Arctic Wolf celebrates top ANZ partners as channel network doubles
Arctic Wolf has named REDD, CSW-IT, and Ethan Global as the recipients of its 2025 Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) Partner of the Year Awards.
The awards were presented to acknowledge the contribution of partner organisations in delivering security operations and supporting efforts to reduce cyber risk for businesses across the region.
Channel growth
Arctic Wolf reported that its ANZ channel partner community has doubled in size, reflecting the company's continued investment in its partner-led strategy. The firm's global partner network now numbers more than 2,250, including resellers, solution providers, managed service providers (MSPs), cyber insurance collaborators, and technology alliances, spanning more than 100 countries.
Alongside the growth in partner numbers, Arctic Wolf said it serves over 10,000 customers and supports more than 1,000 security engineers worldwide.
Security landscape
The company outlined that organisations in the ANZ region are facing a constantly shifting risk environment, influenced by the adoption of new technologies and increased geopolitical uncertainty. To address these challenges, Arctic Wolf has continued to focus on its partner-first approach and has introduced enhancements to its security platforms and MSP Partner Program.
Following Arctic Wolf's acquisition of Cylance earlier this year, the company's partners in ANZ now have access to expanded go-to-market opportunities, including the latest Security Operations Centre (SOC) offerings and endpoint security solutions.
Partner recognition
The Alpha Partner of the Year award was presented to REDD. Brad Ferris, Chief Executive Officer at REDD, said, "At REDD, we're deeply honoured to be named Arctic Wolf's APAC Alpha Partner of the Year. This recognition reflects our team's relentless commitment to excellence, our customer-obsessed culture, and our focus on delivering world-class security outcomes across Australia and New Zealand. Together with Arctic Wolf, we're helping organisations face today's cybersecurity challenges with clarity, confidence, and resilience."
CSW-IT received the Pack Hunter Partner of the Year award. Callum McDonald, Director at CSW-IT, commented, "We are so excited to be Arctic Wolf's Pack Hunter Partner of the year in Australia. This award reflects the dedication of our team, the strength of our strategic alignment with Arctic Wolf, and our shared commitment to helping customers stay ahead of evolving cyber threats."
Ethan Global was named Rising Star Partner of the Year. Tony Geagea, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer at Ethan Global, said, "There's a reason why Australian organisations choose to work with us. We're more than just a security provider – we're AI, we're managed services, we're cloud, telco, and IT. To get security right, you need to have a holistic understanding of the environment, and that's our speciality. Thank you, Arctic Wolf for this year's Rising Star award - we are very excited about this strategic partnership."
Commitment to the partner ecosystem
David Hayes, Regional Director ANZ at Arctic Wolf, highlighted the importance of the company's partner relationships, stating, "By integrating Arctic Wolf's turnkey solutions, our open XDR platform, and the expertise of our partner teams, we serve as trusted advisors throughout the customer security journey." "As a 100% partner-based company, Arctic Wolf's entire portfolio of services is offered exclusively through our partners. Our local partner community is critical to bringing these innovations to the ANZ market, and we are committed to strengthening these relationships and delivering better outcomes for our customers."
