Iran's painful scenes and decisive moment
https://arab.news/njmrx
The veteran politician said the latest American strikes against Houthi positions may be the last message from the Trump administration to Iran before the decisive moment arrives for its nuclear program. He said the region may be headed toward a major crisis should the Iranian supreme leader fail to take a big and painful decision that would 'dismantle the nuclear program and abandon the regional proxies, especially after the blows they were dealt.'
Donald Trump's message to the Iranian leadership reminded me of what took place in the early 2000s between the US and Libya. At that time, Muammar Qaddafi requested that Foreign Minister Abdel Rahman Shalgham convince his friend, Algerian President Abdulaziz Bouteflika, to intervene with George W. Bush to improve relations between Washington and Tripoli. Bouteflika agreed and came back to Shalgham with the following message: 'You either remove the weapons of mass destruction or he (Bush) will destroy everything without discussion.' Shalgham relayed the message to Qaddafi, who told him: 'You are afraid and a coward.'
After considering his options, Qaddafi ultimately went with the one that would save his regime instead of kick off a confrontation with America. Saif Al-Islam Qaddafi contacted British intelligence with a message: 'I am Saif Al-Islam, Muammar Qaddafi's son. I want to talk to you about the weapons of mass destruction.' When a meeting was set up, he said he wanted an improvement in relations in return for cooperation. After that, Libya dismantled its centrifuges and handed them over to the Americans. Libya also severed ties with organizations and parties that were viewed as its proxies.
Iran is nothing like Libya, not in its regime or the way it takes decisions. It is a major regional power that boasts human, military and economic means. But it is approaching the moment of truth now that Trump has returned to the White House. It has for decades avoided sliding into a direct confrontation with the American military machine, preferring instead to undermine American influence in the region by mobilizing its proxies.
But what if it finds itself in the same situation faced by Libya: having to choose between the safety of its regime or waging a confrontation with a foregone conclusion?
Politicians and analysts say that Iran is now facing its most difficult challenge since the victory of Ayatollah Khomeini's revolution, or at least since the end of the long war with Saddam Hussein's regime. Ever since his return to the White House, Trump has been taking decisions that impact the whole world. He is running the world through social media posts. He is breaking rules that were previously viewed as unbreakable, from launching trade wars, imposing tariffs and sanctions, and threatening to change maps and balances of power.
Iran is a major regional power that boasts human, military and economic means. But it is approaching the moment of truth
Ghassan Charbel
The veteran politician spoke of painful images that Iran must pause at. Hamas launched its Al-Aqsa Flood Operation and the residents of Gaza made unimaginable sacrifices, but the enclave is completely destroyed and the issue of Hamas' weapons is on the table. If the disarmament of Hamas is not possible at the moment, then the international community will demand its removal from the military conflict with Israel for several years to ensure that the Gaza reconstruction starts on the right path. It is evident that Hamas has agreed to a reduced role in Gaza after the hostage and prisoner exchange phase is complete.
The politician noted that Iran has been generous in supporting Hamas, but it is incapable of saving it. He also noted that Hezbollah launched its 'support front' but could not change the course of the war in Gaza and lost its Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah — who it is seemingly incapable of replacing. Moreover, the issue of Hezbollah's weapons is on the table, not just in the demands of the international community, but the majority of the Lebanese people too. Iran could not save Hezbollah and its military presence in Syria. It could not prevent the collapse of the regime of its ally Bashar Assad and Russia did not volunteer to help.
The politician then highlighted two more painful images facing Tehran. The first is its inability to continue to trade direct blows with Israel. The war on Gaza and Lebanon demonstrated Israel's military and technological superiority. It can run rampant across the skies of countries near and far. The second is the vow by the man who ordered the killing of Qassem Soleimani to use all means necessary to prevent Iran from acquiring an insurance policy for its regime: a nuclear bomb.
The politician noticed that a new balance of power has emerged in the region and that Iran appears incapable of changing developments in its favor, not in Syria, Lebanon or Gaza. He noted that Iran's diminished role in Syria was coupled with Turkiye's rising influence there, which only makes things more complicated for Tehran.
Trump has also reimposed his 'maximum pressure' policy on Iran. The outcomes of the wars in the region all favor this policy. The latest American raids against the Houthis are like a demand on Iran to quickly reach realistic conclusions from the painful scenes it is witnessing.
Soleimani had at one point drawn up his country's line of defense in the region. He was able to breach Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. The uprooting of the Syrian link from the so-called resistance axis has severed this line of defense.
