Report finds inadequacies and lost emails at the City Chambers
The City of Edinburgh Council will next week discuss a report by former Information Commissioner, Kevin Dunion, which he has presented to them after a four month long investigation.
In February the council appointed Mr Dunion to report to them on matters surrounding former Council Leader, Cllr Cammy Day, who had resigned as council leader in December 2024 amid allegations of misconduct against him.
In the report Mr Dunion suggests ending Christmas parties held by political groups within the City Chambers, questions the working arrangements of the council where officers work in Waverley Court while councillors work in offices on the High Street, and suggests a refreshed induction and training process for new councillors in regard to the Councillors Code of Conduct, with an annual refresher for existing councillors. Mr Dunion said many of his interviewees suggested the practice of holding such social events in the City Chambers should cease.
He reminds councillors that the Code of Conduct revised in 2021 states that each one of the 63 elected in Edinburgh gives a personal undertaking: 'I will meet the public's expectations by ensuring that my conduct is above reproach.' There are also declarations on the part of the councillor that they will not engage in bullying or harassment.
Chief Executive Paul Lawrence said: 'I want to thank Kevin Dunion for leading this sensitive review and for his report, not least given the complexity of the brief and tight timescales.
'I know this must have been challenging and a difficult experience for many people and I particularly want to thank those who came forward to be interviewed or provided information to the review. Your input is very much appreciated.
'Subject to approval by councillors next Thursday, we will bring a further report back to the Policy and Sustainability Committee in August, outlining our proposed actions in response to Mr Dunion's recommendations.'
The Dunion Report
Cllr Day denied any wrongdoing, saying that any communication of explicit photos on dating apps, which was the inappropriate behaviour he was accused of, was his personal business, but he stepped down as leader on 9 December 2024. He was also administratively suspended by the Labour Party.
Police Scotland said there was not enough evidence to mount an investigation and the Ethical Standards Commissioner confirmed to The Edinburgh Reporter in April this year that there were no other complaints 'currently being investigated against Cllr Day' (except an historic one regarding a Labour Christmas party and whether booking procedures had been followed correctly). That complaint was made against Cllr Day and five of his Labour colleagues but was dismissed.
Mr Dunion was charged with considering whether the allegations against Cllr Day were properly considered and investigated in line with the council's policies and procedures. The allegations involved two whistleblowing disclosures made in 2023, a complaint to the Chief Executive, Andrew Kerr, in December 2023 and an anonymous complaint to the then Council Leader, Cllr Adam McVey, in 2018.
Regarding this last complaint Mr Dunion writes: 'The Business Manager [to the Council Leader] at the time said that they would deal with it and responded on 17 May 2018 as follows: 'I am very sorry to read your email and as I handle the Leader's emails, I am responding to ask you to contact the police as we cannot take any action on such a serious allegation. Also, I am concerned that you need to approach someone or an organisation to help support you through this.' According to the former Council Leader, he did not see this response sent by his Business Manager until it was published online in 2024.'
In relation to the 2018 allegation the finding is that the former council leader (Cllr McVey) 'now accepts that he should, at the least, have informed the Monitoring Officer'. He confirmed reading the email and discussing it with staff. Emails from 2018 – despite extensive investigations by an IT consultancy – could not be recovered, as the Council Leader's Business Manager had left the council by then, and that email account was removed. Although Cllr McVey mentioned the matter to a Chief Superintendent with whom he had a regular meeting, he was told that unless there was someone named (victim or perpetrator) then nothing could be done by the police.
Despite allegations on social media and in the press of the content of the complaint, the handling of this is defined by Mr Dunion as inadequate – mainly due to the insufficient records kept by the council.
Mr Dunion conducted interviews with 29 people and received 20 written representations from current and former councillors and council staff. All councillors had been invited to interview. Chief Executive Paul Lawrence said in his report to next week's council: 'As part of the remit all elected members and colleagues were invited to participate in the process.'
SafeCall
The whistleblowing procedure SafeCall deals with allegations of misconduct among council staff, and Mr Dunion suggests extending that to councillors as it might 'discourage unacceptable behaviour'. There is also a suggestion this confidential service could be extended to members of the public who could then use it to retain their anonymity.
