Canada make new rules wey go cancel temporary resident visas, work and study permit - Who go dey affected

Canada don introduce new rules wey go affect temporary residents for di kontri sake of say dem wan protect dia borders and immigration system.
Dis new rules dey come afta several immigration policy wey dey intended to reduce di number of pipo wey dey apply to stay for Canada.
According to di Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), di new rules go empower immigration officials to fit cancel temporary residents documents under some circumstances.
Dem tok say dis cancellation go include electronic travel authorization (eTAs), work and study permit, temporary resident visas (TRVs).
For February 12, 2025, IRCC announce di Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations wey also be di cancellation of Immigration documents.
Di regulations say officer get reasonable grounds to believe say any foreign national no go comot for Canada by di end of di period wey dem authorize for dem to stay.
Meanwhile, Canada say dem dey welcome individuals from kontris all ova di world wey wan study, visit or even work but dem gatz comply wit di eligibility requirements under di Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Regulations.
Canada add say all temporary residents gatz get a TRV or eTA so dem go fit enta di kontri and dose wey wan study or work gatz get permit.
All dis documents dey important to study for Canada unless di Immigration exempt pesin and now, officials get di power to ct wen issues about temporary documents come up.
On di oda hand, Canada say dem dey expect 'approximately 7 000 additional cancellations of temporary resident visas, work permits and study permit documents'.
Dis new rules go affect international students for Canada and even dose wey just wan apply for di new year. Meanwhile, Canada bin officially set to issue 437,000 study permits for international students applications in 2025.
Dis na part of how dem wan reduce international students numbers, but wit dis new rules, Canada immigration officials go fit cancel some permits under certain circumstances.
Dis dey come afta report show say about 50,000 international students wey apply for study permit for Canada to get higher education no show for di school wey dem apply to.
For January 2025, according to di goment data from spring 2024, di number of dose wey dey affected reach 50,000 from kontris like Nigeria, Rwanda, Ghana, Iran among odas.
Di data show say na India and China be di kontri wey dey top di list of di kontris wey get di highest number of non-compliant student applicants wey no show up for di schools wey dey suppose enrol into.
Howeva, dis new rules go affect even students wey no get di correct residency documents wey fit allow dem stay for Canada and dose wey dey stay illegally.
Reasons for temporary visa cancellation
IRCC tok according to Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations say di ground wey go make officials cancel temporary visa include:
Dose wey go dey affected?
According to di new rules, pipo wey go dey affected include students wey dey apply for study permit for Canada.
Di cancellation of temporary Canadian study permit fit be sake of administrative errors or if di pesin dia.
"An officer fit cancel a study permit wey dem issue to a foreign national if di officer dey satisfied say di study permit dey issued based on administrative error, or if di foreign national die."
Di new rules go also affect dose wey get work permit for Canada and immigration fit cancel di temporary visa.
"Work permit go dey invalid wen e expire or wen e dey cancelled or if di officer dey satisfied say di work permit dey issued based on an administrative error or e die."
Dose wey dey visit for oda purposes go dey affected also if dia documents no complete, dey die or na administrative error dem use get di temporary visa.
Consequences of temporary resident visa cancellation
Di impact of dis new changes on foreign nationals dey expected to dey small but di cancellation don alreadi dey happun.
Dose wey dey affected by dis new rules go face di following:

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

4 hours ago

• The Independent

ICE detains Marine Corps veteran's wife who was still breastfeeding their child

Marine Corps veteran Adrian Clouatre doesn't know how to tell his children where their mother went after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers detained her last month. When his nearly 2-year-old son Noah asks for his mother before bed, Clouatre just tells him, ' Mama will be back soon.' When his 3-month-old, breastfeeding daughter Lyn is hungry, he gives her a bottle of baby formula instead. He's worried how his newborn will bond with her mother absent skin-to-skin contact. His wife, Paola, is one of tens of thousands of people in custody and facing deportation as the Trump administration pushes for immigration officers to arrest 3,000 people a day. Even as Marine Corps recruiters promote enlistment as protection for families lacking legal status, directives for strict immigrant enforcement have cast away practices of deference previously afforded to military families, immigration law experts say. The federal agency tasked with helping military family members gain legal status now refers them for deportation, government memos show. To visit his wife, Adrian Clouatre has to make an eight-hour round trip from their home in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to a rural ICE detention center in Monroe. Clouatre, who qualifies as a service-disabled veteran, goes every chance he can get. Paola Clouatre, a 25-year-old Mexican national whose mother brought her into the country illegally more than a decade ago, met Adrian Clouatre, 26, at a southern California nightclub during the final months of his five years of military service in 2022. Within a year, they had tattooed each other's names on their arms. After they married in 2024, Paola Clouatre sought a green card to legally live and work in the U.S. Adrian Clouatre said he is 'not a very political person' but believes his wife deserved to live legally in the U.S. 'I'm all for 'get the criminals out of the country,' right?" he said. "But the people that are here working hard, especially the ones married to Americans — I mean, that's always been a way to secure a green card.' Detained at a green card meeting The process to apply for Paola Clouatre's green card went smoothly at first, but eventually she learned ICE had issued an order for her deportation in 2018 after her mother failed to appear at an immigration hearing. Clouatre and her mother had been estranged for years — Clouatre cycled out of homeless shelters as a teenager — and up until a couple of months ago, Clouatre had 'no idea' about her mother's missed hearing or the deportation order, her husband said. Adrian Clouatre recalled that a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services staffer asked about the deportation order during a May 27 appointment as part of her green card application. After Paola Clouatre explained that she was trying to reopen her case, the staffer asked her and her husband to wait in the lobby for paperwork regarding a follow-up appointment, which her husband said he believed was a 'ploy.' Soon, officers arrived and handcuffed Paola Clouatre, who handed her wedding ring to her husband for safekeeping. Adrian Clouatre, eyes welling with tears, said he and his wife had tried to 'do the right thing' and that he felt ICE officers should have more discretion over arrests, though he understood they were trying to do their jobs. 'It's just a hell of a way to treat a veteran,' said Carey Holliday, a former immigration judge who is now representing the couple. 'You take their wives and send them back to Mexico?' The Clouatres filed a motion for a California-based immigration judge to reopen the case on Paola's deportation order and are waiting to hear back, Holliday said. Less discretion for military families Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement that Paola Clouatre 'is in the country illegally" and that the administration is 'not going to ignore the rule of law.' 'Ignoring an Immigration Judge's order to leave the U.S. is a bad idea,' U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a June 9 post on X which appeared to refer to Clouatre's case. The agency added that the government 'has a long memory and no tolerance for defiance when it comes to making America safe again.' Prior to the Trump administration's push to drive up deportations, USCIS provided much more discretion for veterans seeking legal status for a family member, said Holliday and Margaret Stock, a military immigration law expert. In a Feb. 28 memo, the agency said it 'will no longer exempt' from deportation people in groups that had received more grace in the past. This includes the families of military personnel or veterans, Stock said. As of June 12, the agency said it has referred upward of 26,000 cases to ICE for deportation. USCIS still offers a program allowing family members of military personnel who illegally entered the U.S. to remain in the country as they apply for a green card. But there no longer appears to be room for leeway, such as giving a veteran's spouse like Paola Clouatre the opportunity to halt her active deportation order without facing arrest, Stock said. But numerous Marine Corps recruiters have continued to post ads on social media, geared toward Latinos, promoting enlistment as a way to gain 'protection from deportation' for family members. 'I think it's bad for them to be advertising that people are going to get immigration benefits when it appears that the administration is no longer offering these immigration benefits,' Stock said. 'It sends the wrong message to the recruits.' Marine Corps spokesperson Master Sgt. Tyler Hlavac told The Associated Press that recruiters have now been informed they are 'not the proper authority' to 'imply that the Marine Corps can secure immigration relief for applicants or their families.' ___ Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