Developments are unfolding rapidly in the region. New balances of power and roles are emerging. America's Trump is playing a decisive role in the region. Russia is focused on reaping a greater reward in Ukraine. The supreme leader is confronted with a difficult choice to receive a certificate of good behavior when it comes to its nuclear file and refraining from rebuilding its resistance axis and mobilizing its proxies. The decisive moment is approaching.
This article first appeared in Asharq Al-Awsat.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
22 minutes ago
- Arab News
Democrats are at odds over the Israel-Iran war as Trump considers intervening
After nearly two years of stark divisions over the war in Gaza and support for Israel, Democrats are now finding themselves at odds over US policy toward Iran as progressives demand unified opposition to President Donald Trump's consideration of a strike against Tehran's nuclear program while party leaders tread more cautiously. US leaders of all stripes have found common ground for two decades on the position that Iran cannot be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. The longtime US foe has supported groups that have killed Americans across the Mideast and threatens to destroy Israel. But Trump's public flirtation with joining Israel's offensive against Iran may become the Democratic Party's latest schism, just as it is sharply dividing Trump's isolationist 'Make America Great Again' base from more hawkish conservatives. While progressives have staked out clear opposition to Trump's potential actions, the party leadership is playing the safer ground of demanding a role for Congress before Trump could use force against Iran. Many prominent Democrats with 2028 presidential aspirations are staying silent, so far, on the Israel-Iran war. 'They are sort of hedging their bets,' said Joel Rubin, a former deputy assistant secretary of state who served under Democratic President Barack Obama and is now a strategist on foreign policy. 'The beasts of the Democratic Party's constituencies right now are so hostile to Israel's war in Gaza that it's really difficult to come out looking like one would corroborate an unauthorized war that supports Israel without blowback.' Progressive Democrats use Trump's ideas and words Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., has called Trump's consideration of an attack 'a defining moment for our party' and has introduced legislation with Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, that calls on the Republican president to 'terminate' the use of US armed forces against Iran unless 'explicitly authorized' by a declaration of war from Congress. Khanna used Trump's own campaign arguments of putting American interests first when the congressman spoke to Theo Von, a comedian who has been supportive of the president and is popular in the 'manosphere.' 'That's going to cost this country a lot of money that should be being spent here at home,' said Khanna, who is said to be among the many Democrats eyeing the party's 2028 primary. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent who twice sought the Democratic presidential nomination, pointed to Trump's stated goal during his inaugural speech of being known as 'a peacemaker and a unifier.' 'Very fine words. Trump should remember them today. Supporting Netanyahu's war against Iran would be a catastrophic mistake,' Sanders said about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Sanders has reintroduced legislation prohibiting the use of federal money for force against Iran, insisted that US military intervention would be unwise and illegal and accused Israel of striking unprovoked. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York signed on to a similar bill from Sanders in 2020, but he is so far holding off this time. Some believe the party should stake out a clear anti-war stance as Trump weighs whether to launch a military offensive that is seemingly counter to the anti-interventionism he promised during his 2024 campaign. 'The leaders of the Democratic Party need to step up and loudly oppose war with Iran and demand a vote in Congress,' said Tommy Vietor, a former Obama aide, on X. Mainstream Democrats are cautious, while critical The staunch support from the Democratic administration of President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris for Israel's war against Hamas loomed over the party's White House ticket in 2024, even with the criticism of Israel's handling of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Trump exploited the divisions to make inroads with Arab American voters and Orthodox Jews on his way back to the White House. Today, the Israel-Iran war is the latest test for a party struggling to repair its coalition before next year's midterm elections and the quick-to-follow kickoff to the 2028 presidential race. Bridging the divide between an activist base that is skeptical of foreign interventions and already critical of US support for Israel and more traditional Democrats and independents who make up a sizable, if not always vocal, voting bloc. In a statement after Israel's first strikes, Schumer said Israel has a right to defend itself and 'the United States' commitment to Israel's security and defense must be ironclad as they prepare for Iran's response.' Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nevada, was also cautious in responding to the Israeli action and said 'the US must continue to stand with Israel, as it has for decades, at this dangerous moment.' 'It really seems like the Trump and Iran war track is kind of going along like a Formula 1 racetrack, and then the Democrats are in some sort of tricycle or something trying to keep up,' said Ryan Costello, a policy director for the Washington-based National Iranian American Council, which advocates for diplomatic engagement between US and Iran. Other Democrats have condemned Israel's strikes and accused Netanyahu of sabotaging nuclear talks with Iran. They are reminding the public that Trump withdrew in 2018 from a nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions negotiated during the Obama administration. 'Trump created the problem,' said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Connecticut, on X. 'The single reason Iran was so close to obtaining a nuclear weapon is that Trump destroyed the diplomatic agreement that put major, verifiable constraints on their nuclear program.' The progressives' pushback A Pearson Institute/Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll from September 2024 found that about half of Democrats said the US was being 'too supportive' of Israel and about 4 in 10 said their level support was 'about right.' Democrats were more likely than independents and Republicans to say the Israeli government had 'a lot' of responsibility for the continuation of the war between Israel and Hamas. About 6 in 10 Democrats and half of Republicans felt Iran was an adversary with whom the US was in conflict. Democratic Rep. Yassamin Ansari, an Iranian American from Arizona, said Iranians are unwitting victims in the conflict because there aren't shelters or infrastructure to protect civilians from targeted missiles as there are in Israel. 'The Iranian people are not the regime, and they should not be punished for its actions,' Ansari posted on X, while criticizing Trump for fomenting fear among the Iranian population. 'The Iranian people deserve freedom from the barbaric regime, and Israelis deserve security.'
Leaders
5 hours ago
- Leaders
Israel Leading Middle East to ‘Total Disaster': Turkish FM
Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan accused Israel on Saturday of pushing the Middle East towards the brink of a 'total disaster' by attacking Iranian nuclear facilities on June 13, according to Arab News. 'Israel is now leading the region to the brink of total disaster,' Fidan said. OIC Summit in Istanbul Fidan's remarks came during the summit of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) in Istanbul held to discuss Israel's war against Iran and related regional security issues. 'There is no Palestinian, Lebanese, Syrian, Yemeni or Iranian problem but there is clearly an Israeli problem,' Fidan said. He also described Israel's strikes against Iran as an 'unlimited aggression.' Moreover, he urged for an immediate end to the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, warning that it 'would further jeopardize regional and global security.' Unconditional Support Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan accused Western leaders of unconditionally supporting Israel. Erdogan also stated that Turkey would never allow borders in the Middle East to be redrawn 'in blood.' 'It is vital for us to show more solidarity to end Israel's banditry — not only in Palestine but also in Syria, in Lebanon and in Iran,' he told the OIC's 57 member countries. Harmful Impacts On Friday, Erdogan warned that the ongoing Israeli Iranian tensions could cause a surge in migration and have harmful impacts on Europe and the region, according to Al Arabiya. In a phone call with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Erdogan said that 'negotiations' was the solution to the nuclear disagreements with Iran. 'The spiral of violence triggered bky Israel's attacks could harm the region and Europe in terms of migration and the possibility of nuclear leakage,' he said. He also noted that the ongoing conflict had 'raised the threat to regional security to the highest level,' expressing that Turkey is making efforts to put an end to the Israeli-Iranian strikes. Israel-Iran War On June 13, Israel launched a wave of airstrikes on Iran under the name of Operation Rising Lion. The military campaign targeted Iran's nuclear facilities and killed top military commanders and nuclear scientists. As a response, Iran launched a retaliatory wave of missiles against Israel and targeted Tel Aviv. Israel also killed three more Iranian nuclear scientists, bringing the total number of scientists slain to nine, Gulf News reported. Currently, both countries are trading missiles and attacks amid intensifying efforts to halt the conflict. Related Topics: Iraqi Cities Protest against Israel's War on Iran Netanyahu Uses Iran Conflict to Stay in Office Forever: Former US President Clinton Iran-Israel Conflict Enters 2nd Week with Dim Prospects for Diplomacy Short link : Post Views: 15
Saudi Gazette
5 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Saudi Arabia condemns Israeli strikes on Iran, urges return to negotiations
Saudi Gazette report ISTANBUL — Saudi Arabia on Saturday renewed its condemnation of Israel's 'blatant aggression' against Iran, calling the attacks a violation of Iranian sovereignty and a breach of international laws and norms that threaten regional security and stability. Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan delivered the Kingdom's position during the opening session of the 51st Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), hosted in Istanbul. He called for an immediate halt to military operations, urged all parties to avoid escalation, and emphasized the need to return to diplomatic negotiations between Iran and the international community. Prince Faisal also reaffirmed Saudi Arabia's unwavering commitment to the Palestinian cause, stressing that the Kingdom has exerted every effort to contain the crisis in Gaza, address the worsening humanitarian situation, and work toward ending Israel's war on the Palestinian people. 'The Kingdom stands firm on the right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent state based on the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital,' he said, adding that Saudi Arabia continues to push for Arab and Islamic unity on the to Yemen, the foreign minister reiterated Saudi Arabia's support for a political resolution and renewed the Kingdom's peace initiative aimed at ending the conflict and restoring peace and stability in the war-torn country.
