Republican Defends Potential Sale of Million Acres of Public Land
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Republican Senator Mike Lee has defended his push to include the potential sale of public lands in the party's budget reconciliation bill, arguing that criticism of the idea is misplaced and that the provision is necessary to address the country's housing crisis.
Speaking with conservative podcast host Glenn Beck on Thursday, Lee responded to what he called "falsehoods being circulated by the Left," and said that objections to his proposal failed to grasp its parameters.
"When this bill puts land in the category of eligibility for sale, it doesn't mean for sale," Lee said. "It just means there's a process by which it could be transferred."
Newsweek reached out to Lee's office for comment.
Why It Matters
The plan, which some estimate could put hundreds of millions of acres of public land up for auction, has sparked intense backlash from environmentalist groups and other advocates for the conservation of America's wilderness. Criticism has also come from lawmakers, including from members of Lee's own party, which has already been grappling with internal divisions over other elements of President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill."
What To Know
Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has long advocated for making public land under federal stewardship available for housing projects, introducing a bill on the issue in 2022.
He announced his plans to incorporate the provision into the GOP's tax bill last week.
Senator Mike Lee speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup in Washington, D.C., on June 5, 2025.
Senator Mike Lee speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee markup in Washington, D.C., on June 5, 2025.
Francis Chung/POLITICO via AP Images
According to an updated draft released by his committee, this would direct the secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to "select for disposal" between 0.5 and 0.75 percent of land currently held by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management across 11 eligible states, equivalent to between two and three million acres.
However, analysis by The Wilderness Society found that more than 250 million acres could be at risk, including 18.7 million acres in Lee's home state of Utah. Lee has called the map released by the group "flat out misleading."
Newsweek reached out to the Wilderness Society via email for comment.
A fact sheet released by Lee's committee last week said that selling off government-owned land would "increase the supply of housing and decrease housing costs for millions of American families," but the proposal has faced intense pushback from environmental groups.
A letter, drafted by Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance and signed by nearly 150 similar organizations, was sent to members of the Senate this week, urging them to oppose the budget reconciliation bill if this provision remains in place.
"We strongly oppose any attempts to recklessly sell public lands through legislative shortcuts like budget reconciliation, which bypass public input, environmental review, and accountability," the letter read. "Doing so threatens public access, undermines responsible land management, puts environmental values, cultural resources, and endangered species at risk along with clean drinking water for 60 million Americans and betrays the public's trust
Jeff Crane, president and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, told Newsweek that, "for millions of sportsmen and women, federal public lands provide unmatched access for our hunting, fishing, trapping, and recreational shooting traditions."
"This network of lands that belong to all of us is a key component to what makes America unique," Crane said.
Some Republicans, too, have come out in opposition.
A spokesperson for Montana Representative Ryan Zinke, who helped successfully remove a similar but more limited proposal from the House version of the tax bill last month, told The New York Times that he remains "a hard no on any bill that includes the large-scale sale of public lands."
What People Are Saying
Utah Senator Mike Lee, Thursday on The Glenn Beck Program: "The federal government owns 640 million acres of land, nearly a third of all land in the United States. The vast majority of that land has zero recreational value. Disposing of a fraction of 1 percent of that, so that the next generation can afford a home, is a common-sense solution to a national problem."
In an article for Deseret News last year, Lee wrote: "The federal government's stranglehold on the West means our communities can't fully benefit from the lands surrounding them. The inability to access these lands or collect property taxes stifles local economies and strains public services."
The Wilderness Society, in a statement: "The bill directs what is likely the largest single sale of national public lands in modern history to help cut taxes for the richest people in the country. It trades ordinary Americans' access to outdoor recreation for a short-term payoff that disproportionately benefits the privileged and well-connected."
Jeff Crane, president and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation, told Newsweek: "While we are not opposed to the sale of public lands in principle, we do not support the sale of lands through budget reconciliation as there are existing processes in place that we need to leverage to address challenges facing local communities. Without allowing time to properly identify and vet lands set for disposal, critical access for sportsmen and women may be lost."
Travis Hammill, DC director for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, in a statement: "Senator Lee's never-ending attacks on public lands continue. His hostility stands in stark contrast with Americans' deep and abiding love of public lands. Senator Lee's plan puts Utah's redrock country in the crosshairs of unchecked development."
"Utah and the West, public lands are the envy of the country – but Senator Lee is willing to sacrifice the places where people recreate, where they hunt and fish, and where they make a living – to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy," he added. "The Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, our members, and our partners will work to defeat this Bill."
What Happens Next
Lee told Beck he believed there was a "very good chance" of the provision being included in the tax bill, which he said the Senate will be considering "as early as next week."
