Legendary US rock band send supporters wild after dropping MAJOR hint they are reuniting this summer
Talking Heads sent fans into a frenzy after posting a cryptic message on their social media on Monday.
The legendary US rock band - consisting of front man David Byrne, bassist Tina Weymouth, drummer Chris Fantz and guitarist Jerri Harrison - shot to stardom after forming in 1975.
During a 16-year period together the band achieved commercial and critical success thanks to much-loved tracks such as Once in a Lifetime and Road to Nowhere before they split in 1991.
Now, many supporters think they may finally have got their wish for a reunion after the band posted an obscure video on social media.
The animation simply showed the sun and the moon rising behind the caption: 'June 5, 2025.'
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
The date actually marks exactly 50 years since the group's first ever show at the CBGB club in New York, leaving supporters wondering whether a reunion tour could be on the cards this summer.
Thousands of excited fans took to the comments section, writing: 'announce a tour i date are you',
'Just get back together for some shows and make the world a brighter place!',
'IS TALKING HEADS COMING BACK DON'T PLAY WITH MY FEELINGS',
'Give the people what they really want and need, and that's a tour!!!'
It would be the first time the band - who have four albums named in the 2003 Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Albums of All Time list - have performed a live show together since 1984.
If supporters' suspicions are indeed true and Talking Heads are reuniting, it would likely mean the four band members had a change of mind on an offer they received some six months ago.
The group reportedly turned down a whopping $80million offered to them by Live Nation in December for a reunion tour consisting of six to eight festival and concert gigs, Billboard reported.
It came months after the group's lead singer David mended a rift with his former band mates ready for the 40th anniversary of Stop Making Sense, their concert film, which debuted in 1984.
Coachella's curator Paul Tollett told Billboard he also approached the band members in September to play at the iconic California festival - but said that he 'sensed there were no shows happening, so I didn't make an offer.'
Talking Heads announced their split in December 1991, with the bandmembers excluding David briefly and continuing touring as Shrunken Heads.
After a screening of their movie anniversary in September, they did a Q&A with filmmaker Spike Lee, where Chris said: 'It's so good to be here with my bandmates tonight. It's been a long time.'
According to the LA Times, all four members sat in separate rows to watch the film, but claimed '[no] tensions were on display'.
Jerry recently said working together on the re-worked film had been a 'healing experience' for the group.
He revealed: 'We get along OK. It's all very cordial and whatever. It's not like we're all best friends. But everybody's very happy to see this film coming back out.
'We're all united in the fact that we really love what we did here. So that kind of helps us talk to one another and get along.'
When the group split, Chris said their breakup had been caused by David and that he had learned his bandmate was leaving from a Los Angeles Times article.
He said at the time: 'As far as we're concerned, the band never really broke up. David just decided to leave.
'We were never too pleased about the way David handled the situation.'
David has spoken about his regret over the way the band disbanded, telling People last month: 'As a younger person, I was not as pleasant to be around. When I was working on some Talking Heads shows, I was more of a little tyrant.
'And then I learned to relax and I also learned that, collaborating with people, both sides get more if there's a good relationship instead of me telling everybody what to do.
'I think [the end] wasn't handled well. It was kind of ugly. I have regrets on how that was handled.
'I don't think I did it in the best way, but I think it was kind of inevitable that would happen anyway.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Melrose Place icon Courtney Thorne-Smith files for divorce after 18 years of marriage
Actress Courtney Thorne-Smith has officially filed for divorce from her husband Roger Fishman, nearly four years after their reported separation. According to court documents filed earlier this week, per TMZ, Thorne-Smith, 56, is citing irreconcilable differences as the reason for the split. She submitted the paperwork without legal representation and listed their date of separation as September 1, 2021 — suggesting the couple has been living apart for quite some time. Thorne-Smith and Fishman married on January 1, 2007, and welcomed their only child, Jacob Emerson Fishman, the following year. Now 17, Jacob is nearing adulthood, but the Melrose Place star is requesting joint legal and physical custody as part of the divorce proceedings, according to the outlet. In the filing, Thorne-Smith also asked the court to terminate its ability to award spousal support to either party. This marks the actress's second marriage. She was previously wed to geneticist Andrew Conrad from 2000 to 2001 and famously dated her Melrose Place co-star Andrew Shue during the 1990s.
