UK-India investment treaty lets companies sue government, sources say

An investment treaty between Britain and India will contain a provision that allows companies to sue either government if they believe policy changes unfairly harm their investment or profits, two sources familiar with discussions told Reuters.
The Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) mechanism is aimed at protecting companies against possible unfair treatment under local laws, and will be included in an investment treaty that is expected to be struck alongside a free trade agreement shortly.
The mechanism has been criticised in recent years, including by Britain's previous Conservative government, for blocking efforts to fight climate change because fossil fuel producers can use it to protect their assets.
Britain has not included ISDS in any of the bilateral free trade deals it has struck since it left the European Union, though it is a feature of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) it has signed up to. India has also moved to limit ISDS in its treaties.
One of the sources said London had pushed for its inclusion in a deal with India as British businesses wanted reassurance that they would be treated fairly under the Indian legal system.
The Indian government declined to give an immediate response to a question about the current talks.
A spokesperson for Britain's trade ministry declined to comment on the matter but said any deal needed guarantees for businesses that they would be treated fairly.
The two sources said government officials on Tuesday told a meeting of businesses interested in the deal that ISDS was included.
Britain has never lost an ISDS claim by a company but according to UN data, of 30 ISDS cases brought against India since 2003, 8 were brought by UK-based companies under a previous agreement.
"We are determined to improve access for UK businesses, ensure their fair treatment, cut tariffs, and make trade cheaper and easier," the UK trade ministry spokesperson said.
Britain's left-of-centre Labour Party won power last year, and has been keen to stress that it is now the party of business as it restarts various trade negotiations.
Britain and India have been locked in trade talks, on and off, since January 2022, and are expected to strike a full trade deal soon. The Indian Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal was in London earlier this week for late-stage talks, and returned on Friday for further discussions.
Tariffs on whisky, autos and agricultural products are being negotiated as part of the deal, while regulatory issues around the pharmaceutical sector are another sensitive area.
India had previously indicated its opposition to ISDS, scrapping a previous bilateral investment treaty with Britain in 2017 and moving to a model which allowed use of the mechanism only after routes through India's legal system had been exhausted.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The National

4 hours ago

• The National

US attack on Iran could spark 'rat hole of retaliation', UN Secretary General warns

UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said on Sunday that the Middle East conflict is at risk of "descending into a rat hole of retaliation after retaliation", after the US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites. Mr Guterres was speaking at an emergency session of the Security Council focused on the expanding Israel-Iran conflict. The war began when Israel launched a "pre-emptive" strike against nuclear and military targets in Iran about 10 days ago. 'We must act immediately and decisively to halt the fighting and return to serious sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear programme,' he added. He then urged all states to act with reason, restraint and urgency, pleading for all those present at the meeting to not give up on peace. Rafael Grossi, head the the UN's nuclear watchdog, said initial evidence suggested that Iran's Fordow and Natanz nuclear sites had been hit by powerful ground-penetrating missiles, while Isfahan's nuclear facility was hit by cruise missiles. He added that Iran has indicated there has been no increase in radiation levels near the three sites. 'I am ready to travel immediately and to engage with all relevant parties to help ensure the protection of nuclear facilities and the continued peaceful uses of nuclear technology in accordance with the agency's mandate,' Mr Grossi said. He said that the International Atomic Energy Agency was ready to send nuclear safety and security experts to Iran immediately. He warned of the consequences that might be felt as a result of the US strikes should Iran respond militarily. 'Let us not allow the window to close on diplomacy,' Mr Grossi said. The UK and France said that while they continue to agree that Iran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon, they did not take any part in planning or carrying out the US attack on Iran's nuclear sites on Saturday. They also pushed for diplomacy to prevail, and urged Iran not to worsen the situation. China strongly condemned the US strikes. 'The actions of the US violate the UN Charter as well as Iran's sovereignty and territorial integrity,' China's ambassador to the UN Fu Cong said, calling for an immediate ceasefire to prevent an escalation. Russia's ambassador said the already delicate situation in Iran had been significantly aggravated by the US strikes. 'Washington once again shows its complete contempt for the international community and law,' Vasily Nebenzya said. China, Russia and Pakistan have issued a draft resolution calling for an unconditional ceasefire and a push for the protection of civilians affected in and around Iran. Days before the Saturday attack by the US, Iran called on Mr Guterres to invoke Article 99 of the UN Charter as the conflict with Israel continued. The article empowers the secretary general to bring to the Security Council's attention any matter that may threaten international peace and security. 'Failure to act at this pivotal and perilous moment would constitute a profound abdication of the Security Council's responsibilities,' said a letter sent to the UN, seen by The National. The US hit back against those accusations, calling Iran the world's foremost state sponsor of terror. "For 40 years, the Iranian government has called for death to America and death to Israel, and posed a constant menace to the US, and the entire world," US acting deputy ambassador Dorothy Shea said, claiming that a recent IAEA report conclusively showed that Tehran had continued to accelerate its nuclear capabilities. "Iran has long obfuscated its nuclear weapons programme and stonewalled good faith efforts in recent negotiations." Iran condemned the US and Israel's "brutal aggression". "Once again, the world has witnessed the blatant corruption of the US political system … and over the past 10 days, Israel has continued a barbaric assault on the international bodies," said Amir Iravani, Iran's ambassador to the UN. Mr Iravani insisted that Iran was interested only in peaceful nuclear energy. Israel blamed the UN Security Council for failing to check Iran's nuclear programme earlier. Israel has said Iran was within days of gaining a nuclear weapon. "You were silent, you were complicit, you were afraid, you were bystanders," Israeli ambassador to the UN Danny Danon told the council. "The United States acted not just for itself, but for every nation that values freedom over radicalism." He said that Iran's nuclear programme "was not a diplomatic puzzle – it was a loaded gun pointed at the heart of the international system and the stability of the world". The Gulf Co-operation Council, represented by Kuwait, repeated its call for de-escalation. "We call for an immediate cessation of military actions and exercise of maximum restraint, avoiding anything that could lead to a spillover of this conflict," said Faisal Al Enezi, charge d'affaires at Kuwait's mission to the UN. "GCC countries are firmly committed to support all regional and international efforts aiming at defusing this crisis and consolidating security and stability and to preserve the interests of peoples in the region and the world."