Mr Dunion said in the report: 'Even if Safecall advised them to go to the police, as the Business Manager did, at least a record of the complaint would exist, and the Monitoring Officer would have been aware of it. Consideration should be given to routing complainants to Safecall for the purpose of confidential information gathering and advice.'
Leaks
Mr Dunion was also asked to consider apparent leaks of confidential emails to the press and whether safeguards in the council are sufficient to prevent any instances of behaviour such as that alleged against the former council leader.
He speculates that leaks may be politically motivated: 'Unfortunately, however, as has occurred there may be a temptation to leak details to cause political or personal embarrassment.' A confidential email from the Chief Executive to political group leaders found its way into the Daily Record in December 2024.
As well as this, Mr Dunion found that text from a confidential report dating from May 2024 to the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee was leaked by someone who had access to the report – and who concluded that the unnamed senior individual in question was Cllr Day.
Mr Dunion appears quite frustrated by this leak and said: 'I have interviewed the members of the Sub-Committee. They clearly understand the confidentiality requirements placed upon them regarding the reports they receive, as well as the verbal updates and discussions at committee. I have individually challenged each one over the leak, as to whether they are directly responsible for providing it to The Times or have disclosed the information to someone else who may have done so. All have denied doing so. Many have expressed a view on this however there is no evidence which would allow an assertion to be made by me. Nor are there any proportionate means within the limited capacity of this review to do more.
'There is no doubt however that this constitutes an egregious breach of the confidentiality requirements of Councillors Code of Conduct and undermines confidence in the whistleblowing process. It calls into question whether whistleblowing complaints regarding councillors should be investigated or whether the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee has to be provided with information regarding such investigations.'
Mr Dunion has also suggested that the council uses the 2025 staff engagement survey for feedback on speaking up and raising concerns about possible bullying and harassment from councillors.
Cllr Cammy Day was elected as Council Leader in 2022
Christmas parties
The report mentions in particular the Christmas parties held by all political groups within the City Chambers when alcohol is served. There is a council policy on alcohol for staff, but not for councillors, and it advises staff not to allow themselves to become intoxicated or their judgement impaired. If they do then there is a clear warning of disciplinary action.
After a 2023 party it is alleged that a young Ukrainian man made a complaint of sexual harassment to a councillor who communicated it to councillors in another political party. 'It referenced unsolicited messages and images being sent through social media which continued even after asking for the behaviour to stop. The recipient was said to be feeling extremely harassed.'
There is a complex timeline regarding this complaint and one other which were made anonymously or semi-anonymously. Neither were followed up on by the complainants, with the first unable to provide evidence. As is usual, nothing of these whistleblowing complaints was communicated to Cllr Day until December 2024.
The report states: 'The complained of councillor is not mentioned by name in the email exchanges. However, in conversation prior to the formal email being submitted, the Chief Executive was made aware that it related to Councillor Day.' The Chief Executive did raise this matter with police, but they deemed there was insufficient evidence for any investigation to take place. In regard to this complaint Mr Dunion was content that proper procedure had been followed.
Mr Dunion has now presented the report in which he outlines in some detail what happened since December 2024, and makes recommendations as to what the council will do about his findings.
Recommendations
Mr Dunion has made 14 recommendations:
(i) Review procedures currently in place for dealing with potentially
inappropriate behaviour by Councillors. Clarify and expand routes of
complaints.
(ii) Ensure, whatever the source, that a record of complaints, and
responses to them, are maintained, even if it is informally addressed or
resolved, to reflect the Councillors Code of Conduct provisions
regarding Bullying and Harassment.
(iii) Distinguish between the source of complaints. For staff members, the
response should seek to align with HR policies and have a clear
escalation and feedback route, as well as consideration of recording
and monitoring to allow actions to be agreed and implemented.
(iv) Review and communicate safeguarding arrangements for those who
raise complaints.
(v) Ensure that Council staff, line managers, Speak Up Supporters, Trade
Unions and Colleague Networks are aware of the provisions at (iii) and
(iv) above.
(vi) Where appropriate, details in relation to specific managerial response
or handling of complaints to be passed to Service Director – HR for
consideration of potential actions in line with relevant HR Policy.