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The line between entertainment and reality is getting fuzzier. But making the distinction is more important than ever
Gina Chick, David Genat, Guy Sebastian, Poh Ling Yeow, Elon Musk and Donald Trump don't have a lot in common – except that they are the living embodiment of the essential truth of reality television: there can only be one winner. Gina, David, Guy, Poh and countless others have turned their success at surviving, dancing, cooking and singing into brilliant careers probably beyond their wildest dreams. Donald Trump applied the same single-mindedness to become the most powerful man in the world. For more than a decade he was in the living rooms of millions of Americans most weeks, picking winners, barking his judgment. Viewers did not see the squadrons of producers, camera operators, sound people, makeup artists, fixers and fawners. Truthiness trumps honesty as most of us understand the concept of accuracy. As a nearly 80-year-old, DJT has instinctively absorbed the lessons of television all his life. While others struggled to make sense of communications scholar Marshall McLuhan's theory that 'the medium is the message', he lived it. He strove to be an influencer before the term was invented; he was, and continues to be, the ultimate product placement. The sneers of others fed him. For all the talk about the power of social media, Elon Musk, learned at his expense that while his platform is great for proclamations, self-promotion and advertising, its narrative power still does not match the ingrained habits of television storytelling. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' he posted, waving a white flag on X. Meanwhile, the rest of us nodded sagely, we knew this would happen, pass the popcorn, enjoy the show. Except this is not a show, even though the logic of television we have all grown up with encourages us to think it is. The man at its centre has the capacity, literally, to destroy the world. This fact that no doubt lingered in the minds of other world leaders as he made a typically attention-winning departure from the G7 Canadian summit last week. He quickly slapped down the French president, Emmanuel Macron, who with typical candour, suggested the president had left to broker peace in the Middle East. Like all stars, DJT also has an enormous capacity to charm. Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor of the Atlantic who did enormous (temporary) damage to the new regime when he revealed he had been included in a classified group chat on Signal organised by Mike Waltz, who not long afterwards ceased to be the president's national security adviser. Goldberg describes a subsequent meeting in the gilded Oval Office: 'What I found on this particular meeting was a Trump who was low-key, attentive and eager to convince us that he is good at his job and good for the country. It isn't easy to escape the tractor beam of his charisma, but somehow we managed.' While a young DJT was absorbing the lessons of the age of television in midtown Manhattan, 50 blocks south, Neil Postman, a brilliant scholar at New York University, feared where this new manufactured reality might lead. In his erudite, yet snappily titled treatise, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman described the way the methods of television had transformed, and in his mind debased, the public sphere. Entertainment and emotion prevail; the worst tendencies in human nature pandered to; truthiness is enough. Postman had little objection to television as entertainment, what worried him was when these methods and rituals were also adopted in news and current affairs, in the serious programs that provide the information that inform big decisions. As we would say now, nuance and complexity are lost. He turned time and again to Aldous Huxley to make sense of what he feared was unfolding. 'He was trying to tell us that what afflicted the people in Brave New World was not that they were laughing instead of thinking, but that they did not know what they were laughing about and why they had stopped thinking.' We are the poorer for not knowing what Postman would make of this moment. He died a year before the first season of The Apprentice went to air in 2004, with 'decent ratings and mocking reviews'. DJT took an elevator 21 floors down to the pretend boardroom on the fourth floor of Trump Tower, where contestants who had been set tasks to rescue his failing enterprises awaited his judgment. As Emily Nussbaum documents in Cue the Sun, at that point no one understood how he would use the platform as a stepping stone to his grander ambition. When he did, one of the early apprentices urged voters to look beyond the artifice of television and recognise the risk. Celebrity was transformed into a vocation. The real world a B-roll backdrop. Australian networks were quick to adopt the formats of reality television, in the process creating some of the best in the genre. Our Housewives of … are considered some of the greatest, and Alone has restored a lost sense of authenticity. Despite Pauline Hanson dancing with the stars, there is still a line between public life and entertainment. But it is getting fuzzier as the attention seeking demands of the contemporary online media environment reward froth and emotion more than substance. Preserving this distinction between real and make-believe is more important than ever. Julianne Schultz is the author of The Idea of Australia, the co-editor of First Things First (Griffith Review) and the librettist of the multi-award-winning opera Black River