Arctic Wolf indicated that it will continue to build on its partner network in ANZ, aiming to meet expanding customer requirements while supporting efforts to address increasing security threats faced by organisations in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
9 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Exclusive: Logistics firms face rising OT cyber threats amid global tensions
Cyber attackers are increasingly targeting logistics and supply chain networks, aiming to destabilise nations and gain strategic leverage without ever crossing a border. According to Leon Poggioli, ANZ Regional Director at Claroty, the recent cyber espionage affecting logistics firms supporting Ukraine is not an isolated trend but part of a broader pattern. "There's two key reasons nation states do this," he explained during a recent interview with TechDay. "One is to disrupt the other nation's defences, and the other is to put political pressure on the general public by interfering with their supply chains." These attacks frequently target operational technology (OT) systems - the core infrastructure behind physical processes in logistics, energy, manufacturing and healthcare. Poggioli said attackers exploit connectivity in these environments to carry out sabotage remotely. "A lot of these environments have some kind of external connectivity, so that gives an attacker an ability to remotely trigger a cyber attack and disrupt those supply chains." In some cases, tactics have extended to disrupting weapons infrastructure, such as drones. "When one nation uses drones, the other will defend itself by trying to jam signals and disrupt that infrastructure," he explained. Compared to IT systems, OT vulnerabilities can be far more complex and risky to remediate. Poggioli noted that in OT, even small changes can impact safety and operations. "In the IT world, it's easy to push patches out," he said. "In OT, even a minor change can disrupt operations, so remediation needs to be more targeted." Claroty's platform is built to help organisations quickly cut through large volumes of vulnerability data to find what really matters. "A site may have 1,000 vulnerabilities, but we can whittle that down to the five that make the most impact," he said. "That becomes a manageable number that a cyber leader and OT asset manager can act on within weeks." Recent data from Claroty's global survey of cybersecurity professionals reinforces the growing financial and operational risks posed by cyber attacks on cyber-physical systems (CPS). Nearly half of respondents (45%) reported financial impacts of $500,000 USD or more from such attacks in the past year, with over a quarter suffering losses of at least $1 million. These costs were largely driven by lost revenue, recovery expenses, and employee overtime. "It's a growing concern across multiple sectors, particularly in chemical manufacturing, energy, and mining – more than half of organisations in those sectors reported losses over half a million dollars," Poggioli said. Ransomware remains a major burden, especially in sectors like healthcare where 78% of organisations reported paying over $500,000 to regain access to encrypted systems. "These are real costs, not theoretical risks," he added. "And they're rising." Operational downtime is also widespread. Nearly half of global respondents experienced more than 12 hours of downtime following an attack, with one-third suffering outages lasting a full day or more. "When operations halt, the financial and reputational damage mounts quickly," Poggioli said. He added that one of the most pressing vulnerabilities is the level of remote access in these environments. "We're seeing around 45% of CPS assets connected to the internet," he said. "Most of that is done through VPNs that were never built for OT security." Third-party access is another growing concern, with 82% of respondents saying at least one cyber attack in the past year came through a supplier. Nearly half said five or more attacks stemmed from third-party connections, yet 63% admit they don't fully understand how these third parties are connected to their CPS environment. Poggioli pointed to this as a critical blind spot. "Legacy access methods and poor visibility are allowing attackers in through the back door," he said. Even more concerning is the risk from insiders. "You want to be able to trust your team, but someone with inside knowledge can do more damage than an external attacker," Poggioli said. "Even air-gapped environments need constant monitoring." A cyber attack on Denmark's power grid in 2023 served as a wake-up call. "One operator didn't even know they had the vulnerable firewall in their system," he said. "That's why visibility is so important. You can't secure what you don't know exists." While preparedness across the logistics sector varies, Poggioli believes the industry is slowly recognising the strategic value of cybersecurity. "It's going to become a point of competitive advantage," he said. "Customers are going to start asking serious questions about cyber security and supply chain integrity." He drew a sharp distinction between cyber criminals and state-backed actors. "Cyber criminals want fast financial gain, but nation states are more focused on political objectives," he said. "They have better resources and longer timelines. That changes the game." Poggioli warned that just because no incident has occurred doesn't mean attackers aren't already embedded in critical networks. "There's growing evidence of adversaries nesting in these systems," he said. "My hypothesis is they're preparing for future conflict. If war breaks out, they're already in position to strike." For logistics firms looking to strengthen their defences, Poggioli said the first step is basic visibility. "Most people I speak to admit they don't know 100% what's out there or how it's connected," he said. "Start with an asset inventory. Once you have that, you can start risk modelling and reduce exposure." There are signs that resilience strategies are making a difference. According to the Claroty report, 56% of professionals now feel more confident in their CPS systems' ability to withstand cyber attacks than they did a year ago, and 72% expect measurable improvements in the next 12 months. Still, Poggioli said complacency is not an option. "If you don't know how big the problem is, you won't know how to solve it," he said. "Once you understand the risks, you can act to protect your operations and show the business the value of cyber security."