(vii) Consider inclusion of relevant speaking up and raising concerns
questions to gain wider staff feedback as part of colleague engagement
survey due to be conducted during 2025 to allow further actions to be
considered.
(viii) Review the Whistleblowing policy and the extent to which complaints
against councillors from the public will be accepted for information
gathering and escalation.
(ix) Consideration should be given to referring complainants to Safecall for
the purpose of information gathering and advice.
(x) Review the scrutiny function of the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee, as
to whether or to what extent it can propose operational actions to
resolve complaints.
(xi) In the event it is decided to accept Whistleblowing complaints against
councillors, consider measures to avoid conflict of interest and reduce
the prospect of breaches of confidence, such as restricted information
being provided to the Whistleblowing Sub-Committee.
(xii) Refresh induction and training process for new councillors and
undertake annual refresher training for existing Councillors on
Councillors Code of Conduct, incorporating the Protocol for
Relationships between Councillors and Employees and Advice Note for
Councillors on Bullying and Harassment, as well as any other relevant
City of Edinburgh Council specific guidance or procedures, including
that when agreed at (i) above.
(xiii) As part of wider culture and fostering trust, consider the impact of the
current working locations, and relationship and networking
opportunities with Councillors and staff.
(xiv) Consider the appropriateness of social events and hospitality
arrangements.
Edinburgh City Chambers. Photo: © 2022, Martin P. McAdam www.martinmcadam.com
Like this:
Like
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
36 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Hope for 100s of Scots jobs hit by bus firm plan to go to England
And it has emerged that the SNP-led Scottish Government and the Labour-led UK Government have agreed to establish a joint working group to discuss options to find a solution and avert job losses. They are looking at how far they 'can push' the UK 'state aid' rules set out in the Subsidy Control Act 2022 to create a support package to save the 400 jobs. The second meeting of that working group was held on Monday last week and it is due to meet again this week. An Alexander Dennis source said that they are engaging with both governments "in good faith on the possibility of any intervention" and stressed that a final decision on the move had not yet been made. Read more: The Scottish Government came under fire after the deputy first minister Kate Forbes pledged to leave "no stone unturned" in securing a future for ADL. Kate Forbes (Image: Colin Mearns) Ministers have said there was "cause of hope in terms of looking at a way through the challenges". A row erupted in the Scottish Parliament in the wake of revelations in the Herald over the depth of the public funding for Scottish jobs over the past ten years - and even while it was cutting back its workforce by a third five years ago. The Herald also revealed how the First Minister was warned of Alexander Dennis concerns last summer a year before announcing plans last week to relocate to England putting 400 jobs at risk. Alexander Dennis, which has factories in Falkirk and Larbert, said it was considering moving manufacturing to a site in Scarborough. The plans would see work at the Falkirk site discontinued, while the Larbert site would be closed after current contracts are completed. The company said it was facing strong competition from Chinese electric bus manufacturers whose share of the market had risen from 10% to 35%. Alexander Dennis, which manufactures single and double decker buses, said the new proposed structure would lower costs and increase efficiency. Calls have been made to claw public money back money if Alexander Dennis follows through with its plans. The Herald revealed that the row between ministers and ADL emerged over levels of support and had its roots in Scottish Government schemes launched from 2020 to accelerate the use and manufacture of zero and low emission buses in Scotland and 'help drive a green recovery out of the Covid pandemic" which have been worth a total of £155.8m to date. The SNP launched their financial case for Scottish independence at Alexander Dennis (Image: Newsquest) Frustrations emerged after May 2023 when Alexander Dennis hosted the second phase of the Scottish Government's Zero Emissions Bus Challenge Fund (ScotZEB) which was to have funding worth £58m. It also showcased its Enviro100EV concept, a lightweight single-deck zero-emission bus with new in-house battery powertrain confirmed that grant backing accelerated its development. In a scathing letter seen by The Herald, Paul Soubry, president and chief executive of Alexander Dennis's parent company NFI, told John Swinney that recent developments had 'regretfully left [them] with the impression that the Scottish Government has little regard for domestic bus manufacturing jobs in Scotland'. The First Minister was also told they had already been 'forced' to