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Whoopi Goldberg's shock comparison to living in Iran has Black Americans in disbelief
Black Americans are slamming Whoopi Goldberg after she claimed on The View that living in the United States as a black person is just as bad as living in Iran. The Oscar-winning actress sparked the firestorm during a segment in which co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin praised American freedoms, saying, 'The U.S. in 2025 is not as bad as Iran in 2025.' Goldberg, who is worth an estimated $60 million, immediately cut in: 'Not if you're Black.' That single remark set off a wave of outrage online, especially from fellow black Americans accused the Sister Act star of being completely out of touch with reality. TikTok user Key (@nahzfontee) was among the first to call Goldberg out, posting a passionate video criticizing her for comparing herself to people in a country where women can be jailed or even killed for basic freedoms. 'You're a multi-millionaire black woman on national television saying this?' Key said. 'That alone proves the difference between America and Iran. You have the freedom to say that. In Iran, women can't show their hair. 'They have no freedom of speech, no religion, no protest. Meanwhile, you can march down the street screaming that Trump's a king and nothing happens.' TikTok creator Bigswol (@bigswol) took it a step further, accusing Goldberg of spreading false victimhood while enjoying privileges most people can't dream of. 'Can someone tell Whoopi Goldberg she's rich and black?' he said in his video. 'What the f**k you mean life in America is just as bad as Iran? Women in Iran can't even speak freely. You couldn't wear your favorite outfit over there.' 'America has the most black millionaires in the world - and you're one of them. Nobody in this country would trade places with someone in Iran. And the wildest part? Nobody on The View even pushed back.' But the most blistering takedown came from The Cartier Family, a group of YouTubers whose reaction video went viral. 'She up $60 million talking about her life hard because she black,' host Brandon Rhone said. 'I'm sick of the whole black people are oppressed shit.' 'It's more black people killing each other than the police is killing us. But nobody want to bring it up.' 'There's no way I heard that right,' said the other host Soloman Brant, calling out Goldberg's privilege. 'You probably have security, you're Whoopi Goldberg!' So far, Goldberg has not responded to the growing backlash. But with clips still circulating and high-profile creators weighing in, the pressure to clarify - or double down - is mounting. They added that Goldberg's roles, such as in the movie The Color Purple which examines black poverty, may have distorted Goldberg's view of present-day America. 'So do they believe America is still in like the 1940s, 30s?' chimed co-host Tahj Whitfield. He continued: 'I truly believe we did not suffer as much as our great grandparents and our great great grandparents. We are so blessed right now in America, bro. I don't understand why people keep trying to push us back.' 'If you're black and you're poor and you're born in Africa, you're going to die poor. In America, if you're born poor, you have an opportunity to become rich.' Iran is described as by the US State Department, an 'an authoritarian theocratic republic' ruled by strict Shia Islamist laws. Multiple nationwide protests began in the country in 2022 after the death of Mahsa (Jina) Amini who was taken into custody by the morality police for refusing to wear a hijab. The protests resulted in the deaths of more than 500 people after lethal force was used to quell the backlash. The View's take on the Iran conflict comes as many of Trump's MAGA loyalists urge him to stick to the isolationist platform that first got him elected. On Wednesday, Tucker Carlson released a bombshell interview where Senator Ted Cruz appeared to admit the U.S. is already involved in strikes on Iranian targets. 'You said Israel was,' Carlson said. 'I've said 'we'. Israel is leading, but we're supporting them,' Cruz replied. 'You're breaking news here,' Carlson responded. 'The U.S. government just denied, on Trump's behalf, that we're acting offensively for Israel.' Earlier this week, both Carlson and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon warned on their podcasts that a strike on Iran would be disastrous. They blamed the intelligence 'deep state' and war-hawk Republicans for swaying Trump toward military involvement — and warned it could mean 'the end of his presidency.' Trump brushed off Carlson's criticism at the G7, saying, 'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying. Let him go get a TV network so people listen.'