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Six months out from social media ban, age-checking tech mistakes kids for 37-year-olds
Face-scanning technology tests could only guess age within an 18-month range in 85 percent of cases. Photo: Supplied/ABC Children as young as 15 were repeatedly misidentified as being in their 20s and 30s during Government tests of age-checking tools, sowing new doubts over whether the teen social media ban is viable. ABC News can reveal that face-scanning technology tested on school students this year could only guess their age within an 18-month range in 85 percent of cases. "It's definitely a problem," said Andrew Hammond, general manager of software consultancy firm KJR, which was tasked with running the trial. "So far, it's not perfect and it's not getting every child, but does that mean it's no good at all?" The full results of the age assurance technology trial were not expected to be released until later this year, but preliminary data had experts worried. "I don't think the ban is viable," said RMIT University information services professor Lisa Given, who had closely analysed the Government's policy. "Parents are definitely headed for a rude shock, in terms of what this legislation will actually deliver to them." Under the social media ban, more than 20 million Australians will be required to demonstrate they are 16 or older to log in to most major social media platforms. The ban is due to take effect in December, but the Government has yet to decide how it will be implemented, amid ongoing questions over whether age-checking technology is up to the job. The Government's technology trial, which has been running for eight months, was meant to provide some answers, but Professor Given said the public may be disappointed. "The accuracy level at 85 [percent] is actually quite low and an 18-month range is significant, when you're trying to identify a very particular age grouping," she said. "We are going to see a messy situation emerging immediately, where people will have what they call false positives, false negatives." Some students at Canberra's John Paul College, who previewed the technology as part of the Government's trial, were surprised, when their results were up to decades off the mark. Sixteen-year-old Andy was misidentified as 19, 37, 26, and 23 years old by various face-scanning tools he used. "I don't think the technology is ready yet to become a full-fledged primary defence system," he said. "It's pretty inconsistent." Seventeen-year-old Beth was given results ranging from 14-32. "I usually get told by other people that I don't look 17, I look older, so when it says 14, I thought… that's interesting." Her results from the other end of the spectrum were unwelcome for different reasons. "It's a bit insulting, because that's how old my aunty is," she said. "I don't want to look 32 just yet." Seventeen-year-old Nomi was especially concerned, when one tool mistook her for a 13-year-old. "I'm almost 18," she said. "If I try to sign up to an app and it tells me 'you're not meeting an age requirement', even though I am, that would be a problem for me." While the face-scanning results from the trial may not seem promising, Hammond said he was confident the ban would still work, because it did not rely exclusively on that tech. "If the solution to implementing the legislation was just facial age estimation, I'd say, 'Yep, it's probably not good enough'," he said. "However, it's just one of the tools in the toolkit that could be used." Age-verification providers are not discouraged by the early results either, arguing that other tech was always going to be necessary as a complement to get precise results. "You would never rely on age estimation for people who are literally at the age of 16," said Iain Corby from the Age Verification Providers Association, the industry body for age-check companies. "It was never going to be good enough for that," he said. One tool mistook Beth, 17, as being 32 years old. Photo: ABC News Corby said the early data reported by ABC News, showing an accuracy rate within 18 months for only 85 percent of students, is roughly what he expected. "I think even the best-in-class achieves about a year and a month, on average, above or below your real age." Among the methods tested were other age-estimation techniques that rely on biological traits, such as voice and hand movements, to guess the age of a user, but those methods struggled with the same accuracy issues and fewer companies offered the service. Another avenue was guessing a person's age based on their online activity, but that was also imprecise. Other tools offer a higher degree of certainty by inferring or even verifying a user's age, using data provided by third parties, such as banks, schools or healthcare providers. The strongest proof is a overnment-issued ID, such as a passport or a driver's license, but the legislation prevented social media companies from insisting on it. A last-minute amendment to the Bill, when it was passed back in November, meant platforms would be forced to offer users alternative methods to prove their age. That rule meant many Australians who could not easily provide those more reliable proofs might be forced to rely on less accurate methods, such as face scanning, if they wanted to use social media. "We do know, generally, that young people are going to be less likely to have a Government-issued ID that would satisfy some form of age verification," Given said. If facial scanning was on offer, under-16s who wanted to dodge the ban might be tempted to choose it anyway, in the hope they could fool it. "They might put glasses on, they might put make-up on, different hairstyle, different lighting, just to see if the system is actually able to accurately see that they're underage or over 16," Given said. The Government was expected to decide how the ban would work in the coming months, but one possible solution for the shakiness of facial scanning was a cascade-style system, similar to what we've see in bottle shops. Users might use face-scanning tech as a first hurdle and only be asked for further proof, if their result was within a 