'Act Was Brutal But...': MP HC Commutes Death Sentence Of Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old
Last Updated:
The court held that while the convict's actions were horrifying, they were not executed with a degree of cruelty or depravity that would justify the death penalty.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Thursday commuted the death sentence of a 20-year-old tribal man convicted of raping a 4-year-old child, converting the punishment to rigorous imprisonment for 25 years. The Court acknowledged the 'barbaric" nature of the act but found that it did not rise to the level of 'brutality" necessary to warrant capital punishment.
The Division Bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Devnarayan Mishra held that while the convict's actions were horrifying, they were not executed with a degree of cruelty or depravity that would justify the death penalty.
'In this case, no doubt that appellant's act was brutal as he has committed rape upon the victim of four years and three months of age and after committing rape also throttled her treating her dead and thrown the victim in such a place where she could not be searched and left the spot but it is also clear that he has not committed brutality," the Court observed, distinguishing between the two concepts while citing Supreme Court precedents.
Background of the Case
The convict, a 20-year-old from a Scheduled Tribe, was sentenced to death by a trial court for abducting and raping a 4-year-old girl and leaving her for dead in a mango orchard. The trial court had noted that the victim suffered permanent disability as a result of the assault.
The incident occurred after the convict allegedly entered the complainant's hut under the pretext of requesting a cot and later abducted the minor victim from a nearby house during the night. He was later arrested and charged under Sections 450, 363, 376(a), 376AB, 307, and 201 of the IPC and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act.
Advocate Samar Singh Rajpoot, appearing for the Appellant, argued that the case rested entirely on circumstantial evidence, with no eyewitness testimony or conclusive proof linking the convict to the crime. He contended that the post-mortem report did not conclusively support the trial court's finding of permanent disability and that the evidence had likely been fabricated post-arrest.
He further urged the Court to consider mitigating factors including the convict's age, clean record, illiteracy, tribal background, and the fact that he had been working in a roadside eatery after leaving home at a young age.
State's Response
Opposing the appeal, Deputy Advocate General Yash Soni argued that the gravity of the offence, committed against a 4-year-old and followed by the child being left to die, warranted no leniency. He asserted that the prosecution had proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.
High Court's Observations
The Court rejected the defence argument that the child had suffered permanent disability, noting that the only medical testimony, by Dr. Rakesh Shukla, did not provide clear evidence or specify the nature or extent of injury that could establish lifelong disability.
However, it upheld the conviction under all relevant sections, including aggravated rape under the POCSO Act, while commuting the sentence on the ground that the act, though 'barbaric," did not involve 'brutality" in the legal sense established by the Supreme Court in Manoharan v. State, Bhaggi v. State of MP, and Dhananjoy Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal.
'There is no report that he has previously committed any such type of offence… He is not properly educated," the Court noted.