The Guardian

8 hours ago

• The Guardian

Judge orders release of Kilmar Ábrego García as he awaits federal trial

A Tennessee judge on Sunday ordered the release of Kilmar Ábrego García, whose mistaken deportation has become a flashpoint in Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, while he awaits a federal trial on human smuggling charges. But he is not expected to be allowed to go free. At his 13 June detention hearing, prosecutors said US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) would take Ábrego García into custody if he were released on the criminal charges, and he could be deported before he has a chance to stand trial. US magistrate judge Barbara Holmes has scheduled a hearing for Wednesday to discuss the conditions of Ábrego García's release. The US government has already filed a motion to appeal the judge's release order. Holmes acknowledged in her ruling on Sunday that determining whether Ábrego García should be released is 'little more than an academic exercise' because Ice will probably detain him. But the judge wrote that everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence and 'a full and fair determination of whether he must remain in federal custody pending trial'. Holmes wrote that the government failed to prove that Ábrego García was a flight risk, that he posed a danger to the community or that he would interfere with proceedings if released. 'Overall, the Court cannot find from the evidence presented that Ábrego's release clearly and convincingly poses an irremediable danger to other persons or to the community,' the judge wrote. Ábrego García has pleaded not guilty to the smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify the deportation mistake after the fact. The acting US attorney for the middle district of Tennessee, Rob McGuire, argued on 13 June that the likely attempt by Ice to try to deport him was one reason to keep him in jail. But Holmes said then that she had no intention of 'getting in the middle of any Ice hold'. 'If I elect to release Mr Ábrego, I will impose conditions of release, and the US Marshal will release him.' If he is released into Ice custody, that is 'above my pay grade', she said. The judge suggested that the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security could work out between themselves whether the government's priority is to try him on the criminal charges or deport him. No date has been set for the trial. Will Allensworth, an assistant federal public defender representing Ábrego García at the detention hearing, told Holmes that 'it's not necessarily accurate that he would be immediately deported.' A 2019 immigration judge's order prevents Ábrego García, who had been living in Maryland, from being deported to his home country of El Salvador, Allensworth said in court. That's because he faces a credible threat from gangs there, according to court papers. The government could deport him to a third country, but immigration officials would first be required to show that third country was willing to keep him and not simply deport him back to El Salvador, Allensworth said. The smuggling charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee during which Ábrego García was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Although officers suspected possible smuggling, he was allowed to go on his way with only a warning. He has pleaded not guilty. At the detention hearing, McGuire said cooperating witnesses have accused Ábrego García of trafficking drugs and firearms and of abusing the women he transported, among other claims. Although he is not charged with such crimes, McGuire said they showed Ábrego García to be a dangerous person who should remain in jail pretrial. Ábrego García's attorneys have characterized the smuggling case as a desperate attempt to justify the mistaken deportation. The investigation was launched weeks after the US government deported Ábrego García and the supreme court ordered the administration to facilitate his return amid mounting public pressure. The US is now expected to try to deport him again with much of the world watching and the outcome hard to predict. Most people in Ice custody who are facing criminal charges are not kept in the US for trial but deported, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, an Ohio State University law professor, said. The US will probably try to deport Ábrego García quickly without going before an immigration judge, the professor said. The government would not need a conviction to deport him because Ábrego García came to the US illegally. 'The legal standard is laxer,' García Hernández said. 'The government's argument is on stronger legal footing.' However an immigration judge rules, the decision can be appealed to the board of immigration appeals, García Hernández said. And the board's ruling can then be contested in a federal appeals court.

Daily Mail​

9 hours ago

• Daily Mail​

Labour voters think biggest burden on NHS is migration... as 1,000 more migrants arrive in small boats in just two days

Labour 's own voters now see high immigration as the biggest single pressure on the National Health Service, a survey has found. The poll of 2,000 people who last year voted Sir Keir Starmer into Downing Street came as another 437 migrants in small boats crossed the Channel to Britain on Friday, followed by 583 on Saturday. It illustrates the threat to the party posed by Reform UK's immigration policies, which includes freezing all non-essential immigration and stopping the illegal small-boat Channel crossings. The survey asked the Labour voters which out of five issues creates 'the biggest burden' for the NHS, and some 24 per cent said high immigration. And when asked about their voting intentions, 22 per cent said they would consider voting Reform at the next General Election, while 40 per cent declared approval for the party's leader, Nigel Farage. The latest Home Office figures on dinghy crossings of the English Channel for the year to date is 18,400 – a rise of almost 50 per cent on this time last year. By this date in 2024, 12,644 had arrived in small boats, in 2023 there had been 10,691 arrivals and in 2022 it was 11,739. Downing Street admitted last week that the dinghy situation was 'deteriorating'. A spokesman for the Adam Smith Institute, which commissioned the survey, said: 'It is clear that the British people have felt the impact of mass immigration on healthcare.' The poll found that the other burdens for the NHS included 22 per cent who chose the 'mental health crisis' while 13 per cent blamed the lack of social care provision, such as care home space for the elderly.