5-10-year margin of 16. "If you're within that margin for error, then you have to go to a second stage and find some other way of confirming that somebody is over the legal age," Corby said. Even so, everyone agreed it would not be perfect. "I'm optimistic, having seen the results," Hammond said. "Not necessarily making sure every 16-year-old doesn't get access, but making sure that most 16-year-olds don't get access to social media. "There's a number of solutions… and they have a level of accuracy. Now, whether the accuracy is good enough is a different question." Professor Given saw the end of the tech trial as an opportunity to reconsider the ban. "A responsible decision from Government would be weighing up the evidence in front of them and deciding whether that's actually a robust approach," she said. In the meantime, public expectations of the policy remained undeterred. "I think it's a really positive move for our young people," said John Paul College principal Craig Wattam. "I think that limiting their exposure to places that are potentially really dangerous is a really liberating thing." On the question of the tech's accuracy, he was also optimistic. "I guess this is the whole purpose of a trial," he said. "I'm confident that by the time we get closer to December… they may well have figured out more accurate ways to verify students' ages." A spokesperson for Communications Minister Anika Wells told ABC News the Government would be guided by advice from the eSafety Commissioner on how best to implement the ban. "We know that social media age-restrictions will not be the end-all, be-all solution for harms experienced by young people online, but it's a step in the right direction to keep our kids safer," they said. - ABC
Techday NZ
3 days ago
- Techday NZ
Harbor Solutions launches in ANZ to boost cyber recovery
Harbor Solutions has announced its strategic entry into the Australian and New Zealand markets, extending its cyber resiliency and data recovery services in partnership with cybersecurity provider Rubrik. Steven Baker has been appointed as the ANZ Country Manager and will oversee the regional expansion. In his new role, Baker is responsible for identifying new opportunities, driving growth, and leading operations, which include sales, marketing, partnerships, and customer outcomes. Market context The decision to expand into Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) comes in response to increasing regional demand for robust cyber recovery services amid rising cyber threats. Recent research from Rubrik indicates that 92% of local organisations experienced a cyberattack in the past year. Of those affected, 78% reported partial harm to their backup and recovery options, and 35% said the attack was completely successful in this regard. As hybrid IT environments and cloud adoption accelerate, many organisations remain unprepared to address new vulnerabilities, spurring the need for effective cyber recovery models and strategies that span technology, people, process, and incident response. "Many organisations today are still using back up technology that was never intended to support them in the wake of a cyberattack," said David Rajkovic, Regional Vice President, Australia and New Zealand at Rubrik. "Companies need a cyber resilience strategy that allows them to rapidly recover data and operations from a specific point in time, as close to the intrusion point as possible." Strategic growth and leadership Harbor's entry into ANZ is the first phase of its wider APAC growth strategy. The company aims to secure a significant share of future revenue from international markets and cites strong cultural alignment as a reason for choosing Australia as its initial launchpad in the region. Baker's appointment as Country Manager will see him report directly to Harbor's Chief Revenue Officer. His responsibilities cover the full spectrum of business operations in the region. "We're not just expanding geographically; we're scaling a model that's proven to deliver results when it matters most," said James Harris, CEO, Harbor Solutions. "Clients today aren't looking for just another vendor. They need partners who can deliver cyber recovery outcomes in the midst of chaos. Our ability to operationalise complex recovery into clear, repeatable processes is what truly resonates in the ANZ market." Baker also highlighted the significance of this market for Harbor's services, noting the technology adoption rate in the region: "Business resilience today relies on meticulous data management - ensuring security, maintaining compliance, and mitigating risk are no longer optional; they're essential," said Baker. "Leading Harbor's expansion in ANZ is an exciting opportunity. The region is at the forefront of technical adoption, especially in cloud technologies, and we see strong synergy between cloud tech and our expertise." Partnership and customer benefits The expansion has been driven in close partnership with Rubrik, allowing Harbor to offer localised, managed services based on Rubrik's data protection platform. The collaboration is designed to deliver customers improved recovery outcomes with faster and more effective response to cyber incidents. Rajkovic highlighted the value of the partnership for local businesses: "Harbor Solutions' presence in ANZ is a strategic advantage for us to scale business together and ensure organisations are equipped with the cyber recovery services they need to keep their businesses operating even in the midst of a serious cyber attack," said Rajkovic. "Harbor has a track record of delivering real, measurable recovery outcomes for customers. Together, we can offer organisations what they need to face today's threats and tomorrow's challenges." Harbor Solutions, founded in 2014, provides end-to-end data protection services and offers solutions designed to safeguard businesses from cyber threats and operational disruptions, integrating with existing infrastructure to support business continuity and data security objectives. The company supports multiple vendors and platforms, and was recognised with the Rubrik Global MSP of the Year award in 2024. Follow us on: Share on:
