Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan

By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter
Brendan Kearney speaks at the Marlborough District Council's Local Water Done Well hearing.
Photo:
LDR/Kira Carrington
Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday.
The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options ‒ a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts.
The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council.
The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure.
But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference.
Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation.
Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief executive of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more.
It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said.
He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well.
"[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers.
"This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so."
To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda.
"A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance."
Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow.
"It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much.
"On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations.
"Something in between those two extremes needs to happen."
Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable.
"What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them.
"This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door.
"You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people."
Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services.
"How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said.
Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised.
Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989.
"I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said.
"I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us."
The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table.
The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September .
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scoop

26 minutes ago

• Scoop

Hushtec Delivers Advanced Noise Control Solutions For Construction And Mining Sectors

Hushtec, a New Zealand-based manufacturer with over 50 years of experience, is providing advanced noise control solutions for industries facing stringent regulatory and community noise requirements. The company's customisable barriers and engineered systems are designed for sectors including construction, demolition, utilities, infrastructure, and mining. Construction sites often generate significant sound pollution that affects both workers and surrounding communities. Hushtec addresses these challenges with its range of construction site acoustics barriers, which are engineered to reduce noise by up to 43dB. These barriers are lightweight, weatherproof, and rapid to install, supporting compliance with environmental standards while maintaining a safer work environment. The solutions are available in both off-the-shelf and custom-made formats, and are used by contractors, project managers, and acoustic consultants across New Zealand. In the mining sector, Hushtec has developed targeted approaches for high-noise activities such as rock breaking and pile driving. The company's rock breaker noise mitigation products include premium noise barriers, acoustic tents, and shrouds. These solutions have been lab-tested to provide noise reductions of up to 35dB for barriers, 25dB for acoustic tents, and 15dB for shrouds, supporting compliance with workplace safety and environmental regulations. Their modular, durable construction allows for flexible deployment in harsh mining environments and areas near residential developments. Hushtec's integrated approach—from design and development to manufacturing—is carried out at its state-of-the-art New Zealand facility. The company's products are distributed globally and are trusted by Tier 1 contractors and industry leaders for their proven performance and reliability. Hushtec continues to seek partnerships with organisations dedicated to effective noise management across a range of industries.

Scoop

an hour ago

• Scoop

CPL Group Supports Industrial Safety And Compliance With Advanced Room Divider And Dust Curtain Solutions

CPL Group, a New Zealand-based manufacturer of PVC screening systems, supplies a wide range of industrial barriers designed to support safety, air quality, and compliance in commercial and industrial environments. The product range is used in sectors including manufacturing, logistics, and food processing. Commercial room divider curtains are used to create internal partitions within warehouses, factories, and processing sites. These PVC curtain wall systems help segment workspaces, manage temperature zones, and reduce noise. Manufactured in-house by CPL Group, the curtains are built for industrial durability and can be customised to suit specific spatial layouts. The company also supplies dust curtains, which are used to manage airborne particles and fumes in operational settings. These barriers assist with maintaining air quality and meeting environmental and occupational health standards. Dust curtain systems are available in multiple sizes and formats and can be configured to meet site-specific conditions. CPL Group provides installation advice to ensure performance and regulatory alignment. Applications include food-grade rooms, cleanrooms, and temperature-controlled storage areas. By offering robust and adaptable partitioning systems, CPL Group supports businesses in reducing contamination risks and meeting statutory safety requirements.

