethink her disposition toward the President.
'I just admired our President, I just thought, 'Oh OK, he's intelligent, he's a businessman,' and he had my initial vote,' Nereyda said. 'But just talking to AB … you start analyzing things in a different way.'
AB was publicly outed as transgender in October, when Jessica Tapia, president of the Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education and who formerly taught physical education at Jurupa Valley High School, doxxed the teenager via a series of Instagram posts. Tapia was reportedly fired from the school in January of 2023 for refusing to acknowledge the pronouns of trans and nonbinary students, in violation of district policy.
By February, Sonja Shaw, president of the Chino Valley Unified School District, joined Tapia in doxxing AB with an Instagram post that revealed her full name and the high school she attended.
Nereyda sent a cease-and-desist letter to Tapia and Shaw, both of whom are part of the Save Girls Sports association, an organization dedicated to banning trans athletes from competing in California school sports. Three weeks ago, Tapia and Shaw showed up to a track meet at Yorba Linda High School to heckle AB and Nereyda, who still had yet to witness the full magnitude of criticism and national media attention her daughter would receive.
Trump threatened in a Truth Social post on Tuesday that he would withhold federal funding from California if the California Interscholastic Federation followed its own rules and allowed AB to compete at the state meet.
'I'm not surprised,' Nereyda said of Trump's post. 'Even on the first term, I had my own ideas about our President. But I was a Trump supporter, and I don't think people understand that. I feel like people think, 'OK, well, if you're allies with this community or you represent this community, you can't have this presidential vote.' And it's not like that. I always admired the President for being a businessman. I was like, 'OK, he could be good for our economy,' but when it comes to putting stuff out there (on social media), I've always thought it's immature of a person to have that leadership role, to put a lot of information.'
In what appeared to be a response to Trump, the CIF announced mere hours later its new policy, that would allow the athlete with the next qualifying mark in triple jump, high jump and long jump to participate, also issuing a duplicate medal to the next-best finisher behind Hernandez in those three events.
'I wish they would have waited,' Nereyda said Sunday morning of the policy change. 'I mean, we can see that the girls weren't having a problem with it.'
Despite expectations that protesters against AB's participation would show up at Veteran's Memorial Stadium, the site of the CIF state track and field championships, Nereyda said her daughter never considered skipping the event. A pair of transgender athletes qualified for the 2023 track and field championship, but both did not show up in the wake of harassment they received.
Among the demonstrations across the two-day event this weekend was plane trailing the banner, 'NO BOYS IN GIRLS' SPORTS!' which was flown over the stadium at the start of prelims. Neither Nereyda nor AB noticed, according to Nereyda; they were both too focused on the meet itself. AB had an opportunity to achieve a goal she had first set for herself as a freshman, which marked her first year as a track and field athlete. She aimed to be a state champion.
AB won a third-place medal at state in 2024. Amid the current political focus on this particular front in the long-simmering argument over transgender people's place in public life, Nereyda only hoped her daughter could compete in a safe environment as she looked to place in three events this time around.
'What I saw with that is a culture war, and I wasn't going to entertain it,' Nereyda said.
'We're here to support AB and the other kids.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"I Fully Regret Voting For This S—": Donald Trump Supporters Are Slamming Trump For Bombing Iran, And They're Not Holding Back
Last night, President Donald Trump announced that the US military had bombed three nuclear sites in Iran in a planned attack. If you didn't catch Trump's address to the nation, here's one moment that's going viral: Trump: I just want to thank everyone—in particular, God. We love you — Molly Ploofkins (@Mollyploofkins) June 22, 2025 C-SPAN Twitter: @Mollyploofkins Trump also took to Truth Social to congratulate the US military on the strike and announced that "now is the time for peace." Well, MAGA supporters are not holding back their frustrations and voting regrets about Trump's decision to involve the US in another war in the Middle East. Here's what they're saying over on the r/LeopardsAteMyFace subreddit. lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X, stating, "This is not our fight." 2."I trusted you. I'm done with MAGA and all your bullshit." Related: Kamala Harris Trolled Donald Trump's Crowd Sizes Again, And This Little Jab Is Definitely Going To Set Him Off 3."I fully regret voting for this shit." 4."You betrayed us, your MAGA base. I voted for you THREE TIMES." 5."Trump needs to be impeached." 6."Donald Trump has completely failed us." Related: MAGA Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Doesn't Like This Army Vet's Now-Viral Speech 7."NO MORE WARS!!!" 8."I regret my vote and I couldn't apologize more for voting for this." 9."More than disappointed with this action." 10."He's betrayed the vast majority of his voter base." for Trump voter: "You promised us NO War, and you just started one!!!" 12."If the United States enters war with Iran, as appears to be the case, I will regret my vote." 13."Very disappointed in President Trump." 14."I wish I never voted for @realDonaldTrump." finally, "I trusted Trump to put America first... We have been betrayed." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in In the News: Trump Had A Middle-Of-The-Night Meltdown About... Well... So Many Things Also in In the News: Donald Trump Supporters Are Waking Up To The Reality Of Their Ballot Choices, And The Stories Are A Loooooot Also in In the News: Gavin Newsom Just Absolutely Dragged Trump's Military Parade, And Trump's Really, Really Not Gonna Like It
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Why Wars Rarely Kill Bull Markets: The Contrarian Case For Stocks
Concept of economic crisis due to war. The fall of the world economy and the global financial crisis War shakes nations—but rarely breaks markets. Yes, war is tragic. It unsettles borders, devastates lives, and reorders global priorities. But the stock market doesn't operate on morality. It runs on capital, incentives, and probabilities. Despite investors' natural aversion to conflict, history reveals that some of the most powerful rallies started during periods of global turmoil rather than peace. Markets fear uncertainty more than they fear war. And once the fog clears, once direction becomes visible, capital surges back in. From World War II to the Gulf War, and more recently Ukraine, stocks have not only survived wars, but they've also thrived through them. This isn't an argument for war. It's a reminder that volatility is a feature, not a flaw, and often a precursor to opportunity. Smart investors study patterns of conflict and where to find upside when others are frozen by fear. The Historical Pattern: Market Performance During War When conflict breaks out, people tend to panic. Fear takes control. Investors get ready for things to go wrong. But history paints a different picture, one that is much less emotional and much more logical. Consider the events of Pearl Harbor. Yes, the incident shocked the country, and the markets collapsed. However, this did not persist for an extended period. Despite the global war, the U.S. stock market reached its lowest point by the middle of 1942. The S&P 500 almost doubled by the conclusion of WWII, making it one of the biggest wartime rallies ever. The war had accelerated U.S. industry, and the markets followed suit. The Gulf War followed the same path. The market fell as troops queued up in 1990. But when the bombs started to fall and things were clearer, investors rushed back. The S&P had gone up more than 15% in just six months. It happened again in 2003. There were concerns regarding Iraq, oil, and the market. But what happened within a year of the invasion? The market experienced a surge of 30%. And when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, markets fell for a while. Stocks in defense and energy rose quickly. What you should remember is headlines don't make markets move; expectations do. When investors price in fear, opportunities typically follow shortly after. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks after casting his ballot during the runoff ... More presidential election in Tehran on July 5, 2024. Polls opened on July 5 for Iran's runoff presidential election, the interior ministry said, pitting reformist candidate Masoud Pezeshkian against ultraconservative Saeed Jalili in the race to succeed Ebrahim Raisi, who died in a May helicopter crash. (Photo by ATTA KENARE / AFP) (Photo by ATTA KENARE/AFP via Getty Images) Why War Stimulates Markets War not only shifts borders, but it also shifts capital. While the human cost is immense, the market reads war as a massive reallocation of resources. And in that chaos, certain sectors don't just survive; they thrive. First, there's government spending. War represents a significant increase in fiscal stimulus. Defense budgets balloon, procurement surges, and billions pour into listed contractors. Companies like Lockheed, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman don't just benefit; they become central. That's not speculation; it's government policy. Then comes the industrial ramp-up. Factories run hotter, supply chains reprioritize, and output spikes, especially in energy, aerospace, and raw materials. War compels nations to increase production, which also impacts company earnings. Resource nationalism follows. Countries begin hoarding not just oil, but semiconductors, rare earths, and food. That drives up prices and widens margins for suppliers in those chains. Markets like scarcity. War creates it. Innovation doesn't pause during conflict; instead, it accelerates. From WWII radar to Iraq drone tech to Ukraine's real-time battlefield data, war supercharges defense innovation, cybersecurity, AI, and logistics. Civilian tech almost always inherits advances. Even labor undergoes changes. Wartime economies often see productivity rise and wage dynamics reset, especially as new workforces emerge and inflationary pressures are reprioritized. As I often say: War reallocates capital with brutal efficiency. The winners? Businesses that produce, transport, or safeguard the instruments of sovereignty emerge victorious. Investors who understand this don't wait for peace; they position early War Smart Money: What PE And Hedge Funds Know While retail investors react to headlines, the smart money moves long before the story is fully told. Private equity firms, hedge funds, and institutional allocators don't wait for consensus; they anticipate the pivot from panic to profit. Private equity leans hard into sectors that become vital during geopolitical shocks: defense, energy, infrastructure. Not only are these industries essential, but many of the players are asset-heavy, cash-generative, and often misunderstood. That's gold for a PE model. Activist investors know the game too. They don't just look for earnings growth — they hunt for breakups, hidden value, and balance sheet leverage in old-world names. Think railroads, shipping, industrials with legacy real estate, or utilities sitting on valuable grid infrastructure. Hedge funds quietly build positions in oil & gas ($XOM, $SLB), defense contractors ($LMT, $NOC, $GD), and cybersecurity plays ($PANW, $CRWD)—all before the earnings catch up. Even basic industries like cement and steel ($MLM, $VMC) get bid, as war spending eventually flows into physical rebuilding. Institutional investors don't buy the war — they buy the pattern. And they've modeled this one before. As I often assert, smart money remains unfazed by headlines. It positions itself before the narrative shifts from chaos to control. Saddam Hussein's mug on a 250 dinar bill. Common Misconceptions About War and the Market Isn't this one of the most facile assumptions in investing? War invariably leads to a bear market. It sounds intuitive—conflict must crush confidence—but history simply doesn't support it. Markets don't fear conflict as much as they fear uncertainty. Once the uncertainty begins to fade, capital returns more quickly than most anticipate. Most modern wars involving the U.S. or its allies happen far from domestic markets. Geographic distance plays a crucial role. It limits disruption to supply chains, consumer behavior, and capital formation at home. Even the darkest periods, World War I and Vietnam, were not market disasters solely because of the wars. They coincided with runaway inflation, deep political divisions, and structural economic malaise. It wasn't war that did the damage; it was everything else around it. Here's the truth: Markets don't price in morality. They price in margins. Investors who overlook this often fall behind. As geopolitical tensions simmer, from the Middle East to China-Taiwan to the enduring Russia-Ukraine war and now Iran, smart investors are watching more than the headlines. They're tracking where the money is quietly going. That means defense budgets, cybersecurity mandates, industrial reshoring incentives like the CHIPS Act, and energy independence policies now have market-moving implications. The tactical play isn't just to bet on chaos; it's to identify the companies best positioned to serve sovereign needs. Look to invest in companies with recurring government contracts, especially in defense, logistics, or infrastructure. Hard assets matter too — ports, manufacturing hubs, critical minerals. Bonus points if the company throws off steady cash flow and is still misunderstood by the broader market. Insider buying? Activist involvement? That's smoke before the fire. War Alpha Isn't About Comfort War is uncomfortable. That's precisely why most investors hesitate, giving the advantage to those who don't. Markets aren't moral arbiters; they're mechanisms of capital efficiency. When fear dominates headlines, capital quietly moves toward clarity. In my 30+ years, one thing has held true: when the world watches CNN, smart money watches earnings. Defense contracts get signed. Oil flows shift. The government subsidizes semiconductors. The re-rating begins while most are still glued to the noise. War alpha doesn't wait for peace. Those who comprehend the pattern, not just the panic, capture it in real time.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump opens door to regime change in Iran
President Trump on Sunday suggested regime change in Iran if the current one is 'unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Trump's comments follow his announcement Saturday the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, stepping into a conflict between Iran and Israel that kicked off on June 13 amid already heightened tensions in the region over Israel's war in Gaza and Iran's nuclear capability. In a late Saturday address, the president said, 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' Trump added. The United States warned of a 'heightened threat environment' following Trump's ordering of strikes on the three Iranian nuclear sites. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) bulletin Sunday, giving a heads-up to the public to the possibility of cyberattacks done by those who back Iran or are affiliated with its government. Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley on Wednesday pushed for the U.S. to not 'engage in regime change in Iran.' 'Our focus should only be on our national security. The Iranian regime has threatened the US with nuclear production for years,' Haley, who served in the first term of the president, said.