The reconciliation narrowly made it through the House last month. With growing public opposition and a handful of dissenting members within the GOP, the One Big Beautiful Act is on a similarly rocky path before it can move to Trump's desk.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Russia Responds To US Strikes, Will Hold Direct Talks With Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Russian government on Sunday "strongly condemned" the United States' strikes the day before against three key Iranian nuclear facilities and is preparing to hold direct talks with Iranian officials to address the fallout. Why It Matters Trump on Saturday evening announced what he described as a "very successful attack" against three Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials said the attacks caused severe damage, but questions remain about the full extent of the damage and how much of a setback it is for Iran's nuclear program. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the Trump administration for taking an offensive position in the conflict, which Israeli officials have strongly advocated for since Israel first ignited the war on June 13. The Israelis said the U.S. should strike Iran's nuclear facilities because Tehran was getting close to developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies the charge, saying its nuclear program is for civilian purposes. Iran vowed to retaliate after Saturday's strikes, accusing the U.S. of crossing "a very big red line" with its decision to pummel the three nuclear sites with 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. What To Know "It is already clear that a dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement addressing the U.S.'s strikes. "The risk of the conflict spreading in the Middle East, which is already gripped by multiple crises, has increased significantly." Russia also called the strikes "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law." Iran and Russia will hold talks in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said hours after the attacks that he will travel to Moscow while emphasizing Iran's "strategic partnership" with Russia. A top Russian official and close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin also skewered Trump on social media after he announced the U.S.'s strikes, which hit Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. "The US is now entangled in a new conflict, with prospects of a ground operation looming on the horizon," Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, wrote in a thread on X (formerly Twitter). Medvedev went on to praise Iran's "political regime," saying it "survived" the strikes and "in all likelihood, has come out even stronger." "Donald Trump, once hailed as 'president of peace,' has now pushed the US into another war," Medvedev wrote, taunting Trump. The vast majority of countries around the world oppose the actions of Israel and the United States." "At this rate, Trump can forget about the Nobel Peace Prize — not even with how rigged it has become," he added. "What a way to kick things off, Mr. President. Congratulations!" Trump, for his part, said on social media after that if Iran retaliated against the U.S., it would "BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would 'direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress.' Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!' the president said on social media. 'The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.'
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the U.S. Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand without doing the same for Democrats. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee were all briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, "but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran. Trump faces a vote in Congress as soon as this week on a war powers resolution from Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would "direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran that have not been authorized by Congress." Another resolution has been introduced by lawmakers from both parties in the U.S. House. And at least one Democrat, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, said Trump's actions are 'clearly grounds for impeachment.' At the same time, the Trump administration is expecting Congress to send an additional $350 billion in national security funds as part of the president's big tax breaks bill also heading soon for a vote. Senators are set to be briefed Tuesday behind closed doors on the situation in Iran. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Sunday that the White House made 'bipartisan courtesy calls' to congressional leadership. She said in a social media post that the White House spoke to Schumer 'before the strike' but that House leader Jeffries 'could not be reached until after, but he was briefed.' While the president has authority as the commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces to order specific military actions, any prolonged war-time footing would traditionally need authorization from Congress. The House and Senate authorized actions in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond after the Sept. 11, 2001, attack. 'Congress should be consulted,' Kaine said on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'We were not.' As soon as Trump announced the actions late Saturday, he won swift support from the GOP leadership in Congress. Johnson, Thune and the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, were all briefed ahead of time and sent almost simultaneous statements backing the military campaign, as did the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Rick Crawford, also of Arkansas. But by apparently engaging with only one side of the political aisle, Trump risks saddling his Republican Party with political ownership of the military action against Iran, which may or may not prove popular with Americans. Rather than rally the country to his side, Trump risks cleaving its already deep divisions over his second term agenda. Johnson, who praised Trump's action against Iran as 'the right call,' said the president's targeted strike was within his authority and in line with past presidential actions. 'Leaders in Congress were aware of the urgency of this situation and the Commander-in-Chief evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act,' Johnson, R-La., said on social media. Trump himself has shown little patience for political dissent from within his party, even as criticism rolls in from among his most trusted backers. The Iran military campaign threatens to splinter Trump's Make America Great Again movement, which powered his return to the White House. Many Trump supporters aligned with his campaign promises not to involve the United States in overseas actions and instead to be a peace-making president. 'I think I represent part of the coalition that elected Trump,' said Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., on CBS. 'We were tired of endless wars in the Middle East.' Massie and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California have introduced their own war powers resolution in the House, a sign of how close the far left and far right have bonded over their opposition to U.S. campaigns abroad, particularly in the Middle East. The Trump administration insisted Sunday the U.S. is not seeking a war with Iran. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program,' said Vice President JD Vance on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' And Trump swiftly attacked Massie, who is one of the most steadfast non-interventionist GOP lawmakers in Congress — along with Sen. Rand Paul, also of Kentucky — and the president suggested he would turn his Republican Party against the congressman. 'MAGA should drop this pathetic LOSER, Tom Massie, like the plague!" the president said on social media. "The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard.'
