DHS sets strict limits on lawmaker visits to immigration detention centers
Live Events
You Might Also Like:
Trump administration gives personal data of immigrant medicaid enrollees to deportation officials
You Might Also Like:
'Any illegal immigrants?' Trump asks White House workers about deportation status
You Might Also Like:
Federal judge says Trump can't tie state funding to immigration enforcement
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has tightened rules for members of Congress visiting immigration detention centers . The new policy requires lawmakers to give up to a week's notice before they can access these facilities, creating fresh tension between federal immigration officials and Democratic lawmakers.Previously, under federal law, members of Congress could enter Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities without advance notice to conduct oversight visits. Staff were only required to provide 24 hours' notice. The updated guidance from ICE, released this month, asks lawmakers to give at least 72 hours' notice — with the Department of Homeland Security going even further, saying visits should ideally be arranged seven days in advance.Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokesperson, said in a statement that a week's notice would 'ensure no intrusion on the president's constitutional authority.' McLaughlin added that any request to visit sooner must first be approved by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)The policy also states ICE can cancel, reschedule, or deny visits if it has 'operational concerns' or if facility managers decide a visit is not appropriate. Another change says ICE field offices are no longer subject to the law allowing lawmakers to make surprise visits — a key part of the federal oversight process.The updated policy comes after tense visits by elected officials to immigration detention sites. In recent months, lawmakers in California, Illinois, and New York reported being kept outside ICE centers for hours. Some were denied entry entirely, even after they had scheduled visits in advance.New Jersey Representative LaMonica McIver and other Democratic lawmakers were among those recently barred from entering an ICE facility in Newark. On the same day, Newark's mayor, Ras Baraka, was briefly arrested when he tried to join the congressional delegation.Representative Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, top Democrat on the House Committee on Homeland Security, called the new restrictions illegal and unconstitutional. 'This guidance is an affront to the Constitution and federal law,' Thompson said in a statement. 'We have an obligation to oversee these taxpayer-funded facilities, and this policy is designed to shut us out.'The issue has already sparked complaints from elected leaders across party lines. Some Republicans have also expressed concern about restrictions that could limit their oversight power.With lawmakers and federal agencies on a collision course over transparency, legal challenges and further protests are expected. Many lawmakers have already indicated they will continue to press for access to ICE facilities without delays.The new policy is expected to face scrutiny in Congress in the coming weeks as the Biden administration responds to the growing controversy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Why bigger may not be better for Indian cities
This is true not just in India, but in other countries, too—such as the growth machines in the US and local governments in China, whose officials are often disciplined for corruption. It is understandable, therefore, if state politicians balk at handing these decisions and rents over to local representatives. By contrast, smaller cities with limited rents may stand a chance of being better governed. The GBA model is perhaps an acknowledgment of this tension with representation. It removes local politicians from decision-making and promises better coordination across civic functions. Should this be a model for the future? What if we had a trade-off, with chief ministers controlling the capital city, as in Bengaluru, but implementing the Constitution's 74th amendment—also known as the Nagarpalika Act—in letter and spirit in the other cities of the state? Could this create an open, constructively competitive ecosystem across secondary cities, resulting in a sustainable and vibrant process of urbanisation, as hoped for by the prime minister? Eventually, those in the capital cities may also demand a voice, emboldened by an encirclement of the state capital—not Mao-like from the countryside, but by smaller cities. Not only is urban governance not representative, it is often also performative. Like anti-smog guns, they have limited effectiveness but look modern and give the appearance of action. Delhi has shifted this expenditure to the private sector, but public money, too, is often spent on ineffective infrastructure that has popular support because of its performative aspect. Consider the metro rails in many cities. While in some they are both necessary and effective, they do little to solve the transportation problem in others. But residents feel proud to live in a city with a metro rail, unaware that for that cost they could have mitigated their transport woes with an effective bus system. Finally, the identity crisis. Is the urban local body an artificial administrative construct and should one instead consider the 'metropolitan area' or 'economic region' determined by commuting, spread of contiguous night lights, or just fiat? How can such regions be governed? Indeed, for cities like Delhi, Bengaluru and Chennai, such a region will spill across even state boundaries and trigger a series of other questions. Are investments such as the Namo Bharat regional rapid transit system, which takes less time to reach Meerut from Delhi than it does to reach parts of Gurugram by road, to be seen as guideposts? Is the preferred expansion of Delhi to be along this corridor? If so, should one shift defence operations to Jewar instead, and develop Hindon as a civilian airport? Where will the existing private investments along the Gurugram-Jaipur route fit into such a plan? No such questions are raised. Urbanisation has been reduced to an assorted collection of schemes and projects, scattered pieces of a jigsaw puzzle that no one is interested in putting together. Maybe, each individual answer has become so lucrative that it's too troublesome to even remember there was a question. Partha Mukhopadhyay | Senior Fellow, Centre for Policy Research, and former member, Technical Advisory Committee, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (Views are personal)
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Europeans' meeting with Iranian foreign minister yields hope of more talks
A meeting between Iran's foreign minister and top European diplomats on Friday yielded hopes of further talks but no indication of any immediate concrete breakthrough, a week after the crisis centered in the Iranian nuclear program erupted into war between Israel and Tehran. Foreign ministers from Britain, France and Germany, as well as the European Union's foreign chief, emerged from talks at a Geneva hotel about 3 1/2 hours after talks with Iran's Abbas Araghchi started. It was the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials since the start of the conflict. 'We leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is fundamentally ready to continue talking about all important issues,' German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said that 'we are keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States.' Lammy traveled to Geneva after meeting in Washington with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump's Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff. Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. He said Wednesday that he'll decide within two weeks whether the US military will get directly involved in the war given the 'substantial chance' for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program. Israel says it launched its airstrike campaign to stop Iran from getting closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon. Iran and the United States had been negotiating over the possibility of a new diplomatic deal over Tehran's program, though Trump has said Israel's campaign came after a 60-day window he set for the talks.
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Judge orders release of Columbia protester Mahmoud Khalil from US detention
A federal judge has ordered the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student, from immigration detention, the Associated Press (AP) reported on Friday. Khalil has been held since early March as the Trump administration tried to deport him over his involvement in pro-Palestinian protests. He was the first student arrested under President Donald Trump's efforts to remove students who took part in campus protests against Israel's military action in Gaza. US District Judge Michael Farbiarz announced his decision in a New Jersey court, AP said. The judge said Khalil should be freed after his lawyers asked either for his release on bail or for him to be moved from a Louisiana jail to New Jersey so he could be closer to his wife and newborn son. 'The government cannot continue to hold Mr Khalil on these grounds,' Judge Farbiarz said, according to AP. The government argued that Khalil, a legal US resident, was being held because he allegedly lied on his green card application. Khalil denies this, saying he answered truthfully. Khalil was detained on 8 March at his home in Manhattan. His lawyers say his arrest is part of an effort to limit free speech. AP said he is not accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. Khalil, who was studying international affairs, acted as a spokesperson and negotiator for the student protesters. He was not among those arrested at the demonstrations, but his public role drew attention. According to AP, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Khalil's presence in the US could harm foreign policy. The Trump administration has said it wants to expel noncitizens who take part in such protests, claiming their views are antisemitic.