RNZ News

4 hours ago

• RNZ News

Media in the middle of political skirmishes over sickness and health

Last weekend's Sunday Star Times digs into the political battleground of healthcare. Photo: Sunday Star Times Mediawatch : This week the latest Ipsos Issues Monitor survey showed 'inflation/cost of living' was - again - the top concern of Kiwis. No surprise there - or that 'healthcare/hospitals' was in second place. "It continues on its upward trend, reaching its highest level of concern (43 percent) since tracking began," Ipsos said. That - and the fact that more of those surveyed chose Labour as the party most capable of managing health - would have stood out for the government. The same is true of how the issue plays out in the media. Under the headline The political problem of health Health Minister Simeon Brown told the Sunday Star-Times last weekend the job "matters to every New Zealander from the moment they're born to the moment they die. It's a huge responsibility, but there's also significant opportunity." He'd just announced an opportunity for private hospitals - instructing Health NZ to make long-term deals with them for elective surgeries. "We haven't been ideological about it, we've been focusing on pragmatic solutions to ... maximise what's delivered both in the public and private system," Brown told Newstalk ZB the same day. The next day, New Zealand Herald political editor Thomas Coughlan reported official papers showed Treasury reckoned further cuts to health would be needed to meet the demands of the government's health delivery plan. But that didn't come up when the prime minister appeared that day on Newstalk ZB for his regular Monday morning chat. The host Mike Hosking said he couldn't agree more when the PM said people don't care who's doing their long awaited op when they are staring at the hospital ceiling. But then Hosking told the prime minister about an interview last week with a Christchurch surgeon who works in both the public and the private systems. "We need to be more flexible in public (hospitals). They even come round at one o'clock and say it looks like you'll finish after 4 or 4.30, so we won't let you do your second case," Chris Wakeman told Hosking last week. "You wouldn't close your factory at 4 o'clock if you still had work to do," he added. Later, Mike Hosking read out a text from an unnamed listener who claimed nurses and anaesthetic technicians insist operating stops early if it looks like it's going to go past 4pm. The following day Mike Hosking asked Brown if surgeries that might overrun 4pm were routinely postponed. "Look, there are heavily unionised contractual arrangements in the public system and so you do end up with inefficiencies throughout the system. Those issues need to be dealt with by Health New Zealand to make sure that it is more efficient," Brown replied. "These union agreements ... drive inefficiency and a lack of productivity. These are issues that do need to be resolved as part of (Health New Zealand) negotiations with the unions." Health Minister Simeon Brown Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER "Absolutely not. The limits are more about management decisions on staffing costs, availability of recovery beds and how to distribute operating theatres between acute and elective work," Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists told Mediawatch . "The barrier to providing more elective surgeries is a refusal to pay staff required to work longer hours ... and inability to provide sufficient staff to run our operating theatres to their maximum capacity." "We don't have anything in place that would stand in the way of doctors opting to work in a different work pattern or longer hours. And in fact, many of them frequently do. "Typically surgeons and anaesthetists work 10 hour days. A number of hospitals sometimes run what are sometimes called twilight theatres in the early evening or on weekends. "I don't think the way that the discussion has been presented is entirely fair - and it is somewhat misleading. "It is concerning to us that 'private' is seen as the answer when in fact they are already near capacity for what they can do. And we also have significant doctor shortages." Sarah Dalton Photo: LDR / Stuff / Kevin Stent Hosking [ returned to the issue] with Health NZ's Chief Clinical Officer Dr Richard Sullivan on Thursday. He said the proportion of "early finishes" in theatres doing elective surgery is declining - and under the government's 'elective boost' programme they had been doing some surgeries on Saturdays and Sundays too. "It's more than just the unions. You'd need a quite a big workforce to run full Saturday lists all the time. That's not to say we shouldn't look at that, but we need the most efficient way of getting people through our theatres," Dr Sullivan said. Hosking told his listeners the bottom line in public hospitals was: "If it's 4:30, we're going home." There's a bit more to it than that. While there is some extra capacity in theatres, many more people would have to be paid for more hours to do more out-of-business-hours. They don't have all the staff to do a lot more of elective surgeries, in either public or private hospitals And as the Herald' s Thomas Coughlan reported earlier this week, Treasury reckoned the Health Delivery Plan targets could mean increased spending cut targets in the year ahead. Health workforce pay increases would be limited to a degree described as "unprecedented," Treasury documents also stated. In the Herald , Brown rejected Treasury's conclusions. He said government provided Health NZ additional funding in three successive Budgets and Treasury had not consulted the Ministry of Health or Health NZ before reaching its conclusions. "Why do we still have 10 days' sick leave?" Hosking also asked the PM last Monday. He said the question had been put to him by "my tech guy" working at his house. The tech guy got a headline-making response on that from the nation's leader. "So we had five sick days until Jacinda [Ardern] decided we needed ten for Covid. Can we agree that it's gone-ish - and therefore we might need to do something about sick leave?" Hosking asked. "We might need to do things about pro rata and sick leave as well, because you know, people who are on part time contracts are getting full-time 10-day equivalency. Brook Van Velden is working through some of those issues," Luxon replied. The possibility of that went straight into Newstalk ZB's news bulletins. When the prime minister did his turn on RNZ's Morning Report soon after that, he was asked if he would support a cut in sick leave. "Well, I think there's probably a need for us to look at it ... and just make sure that we've got that setting right," he replied. ZB's political editor Jason Walls was puzzled. "Sick leave is an entitlement that everybody has. So it's not just some beltway story. It is an interesting thing for the Prime Minister to bring up. It was just Mike's mate that was talking about it." But Mike's mates behind the mic at Newstalk ZB were teed up to talk about sick leave all day. "A very strong hint that 10 days of sick leave might be going the way of the dodo," was Kerre Woodham's take when she followed the Mike Hosking Breakfast . "I get that it's a godsend if you are prone to infections during winter, but really spare a thought for the employers." Employers such as perhaps Nick Mills, a hospo guy in the capital who's also the host of Wellington Mornings on Newstalk ZB. "I go with the flow. But I'm in an industry where people take the absolute mickey," Mills told his listeners in the capital. "They're just teasing it a bit at the moment on the fact that it's going to be for only part- time employees, but that's going to change," he said. One hour later they were hearing more on this on ZB in Canterbury from the local host, John MacDonald. When Matt Heath and Tyler Adams took the ZB mic for the full national ZB network at noon, they had a similar sense of what was common sense. "10 days a year? Does the average person walking around need 10 sick days a year? I don't think so," Heath said. The questions for the workplace relations minister Brooke van Velden followed. On ThreeNews and Checkpoint she batted back questions about whether it was a gender issue. She was also taken aback that this was a talking point at all. "The only reason we're talking about this is because Mike Hosking was talking about it this morning. There was nothing from the government side to say we had an announcement to make," she told ThreeNews . In the end it will be months before all this is fully aired in Parliament, long after Mike Hosking's tech guy first put it on the agenda. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.