offshore certain manufacturing functions to China. But a Scottish Government memo said that ADL had received orders for 363 zero-emission buses from ScotZEB more than any other manufacturer benefitting from the schemes. A separate briefing states that Alexander Dennis was awarded only 17% or 44 buses from second phase of the programme. A significant grant through the ScotZeb 2 programme was awarded to Zenobe, and its consortium of bus and coach operators to support the transition of bus fleets to electric. ADL, which incurred total losses over three years of £44.9m between 2021 and 2023, made its own bid to the programme but was unsuccessful. While ADL was a supplier to the successful consortium it was not a formal part of it. An Alexander Dennis spokesman said: 'Our focus remains on ensuring our people are supported during our consultation process. "This is a challenging time, and we are grateful for the active engagement from the Scottish and UK Governments and other political parties and stakeholders to discuss options and possible interventions. "It is clear there is a shared ambition to ensure the Scottish and UK manufacturing industry is protected and can thrive and we hope that we can encourage a cross-nation, collaborative approach as we continue to progress these important discussions.' The Scottish Government has said that policy interventions had been designed to "accelerate uptake of zero emission buses in the Scottish market". According to Scottish ministers, ADL secured orders for more than 360 vehicles through Scottish Government funding programmes. And they say the route to providing further support involves looking at ADL's cost base, considering what additional support can be provided to help with productivity and to lower costs and to look at how an order book can be developed for the company. They to say that there is "cause for hope" and that there were "solutions" that can be delivered through the collaborative process. While they say they have to abide by public procurement regulations and subsidy controls, but were working on a "support package" for the company.
The Herald Scotland
41 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Labour says SNP ban on nuclear power should end
Speaking ahead of a visit to Torness Nuclear Plant in Dunbar, Mr Sarwar has said that the SNP's 'Student politics and dated views' on nuclear power are standing in the way of jobs, investment, and energy security for Scotland. Mr Sarwar's intervention comes as the UK Labour government has announced tens of billions of pounds of investment in new nuclear projects to secure our energy security and to deliver new high-skilled jobs. Today Mr Sarwar has said that a Scottish Labour government would allow Scotland to join the race to be a 'nuclear energy superpower' and unlock billions of pounds of investment. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar MSP said: 'The global race towards clean power is on and I firmly believe Scotland should be at the forefront of it. 'Investing in clean power will not only deliver lower bills, but will create quality jobs and strengthen our energy security so we are no longer subject to the whims of tyrants like Putin. 'Communities elsewhere in the UK are set to reap the benefits of nuclear power, but the SNP is stopping Scotland from doing the same. 'John Swinney could unlock millions of pounds of investment in Scotland with the stroke of a pen by lifting his party's ideological ban on nuclear power, but he refuses. 'A Scottish Labour government would ditch the SNP's damaging ban, unlock billions of pounds of investment and get Scotland in the race to become a nuclear energy superpower.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Scottish Government is focussed on supporting growth and creating jobs by capitalising on Scotland's immense renewable energy capacity rather than expensive new nuclear energy which takes decades to build, creates toxic waste which is difficult and costly to dispose of and does not generate power at a cost that will bring down energy bills." The Herald has teamed up with the East Lothian Courier for an in-depth series, The Future of Torness. Our team of journalists has worked together to look at everything from the current state and safety of Torness to ideas for its future, from decommissioning to fresh new options for the site. We will also look at what closure will mean for the many people in the area who have worked there, sometimes over decades, and been part of what the plant calls 'the Torness family'. We'll ask the big Torness questions. How safe are its aging and cracked reactors? How do new apprentices feel about their future in a Scotland where nuclear is considered not an option? What is it like to spend a day in the plant? What happens to the site when it stops generating power? And does Torness itself tell us anything about whether Scotland should grasp or reject the idea of new nuclear? Join us next week, on June 26, in both The Herald and East Lothian Courier. Subscribe to The Herald here for exclusive access to the series.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Scottish Labour MSPs missing more Holyrood votes than Tories and SNP