Final Sentence
The High Court affirmed the convictions but converted the death penalty to 25 years of rigorous imprisonment without remission, along with a fine of Rs.10,000 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. In default of payment, the convict will undergo an additional year of rigorous imprisonment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Youth, woman friend arrested for sexually assaulting 10-year-old girl: Police
Meghawadi police arrested a 24-year-old man and his 21-year-old woman friend on Thursday for allegedly sexually assaulting a 10-year-old girl with a screwdriver, causing injury to her private part. The accused also filmed the crime, the police said. According to the police, the girl's 36-year-old mother works as a supervisor in a catering service firm. She lives in a chawl. The accused, both waiters who work under her, also stayed with her. As per the police complaint, when the girl's mother was out at work between May 15 and June 14, the accused sexually assaulted the 10-year-old at least four times. Police said the 24-year-old man allegedly raped the girl several times, assaulted her with a screwdriver while his girlfriend filmed the crime. The man also allegedly assaulted the girl with blunt objects and threatened to make the video viral if she told her mother about it, police said. On Thursday, she told her mother about the sexual assault, who reported it to the police. 'Both accused have been arrested. They were produced before a special court, which remanded them in two-day police custody,' said Sambhaji Jadhav, senior inspector, Meghwadi police station. Police have pressed sections 64(1) (rape), 64(2)(i) (rape on a woman incapable of giving consent), 77 (voyeurism), 115 (voluntarily causing hurt), 352 (intentional insult by abusing), 351(3) (criminal intimidation by threatening to cause death or grievous hurt) of BNS; 4, 6, 8 and 12 of POCSO Act, and 66E and 67B of IT Act.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Woman, cousin arrested for husband's murder in Aligarh
A woman, along with her cousin brother, was arrested for the alleged murder of her husband in a village under the jurisdiction of Gangiri police station in Aligarh on Friday. The accused woman was reportedly involved in an illicit relationship with the co-accused, who shot dead the husband. The woman did not inform the police about her husband's murder. The woman did not inform the police about her husband's murder. (For representation only) Superintendent of Police (Rural), Aligarh, Amrit Jain, stated that information was received on June 18 regarding the discovery of the body of 30-year-old Rishi Singh, a resident of Nagla Himachal village, within the limits of Gangiri police station. A case was registered based on a complaint by Rahul Kumar, the deceased's brother, under Section 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) against the wife, Lalita Yadav, and her cousin Neeresh at Gangiri police station. 'Both accused were arrested on Friday near Naugawan crossing in Aligarh. Based on clues provided by Neeresh, a country-made pistol was recovered. Sections 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 3/25/27 of the Arms Act were added to the case,' informed SP Rural, Aligarh. During interrogation, Lalita confessed that she had been married to Rishi for four years. Rishi, who was a driver, often stayed away from home. Lalita frequently visited her aunt's house, where she met her unmarried cousin Neeresh. She admitted to having an illicit relationship with Neeresh, and they planned to eliminate Rishi, who stood in their way. 'Rishi discovered Lalita's affair and asked her not to allow Neeresh into their house. However, she refused to follow these instructions. On the night of June 17-18, Neeresh came to Rishi's house and had drinks while Lalita was away. After midnight, Neeresh shot Rishi and informed Lalita, who did not report the murder to the police or relatives,' said SP Amrit Jain. Both accused were sent to judicial custody following court orders after their presentation in Aligarh.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Bhima Koregaon case: Court rejects activist Gautam Navlakha's plea to live in Delhi
A Mumbai court on Thursday rejected human rights activist Gautam Navlakha's petition seeking permission to live in Delhi during the pendency of his trial in the Bhima Koregaon case, reported Live Law. The trial in the case is yet to begin. Navlakha, 72, is among 16 academicians, activists and lawyers who have been charged under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act for their alleged role in instigating caste violence at Bhima Koregaon near Pune in January 2018. He was arrested in August 2018 and placed under house arrest in November 2022 after the Supreme Court granted his request to be shifted from jail on the grounds of ill health and poor facilities in prison. In December 2023, the Bombay High Court granted him bail, which was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in May 2024, following which he was released. However, one of the bail conditions prohibits him from leaving Mumbai without the permission of the special court, where the trial of the case will be held. On Thursday, Navlakha was directed by the special National Investigation Agency court not to leave the jurisdiction of the Mumbai court, PTI reported. The court reportedly told the activist that 'allowing him to reside permanently beyond the jurisdiction of the court is an entirely different thing'. 'This unnecessary application deserves to be rejected,' special judge CS Baviskar was quoted as saying by PTI. Navlakha, a Delhi resident, had approached the court in April seeking permission to move as it had become 'extremely difficult for him to sustain a stable lifestyle' in Mumbai. He told the court that he had been unemployed and thus had to financially depend on friends and family since he was released in May 2024. The activist pointed out that the trial in the case will take a long time to conclude and hence it is 'crucial for him to be employed and financially stable' to be able to meet legal expenses.