Gulf Today

5 hours ago

• Gulf Today

Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran — a day after nominating him for Peace Prize

Tariq Butt, Gulf Today Correspondent / Reuters Pakistan condemned on Sunday the strikes ordered on its neighbour Iran by Donald Trump, a day after Islamabad had said it would nominate the US President for the Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan on Sunday said Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities violated international law and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the Iran crisis. "The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. Shiite activists hold placards to condemn US and Israel's attacks on Iran, during a protest in Karachi on Sunday. AFP Also on Sunday, Pakistan's Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and "conveyed Pakistan's condemnation of the U.S. attacks," a statement from the Pakistani leader said. Pakistan's information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country's positions over the weekend. In Pakistan's biggest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. Shiites hold portraits of Iran's Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to condemn US and Israel's attacks on Iran, during a protest in Karachi. AFP A large American flag with a picture of Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over. The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan's regional enemy India. Pakistan on Saturday said it was nominating Trump as "a genuine peacemaker" for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month. It said he had "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship." Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Ishaq Dar has formally sent a letter of recommendation to the Nobel Committee in Norway, nominating US President Donald Trump for the Nobel peace prize. Officials said the letter cited Trump's role in defusing tensions between Pakistan and India earlier this year. The move recognises Trump's efforts in bringing about a ceasefire between the two nuclear-armed neighbours and for highlighting the Kashmir dispute on the international stage. The development comes after the government's announcement, made earlier on social media, of its decision to formally nominate Trump for the world's most prestigious peace award. Pakistani nationals who were residing in Iran, arrive with their belongings in Quetta. AFP In a statement issued on X, the federal government said that the international community had witnessed "unprovoked and unlawful Indian aggression," which it described as a "grave violation" of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity. The attack, according to the statement, resulted in the "tragic loss of innocent lives, including women, children, and the elderly." In response, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyan-um-Marsoos - a "measured, resolute, and precise military" countermeasure. The operation, Pakistan stressed, was executed to re-establish deterrence and defend its territorial integrity while "consciously avoiding civilian harm." Amid the heightened tensions, the statement noted that President Trump "demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship" by engaging diplomatically with both Islamabad and New Delhi. This effort, it added, helped de-escalate the rapidly worsening situation, secured a ceasefire, and prevented a wider regional conflict. The government hailed Trump's actions as those of a "genuine peacemaker" with a firm commitment to resolving conflict through dialogue.

Middle East Eye

5 hours ago

• Middle East Eye

Israel dismisses EU rights report as ‘moral and methodological failure'

Israel has slammed a European Union report accusing it of potential human rights violations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank, calling the assessment flawed and baseless. In a note seen by Reuters and shared with EU officials ahead of Monday's foreign ministers' meeting, Israel's Foreign Ministry rejected the findings outright. 'The Foreign Ministry of the State of Israel rejects the document ... and finds it to be a complete moral and methodological failure,' the note said, urging the EU to disregard it entirely. The EU's diplomatic service compiled the report, which Israel claims ignored the security challenges it faces and relied on what it called inaccurate sources. Tensions between Israel and Europe have grown in recent months, with several European governments voicing concern over the rising civilian death toll from Israel's military offensive in Gaza, launched in response to Hamas's 7 October 2023 attacks.