In recent weeks, the number of Labour MSPs failing to vote on motions in the Scottish Parliament has increased, leading to concerns that their absence could be "changing the result of the votes". Last Wednesday for example – the most recent day of voting at the time of writing – 39% of Labour MSPs (nine members) did not vote in the chamber, compared with 6.7% of Tory MSPs (two members) and 1.6% of SNP (one member). The National analysed all the main votes which have taken place so far in June, excluding amendments, and found that among the three main parties, Labour consistently had the highest percentage of absent MSPs, with the Tories following not far behind, while the SNP had the highest turnout. READ MORE: Labour blasted as 'deeply authoritarian' over plans to proscribe Palestine Action Between June 1 and 19, an average of 20.1% of Labour MSPs failed to vote in motions, compared to 14% Tory and 6.6% SNP. Of the 10 votes that took place in that time, there were only four instances where turnout for both Labour and the Tories was higher than 90%. Meanwhile, the SNP turnout was above 90% in all of these votes. Scottish Labour had a higher turnout when it came to their own motions, such as their Planning motion on June 11, which was missed by one MSP, and their motion on Scotland's medical and nursing workforce crisis also on June 11, which all Labour MSPs voted on. More Labour MSPs tended to turn up when it came to voting on bills. At the Scottish Languages Bill debate on June 17, 17.4% of Labour MSPs did not vote, compared with 20% Tory and 8.2% SNP. And at the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill on June 10, 8.7% of Labour MSPs were absent, while the Tories had double, at 16.67%, and the SNP had 6.6%. But when these figures are compared with the start of the year, it shows a significant drop in attendance from Labour MSPs. READ MORE: Presiding Officer to step down at Holyrood election The National found that in January, an average of 7.9% of Labour MSPs failed to vote, compared with 9.1% Tory and 6.6% SNP. And in February, the average number of MSPs missing votes stood at 15% Labour, 10.1% Tory and 6.2% SNP. When looking at the smaller parties, the Greens and LibDems – which have seven and five MSPs respectively – were much more likely to show up to votes. In fact, since the beginning of this year, the Scottish Greens have had a full turnout at 86.9% of votes (53 out of 61 votes), while the LibDems had 65.6% (40 votes). In the instances where full turnout was not recorded, this was down to a maximum of two MSPs not voting. READ MORE: Scottish civil service reaches 'record' size, figures show There is one Alba MSP (Ash Regan) and one Independent MSP (John Mason), who turned up to 75.4% (46 votes) and 100% of votes respectively. For parties with higher numbers of MSPs, it is more difficult to achieve a full turnout. The SNP, which have 60 MSPs, recorded a full turnout at just two votes (3.3%) – the Assisted Dying Bill on May 13 and an SNP motion on Scotland's Hydrogen Future on May 1. The only instance where every single Tory MSP (of which there are 30) took part in a vote was for the Assisted Dying Bill (1.6% of the total number of votes), while Labour (which have 23 MSPs) saw a full turnout at four votes (6.6%) – but three of those were motions submitted by Labour, while the fourth was for the Assisted Dying Bill. While it is expected that MSPs will not be able to make every single vote, such as due to illness or maternity leave, there are proxy voting arrangements in place which mean that the absence would not affect the overall result of a vote. Commenting on the figures, Greens MSP Ross Greer – who has voted in every motion analysed by The National – said that "if Labour MSPs don't want to do the jobs they were elected to, they should resign". He added that the proxy voting arrangements mean "there is no excuse for almost half of the Labour group casting no vote at all" in some cases. Ross Greer MSP"That is bad enough on ordinary motions, but it is totally unacceptable when we are deciding on the laws of this country," he said. Greer added that "it is a privilege to serve Scotland in Parliament", and that turning up to vote is "the bare minimum" that voters expect of those they elect. READ MORE: SNP the only pro-indy party not to sign pledge condemning Gaza genocide He continued: "This isn't a one off. The attendance of Labour and Tory MSPs has been shocking for years. "It has absolutely changed the result of votes and therefore meant that Scotland's laws are different than they otherwise would have been if everyone elected by the public had actually turned up to do their job." Commenting, SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said: "The fact Labour and Tory MSPs are increasingly failing to turn up to Parliament shows that Scotland is always an afterthought for the unionist parties. "SNP MSPs have the best attendance rate of any party – we are in Parliament every day, standing up for our constituents – while Labour and the Tories are nowhere to be seen when it matters most." Scottish Labour did not respond when approached for comment.
